Brett Kavanaugh rape allegations

487,799 Views | 5316 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by 93MarineHorn
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Alta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Man my high school sucked.
SupaManu
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:



Joe Exotic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BallerStaf2003 said:

mugwurt said:

BallerStaf2003 said:

Honestly, if he really was part of gang bangs and his friend, Judge, admits that he was a part of it, he shouldn't be on the Supreme Court.

I don't care if trump nominates someone else socially conservative, this guy shouldn't be on ONLY IF This Judge guy admits to this sort of culture m
If gang-bangs are consentual (and yes, some girls do this), then who cares. Obviously, if they were not consentual, then it is a crime.



Didn't he just say he was a virgin?


Yes and this claim says he facilitated the gang rapes, not participated in them
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bo Darville said:

BallerStaf2003 said:

mugwurt said:

BallerStaf2003 said:

Honestly, if he really was part of gang bangs and his friend, Judge, admits that he was a part of it, he shouldn't be on the Supreme Court.

I don't care if trump nominates someone else socially conservative, this guy shouldn't be on ONLY IF This Judge guy admits to this sort of culture m
If gang-bangs are consentual (and yes, some girls do this), then who cares. Obviously, if they were not consentual, then it is a crime.



Didn't he just say he was a virgin?


Yes and this claim says he facilitated the gang rapes, not participated in them
In addition to inteviewing at Yale and Brown, I guess he had time to pimp on the side.
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:



Did she try to get this story in the New Yorker?
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm gonna be even more ticked now if this falls through, because it means Creepy Porn Lawyer got the killshot and that's gonna embolden the libs so much
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
Burdizzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looks like it's University of Illinois!
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bearmw said:

This is like the Baylor scandal all over again. Maybe 1% accurate and 99% complete bull****
YES! An Old Rivalries reference!

Baylor still holds title as the creepiest place on earth and most dangerous "university" for a female to attend.

Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
aginlakeway
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bearmw said:

This is like the Baylor scandal all over again. Maybe 1% accurate and 99% complete bull****
BallerStaf2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bearmw said:

This is like the Baylor scandal all over again. Maybe 1% accurate and 99% complete bull****


The Baylor scandal was about 99% true and 1% bull*****

There are mounds and mounds of evidence against Baylor, Baylor Scott and white hospital, the Waco PD, and Art Briles.

Get out of here with your garbage.
PanzerAggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Kavanaugh worked at the WH. He was in close proximity to President Bush. The type of clearance needed for that is staggeringly complex. I went thru a TS/SCI clearance process which is below what one needs to be near the Commander in Chief. They went so far back on my timeline that they interviewed teachers and friends of mine from my junior high days. All this for some smuck Army Captain.

The notion that the FBI has done numerous background checks on Kavanaugh and has not caught one whiff of gang bangs, rape clubs, and trains is so absurd that I can't think of an intelligent way to respond.

In addition CNN has mentioned that the latest accuser has so much to risk because her jobs require a Public Trust Clearance. A Public Trust clearance is the most basic/simple of clearances. They basically run your credit report and run a criminal background check in the databases. Probably takes a 30 minutes.
FroWins
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bearmw said:

This is like the Baylor scandal all over again. Maybe 1% accurate and 99% complete bull****
Flagged for trolling
JobSecurity
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bearmw said:

This is like the Baylor scandal all over again. Maybe 1% accurate and 99% complete bull****


Get the **** out of here with that ***** This is not comparable. Baylor has a documented and verified history of covering up sexual assault and you want to compare that to baseless unverifiable allegations from 3 decades ago? No.
Alta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Or in a normal society nobody gives a flying buck if somebody got drunk and kissed girls in high school.
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Libs are spiking the football:

https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/9j360e/avenatti_identifies_kavanaugh_accuser_as/
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
End Of Message
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
PanzerAggie06 said:

Kavanaugh worked at the WH. He was in close proximity to President Bush. The type of clearance needed for that is staggeringly complex. I went thru a TS/SCI clearance process which is below what one needs to be near the Commander in Chief. They went so far back on my timeline that they interviewed teachers and friends of mine from my junior high days. All this for some smuck Army Captain.

The notion that the FBI has done numerous background checks on Kavanaugh and has not caught one whiff of gang bangs, rape clubs, and trains is so absurd that I can't think of an intelligent way to respond.
Any rational person knows this, but a part of me thinks that this is the Dems way of throwing the FBI under the bus.

FBI credibility on the ropes, so lets trash them even more by questioning their diligence.
Resistance to tyranny is obedience to God.
NoHo Hank
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This whole drama reminds me of that office scene where everyone shares a painful story of losing someone:



This one time, I went camping with a group of 3 of my buddies in backwater Georgia, and Brett Kavanaugh and some of his hill-billy friends tracked us down and made one of my friends squeal like a pig. But that's okay because I shot him in the chest with a bow and arrow.

FBI, I demand immediate investigation!!
RikkiTikkaTagem
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BenFiasco14 said:

Libs are spiking the football:

https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/9j360e/avenatti_identifies_kavanaugh_accuser_as/


Sure:

Wildmen03
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BenFiasco14 said:

Libs are spiking the football:

https://old.reddit.com/r/politics/comments/9j360e/avenatti_identifies_kavanaugh_accuser_as/
I stopped clicking political links on reddit. That site is 90% left. Any comments on anything Trump, republican, or right wing is going to be **** on by thousands and thousands of liberal nutjobs on there. The bias there is real, and the owners have said as much, with no remorse.

There's quality stuff on reddit, but politics isn't among them.
Alta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I suggest getting your information from a different source if you believe that...
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Goose83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So this guy pimped out women at parties but never partook himself?
DallasAg 94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rush just mentioned that the 2012 psychologist visit corresponds with information Romney had leaked Kav might be his SCOTUS nominee, in 2012.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Come on Grassley, email the dems a pic of your middle finger and tell them see you tomorrow. And when they come out tonight with the story of Kav as a 17 year old pimp that offed several of his girls, just ignore it.
Goose83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Countdown until Collins/Murkowski demand that we believe put off the confirmation as we need an FBI investigation because we must believe the victim.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?

IrishTxAggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:



BallerStaf2003
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What an unbelievable **** show.

I've never been so conflicted on an issue in my life.

I don't want to discredit women, but it's all really fishy. Democrats have been disgusting through this, but republicans are trying to rush a nominee that might be a scumbag.

What if one of these women is correct? Just a really messed up situation.

I will say, a Supreme Court nominee should have a completely flawless and perfect record.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh good grief! An injunction against a Senate vote?
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
JAS61 said:

Countdown until Collins/Murkowski demand that we believe put off the confirmation as we need an FBI investigation because we must believe the victim.


Blumenthal already did. He was interviewed on Fox a few minutes ago. What a slime bag.
tsuag10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
houag80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You haven't seen anything yet.....wait until CPL rolls out his next loon charge tonight. I said that they would roll one out every night until the hearing and was poopooed. These people are evil sociopaths and will do anything to win. Unfortunately, the GOP traditionally turns into a blubbering mess on the floor....so sad. Kavanagh would have been great on the court. I am afraid we are done here.
SquareOne07
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BallerStaf2003 said:

What an unbelievable **** show.

I've never been so conflicted on an issue in my life.

I don't want to discredit women, but it's all really fishy. Democrats have been disgusting through this, but republicans are trying to rush a nominee that might be a scumbag.

What if one of these women is correct? Just a really messed up situation.

I will say, a Supreme Court nominee should have a completely flawless and perfect record.


Then give further credit to real victims of sexual violence by calling out obvious frauds for what they are.

And what if one of them are right? About having their boob grabbed? About being at parties where they willingly got trains ran on them and Kav being down the hall having a beer with his buddies?
First Page Last Page
Page 89 of 152
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.