rgag12 said:

---

captkirk said:

---

tsuag10 said:

---

Not sure if there is anything there, but Fords "lifelong friend" Keyser was a pro golfer and the Georgetown U women's golf coach before her health issues (I think I read it has something to do with a neck injury). Keyser was also previously married to Fox's Bob Beckel (maybe not significant).

Joe DiGenova made several comments about Ford's possible "connection" with PGA golfers and it not being good for her if they were to talk.

Interesting.

---

So a neck injury has clouded her memory of events. Seems legit

---

As long as that Hippocampus is still functioning she should still be able to remember every traumatic event! That's what I learned from Dr. Ford, what a brave smart woman

---

A brave smart woman? I'd settle for honest as it relates to Dr. Ford.

This is impossible. A poster here said that she signed that sworn statement made it a much more credible allegation.

Rapier108 said:

---

Quote:

---

---

Unless she is under oath, or has sworn on penalty of perjury, then no. Her statement, despite claiming her signing it is under penalty of perjury, is not notarized, which is required for it to be legally binding.

---

I swear I just saw somewhere that congess and/or the media had a notorized copy of that letter, but I may have been reading about something else

Icecream_Ag said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Quote:

---

---

Unless she is under oath, or has sworn on penalty of perjury, then no. Her statement, despite claiming her signing it is under penalty of perjury, is not notarized, which is required for it to be legally binding.

---

I swear I just saw somewhere that congess and/or the media had a notorized copy of that letter, but I may have been reading about something else

---

Probably just more fake news --- the MSM specializes in dispensing it.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1047179783212285952.html

Quote:

---

...
3) As has been hinted elsewhere, the FBI report on Kavanaugh finished last night. Word from my source came from September 30th, with an update yesterday that everything was on schedule to be revealed TODAY.
4) The FBI acquired emails showing the Dems on the @senjudiciary and the media working together to arrange the barrage of allegations against Kavanaugh specifically to circumvent the hearing process and cause maximum damage and delay to the confirmation vote.
5) Those emails are either going to end up getting leaked into the public eye or they'll be released as part of the statement on the investigation.
6) My source is vouching for the multiple reliable channels he got his information from. So, disclaimer, this is secondhand, but with Feinstein now saying she wants the FBI report kept private.... yeah.
7) Some minor speculation, it would APPEAR that the media was the ones who turned over the emails to the FBI, effectively throwing the Democrat politicians involved under the bus....

---

I follow this guy. He's usually reliable, but it's secondhand info from his source. Should know very soon if it's accurate.

drcrinum said:

---

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1047179783212285952.html

Quote:

---

...
3) As has been hinted elsewhere, the FBI report on Kavanaugh finished last night. Word from my source came from September 30th, with an update yesterday that everything was on schedule to be revealed TODAY.
4) The FBI acquired emails showing the Dems on the @senjudiciary and the media working together to arrange the barrage of allegations against Kavanaugh specifically to circumvent the hearing process and cause maximum damage and delay to the confirmation vote.
5) Those emails are either going to end up getting leaked into the public eye or they'll be released as part of the statement on the investigation.
6) My source is vouching for the multiple reliable channels he got his information from. So, disclaimer, this is secondhand, but with Feinstein now saying she wants the FBI report kept private.... yeah.
7) Some minor speculation, it would APPEAR that the media was the ones who turned over the emails to the FBI, effectively throwing the Democrat politicians involved under the bus....

---

I follow this guy. He's usually reliable, but it's secondhand info from his source. Should know very soon if it's accurate.

---

Love their logo.

drcrinum said:

---

So NBC can't independently verify Swetnick's allegations per her TV interview. Then a question comes to mind:

---

I'll need MF Barnes to weigh in, the hardest working man in law, not Robert Barnes.

drcrinum said:

---

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1047179783212285952.html

Quote:

---

...
3) As has been hinted elsewhere, the FBI report on Kavanaugh finished last night. Word from my source came from September 30th, with an update yesterday that everything was on schedule to be revealed TODAY.
4) The FBI acquired emails showing the Dems on the @senjudiciary and the media working together to arrange the barrage of allegations against Kavanaugh specifically to circumvent the hearing process and cause maximum damage and delay to the confirmation vote.
5) Those emails are either going to end up getting leaked into the public eye or they'll be released as part of the statement on the investigation.
6) My source is vouching for the multiple reliable channels he got his information from. So, disclaimer, this is secondhand, but with Feinstein now saying she wants the FBI report kept private.... yeah.
7) Some minor speculation, it would APPEAR that the media was the ones who turned over the emails to the FBI, effectively throwing the Democrat politicians involved under the bus....

---

I follow this guy. He's usually reliable, but it's secondhand info from his source. Should know very soon if it's accurate.

---

I've read rumors about the part I bolded. Apparently they gave up the emails for immunity.

Hysterical if true.

Would love for this to be true but the website that is claiming all this is sketchy as ****.

ThatOneAg said:

---

This isn't going how DiFi had hoped. /laughcry

---

Grassley should extend her the same courtesy she extended Ford.

There is no way that is about to come out. I don't buy it. If it does, that'd be awesome, but it reads like a "too good to be true" type of situation.

Quote:

---

Too Q-anon/good to be true.

---

This right here. I honestly wouldn't be surprised if Q-anon turned out to be a bunch of liberals gaslighting conservatives.

drcrinum said:

---

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1047179783212285952.html

Quote:

---

...
3) As has been hinted elsewhere, the FBI report on Kavanaugh finished last night. Word from my source came from September 30th, with an update yesterday that everything was on schedule to be revealed TODAY.
4) The FBI acquired emails showing the Dems on the @senjudiciary and the media working together to arrange the barrage of allegations against Kavanaugh specifically to circumvent the hearing process and cause maximum damage and delay to the confirmation vote.
5) Those emails are either going to end up getting leaked into the public eye or they'll be released as part of the statement on the investigation.
6) My source is vouching for the multiple reliable channels he got his information from. So, disclaimer, this is secondhand, but with Feinstein now saying she wants the FBI report kept private.... yeah.
7) Some minor speculation, it would APPEAR that the media was the ones who turned over the emails to the FBI, effectively throwing the Democrat politicians involved under the bus....

---

I follow this guy. He's usually reliable, but it's secondhand info from his source. Should know very soon if it's accurate.

---

I'd like to believe it, and maybe it is all true, but the FBI would never release a report that would put that big of a black eye on democrats. The job of the FBI when it comes to investigating the federal government is to keep the status quo and not cause a massive uproar. That's why you always see reports being issued that give red meat to both democrats and republicans. My guess is that while all of that might be true, only snippets will be released along with stuff the Dems can cling to.

Rapier108 said:

---

Quote:

---

---

Unless she is under oath, or has sworn on penalty of perjury, then no. Her statement, despite claiming her signing it is under penalty of perjury, is not notarized, which is required for it to be legally binding.

---

When's the last time you had your form 1040 notarized? Not saying what she signed is enough, but notary is not required for jeopardy to attach.

I bet he does

Trading silence on their collusion to end the charade and vote

bigcat22 said:

---

I bet he does

---

Why? He's going to vote no either way.

bigcat22 said:

---

I bet he does

---

Why? He is going to vote no regardless.

Bo Darville said:

---

bigcat22 said:

---

I bet he does

---

Why? He's going to vote no either way.

---

Gotta figure out the next talking point for the #Resistance on Kav.

Need 24 hours to run FBI report through media spin cycle before the vote.

AG 2000' said:

---

Bo Darville said:

---

bigcat22 said:

---

I bet he does

---

Why? He's going to vote no either way.

---

Gotta figure out the next talking point for the #Resistance on Kav.

---

I think we have pretty solid confirmation that the FBI report contains -- at best -- nothing.

"The candidate is deeply flawed. We have nothing to do with delay."
-Schumer

drcrinum said:

---

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1047179783212285952.html

Quote:

---

...
3) As has been hinted elsewhere, the FBI report on Kavanaugh finished last night. Word from my source came from September 30th, with an update yesterday that everything was on schedule to be revealed TODAY.
4) The FBI acquired emails showing the Dems on the @senjudiciary and the media working together to arrange the barrage of allegations against Kavanaugh specifically to circumvent the hearing process and cause maximum damage and delay to the confirmation vote.
5) Those emails are either going to end up getting leaked into the public eye or they'll be released as part of the statement on the investigation.
6) My source is vouching for the multiple reliable channels he got his information from. So, disclaimer, this is secondhand, but with Feinstein now saying she wants the FBI report kept private.... yeah.
7) Some minor speculation, it would APPEAR that the media was the ones who turned over the emails to the FBI, effectively throwing the Democrat politicians involved under the bus....

---

I follow this guy. He's usually reliable, but it's secondhand info from his source. Should know very soon if it's accurate.

---

That guy's whole presentation is impossible to take seriously and it reads more like fantasy than news.

I'm going to be contray here. The FBI report shouldnt be released. When you go through a BGC those documents are not public record. Kavanaugh's previous 6 were not released for public consumption. Why should the 7th? Thats an internal document for the people cleared to read it. The only way it should be released is if Kavanaugh's chooses to releases and waives his right to privacy AND if the documents contain no secure information.

Its ****ty because people can say and speculate all they want about what it says but they dont belong in the public record.

At this point, why wouldn't Kavenaugh agree to release?

blindey said:

---

At this point, why wouldn't Kavenaugh agree to release?

---

That will be the next question the Dems ask him.