***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****

982,478 Views | 9220 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Pizza
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Ironic, isn't it? Schiff's leaking to Politico ruined everything!!!
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pressuring Ukraine to stay at Trump Hotels.
Setting Don Jr up on a board.
Monetary donations to his political campaign.

All examples of "something of value". An investigation doesn't fit that definition, or else the ENTIRE FBI AND OBAMA broke some huge campaign finance laws investigating HRC and Trump in 2016.

Doubt any of the resident "brain trust" ever engage this fact.
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rockdoc said:

captkirk said:

MetoliusAg said:


Zakaria admits he has no idea if this reporting from the NYT was accurate and Zelinsky or his staff never discussed this planned "bombshell" disclosure. 100% conjecture and made up nonsense

Are you sure? I've heard dems have this 6th sense that enables them to "know what a person thinks".
You're mistaken. Iirc, it was your two GOP boys in the HoR, Goser and Gohmert, who idiotically claimed to have super-perceptive abilities to read minds and body language when they questioned Rod Rosenstein.
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

hbtheduce said:

MetoliusAg said:

Quote:

As a corollary, Pelosi was just on doing her weekly presser. She flat out accused Trump of bribery and then completely dismissed the notion that hearsay was inadmissible in court.
You were taught all hearsay is inadmissable in court? Interesting.

Just out of curiousity, what law school taught you this? Because your claim contradicts what numerous ex-DOJ attorneys and criminal defense attorneys have stated.
Quote:

Bribery? I'll give you lethal military aid if you give me Biden's head on a silver platter. Is that supposed to be the "bribe" here? Doesn't exactly fit, does it?
It fits like glove. Thank you for stating concisely what Trump, Giuliani, Parnas, Mulvaney, and Sondland attempted. Iirc, a few months ago your legal opinions on the 4A and Manafort search warrants were exposed as egregiously incorrect. Now you're claiming the bolded description you stated above isn't bribery and extortion. Good luck arguing that assertion in a debate.


Yes, there are exceptions to hearsay, but you think the general public knows that... It also, rightfully, makes your "evidence" look so weak, sad, and pathetic.



The framing in that quote is hyperbole. Biden's head would only be on a silver platter if he is guilty! An investigation guarantees no political damage (see mueller), unless you are suggesting Biden is obviously guilty?

So take into account the obvious hyperbole, you still don't have bribery and extortion because AN INVESTIGATION IS NOT SOMETHING OF VALUE. I wish I could make the text size 32 because its the point you always ignore.

Plus. You believed Trump was a Russian asset, so I wouldn't throw any stones on being wrong in the past. Engage the argument lightweight.
BINGO. You can't commit bribery or extortion without trying to obtain something of value. Just a fact ...
In return for the held-up US aid, Trump, Giuliani, and Sondland asked for things of value to Trump and his 2020 campaign. Hth.
Gary Johnson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
hbtheduce said:

Pressuring Ukraine to stay at Trump Hotels.
Setting Don Jr up on a board.
Monetary donations to his political campaign.

All examples of "something of value". An investigation doesn't fit that definition, or else the ENTIRE FBI AND OBAMA broke some huge campaign finance laws investigating HRC and Trump in 2016.

Doubt any of the resident "brain trust" ever engage this fact.


Strawmanning now. At least pretend to know what the accusation is.

He wanted it to appear as if Ukraine independently uncovered corruption involving Biden. It had to be announced publicly, thereby knocking his strongest dem challenger out of the race.

hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

Quote:

Speculation, you have not idea what did or didn't prompt the Trump team to do anything

He got busted. A cabal of angry senators and congressmen demanded it be released. 36 hours later they did it. It's not rocket science.

You have proof? You could be right, but you have no hard facts to back this up other than a timeline and that it fits your narrative.

Even if we accept congress effected the release. It also ignores the possibility the plan was to hold the payments until the last day to legally withhold the funds, with or without action by Ukraine.


PS: It doesn't matter, because Trump still had time to legally release the funds. So we still aren't discussing criminal activity.
Wildcat
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:


He wanted it to appear as if Ukraine independently uncovered corruption involving Biden. It had to be announced publicly, thereby knocking his strongest dem challenger out of the race.



Biden was doing a good job of that on his own...and continues to sound like a dawdling old fool whose cognitive decline is painfully evident.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

In return for the held-up US aid, Trump, Giuliani, and Sondland asked for things of value to Trump and his 2020 campaign. Hth.
Such as? I mean Zelensky has repeatedly denied this. His Foreign Minister has denied this as I posted and linked above.

So you are claiming both Zelensky and his Foreign Ministers are lying?
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Basically, Schiff couldn't hold his wad...

Premature e-gotcha-lation...
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gary Johnson said:

hbtheduce said:

Pressuring Ukraine to stay at Trump Hotels.
Setting Don Jr up on a board.
Monetary donations to his political campaign.

All examples of "something of value". An investigation doesn't fit that definition, or else the ENTIRE FBI AND OBAMA broke some huge campaign finance laws investigating HRC and Trump in 2016.

Doubt any of the resident "brain trust" ever engage this fact.


Strawmanning now. At least pretend to know what the accusation is.

He wanted it to appear as if Ukraine independently uncovered corruption involving Biden. It had to be announced publicly, thereby knocking his strongest dem challenger out of the race.




Meaningless. Pressuring Ukraine to open an investigation and publicly announcing it aligns them with the US DOJ & Trumps foreign policy. Hence why he asked them to work with Bill Barr on BOTH sets of investigations.


But keep trying. An investigation still doesn't meat the legal definition of "something of value".
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

aginlakeway said:

hbtheduce said:

MetoliusAg said:

Quote:

As a corollary, Pelosi was just on doing her weekly presser. She flat out accused Trump of bribery and then completely dismissed the notion that hearsay was inadmissible in court.
You were taught all hearsay is inadmissable in court? Interesting.

Just out of curiousity, what law school taught you this? Because your claim contradicts what numerous ex-DOJ attorneys and criminal defense attorneys have stated.
Quote:

Bribery? I'll give you lethal military aid if you give me Biden's head on a silver platter. Is that supposed to be the "bribe" here? Doesn't exactly fit, does it?
It fits like glove. Thank you for stating concisely what Trump, Giuliani, Parnas, Mulvaney, and Sondland attempted. Iirc, a few months ago your legal opinions on the 4A and Manafort search warrants were exposed as egregiously incorrect. Now you're claiming the bolded description you stated above isn't bribery and extortion. Good luck arguing that assertion in a debate.


Yes, there are exceptions to hearsay, but you think the general public knows that... It also, rightfully, makes your "evidence" look so weak, sad, and pathetic.



The framing in that quote is hyperbole. Biden's head would only be on a silver platter if he is guilty! An investigation guarantees no political damage (see mueller), unless you are suggesting Biden is obviously guilty?

So take into account the obvious hyperbole, you still don't have bribery and extortion because AN INVESTIGATION IS NOT SOMETHING OF VALUE. I wish I could make the text size 32 because its the point you always ignore.

Plus. You believed Trump was a Russian asset, so I wouldn't throw any stones on being wrong in the past. Engage the argument lightweight.
BINGO. You can't commit bribery or extortion without trying to obtain something of value. Just a fact ...
In return for the held-up US aid, Trump, Giuliani, and Sondland asked for things of value to Trump and his 2020 campaign. Hth.

An investigation is not something of value.

If so, we need to arrest the entire FBI right now for their political contributions to candidates for EVERY ****ING INVESTIGATION THEY HAVE EVER DONE ON A POLITICIAN.

Wouldn't this also open every criminal referral made by a member of congress an illegal solicitation for a campaign contribution? BRAIN TRUST
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

In return for the held-up US aid, Trump, Giuliani, and Sondland asked for things of value to Trump and his 2020 campaign. Hth.
Such as? I mean Zelensky has repeatedly denied this. His Foreign Minister has denied this as I posted and linked above.

So you are claiming both Zelensky and his Foreign Ministers are lying?
It's gotta be one or the other, right? Can't have it both ways...

Can't have the Ukrainians painted as pawns and victims and then call them liars...
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Ironic, isn't it? Schiff's leaking to Politico ruined everything!!!
Things are progressing nicely for those of us patriots who support the rule of law, the Constitution, and country over party, dear. Thank God the House Dems and Amash are doing their duty. So are the witnesses who have come forward. Your hero Trump (who is a corrupt crook) is headed for impeachment and a Senate trial.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

Quote:

Ironic, isn't it? Schiff's leaking to Politico ruined everything!!!
Things are progressing nicely for those of us patriots who support the rule of law, the Constitution, and country over party, dear. Thank God the House Dems and Amash are doing their duty. So are the witnesses who have come forward. Your hero Trump (who is a corrupt crook) is headed for impeachment and a Senate trial.

Trump had until the end of September to legally release the funds. If it was that vital, why did congress leave so much time to write the check?
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And he won't be removed from office. The patriots in the Senate will do the right thing.

They will have a hearing just like they did with Blow Job Ford but in the end it will result in the right thing just like with Kavanaugh another true patriot.
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

Quote:

Ironic, isn't it? Schiff's leaking to Politico ruined everything!!!
Things are progressing nicely for those of us patriots who support the rule of law, the Constitution, and country over party, dear. Thank God the House Dems and Amash are doing their duty. So are the witnesses who have come forward. Your hero Trump (who is a corrupt crook) is headed for impeachment and a Senate trial.
BanderaAg956
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MetoliusAg said:

Quote:

Ironic, isn't it? Schiff's leaking to Politico ruined everything!!!
Things are progressing nicely for those of us patriots who support the rule of law, the Constitution, and country over party, dear. Thank God the House Dems and Amash are doing their duty. So are the witnesses who have come forward. Your hero Trump (who is a corrupt crook) is headed for impeachment and a Senate trial.

The Constitution and Rule of Law are going to bite you and your team on the tata before this witch hunt is over! I can't wait to hear you cry then. I know I'll be laughing for years!
Liberals are Damn Liars! Terminate Section 230! It has been ONLY 72!hours since my last banning for defending my conservative values against liberal snowflake cupcakes and the LIBERAL Mod’s that protect them! Fairness is a myth! Stop trying to silence us! Decent LAW ABIDING HUMAN BEINGS MATTER and so do our voices. When you protect the wicked, the Anarchist, the deviant, you become One of them!

ALL LIVES MATTER - I support police and motorcycle riders. Patriot Gun Owners Unite!
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S
MetoliusAg said:

Quote:

Ironic, isn't it? Schiff's leaking to Politico ruined everything!!!
Things are progressing nicely for those of us patriots who support the rule of law, the Constitution, and country over party, dear. Thank God the House Dems and Amash are doing their duty. So are the witnesses who have come forward. Your hero Trump (who is a corrupt crook) is headed for impeachment and a Senate trial.
That is not true of any of the current Democratic Party main ringleaders.

Of the candidates, it may be true of Tulsi Gabbard and probably is.
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Met and Gary, I honestly want to know why you think Schiff is lying about knowing the identity of the leaker?

Why is he covering up his ties with the leaker? Does this seriously not bother you at all? Do you have the intellectual honesty to think critically about your pied piper?
chimmy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Its weird Zelinsky didn't know about this plan. Man that Trump is diabolically subtle
The words "subtle" and "Trump" don't often collide in the same sentence.

Zelensky was told about the QPQ before aid was released on Sept. 11th.

Zelensky asked Pence about the suspension of aid on Sept. 1st. On the same day, Sondland said to Zelensky's adviser, Mr. Yermak, "aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks."
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Also, Gary, your "timetable" argument goes both ways. The timing of the leaker and the coup attempt just as Zelensky was about to announce his investigation of Burisma seems awfully convenient.

It appears the swamp rats panicked when they found out one of their potential bell cows was about to be butchered.
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

Quote:

Ironic, isn't it? Schiff's leaking to Politico ruined everything!!!
Things are progressing nicely for those of us patriots who support the rule of law, the Constitution, and country over party, dear. Thank God the House Dems and Amash are doing their duty. So are the witnesses who have come forward. Your hero Trump (who is a corrupt crook) is headed for impeachment and a Senate trial.

Staff? Come on, this one is obvious.
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
chimmy said:

aggiehawg said:

Its weird Zelinsky didn't know about this plan. Man that Trump is diabolically subtle
The words "subtle" and "Trump" don't often collide in the same sentence.

Zelensky was told about the QPQ before aid was released on Sept. 11th.

Zelensky asked Pence about the suspension of aid on Sept. 1st. On the same day, Sondland said to Zelensky's adviser, Mr. Yermak, "aid would likely not occur until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks."

"until Ukraine provided the public anti-corruption statement that we had been discussing for many weeks."

Even if true, which is debatable, I don't see Biden's name.
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

You can't commit bribery or extortion without trying to obtain something of value. Just a fact ...
In return for the held-up US aid, Trump, Giuliani, and Sondland asked for things of value to Trump and his 2020 campaign. Hth.
An investigation is not something of value.
Good luck with that argument.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Pinche Abogado said:

MetoliusAg said:

Quote:

Ironic, isn't it? Schiff's leaking to Politico ruined everything!!!
Things are progressing nicely for those of us patriots who support the rule of law, the Constitution, and country over party, dear. Thank God the House Dems and Amash are doing their duty. So are the witnesses who have come forward. Your hero Trump (who is a corrupt crook) is headed for impeachment and a Senate trial.

Staff? Come on, this one is obvious.
Oh, just laugh at him and move on. He's very special.
titan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
S

There is also the matter the pro-Brennan whistleblower doesn't even qualify for that status, and should be brought forth.

Not that any of this matters or is in good faith.
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

Quote:

Quote:

Quote:

You can't commit bribery or extortion without trying to obtain something of value. Just a fact ...
In return for the held-up US aid, Trump, Giuliani, and Sondland asked for things of value to Trump and his 2020 campaign. Hth.
An investigation is not something of value.
Good luck with that argument.


Not an argument. Shocking.
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why are you avoiding my question, Met?

Are you okay with Schiff lying about his ties to the leaker? What does he have to hide if this investigation is all on the up and up?
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Silent For Too Long said:

Why are you avoiding my question, Met?

Are you okay with Schiff lying about his ties to the leaker? What does he have to hide if this investigation is all on the up and up?
Met won't answer just like the non-response to the wager on the election.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick said:

Silent For Too Long said:

Why are you avoiding my question, Met?

Are you okay with Schiff lying about his ties to the leaker? What does he have to hide if this investigation is all on the up and up?
Met won't answer just like the non-response to the wager on the election.
The ignore function...embrace it...
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prosperdick said:

Silent For Too Long said:

Why are you avoiding my question, Met?

Are you okay with Schiff lying about his ties to the leaker? What does he have to hide if this investigation is all on the up and up?
Met won't answer just like the non-response to the wager on the election.
Ignore him. Easy.
"I'm sure that won't make a bit of difference for those of you who enjoy a baseless rage over the decisions of a few teenagers."
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aginlakeway said:

Prosperdick said:

Silent For Too Long said:

Why are you avoiding my question, Met?

Are you okay with Schiff lying about his ties to the leaker? What does he have to hide if this investigation is all on the up and up?
Met won't answer just like the non-response to the wager on the election.
Ignore him. Easy.
Definitely a nice perk of premium membership....guess I'll start it now.
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A very bad week for Sondland just got worse.

Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So this is the one?
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Why do ya'll think this is such a gotcha?

It's common knowledge that there was discussion of investigations.

That doesn't prove any of the wild ass allegations you have.
First Page Last Page
Page 90 of 264
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.