Brett Kavanaugh rape allegations

488,671 Views | 5316 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by 93MarineHorn
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prognightmare said:

Shiner Bock said:

pardon me if this has been discussed above, but has it been determined whether this will be a public or private hearing?
There's not going to be a hearing at all.

Hth

Still where I have my money.

Actually securing a hearing with only the evidence presented is the successful Hail Mary of all Hail Marys.....if you have something. Every single move by Fords team indicates they simply don't.
Burdizzo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
WTF is up with Fox News? They have a poll on their front page claiming more Americans believe her than believe him.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Has she said whose house it was?
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Burdizzo said:

WTF is up with Fox News? They have a poll on their front page claiming more Americans believe her than believe him.
The worm is turning with the ownership of Fox News. We knew this was coming.
Joe Exotic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So basically you can only remember things accurately if you're a victim. How convienant.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wrong thread. That should be on the funny thread.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Old Tom Morris
How long do you want to ignore this user?
captkirk said:




The worst part is that they'll be US Senators.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
backintexas2013 said:

Has she said whose house it was?
Not that I have seen or heard. That's one of the weirder parts of her story. A small gathering, only a handful of kids but not at any one of their homes?
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Chris Cuomo is garbage

The Collective
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Blumenthal crying is always fun for me, so I will watch. The sad part is the dems on the Senate Judiciary Cmte come across as junior reps in the House. Real sad.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:



I've seen every episode. I had no idea Boyd Crowder had a sister.
Emotional Support Cobra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bo Darville said:

So basically you can only remember things accurately if you're a victim. How convienant.


But but Ronald Reagan's daughter said that I only remember certain details!

PS: False. </Dwight Schrute>
Joe Exotic
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
backintexas2013 said:

Has she said whose house it was?


The only details she remembers are names, all of which have denied her claim or even being there
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

backintexas2013 said:

Has she said whose house it was?
Not that I have seen or heard. That's one of the weirder parts of her story. A small gathering, only a handful of kids but not at any one of their homes?

So we need to look into charges that Brett Kavanaugh was involved in a possible Trespassing/Breaking and Entering event in 1983. Or maybe 1982.

/The Elf On The Shelf That Sometimes Talks To ArcticPenguin Late At Night
MD1993
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
By Thursday, the Dems will of reviewed and research every place Kavanaugh was one summer, then supply dates and times to Ford. I guarantee the delay is to hear the strategy as much as delay the process. A "story" with tears is being formulated with very specific "facts" to make Kavanaugh look bad. They do not need everything to be right or believable to bring down the elephant, they just need one small "sound bite" thorn to do the job.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bo Darville said:

backintexas2013 said:

Has she said whose house it was?


The only details she remembers are names, all of which have denied her claim or even being there

There was a guy there named Shlage who later went to Yale.












Or it may have been the name on the lock that was installed backwards on the door.
(Removed:11023A)
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Republicans are truly truly the biggest idiots on the planet!!

It's time to call the vote!!
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?

bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Squadron7 said:

Quote:

Didn't a condescending lib...

Is there another kind?


Don't forget unhinged.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Burdizzo said:

WTF is up with Fox News? They have a poll on their front page claiming more Americans believe her than believe him.


Unhinged libs have been drawn to the poll like moth's to a flame.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:



Well, apparently her girlfriend, Leland, didn't remember being at a party with the jocks.
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
New info regarding the original letter from Ford.....which (just a friendly reminder) the Judiciary Committee has yet to get an un-redacted version of, by the way......wasn't originally sent to Feinstein. It was sent to Rep. Anna Eschoo.

It may be that sending the letter Feinstein (on the Judiciary Committee) directly, rather than Ecshoo (no jurisdiction at all) would introduce legal complications for Ford if her charges were proved to be false.

Lawyers.....thoughts?



BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She will never be charged with anything, so it's irrelevant.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
captkirk said:




Oral sex causes claustrophobia?
Squadron7
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
bobbranco said:

captkirk said:




Oral sex causes claustrophobia?

When you mistakenly think you're trapped under a dairy cow, yes.










(I denounce myself.)
Thriller
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SIAP, but CNN is reporting a Thursday date for the hearing.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Burdizzo said:

WTF is up with Fox News? They have a poll on their front page claiming more Americans believe her than believe him.
Fox is just slightly less unhinged on this than the rest.

Notice Hannity, Tucker, and Laura cannot really say much against her. They can say things like "presumption of innocence" and these claimed witnesses have said it didn't happen, but that's it. Fox management will not let anyone be seen as "attacking a 'rape victim'".

Hell, last night on of their legal talking heads was pushing for Ford to file charges in Maryland.

Unless you put out some effort, you will not hear any of the important details. You will only hear what the media tells you, and that if you don't believe a "rape victim" no matter what, you're a rape enabler or worse.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

Burdizzo said:

WTF is up with Fox News? They have a poll on their front page claiming more Americans believe her than believe him.
Fox is just slightly less unhinged on this than the rest.

Notice Hannity, Tucker, and Laura cannot really say much against her. They can say things like "presumption of innocence" and these claimed witnesses have said it didn't happen, but that's it. Fox management will not let anyone be seen as "attacking a 'rape victim'".

Hell, last night on of their legal talking heads was pushing for Ford to file charges in Maryland.

Unless you put out some effort, you will not hear any of the important details. You will only hear what the media tells you, and that if you don't believe a "rape victim" no matter what, you're a rape enabler or worse.
Her attempt to file charges would make news as the Maryland AG would be forced to go on record that there isn't enough credible evidence to proceed with an investigation.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Rapier108 said:

Burdizzo said:

WTF is up with Fox News? They have a poll on their front page claiming more Americans believe her than believe him.
Fox is just slightly less unhinged on this than the rest.

Notice Hannity, Tucker, and Laura cannot really say much against her. They can say things like "presumption of innocence" and these claimed witnesses have said it didn't happen, but that's it. Fox management will not let anyone be seen as "attacking a 'rape victim'".

Hell, last night on of their legal talking heads was pushing for Ford to file charges in Maryland.

Unless you put out some effort, you will not hear any of the important details. You will only hear what the media tells you, and that if you don't believe a "rape victim" no matter what, you're a rape enabler or worse.
Her attempt to file charges would make news as the Maryland AG would be forced to go on record that there isn't enough credible evidence to proceed with an investigation.
One would think so, but Maryland is just slightly less liberal than California, so the AG would likely drag it out for months or longer, just to cause trouble. And just like old Ronnie Earl used to do in Travis County, he could have Kavanaugh indicted, even though he would know it would never go to trial.
cr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Rapier108 said:

Burdizzo said:

WTF is up with Fox News? They have a poll on their front page claiming more Americans believe her than believe him.
Fox is just slightly less unhinged on this than the rest.

Notice Hannity, Tucker, and Laura cannot really say much against her. They can say things like "presumption of innocence" and these claimed witnesses have said it didn't happen, but that's it. Fox management will not let anyone be seen as "attacking a 'rape victim'".

Hell, last night on of their legal talking heads was pushing for Ford to file charges in Maryland.

Unless you put out some effort, you will not hear any of the important details. You will only hear what the media tells you, and that if you don't believe a "rape victim" no matter what, you're a rape enabler or worse.
Her attempt to file charges would make news as the Maryland AG would be forced to go on record that there isn't enough credible evidence to proceed with an investigation.


Hawg, Cmon. You still believe that libs follow the law and wouldn't craft some way to investigate and prosecute?
biobioprof
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thriller said:

SIAP, but CNN is reporting a Thursday date for the hearing.
a few more details here
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

aggiehawg said:

Rapier108 said:

Burdizzo said:

WTF is up with Fox News? They have a poll on their front page claiming more Americans believe her than believe him.
Fox is just slightly less unhinged on this than the rest.

Notice Hannity, Tucker, and Laura cannot really say much against her. They can say things like "presumption of innocence" and these claimed witnesses have said it didn't happen, but that's it. Fox management will not let anyone be seen as "attacking a 'rape victim'".

Hell, last night on of their legal talking heads was pushing for Ford to file charges in Maryland.

Unless you put out some effort, you will not hear any of the important details. You will only hear what the media tells you, and that if you don't believe a "rape victim" no matter what, you're a rape enabler or worse.
Her attempt to file charges would make news as the Maryland AG would be forced to go on record that there isn't enough credible evidence to proceed with an investigation.
One would think so, but Maryland is just slightly less liberal than California, so the AG would likely drag it out for months or longer, just to cause trouble. And just like old Ronnie Earl used to do in Travis County, he could have Kavanaugh indicted, even though he would know it would never go to trial.
So that raises the question, why hasn't she done that yet? Surely her lawyers have talked to Maryland authorities just to check it out if there was such a possibility.
First Page Last Page
Page 58 of 152
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.