Brett Kavanaugh rape allegations

501,126 Views | 5316 Replies | Last: 3 yr ago by 93MarineHorn
ccaggie05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

Rockdoc said:

Ok. I'll tell you that old dude has won my respect.
Bad idea because he just caved.



I'm at the point now where I think they should just push him through and confirm him. What happens at the hearings won't change how Kavanaugh is treated by the media and the Democrats. He will forever be labeled an attempted rapist (or an outright rapist as I've seen on some sites) or sex offender. The hearing will change nothing. Push him through and get it done.
Bockaneer
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Are we sure that's really his Twitter?
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
mathguy86 said:

I find it hard to believe Grassley would write that and release a decision like that in broken twitter English.
Could be an aid doing it, but he also tweeted this.



Sounds to me like Flake is still causing trouble.
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I guess he's just playing a game with the libs. I hope it's just the 24 hours. I think he knows she's gonna cave.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Bockaneer said:

Are we sure that's really his Twitter?
It's a verified account.
johnnyblaze36
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Has to be hacked though.
Old Tom Morris
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Seems like shorthand to make the character count work.
GarryowenAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who's to say they even have the votes to push him through?
Emotional Support Cobra
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds like the first one meant to be a text.
PanzerAggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
If that's real...they don't have the votes.
Tater Salad
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have to believe that Grassley has some reason to be allowing this to drag on and on like this, but I'll be darned if I can decipher what it is. Is Flake or Collins telling him they will defect unless he backs down on every deadline when she demands, or is something else going on here? This has long past getting rediculous. It's beginning to seem like Ford and her attorneys are running the Senate Judiciary Committee, not Grassley.
light_bulb
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Pennsylvania_Ag said:

Why am I beginning to actually believe Republicans are going to trip over their own dicks and screw this up beyond repair?
Because that is what the Stupid Party does best.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

Rockdoc said:

Ok. I'll tell you that old dude has won my respect.
Bad idea because he just caved.



Terrible grammar twitter. Weird.
RAB91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Do we know the length of the extension she was given? (no pun intended)
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RAB91 said:

Do we know the length of the extension she was given? (no pun intended)
Nope, but they pulled the scheduled vote from the committee calendar.
ktownag08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think it's Grassley controlling the narrative the best way possible over the weekend. If he says right now, "the vote is on Monday since the deadline came and went", media and Dems have a field day all weekend. She could pop up on a news show before the vote or she could send a message tomorrow saying she's ready to testify Thursday but it's past the deadline so now those mean old men won't let me.

Giving her 24 more hours limits the media circus while coming across as cooperative and being somewhat compassionate to her " victim" status.

In short, nothing has changed. She accepts in her self defined period of 24 more hours or vote happens Monday.

Don't see a problem here.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tater Salad said:

Flake or Collins
Has to be Flake. Collins is one of (if not the) first person the Trump administration called when Kennedy retired for very obvious reasons. But it may be neither.

The last handful of Grassley tweets have some of the shorthand that he uses on twitter, but seem more drunk/incoherent.

Weird release for late on a Friday night.
Burt Macklin, FBI
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nvm
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The only victim here are facts. We have none from Blowsey.
PanzerAggie06
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This seem reasonable. I must admit that when I initially read he had given another extension I had a slight PTSD moment. If this is an attempt to control the narrative over the weekend then the extension isn't a big deal.
William K. Klingaman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
She's not being bullied. She allowed a story to sit even after a couple of months where she took it to a Democrat politician on the Senate Judiciary Committee and they all waited until the week before this vote, going to the media instead of the authorities.

She's made an accusation against a presumed innocent man, and now doesn't have the authority to dictate how and when they will address this accusation. If she's not ready to testify, either she doesn't have her story straight or is having second thoughts knowing she made up a lie and is being used by the left to destroy a good man's name, life and career.

If he tried to grab her boob outside of a shirt as teenagers and she's still so scarred she can barely function (other than being able to move forward and get her PhD), then she needs psychiatric treatment and needs to get her life together and stop holding this natuon back.
johnnyblaze36
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blindey said:

Rapier108 said:

Rockdoc said:

Ok. I'll tell you that old dude has won my respect.
Bad idea because he just caved.



Terrible grammar twitter. Weird.
At least he could have the decency to @ him. What a **** show.
Goose83
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Jesus Tapdancing Christ.




tsuag10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ktownag08 said:

I think it's Grassley controlling the narrative the best way possible over the weekend. If he says right now, "the vote is on Monday since the deadline came and went", media and Dems have a field day all weekend. She could pop up on a news show before the vote or she could send a message tomorrow saying she's ready to testify Thursday but it's past the deadline so now those mean old men won't let me.

Giving her 24 more hours limits the media circus while coming across as cooperative and being somewhat compassionate to her " victim" status.

In short, nothing has changed. She accepts in her self defined period of 24 more hours or vote happens Monday.

Don't see a problem here.
Nailed it.

The Dems are frothing at the mouth, waiting for one the "old white men" to step out of line. Everyone needs to STFU for the weekend and come ready to take care of business Monday morning.

They will makes themselves look foolish all weekend with their faux outrage theatrics. Let them show people who they are.
techno-ag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ccaggie05 said:

Rapier108 said:

Rockdoc said:

Ok. I'll tell you that old dude has won my respect.
Bad idea because he just caved.



I'm at the point now where I think they should just push him through and confirm him. What happens at the hearings won't change how Kavanaugh is treated by the media and the Democrats. He will forever be labeled an attempted rapist (or an outright rapist as I've seen on some sites) or sex offender. The hearing will change nothing. Push him through and get it done.
Oh I don't know. Everybody knew Anita Hill was lying, and nobody labels Clarence Thomas that way.
Trump will fix it.
Big Al 1992
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I was pissed when first seeing Grassly cave but the way he tells Kavanaugh he wants to hear her makes me hope - they have something on her that they want to confront with her in public so that it makes her and the left look like fools and removes the smear Kavanaugh will no doubt have to deal with his entire time in SC. That would be beautiful.
Touchscreen
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Looks like the Repubs continue to slip into the Dem's trap. Each passing day that this circus is allowed to continue equates to less and less support for Kavanaugh. Squishy RINOs are going to see that the safest and easiest route will be to abandon Kavanaugh. The Senate Democrats on the bubble who might have voted for Kavanaugh out of necessity are being provided enough of a smoke screen to reconsider the necessity of that.

All that anyone needs to remember about this is that the Dems have been sitting on this since July, if not before. Not enough time my a_ _.

Edit: I hope that Big Al above me is correct and the delay is all part of a calculated strategy, but given past Repub performance I doubt it.
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is bull*****..
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You know...the only news stories out there say Grassley tweeted this and no one on either side is confirming...

That grammar is SO BAD that I am honestly wondering if it is real...
FireAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Seriously...why would a Senator tweet a half assed apology to the judge? Grassley has been handling his **** with formal letters...then summarizing on Twitter...usually posting the letter...

I'm struggling to get this to pass the smell test...

Again, Ford's side isn't confirming any such extension...and Grassley has always mentioned a new deadline time...but now he doesn't?
wbt5845
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm guessing he has a staffer tweet for him and apparently that staffer is a 15 year old girl.
OleArmyBQ68
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Dems are delaying as long as they can in hopes to find and promote another BSC woman will come out of the shadows to tell a whopper about BK.
Ewok It Out08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't use twitter but how easy is it to confuse a direct message and posting a tweet? The format and informal nature of the message makes me think
He was attempting to communicate directly to the judge.
BoerneGator
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
UncleNateFitch said:

Michael Barnhart said:

aTm2004 said:

Michael Barnhart said:

aTm2004 said:

etcetera said:

It is amazing that there are people defending this tweet by Trump.



It's amazing people believe this isn't a political hit job.


It's very possible to both attack that tweet and to believe Ford is being used for a political hit job.

You don't know that poster.


I've been getting treated like that poster.
If nobody else will say it, I will. It's keithdb.
If you're talking about the "ID" of the poster etcetera, it's StephenvilleAg77, aka SA77.
First Page Last Page
Page 48 of 152
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.