***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****

1,018,260 Views | 9220 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by 197361936
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Right it says that they were spreading "false information" without saying what it was, implying that Shokin was investigating Burisma.

The memo confirms the investigation was dead.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
aggieforester05 said:

Pinche Abogado said:

Levin is a brilliant Constitutionalist. To dismiss him otherwise shows exactly what you are: a Marxist pig.
Right, those that prescribe to a document written by classical liberals are now considered "far right extremist". American leftists really are delusional and hopelessly misinformed.
The Left is so radicalized and moving toward the heart of extreme -- and entirely manufactured reality that is seeks to impose and project on others - that it no longer knows what "extremist" is.

This is clearly an age of mass hysteria, and times of great peril as well as testing.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gary Johnson said:

Right it says that they were spreading "false information" without saying what it was, implying that Shokin was investigating Burisma.

The memo confirms the investigation was dead.
From the article

Quote:

Some media outlets have reported that, at the time Joe Biden forced the firing in March 2016, there were no open investigations. Those reports are wrong. A British-based investigation of Burisma's owner was closed down in early 2015 on a technicality when a deadline for documents was not met. But the Ukraine Prosecutor General's office still had two open inquiries in March 2016, according to the official case file provided me. One of those cases involved taxes; the other, allegations of corruption. Burisma announced the cases against it were not closed and settled until January 2017.

After I first reported it in a column, the New York Times and ABC News published similar stories confirming my reporting.

......
Blue Star, using the Ukrainian embassy worker it had hired, eventually scored a meeting with Sevruk on April 6, 2016, a week after Shokin's firing. Buretta, Tramontano and Painter attended that meeting in Kiev, according to Blue Star's memos.
Sevruk memorialized the meeting in a government memo that the general prosecutor's office provided to me, stating that the three Americans offered an apology for the "false" narrative that had been provided by U.S. officials about Shokin being corrupt and inept.
"They realized that the information disseminated in the U.S. was incorrect and that they would facilitate my visit to the U.S. for the purpose of delivering the true information to the State Department management," the memo stated.
.....
There were 2 open inquiries in March, who opened them.

The memo was written after Shokin was fired.

The Americans(Blue Star reps), and I quote, "offered an apology for the "false" narrative that had been provided by U.S. officials about Shokin being corrupt and inept.

Note that Burisma's own accounting records show that it paid tens of thousands of dollars while Hunter Biden served on the board of an American lobbying and public relations firm, Blue Star Strategies,
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Right. The other investigations were already known.


https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/trump-whistleblower-scandal-explained-from-ukraine.html

The investigations "Biden killed": 1 was already dead, 1 continued to punishment, 1 continues to this day. And Shokin had no part in it.

Pyatt criticized Shokin for protecting the guys that sabotaged the British case, they were never punished. And he was also deeply unpopular in Ukraine for other reasons, that's why he got fired.

This Yuriy Sevruk character is a Shokin appointee and implicated in the "diamond bribe" scandal.

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/why-poroshenko-s-support-for-shokin-is-dangerous/
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think I remember a story that said articles of impeachment would happen before Thanksgiving and the trial would run till Christmas. Obviously things have changed.

I go back and forth on whether the Dems are actually going to do it. After Schiff backed down I thought no but now Fat Man wants to hold hearings so I am thinking they may actually try.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Why would he make such a short deadline
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No need to lend credibility to the sham.

Wildcat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did I miss something? I thought this needed to come from the Judiciary Committee to be "official"?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think he is almost daring them to go through with it.
txaggie_08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Great response there. Clearly outlines the issues within this inquiry.
Joe Exotic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
backintexas2013 said:

I think he is almost daring them to go through with it.


Of course. He's raking in donations with this.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No way Trump or his attorneys should have anything to do with the faux-impeachment inquiry.

Doing so would allow the Democrats to claim legitimacy.

It would allow the Democrats to try and setup a perjury trap.

Lastly, to paraphrase Napoleon, "Never Interfere With an Enemy While He's in the Process of Destroying Himself."
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gary Johnson said:

Right. The other investigations were already known.


https://www.kyivpost.com/ukraine-politics/trump-whistleblower-scandal-explained-from-ukraine.html

The investigations "Biden killed": 1 was already dead, 1 continued to punishment, 1 continues to this day. And Shokin had no part in it.

Pyatt criticized Shokin for protecting the guys that sabotaged the British case, they were never punished. And he was also deeply unpopular in Ukraine for other reasons, that's why he got fired.

This Yuriy Sevruk character is a Shokin appointee and implicated in the "diamond bribe" scandal.

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/why-poroshenko-s-support-for-shokin-is-dangerous/

So Shokin didn't authorize this activity?

https://en.interfax.com.ua/news/general/322395.html

You are big on using timelines to make inferences regarding Trump's behavior with Ukraine. The announcement of the seizure of Zlochevsky's holdings takes place on February 4, 2016.

Why is Biden amping up his phone activity to the Ukraine later that month? Why are he and Blue Star moving against a prosecutor you claim had no part in the investigations against Burisma? And if Biden were truly targeting corruption across the Ukrainian landscape, then why was the only man with the bullseye on his back the same individual running an operation that just happened to be seizing the assets of the founder of the company for whom Hunter Biden earned a monthly bribe?

So in February we have Shokin's organization seizing the assets of Zlochevsky. That same day, Crackhead Biden gets in touch with Deputy Secretary of State Tony Blinken. The next week, VPOTUS starts calling Ukraine on a regular basis. Later that month, Blue Star begins talks with DoS requesting assistance to end the investigation into the corruption at Burisma Holdings you claim were not being pursued:

https://www.scribd.com/document/433389210/Bluestar-Novelli-Contacts

The next month VPOTUS uses Federal funds to protect his son's company from the consequences of its corrupt actions. He doesn't threaten withholding disbursement of funds if Ukraine fails to act on areas of corrupt activity in other aspects of his government (Especially the ones that directly benefit Democrats.). He doesn't threaten withholding funds unless others are fired who are corrupt within the government.

He targets Shokin and Shokin alone. Why? Because Shokin and the PGO are breathing down the neck of the corrupt company where Crackhead Biden "works."

If Shokin were as inconsequential as you claim him to be, then there would never have been a need to use Federal funds to force his ouster. If he were not really investigating Burisma, as you repeatedly claim throughout this thread, then why would VPOTUS consider him a threat at all and target him and him alone for ouster in a nation ripe with corruption on all levels of government?

I know you have this need for Joe Biden to be innocent. But the timeline, his lies when confronted on the subject, and his own boastful ignorance in a public forum, condemn him and prove the need for the present Chief Executive to launch an investigation into the activities taking place within his department before he arrived at the White House.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Senator Johnson's letter to Nunes and Jordan regarding Trump and the Ukraine:

https://www.axios.com/ron-johnson-ukraine-jim-jordan-devin-nunes-6cd5a357-e8cd-4445-9498-76481c5ee9a0.html

Pg. 6...

Quote:

It was only after he reiterated his reasons for not giving me the authority to tell Zelensky the support would be released that I asked him about whether there was some kind of arrangement where Ukraine would take some action and the hold would be lifted. Without hesitation, President Trump immediately denied such an arrangement existed. As reported in the Wall Street Journal, I quoted the President as saying, "(Expletive deleted) -- No way. I would never do that. Who told you that?" I have accurately characterized his reaction as adamant, vehement, and angry -- there was more than one expletive that I have deleted.

Wonder why Mr. Schiff didn't bother calling on Senator Johnson to testify as he was directly involved on this issue and spoke to the President regarding Zelensky and Ukrainian corruption?

Perhaps hearsay from butthurt bureaucrats was preferable to the direct observations of those best in a position to inform Mr. Schiff's lynch mob about this matter.

RGLAG85
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stlkofta said:

Senator Johnson's letter to Nunes and Jordan regarding Trump and the Ukraine:

https://www.axios.com/ron-johnson-ukraine-jim-jordan-devin-nunes-6cd5a357-e8cd-4445-9498-76481c5ee9a0.html

Pg. 6...

Quote:

It was only after he reiterated his reasons for not giving me the authority to tell Zelensky the support would be released that I asked him about whether there was some kind of arrangement where Ukraine would take some action and the hold would be lifted. Without hesitation, President Trump immediately denied such an arrangement existed. As reported in the Wall Street Journal, I quoted the President as saying, "(Expletive deleted) -- No way. I would never do that. Who told you that?" I have accurately characterized his reaction as adamant, vehement, and angry -- there was more than one expletive that I have deleted.

Wonder why Mr. Schiff didn't bother calling on Senator Johnson to testify as he was directly involved on this issue and spoke to the President regarding Zelensky and Ukrainian corruption?

Perhaps hearsay from butthurt bureaucrats was preferable to the direct observations of those best in a position to inform Mr. Schiff's lynch mob about this matter.


Give GJ some time, he's has to get new talking points.
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This property seizure news release I've seen in several outlets, the text is identical as if spread by a press release bot. No other news stories I can find mention it, or say which investigation It's related to. If you can find it I'd be obliged.

Zooming out the big problem for the Biden conspiracy theory is Shokin was fired for bottom up pressure from Ukrainians and a 289-6 vote in the Rada.

The Kiev Post reports Burisma was never mentioned publicly by Shokin in his 14 months and covered up bribes in his office. He was basically the Martin Shkireli of Ukraine.

This is the problem with far fetched conspiracy theories, every time one facet is debunked or shown to be a dead end, the theorist says "Aha! It goes deeper than we thought".

The Republicans held both chambers in 2015-2018 and could have investigated in real time. No interest in this matter, the state department position on Shokin was also supported by Republican Senators. The interest only started toward the end of '18 when dirt, even if fake news dirt, became important on a certain person polling 10 points higher than Trump.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Spotted Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's 8:44 AM on December 2, 2019 and Donald J. Trump is STILL your POTUS...




and Jeffrey Epstein STILL didn't kill himself....



and Coach O STILL speaks some unknown language but he Bobby Boucher'd Jimbo




Covidians, Communists, CNN, FOX, and all other MSM are enemies of the state and should be treated as such.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And another day that thankfully, Tom Herman is the coach at Texas.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
White House to Nadler: That's a hard pass to your non-invitation to a fake hearing and any other ad hoc hearings.
LINK

captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Gary Johnson said:

This property seizure news release I've seen in several outlets, the text is identical as if spread by a press release bot. No other news stories I can find mention it, or say which investigation It's related to. If you can find it I'd be obliged.

Zooming out the big problem for the Biden conspiracy theory is Shokin was fired for bottom up pressure from Ukrainians and a 289-6 vote in the Rada.

The Kiev Post reports Burisma was never mentioned publicly by Shokin in his 14 months and covered up bribes in his office. He was basically the Martin Shkireli of Ukraine.

This is the problem with far fetched conspiracy theories, every time one facet is debunked or shown to be a dead end, the theorist says "Aha! It goes deeper than we thought".

The Republicans held both chambers in 2015-2018 and could have investigated in real time. No interest in this matter, the state department position on Shokin was also supported by Republican Senators. The interest only started toward the end of '18 when dirt, even if fake news dirt, became important on a certain person polling 10 points higher than Trump.

You cited Kiev Post, well they reported on Feb. 4, 2016 at 6:40 pm:
Court seizes property of ex-minister Zlochevsky in Ukraine PGO

Also:
When Ukraine's Prosecutor came after his son's sponsor Joe Biden sprang into action

Quote from the article:
Quote:

The above accounts are incorrect. Shokin did go after Zlochevsky. He opened two cases against him in 2015. After he did that Biden and his crew started to lobby for his firing. Shokin was aggressively pursuing the case. He did so just before Biden's campaign against him went into a frenzy.

On February 4 2016 Interfax-Ukraine reported:
The movable and immovable property of former Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine Mykola Zlochevsky in Ukraine has been seized, according to the press service of the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine (PGO)."The PGO filed a petition to court to arrest the property of the ex-Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine, the Deputy Secretary of the National Security and Defence Council of Ukraine, Mykola Zlochevsky, from which arrest was withdrawn, and other property he actually uses, namely housing estate with a total area of 922 square meters, a land plot of 0.24 hectares, a garden house with a total area of 299.8 square meters, a garden house in the territory of Vyshgorod district, a garden house of 2,312 square meters, a land plot of 0.0394 hectares, a Rolls-Royce Phantom car, a Knott "924-5014"trainer," reads the report.
The PGO clarifies that the court satisfied the petition on February 2, 2016.

Zlochevsky is suspected of committing a criminal offense under Part 3 of Article 368-2 of the Criminal Comment de of Ukraine (illicit enrichment).
On February 2 Shokin confiscated four large houses Zlochevsky owned plus a Rolls-Royce Phantom and a "Knott "924-5014" trainer". (Anyone know what that is?) Ten days later Biden goes into overdrive to get him fired. Within one week he personally calls Poroshenko three times with only one major aim: to get Shokin fired.

No wonder Congressmen are asking for VP Biden's transcripts of conversations he had with Ukrainian officials.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
richardag said:

Gary Johnson said:

This property seizure news release I've seen in several outlets, the text is identical as if spread by a press release bot. No other news stories I can find mention it, or say which investigation It's related to. If you can find it I'd be obliged.

Zooming out the big problem for the Biden conspiracy theory is Shokin was fired for bottom up pressure from Ukrainians and a 289-6 vote in the Rada.

The Kiev Post reports Burisma was never mentioned publicly by Shokin in his 14 months and covered up bribes in his office. He was basically the Martin Shkireli of Ukraine.

This is the problem with far fetched conspiracy theories, every time one facet is debunked or shown to be a dead end, the theorist says "Aha! It goes deeper than we thought".

The Republicans held both chambers in 2015-2018 and could have investigated in real time. No interest in this matter, the state department position on Shokin was also supported by Republican Senators. The interest only started toward the end of '18 when dirt, even if fake news dirt, became important on a certain person polling 10 points higher than Trump.

You cited Kiev Post, well they reported on Feb. 4, 2016 at 6:40 pm:
Court seizes property of ex-minister Zlochevsky in Ukraine PGO

Also:
When Ukraine's Prosecutor came after his son's sponsor Joe Biden sprang into action

Quote from the article:
Quote:

The above accounts are incorrect. Shokin did go after Zlochevsky. He opened two cases against him in 2015. After he did that Biden and his crew started to lobby for his firing. Shokin was aggressively pursuing the case. He did so just before Biden's campaign against him went into a frenzy.

On February 4 2016 Interfax-Ukraine reported:
The movable and immovable property of former Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine Mykola Zlochevsky in Ukraine has been seized, according to the press service of the Prosecutor General's Office of Ukraine (PGO)."The PGO filed a petition to court to arrest the property of the ex-Minister of Ecology and Natural Resources of Ukraine, the Deputy Secretary of the National Security and Defence Council of Ukraine, Mykola Zlochevsky, from which arrest was withdrawn, and other property he actually uses, namely housing estate with a total area of 922 square meters, a land plot of 0.24 hectares, a garden house with a total area of 299.8 square meters, a garden house in the territory of Vyshgorod district, a garden house of 2,312 square meters, a land plot of 0.0394 hectares, a Rolls-Royce Phantom car, a Knott "924-5014"trainer," reads the report.
The PGO clarifies that the court satisfied the petition on February 2, 2016.

Zlochevsky is suspected of committing a criminal offense under Part 3 of Article 368-2 of the Criminal Comment de of Ukraine (illicit enrichment).
On February 2 Shokin confiscated four large houses Zlochevsky owned plus a Rolls-Royce Phantom and a "Knott "924-5014" trainer". (Anyone know what that is?) Ten days later Biden goes into overdrive to get him fired. Within one week he personally calls Poroshenko three times with only one major aim: to get Shokin fired.

No wonder Congressmen are asking for VP Biden's transcripts of conversations he had with Ukrainian officials.


Gary Johnson is great for this forum. The more he cites propaganda to support his argument, the more other posters dig for actual information that prove him wrong.

Should he be called a "Ukraine denier"?

It is obvious that Biden and his son were doing something inappropriate in Ukraine. At a minimum there was a definite conflict of interest. Had Trump set his son up within a known corrupt foreign company, the MSM and GJ would be all over the story. Since it's Biden, they defend him and hinder any attempt to show evidence that makes it appear that there is more to the story.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Did etc catch the ban hammer. He hasn't been around for a while. Hope all is ok
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yep, that's a very good take, and quiet accurate.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
backintexas2013 said:

Did etc catch the ban hammer. He hasn't been around for a while. Hope all is ok
No. He's been on OR this morning.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

NM, got various aliases turned-around.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ok good. Glad he is ok
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

This is the problem with far fetched conspiracy theories, every time one facet is debunked or shown to be a dead end, the theorist says "Aha! It goes deeper than we thought".
The irony
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggieforester05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He looks like a total perv.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
aggiehawg said:

backintexas2013 said:

Did etc catch the ban hammer. He hasn't been around for a while. Hope all is ok
No. He's been on OR this morning.
So might eventually get answer on the understand liberal thread then.
First Page Last Page
Page 130 of 264
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.