andyv94 said:

---

So, this last woman says she went to 10 parties in I am assuming Maryland, correct?

Isn't Yale about a 6 hour drive from Maryland?? You are telling me you are going to drive 12 hours to attend a high school party.............ten times??

---

Parties you apparently knew gang rapes happened at

...so obviously yes

FireAg said:

---

p-value = 0.002

Sample size = 2

HOLY *****!! DO THESE PEOPLE EVEN UNDERSTAND STATISTICS?!?!?

This polygraph is a TOTAL FARCE!!!

---

No one in their right mind would accept a P so low with an N=2...

An N=2 completely eliminates any ability to determine the normal distribution...

Quote:

---

So, this last woman says she went to 10 parties in I am assuming Maryland, correct?

Isn't Yale about a 6 hour drive from Maryland?? You are telling me you are going to drive 12 hours to attend a high school party.............ten times??

---

She didn't go to Yale. She went to University of Maryland.

AggieUSMC said:

---

Quote:

---

So, this last woman says she went to 10 parties in I am assuming Maryland, correct?

Isn't Yale about a 6 hour drive from Maryland?? You are telling me you are going to drive 12 hours to attend a high school party.............ten times??

---

She didn't go to Yale. She went to University of Maryland.

---

Ahhhhh so she was close enough to attend the high school gang rape parties 10 times like all regular college girls do! Younger boys and gang rape! The two thing older women can't get enough of and actively seek out!

Ain't no way in HELL she shows up tomorrow...

Anyone with half a brain can now see this is a total set up...

An N of 2 is supposed to define a normal distribution??? Not on this planet...

35 years ago, I also attended several parties where Bertt Kavanaugh was in attendance. At these parties, people were mutilated and murdered. These parties occurred on a weekly basis and mutilations and murders were at times a single murder or multiple murders.

GCP12 said:

---

ThatOneAg said:

---

I wouldn't be surprised if the left finds someone to call him a pedophile since this bs ain't working.

---

I think they've given up. Schumer called for him to withdraw and they are moving on to, "If the Republicans still hold the vote, they're morally bankrupt"

They're out of bullets.

---

Their heroine isn't going to show. They know it. They've known it for a while.

Their only hope was for the R's to self-destruct. The smart play was to leave it where it was, say, 7-10 days ago.

Everything that has happened since makes them look like Inquisitors at best....and a party full of Avenattis at worst.

I have to think that that this shows a lack of confidence in their supposed "blue wave". This SC nomination is about replacing Kennedy with one of his own proteges. They are fighting this one like they aren't going to be able to stop the one that really counts, either....RBG's replacement.

Quote:

---

Quote:

---

WelchAg said:
Flake just said we will not get answers tomorrow and is supportive of a vote.

---

FriscoKid said:
That sounds like a yes to me then, but he is still a little b.

---

He said he's going to base his vote how the hearing goes. If he votes no based on the flimsy evidence (or lack there of), your right. He's a little b.

FireAg said:

---

FireAg said:

---

p-value = 0.002

Sample size = 2

HOLY *****!! DO THESE PEOPLE EVEN UNDERSTAND STATISTICS?!?!?

This polygraph is a TOTAL FARCE!!!

---

No one in their right mind would accept a P so low with an N=2...

An N=2 completely eliminates any ability to determine the normal distribution...

---

She can't even write in Cursive and I know it was taught back then for I think my hands are permanently scarred from being hit each time I did not write legibly in cursive.

Literally 2 questions on the polygraph.

2.

Two.

What the actual ****

Could you imagine if roles were reversed and it was the Republicans doing this? The media would have already produced so many stories attempting to damage the credibility of any of the people making accusations, but in this case, the media is completely silent and only interested in digging up any and all info on Kavanaugh.

That's a good point about Graham but at the same time he went from saying he'd rather die via poisoning than have Trump be POTUS to being one of his strongest and most vocal supporters on just about everything.

Oh for ****'s sake. I hope the judge throws this out immediately as non-actionable and makes him pay attorney's fees and court costs.

HTownAg98 said:

---

Oh for ****'s sake. I hope the judge throws this out immediately as non-actionable and makes him pay attorney's fees and court costs.

---

Why won't the Dems just let Ford speak tomorrow and bring Kavanaugh down like she and they promised?

rgag12 said:

---

johnnyblaze36 said:

---

Lindsey Graham just swatted Avenatti's bullsh into the 5th row and said "If I went to a party where there was gang raping going on I probably wouldn't go to the next nine".

I've really done a miraculous 180 on Lindsey in the last few months.

edit: And Graham said "This is becoming more and more like the Twilight Zone".

---

I think it helps that Kavanaugh is an "old guard" GOP that served under W. If Kavanaugh was a tea party or newer style republican I bet Graham wouldn't go out of his way to defend him.

---

Graham is going to be on Hannity's radio show next hour.

I don't care who you are, that's funny right there.

And who is Katie? Cause she's pretty easy on the eyes.

Fox contributor

blindey said:

---

Saw that earlier. He's asking the court to intervene in the political process? LOL.

---

Wow, why didn't the republicans just seek an injunction on the Obamacare vote???

Sadly, there is some leftist, activist judge out there that will grant that insane injunction.

HTownAg98 said:

---

Oh for ****'s sake. I hope the judge throws this out immediately as non-actionable and makes him pay attorney's fees and court costs.

---

Obstructing him from, what, exactly? Voting "no" extra hard or something?

Squadron7 said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

Oh for ****'s sake. I hope the judge throws this out immediately as non-actionable and makes him pay attorney's fees and court costs.

---

Obstructing him from, what, exactly? Voting "no" extra hard or something?

---

Apparently the injunction has to do with not getting 100% of the documents from when Kavanaugh was serving in the W administration

If he's not happy with what he got, he can vote no.

rgag12 said:

---

Squadron7 said:

---

HTownAg98 said:

---

Oh for ****'s sake. I hope the judge throws this out immediately as non-actionable and makes him pay attorney's fees and court costs.

---

Obstructing him from, what, exactly? Voting "no" extra hard or something?

---

Apparently the injunction has to do with not getting 100% of the documents from when Kavanaugh was serving in the W administration

---

It's admirable that he is searching so hard for a reason to change his vote to "Yes".

BenFiasco14 said:

---

I'm starting to have doubts that Kavanaugh is going to be confirmed now. Call it a political version of BAS. I let the press get to me too much I suppose, but I'm not feeling good about this.

---

Jesus Christ you've been saying this since yesterday...........step away from the computer!!

This is NOTHING but a hollow attack by the corrupt left because they have NOTHING to offer!!

andyv94 said:

---

BenFiasco14 said:

---

I'm starting to have doubts that Kavanaugh is going to be confirmed now. Call it a political version of BAS. I let the press get to me too much I suppose, but I'm not feeling good about this.

---

Jesus Christ you've been saying this since yesterday...........step away from the computer!!

This is NOTHING but a hollow attack by the corrupt left because they have NOTHING to offer!!

---

I was walked off the ledge yesterday afternoon and now I'm back up there again man!!