***** OFFICIAL TRUMP IMPEACHMENT THREAD *****

965,315 Views | 9220 Replies | Last: 1 yr ago by Pizza
MousepadMarauder
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is the "bombshell" in George Kent's just released testimony?
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Scorpions can't change or control their nature, and leopards can't change their spots. Likewise, Trump can't stop being dishonest and corrupt.

Today is another new day, so naturally there is yet another new breaking news story about the utter corruption of Trump:



It really is amazing that the LIV voters who fervently believe Obama was corrupt and immoral (he is neither) are the same people who voted into the WH a Potus who is more corrupt and immoral than any US President in U.S. history.
Artorias
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

It really is amazing that the LIV voters who fervently believe Obama was corrupt and immoral (he is neither)
Dude, seriously. Just stop. Don't you ever get tired of embarrassing yourself?


Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trump could be profiting millions off of being President each year and I would not care one bit because he has delivered on all of his promises to the country. Worth every dime.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yes Obama never got in trouble for campaign donations. He also didn't pay under the table payouts to insurance companies so they would back Obamacare.
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The Trump Foundation's newest tax returns show Trump was listed as the nonprofit's president his entire first year in the White House. The nonprofit was funded by his business & his golf club's reimbursement of payments. Also known as "self-dealing".

Not sure how the multitude of Trump supporters here can square this latest act of corruption by DJT with the "Trump is Draining The Swamp" anti-corruption mantra they've been posting for the past 3 years, but I'm sure their explanations and rationalizations will be entertaining and illuminating.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Noose tightening.
aggie2812-2
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
5 more years hahahahaha....and I love hearing the left try to use moral arguments against the right. Like y'all haven't killed enough babies, cheered for people to alter their bodies (cutting off private parts even while under the age of 10), allowed people to freely use drugs that has ruined their life in the long run...should I keep going. Listening to a moral argument from the left is like thinking a lion wouldn't eat me alive and instead believe he's really just a friendly oversized cat. Nope, the left put morals behind them and then told me I'm stupid for holding on to my beliefs. Moral high ground my &$# the left has none.
Good Poster
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
that guy is so triggered
Silent For Too Long
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MetoliusAg said:



It really is amazing that the LIV voters who fervently believe Obama was corrupt and immoral (he is neither)
Oh, come on.

You're not even trying at this point.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Silent For Too Long said:

MetoliusAg said:



It really is amazing that the LIV voters who fervently believe Obama was corrupt and immoral (he is neither)
Oh, come on.

You're not even trying at this point.
He's trying all right. Trying his hardest to troll 18 hours a day.
Joe Exotic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

The Trump Foundation's newest tax returns show Trump was listed as the nonprofit's president his entire first year in the White House. The nonprofit was funded by his business & his golf club's reimbursement of payments. Also known as "self-dealing".

Not sure how the multitude of Trump supporters here can square this latest act of corruption by DJT with the "Trump is Draining The Swamp" anti-corruption mantra they've been posting for the past 3 years, but I'm sure their explanations and rationalizations will be entertaining and illuminating.

It's easy to square when he's not a gun grabbing socialist. You seem to be under some kind of illusion that things matter more than policy.

It doesn't. It's the same reason you give Obama a pass. And I don't blame you for it. You want liberal policies in place. Only difference between you and I is that I'm honest.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Obsession noted said:

Rapier108 said:

Silent For Too Long said:

MetoliusAg said:



It really is amazing that the LIV voters who fervently believe Obama was corrupt and immoral (he is neither)
Oh, come on.

You're not even trying at this point.
He's trying all right. Trying his hardest to troll 18 hours a day.



Someone's gotta ad some substance; you sure aren't doing it.
We got a new sock.
93MarineHorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Also known as "self-dealing".
Boy oh boy does the left know about "self-dealing". They are the experts on the matter: public sector unions, the Clinton Foundation, Solyndra....
flown-the-coop
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MetoliusAg said:

The Trump Foundation's newest tax returns show Trump was listed as the nonprofit's president his entire first year in the White House. The nonprofit was funded by his business & his golf club's reimbursement of payments. Also known as "self-dealing".

Not sure how the multitude of Trump supporters here can square this latest act of corruption by DJT with the "Trump is Draining The Swamp" anti-corruption mantra they've been posting for the past 3 years, but I'm sure their explanations and rationalizations will be entertaining and illuminating.
The linked article is not just hard to read, but seems to be written by a complete idiot.

Here's the thing, if Trump had done or directed anything remotely criminal, he would have been impeached no later than January 2019, the day after Pelosi got her gavel. Hell, if he had done anything criminal, Ryan would have done it himself in 2017.

Its funny as newcomer on this board to watch people call you out again and again for blindly posting leftist propaganda day after day. Dems are like baptists deacons always calling for the adulterer to be hung by her teets while they gang bang the preacher's wife in the choir room.

I do wish TexAgs would add the functionality to just ignore certain posters. Would make the board much more readable for actual relevant material.
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Obsession noted said:

FriscoKid said:

Obsession noted said:

Rapier108 said:

Silent For Too Long said:

MetoliusAg said:



It really is amazing that the LIV voters who fervently believe Obama was corrupt and immoral (he is neither)
Oh, come on.

You're not even trying at this point.
He's trying all right. Trying his hardest to troll 18 hours a day.



Someone's gotta ad some substance; you sure aren't doing it.
We got a new sock.


It's not a sock if you only have one account.
OK. So welcome to TexAgs new person. I hope you find this place to be entertaining and informative.
Joe Exotic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Obsession noted said:

FriscoKid said:

Obsession noted said:

Rapier108 said:

Silent For Too Long said:

MetoliusAg said:



It really is amazing that the LIV voters who fervently believe Obama was corrupt and immoral (he is neither)
Oh, come on.

You're not even trying at this point.
He's trying all right. Trying his hardest to troll 18 hours a day.



Someone's gotta ad some substance; you sure aren't doing it.
We got a new sock.


It's not a sock if you only have one account.

Don't worry, you'll have zero momentarily.
Oyster DuPree
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Trolling is a art
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ah, someone that had their other account permabanned? Got it. I hope you have more luck this time staying out of trouble.
Spotted Ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Obsession noted said:

FriscoKid said:

Obsession noted said:

FriscoKid said:

Obsession noted said:

Rapier108 said:

Silent For Too Long said:

MetoliusAg said:



It really is amazing that the LIV voters who fervently believe Obama was corrupt and immoral (he is neither)
Oh, come on.

You're not even trying at this point.
He's trying all right. Trying his hardest to troll 18 hours a day.



Someone's gotta ad some substance; you sure aren't doing it.
We got a new sock.


It's not a sock if you only have one account.
OK. So welcome to TexAgs new person. I hope you find this place to be entertaining and informative.


Person/=Account.
So, you're saying that Trump FINALLY broke you enough that you had to create AND PAY for an account on TA so you could vent?
Covidians, Communists, CNN, FOX, and all other MSM are enemies of the state and should be treated as such.
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

The NY Court issued a finding that $2.8 million in charitable funds "was used for Mr. Trump's political campaign and disbursed by Mr. Trump's campaign staff, rather than by the Foundation..."
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was getting kind of bored with etcetcra to be honest. Maybe obsession will make a better case for impeachment than he did.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And he bought stars. Lot Y confirmed.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sine poena nulla lex.
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sine poena nulla lex.
4stringAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:


And of course he'll be the arbiter of what qualifies as "proof of relevance".
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sine poena nulla lex.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
C@LAg said:

Rapier108 said:

And he bought stars. Lot Y confirmed.
that sucks. staff will allow him to troll hard for longer.
He Gone
C@LAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sine poena nulla lex.
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The NYAG's investigation found that the Trump Foundation Board existed in name only: it didn't meet after 1999, set policy or criteria for choosing grant recipients, or approve of any grants. Donald J. Trump alone made all decisions related to the Foundation.

The Trump campaign held a fundraiser event in Iowa for veterans. It raised $5.6M, and then it deposited $2.8M of that in the Trump Foundation, and spent the $2.8M on Trump campaign events and promotions of Trump properties.



backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oyster DuPree said:

Trolling is a art


It's like working with mercury. It's high science, man. It's an art form
FriscoKid
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I guess we are going to need two impeachments.
chimmy
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MetoliusAg said:

The NYAG's investigation found that the Trump Foundation Board existed in name only: it didn't meet after 1999, set policy or criteria for choosing grant recipients, or approve of any grants. Donald J. Trump alone made all decisions related to the Foundation.

The Trump campaign held a fundraiser event in Iowa for veterans. It raised $5.6M, and then it deposited $2.8M of that in the Trump Foundation, and spent the $2.8M on Trump campaign events and promotions of Trump properties.




"used to help elect Trump,"....which furthers the interests of veterans.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MetoliusAg said:

The NYAG's investigation found that the Trump Foundation Board existed in name only: it didn't meet after 1999, set policy or criteria for choosing grant recipients, or approve of any grants. Donald J. Trump alone made all decisions related to the Foundation.

The Trump campaign held a fundraiser event in Iowa for veterans. It raised $5.6M, and then it deposited $2.8M of that in the Trump Foundation, and spent the $2.8M on Trump campaign events and promotions of Trump properties.




This is not a part of the impeachment sham. Can you please create a new thread? Thanks.
MetoliusAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Another breaking news story on Trump and RNC corruption. Hawg would call this "Bidenesque" if it involved a Dem instead Trump.

So if you accept the bribe...and grant the meeting...hmmm.

First Page Last Page
Page 69 of 264
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.