Brett Kavanaugh rape allegations

487,318 Views | 5316 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by 93MarineHorn
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I realize she is retired but does the FBI not have physical test requirements? I mean maybe she beefed up in retirement but good lord.
Thriller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I still get triggered anytime I read the word cloture.

Knocked me out of the city-level spelling bee in 3rd grade.

In this case, though...time for the Dems to sit down and shut up. Cloture *****ES!!!
HowdyTexasAggies
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
DC is sickening, it's worse than a swamp, damn sewer rats across the board.
bigcat22
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old Tom Morris
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Good Trump
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Does Mitch McConnell realize he's an internet hero now as cocaine Mitch?
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
William K. Klingaman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
backintexas2013 said:

I realize she is retired but does the FBI not have physical test requirements? I mean maybe she beefed up in retirement but good lord.


Wondering what she did to get out of PT.
Old Tom Morris
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Zemira
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BenFiasco14 said:

Does Mitch McConnell realize he's an internet hero now as cocaine Mitch?


I like War Turtle better
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Outstanding reference but I caught the ban and was threatened with perma ban for making reference like that to the beautiful and honest Dr Ford.
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
backintexas2013 said:

Outstanding reference but I caught the ban and was threatened with perma ban for making reference like that to the beautiful and honest Dr Ford.

She is neither.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well I know that but the mods were not happy with my other characterization so I am sticking with flattering her.
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:



Wow. This picture, along with the information that came out today about Ford's friendship with McClean and her subsequent employment with the FBI, is staggering. The whole thing is starting to look like a coordinated lie cooked up between former bureaucrats, feminists opposed to Trump and his nominee, and several Democrats in the Senate, to bring down Kavanaugh. And the tweet above certainly gives the appearance of motive for the Clintons to want payback. For McClean to show herself at the hearings, they either have massive hutzpa or they are arrogant idiots that thought they were smart enough not to get caught.

I feel like I've been red pilled.
oldarmy1
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
oldarmy1 said:


Wait, I thought he turned on Trump
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?

drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?

VaultingChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rumor has been verified.

Where's Don Lemon to offer his expert analysis on what her nickname means?

Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drcrinum said:



aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:





So is that a bad thing?
JTatter88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aginlakeway said:

drcrinum said:





So is that a bad thing?


Not for us, shows she was a hooer
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


I doubt this would happen, but one never knows when it comes to politics.
PanzerAggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Just another hint that the new findings do nothing but strengthen the argument to confirm Kavanaugh. Feinstein has already called for the documents not to be released. If there was anything in there that damages BK all of this would be flipped with the D's calling for a public release.
mazzag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The comments are great! "It's a sham!" "Didn't talk to ford or Kavanaugh!"
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What's that smell?

It's the smell of Democrat desperation. And it's glorious.
Post removed:
by user
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?



The document is embedded in the second tweet; see Page 2, Paragraph 2.f. = the supplemental FBI report will never see the light of day...other than leaks which will be politicized.
Old Tom Morris
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drcrinum said:



I doubt this would happen, but one never knows when it comes to politics.

Needs to happen. So many Senators are going to end up referring to it (and spinning their own version of it), that a public release to see the true findings is better than a bunch of 2nd hand politically motivated comments/summaries via twitter
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is an awesome play by the republicans. Demand it go public, knowing it won't, all the while the dems demanding it stay private. That's wonderful.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Yup.
JDUB08AG
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What is glorious is that had dems just let Gorsuch get confirmed without requiring McConnell to change the senate rules, you very well may have a completely different situation regarding Kavanaugh. Sure, McConnell would have tried to go nuclear with Kavanaugh, but with all the "accusations" out there, it would have made the argument for going nuclear that much more challenging.
Patentmike
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:



Yup.

More evidence that a lot of people still don't know what's going on. Follow the money.

Kavanaugh, Gorsuch, Thomas, Alito, and Roberts are a serious threat to gut the administrative state. The basis will likely be separation powers and that admin agencies cannot make laws, only subordinate rules tailored to clear intent articulated in the statutes.

This threatens to curtail the path to wealth so many in government follow. It was never about public policy or the public good...it was about the Senator's wallets, the power wielded by unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats and the disproprtionate influence that the MSM and lobbyists gained by becoming the path to wealth for those bureaucrats and Senators.

So, to try and preserve their path to wealth and privilege, the Dems had to hold this hill.

Anticipating the question "aren't the R's doing the same thing?".Yes, but in a different way. The R money wielders typically need/want non-action more than any particular action. Limiting what the executive can do on its own helps achieve that end.
PatentMike, J.D.
BS Biochem
MS Molecular Virology


Houston Lee
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


New Grassley statement after reviewing the FBI report today
First Page Last Page
Page 135 of 152
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.