FriscoKid said:Heck yeah. Get some!aggiehawg said:Is that what happened? I didn't think it was Nadler though. Sounded more like some Dem critter in the back to me.HowdyTAMU said:
Gohmert ain't takin' no crap from Nadler.
Nadler accused him of spouting Russian propaganda on the House floor after Gohmert had spoken and exited. Gohmert came back and basically told him to piss off....my interpretation of Gohmert's words since they cut his mic.
- Want to be able to say he is "impeached" until the election, but not cleared by the SenateFriscoKid said:
So first, they wouldn't give the president his due process, call witnesses, or defend himself.
They convict him on nothing more than hearsay.
Now they want to charge him, but not give him his chance in court?
That goes again every legal norm we have in our country.
The spending bill they passed yesterday gives government employees 12 weeks of family leave.fasthorse05 said:
Long story short (too late), does ANYONE pay attention to the BS those *******s pull on the Hill? One of the beautiful things about impeachment was having the freshman Dems on record, and on video, voting to impeach. And now, we won't have video evidence. I'm not even sure Fox would cover this, although OAN probably will.
They need these not to be summarily dismissed in case RBG passes. Then they'll send it to the Senate to mess up the confirmation process and calendar.Rapier108 said:- Want to be able to say he is "impeached" until the election, but not cleared by the SenateFriscoKid said:
So first, they wouldn't give the president his due process, call witnesses, or defend himself.
They convict him on nothing more than hearsay.
Now they want to charge him, but not give him his chance in court?
That goes again every legal norm we have in our country.
- Scream that an impeached President cannot appoint someone to the Supreme Court
- Want to use further "impeachment inquiries" to get their hands on the Mueller Grand Jury material and Trump's tax/financial records
Quote:
On the morning of President Trump's likely impeachment in the House of Representatives, Gallup released a poll showing a six-point jump in the president's approval rating.
When House Democrats first announced their impeachment efforts in late September, Trump's approval rating plummeted to just 39%. After weeks of testimony and the House's decision to draft two articles of impeachment, his approval rating climbed six points to 45%.
Trump's approval among independent voters grew eight points throughout impeachment from 34% to 42%. The poll, which was conducted from Dec. 2 to Dec. 15, revealed the president has maintained solid support within the Republican Party and has approval from 89% of GOP respondents. However, only 8% of Democratic respondents approved of Trump's performance in the White House.
aggiehawg said:They need these not to be summarily dismissed in case RBG passes. Then they'll send it to the Senate to mess up the confirmation process and calendar.Rapier108 said:- Want to be able to say he is "impeached" until the election, but not cleared by the SenateFriscoKid said:
So first, they wouldn't give the president his due process, call witnesses, or defend himself.
They convict him on nothing more than hearsay.
Now they want to charge him, but not give him his chance in court?
That goes again every legal norm we have in our country.
- Scream that an impeached President cannot appoint someone to the Supreme Court
- Want to use further "impeachment inquiries" to get their hands on the Mueller Grand Jury material and Trump's tax/financial records
Don't tease meBo Darville said:aggiehawg said:They need these not to be summarily dismissed in case RBG passes. Then they'll send it to the Senate to mess up the confirmation process and calendar.Rapier108 said:- Want to be able to say he is "impeached" until the election, but not cleared by the SenateFriscoKid said:
So first, they wouldn't give the president his due process, call witnesses, or defend himself.
They convict him on nothing more than hearsay.
Now they want to charge him, but not give him his chance in court?
That goes again every legal norm we have in our country.
- Scream that an impeached President cannot appoint someone to the Supreme Court
- Want to use further "impeachment inquiries" to get their hands on the Mueller Grand Jury material and Trump's tax/financial records
McConnell would confirm RBG's replacement before taking up impeachment
txaggie_08 said:FriscoKid said:Heck yeah. Get some!aggiehawg said:Is that what happened? I didn't think it was Nadler though. Sounded more like some Dem critter in the back to me.HowdyTAMU said:
Gohmert ain't takin' no crap from Nadler.
Nadler accused him of spouting Russian propaganda on the House floor after Gohmert had spoken and exited. Gohmert came back and basically told him to piss off....my interpretation of Gohmert's words since they cut his mic.
How would that even be Russian propaganda? He's tearing down the Dems for not protecting Ukraine while Obama was in office. That is in no way beneficial to Russia, Inc act painting Russia in a bad light. and is simply Gohmert stating the truth. For Nadler to sit there and claim Gohmert is spreading Russian propaganda is a bald face lie.
Cassius said:
Nadler is a lying sack of sht.
Maybe. The clock and calendar can work both ways in an election year. Confirmation takes months. Depending on the date of her demise and the nomination, the calendar. The entire Senate has to sit for an impeachment trial.Quote:
McConnell would confirm RBG's replacement before taking up impeachment
Which their very own Overlord Obama used at historic levels.4stringAg said:
They keep talking about checks and balances and how they are exercising that, not seeing the irony that one of the articles is impeaching the POTUS for exercising his check and balance of exec privilege.
mesocosm said:
Doug Collins, turkey-neck, America-hating, redneck talking nonsense
WestTexAg12 said:mesocosm said:
Doug Collins, turkey-neck, America-hating, redneck talking nonsense
My god you are unhinged...
Go drink your cranberry juice and calm down
