Michael Barnhart said:

---

WelchAg said:

---

amercer said:

---

Tom Hagen said:

---

Trump breaks his silence.

---

He was so close to not ****ing this up.

---

Nothing he said was out of line. People are afraid to state the obvious. Nothing happened (even if it was actually tried). It was not bad enough that she reported it to authorities. Kavanaugh has made his way up the ranks as a circuit court judge, yet it wasn't bad enough for her to bring it up then...only now that he is a SCOTUS candidate.

People are too afraid to call out the obvious BS in this whole story.

---

Well, that's enough. Time to figure out who I will support in 2020. I know there are plenty of men are thinking the same thing, but there was no need to vilify Ford here. I believe something substantial and traumatic happened to her around the stated time frame (whether the reported event or something else) and it's tyrannical to use the bully pulpit in an attack like Trump's.

---

Are you kidding me? This woman is holding the Supreme Court hostage over an alleged boob grabbing incident that is 36 years old, and you're mad that the guy who nominated the person who's being smeared in the public square told her to fess up?

aggiehawg said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

FireAg said:

---

hawg-

In the spirit of the President's tweets, didn't he just dare Ford and her attorneys to contact the appropriate police department and DA's office in the county in Maryland where the alleged incident occurred and file a formal, criminal complaint?

To me, that seems like the logical next step for them...

---

They likely already did that.

The liberal twitter army was calling for the Maryland AG to file charges or at least investigate Kavanaugh.

---

No. Neither she, nor her lawyers have requested a state investigation. They are all in on the FBI doing it.

Except that she's in hiding and avoiding talking to the FBI even if they had jurisdiction. Why they think an on record interview with the FBI would not be stressful to her, I don't know. She's still in legal jeopardy.

Nothing she and her lawyers have done to this point make much logical sense, particularly from a legal standpoint.

---

Which is further evidence that neither her attorneys or the dems care at all about "truth" and instead are all in to delay this vote until after the mid-terms.

Michael Barnhart said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Michael Barnhart said:

---

WelchAg said:

---

amercer said:

---

Tom Hagen said:

---

Trump breaks his silence.

---

He was so close to not ****ing this up.

---

Nothing he said was out of line. People are afraid to state the obvious. Nothing happened (even if it was actually tried). It was not bad enough that she reported it to authorities. Kavanaugh has made his way up the ranks as a circuit court judge, yet it wasn't bad enough for her to bring it up then...only now that he is a SCOTUS candidate.

People are too afraid to call out the obvious BS in this whole story.

---

Well, that's enough. Time to figure out who I will support in 2020. I know there are plenty of men are thinking the same thing, but there was no need to vilify Ford here. I believe something substantial and traumatic happened to her around the stated time frame (whether the reported event or something else) and it's tyrannical to use the bully pulpit in an attack like Trump's.

---

So BEFORE this all started with Kavanaugh/Ford, you will supporting Trump? Correct?

---

Before Trump's unnecessary bullying tweet, I was planning to vote for him in 2020.

---

So, that's a no. You're going to let him calling for facts to be presented be the reason not to vote for him and ignore the thriving economy and low unemployment? #itsallaboutmyfeelz

Rapier108 said:

---

fatherof4 said:

---

With all do respect, why would anyone believe that something happened to Dr Ford?

---

For most, they "believe it" because they want to stop Trump and Kavanaugh, nothing more. If they were actually honest, most would call it BS.

Then there are those who believe "a woman never lies about rape" which of course everyone knows is complete BS as well.

---

Especially when copping a feel ISN'T RAPE!

Prognightmare said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

fatherof4 said:

---

With all do respect, why would anyone believe that something happened to Dr Ford?

---

For most, they "believe it" because they want to stop Trump and Kavanaugh, nothing more. If they were actually honest, most would call it BS.

Then there are those who believe "a woman never lies about rape" which of course everyone knows is complete BS as well.

---

Especially when copping a feel ISN'T RAPE!

---

Using "do respect" instead of "due respect" rapes my ears, however.

blindey said:

---

aTm2004 said:

---

yell through their vaginas.

---

There was a time when this was called a queef.

---

There is even a time when it was called a vagina.

Now it is "front hole".

Enjoy your ban for saying the forbidden phrase.

pagerman @ work said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

FireAg said:

---

hawg-

In the spirit of the President's tweets, didn't he just dare Ford and her attorneys to contact the appropriate police department and DA's office in the county in Maryland where the alleged incident occurred and file a formal, criminal complaint?

To me, that seems like the logical next step for them...

---

They likely already did that.

The liberal twitter army was calling for the Maryland AG to file charges or at least investigate Kavanaugh.

---

No. Neither she, nor her lawyers have requested a state investigation. They are all in on the FBI doing it.

Except that she's in hiding and avoiding talking to the FBI even if they had jurisdiction. Why they think an on record interview with the FBI would not be stressful to her, I don't know. She's still in legal jeopardy.

Nothing she and her lawyers have done to this point make much logical sense, particularly from a legal standpoint.

---

Which is further evidence that neither her attorneys or the dems care at all about "truth" and instead are all in to delay this vote until after the mid-terms.

---

Which is idiotic in and of itself. The Anita Hill FBI investigation took three days, not weeks, not months, three days. And she was making multiple accusations of events occurring over a matter of years, not one single event.

BTW, there is an FBI office in Palo Alto where she lives. She could have called them at any time since Kavanaugh was first nominated on July 9th. They could have then had their counterparts in Maryland try to track down classmates and contemporaries of hers to get witness statements. (As was done with Anita Hill.) Then those would have been added to the highly confidential background file provided to the White House and the Senate Judiciary Committee.

That's the procedure. But that would have entailed giving Kavanaugh a head's up instead of a last second ambush.

I wonder how many millions of people, now that this is gaining wall-to-wall attention in the media, are like "well, I've heard a little about this accusation but now that the media is running with it non-stop I suppose I should look into it a bit more."

Does a few minutes of research...

Wait, what...this was a boob grab from 36 years ago between two high school teenagers and she can't remember where or when it exactly happened. Oh FFS - commence atomic eye roll.

Yup, Democrats, this what the bulk of the country is doing right now. I'm sure you're ecstatic with all the fringe left virtue signalling and faux outrage but believe me, the majority of the country are collectively eye rolling this absolute nothing burger with a side of crazy fries.

4stringAg said:

---

For every person believing her because "she wouldn't lie about something like this and expose herself to the backlash", there are a bunch more looking at her actions that scream that she is trying desperately to get away from this story. If she had real factual proof or was genuine in ensuring Kavanaugh didn't ascend to the SCOTUS, she'd be out there singing like a canary, taking Congress up on their offer to testify, etc.

This has all the earmarks of a woman making up a story, her being manipulated by political operators to use it to obfuscate a nomination, and then having the "oh ****, I can't believe where this has gone" moment wishing like hell she'd never done it.

---

Yep. When this first came out, I thought it was a sham, but they were saying she was willing to testify. Because of that, I thought that there may be something there...still thinking it was a sham but willing to give her the benefit of the doubt. When the republicans gave her time to testify and offered for it to be private and the dems began crawfishing, I knew it was nothing more than a political move that blew up in their faces like a goodbye hug from Stormy Daniels.

BenFiasco14 said:

---

Enjoy your ban for saying the forbidden phrase.

---

I hope you are kidding.

aTm2004 said:

---

Michael Barnhart said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Michael Barnhart said:

---

WelchAg said:

---

amercer said:

---

Tom Hagen said:

---

Trump breaks his silence.

---

He was so close to not ****ing this up.

---

Nothing he said was out of line. People are afraid to state the obvious. Nothing happened (even if it was actually tried). It was not bad enough that she reported it to authorities. Kavanaugh has made his way up the ranks as a circuit court judge, yet it wasn't bad enough for her to bring it up then...only now that he is a SCOTUS candidate.

People are too afraid to call out the obvious BS in this whole story.

---

Well, that's enough. Time to figure out who I will support in 2020. I know there are plenty of men are thinking the same thing, but there was no need to vilify Ford here. I believe something substantial and traumatic happened to her around the stated time frame (whether the reported event or something else) and it's tyrannical to use the bully pulpit in an attack like Trump's.

---

So BEFORE this all started with Kavanaugh/Ford, you will supporting Trump? Correct?

---

Before Trump's unnecessary bullying tweet, I was planning to vote for him in 2020.

---

So, that's a no. You're going to let him calling for facts to be presented be the reason not to vote for him and ignore the thriving economy and low unemployment? #itsallaboutmyfeelz

---

No, I'm going to let the fact that he's using the failure to file a police report as conslusive evidence no assault or abuse occurred affect my decision.

If you actually care, look at my posts on Title IX investigations. Due process and fairness are important, but Trump's tweet this morning struck me as unnecessarily mean spirited. Add that to his apparent mysoginy and I'm not sure he's trustworthy in a second term where even public opinion (the vote) becomes irrelevant to him.

Quote:

---

Don't need English lessons thank you, I am quite nimble with the use of words and actually gifted in recognizing meaning in other people's writings.

---

r/iamverysmart/

Duly noted. My apologies to CanyonAg.

fatherof4 said:

---

Duly noted. My apologies to CanyonAg.

---

No apology needed. I'm a natural born smartass, no need to apologize when I act like one.

Squadron7 said:

---

BenFiasco14 said:

---

Enjoy your ban for saying the forbidden phrase.

---

I hope you are kidding.

---

Nope, staff specifically banned that term

Michael Barnhart said:

---

aTm2004 said:

---

Michael Barnhart said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Michael Barnhart said:

---

WelchAg said:

---

amercer said:

---

Tom Hagen said:

---

Trump breaks his silence.

---

He was so close to not ****ing this up.

---

Nothing he said was out of line. People are afraid to state the obvious. Nothing happened (even if it was actually tried). It was not bad enough that she reported it to authorities. Kavanaugh has made his way up the ranks as a circuit court judge, yet it wasn't bad enough for her to bring it up then...only now that he is a SCOTUS candidate.

People are too afraid to call out the obvious BS in this whole story.

---

Well, that's enough. Time to figure out who I will support in 2020. I know there are plenty of men are thinking the same thing, but there was no need to vilify Ford here. I believe something substantial and traumatic happened to her around the stated time frame (whether the reported event or something else) and it's tyrannical to use the bully pulpit in an attack like Trump's.

---

So BEFORE this all started with Kavanaugh/Ford, you will supporting Trump? Correct?

---

Before Trump's unnecessary bullying tweet, I was planning to vote for him in 2020.

---

So, that's a no. You're going to let him calling for facts to be presented be the reason not to vote for him and ignore the thriving economy and low unemployment? #itsallaboutmyfeelz

---

No, I'm going to let the fact that he's using the failure to file a police report as conslusive evidence no assault or abuse occurred affect my decision.

If you actually care, look at my posts on Title IX investigations. Due process and fairness are important, but Trump's tweet this morning struck me as unnecessarily mean spirited. Add that to his apparent mysoginy and I'm not sure he's trustworthy in a second term where even public opinion (the vote) becomes irrelevant to him.

---

Ah, nice slip up there - just dribbled out a little of the MSM /DNC talking points. Cover blown. Oops.

Anyone got an answer for this?

Nope, staff said on another thread the the use of the "FH" or "BH" will get you a ban. HTH

BenFiasco14 said:

---

Ah, nice slip up there - just dribbled out a little of the MSM /DNC talking points. Cover blown. Oops.

---

Quote:

---

No, I'm going to let the fact that he's using the failure to file a police report as conslusive evidence no assault or abuse occurred affect my decision.

---

Because all of the other pages and pages of information she has provided are crystal clear and highly detailed.

BenFiasco14 said:

---

Michael Barnhart said:

---

aTm2004 said:

---

Michael Barnhart said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Michael Barnhart said:

---

WelchAg said:

---

amercer said:

---

Tom Hagen said:

---

Trump breaks his silence.

---

He was so close to not ****ing this up.

---

Nothing he said was out of line. People are afraid to state the obvious. Nothing happened (even if it was actually tried). It was not bad enough that she reported it to authorities. Kavanaugh has made his way up the ranks as a circuit court judge, yet it wasn't bad enough for her to bring it up then...only now that he is a SCOTUS candidate.

People are too afraid to call out the obvious BS in this whole story.

---

Well, that's enough. Time to figure out who I will support in 2020. I know there are plenty of men are thinking the same thing, but there was no need to vilify Ford here. I believe something substantial and traumatic happened to her around the stated time frame (whether the reported event or something else) and it's tyrannical to use the bully pulpit in an attack like Trump's.

---

So BEFORE this all started with Kavanaugh/Ford, you will supporting Trump? Correct?

---

Before Trump's unnecessary bullying tweet, I was planning to vote for him in 2020.

---

So, that's a no. You're going to let him calling for facts to be presented be the reason not to vote for him and ignore the thriving economy and low unemployment? #itsallaboutmyfeelz

---

No, I'm going to let the fact that he's using the failure to file a police report as conslusive evidence no assault or abuse occurred affect my decision.

If you actually care, look at my posts on Title IX investigations. Due process and fairness are important, but Trump's tweet this morning struck me as unnecessarily mean spirited. Add that to his apparent mysoginy and I'm not sure he's trustworthy in a second term where even public opinion (the vote) becomes irrelevant to him.

---

Ah, nice slip up there - just dribbled out a little of the MSM /DNC talking points. Cover blown. Oops.

---

Nah, he was totally pro-Trump before this tweet. For reals! Pinky promise!

biobioprof said:

---

Anyone got an answer for this?

---

Interesting point. He did mention the female friend's house being so many miles away (don't remember the #). I don't have an answer, but I'm so turned around on this deal at this juncture that I can't keep up.

Prognightmare said:

---

Nope, staff said on another thread the the use of the "FH" or "BH" will get you a ban. HTH

---

That came from an actual news article about actual activists. We can use every age old euphemism for vagina there is but using the term from the activist group draws a ban?

Michael Barnhart said:

---

aTm2004 said:

---

Michael Barnhart said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Michael Barnhart said:

---

WelchAg said:

---

amercer said:

---

Tom Hagen said:

---

Trump breaks his silence.

---

He was so close to not ****ing this up.

---

Nothing he said was out of line. People are afraid to state the obvious. Nothing happened (even if it was actually tried). It was not bad enough that she reported it to authorities. Kavanaugh has made his way up the ranks as a circuit court judge, yet it wasn't bad enough for her to bring it up then...only now that he is a SCOTUS candidate.

People are too afraid to call out the obvious BS in this whole story.

---

Well, that's enough. Time to figure out who I will support in 2020. I know there are plenty of men are thinking the same thing, but there was no need to vilify Ford here. I believe something substantial and traumatic happened to her around the stated time frame (whether the reported event or something else) and it's tyrannical to use the bully pulpit in an attack like Trump's.

---

So BEFORE this all started with Kavanaugh/Ford, you will supporting Trump? Correct?

---

Before Trump's unnecessary bullying tweet, I was planning to vote for him in 2020.

---

So, that's a no. You're going to let him calling for facts to be presented be the reason not to vote for him and ignore the thriving economy and low unemployment? #itsallaboutmyfeelz

---

No, I'm going to let the fact that he's using the failure to file a police report as conslusive evidence no assault or abuse occurred affect my decision.

If you actually care, look at my posts on Title IX investigations. Due process and fairness are important, but Trump's tweet this morning struck me as unnecessarily mean spirited. Add that to his apparent mysoginy and I'm not sure he's trustworthy in a second term where even public opinion (the vote) becomes irrelevant to him.

---

He's asking for the facts to be presented, which is something her and her attorney seem to be not wanting to do. Why do you think that is? Why do you think they've made a list of absurd demands for her to testify? We're going on almost a week of this and we know as much now as we did when it started...it happened a long time ago and she's fuzzy on the details. Do you know who you should really feel bad for? Real victims of sexual abuse. This is an obvious political witch hunt and it does nothing to help those who have been abused. But the libs have a history of this type of crap...just google the Columbia mattress girl, the Amherst case, etc. Use sexual assault/rape to ruin lives when they don't get their way.

His apparent mysoginy? You were OK with it enough before this tweet to think about voting for him, but this is the line in the sand to you? Give me a break. Trump has a ton of faults, but the one thing that we can all agree upon is that he believes in equal opportunity when making remarks about somebody. He doesn't care if they're liberal or conservative, male or female, white or black or Asian or whatever. He says what people are afraid of saying and it's a breath of fresh air for the American people who see what's acceptable get smaller and smaller everyday.

CanyonAg77 said:

---

Prognightmare said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

fatherof4 said:

---

With all do respect, why would anyone believe that something happened to Dr Ford?

---

For most, they "believe it" because they want to stop Trump and Kavanaugh, nothing more. If they were actually honest, most would call it BS.

Then there are those who believe "a woman never lies about rape" which of course everyone knows is complete BS as well.

---

Especially when copping a feel ISN'T RAPE!

---

Using "do respect" instead of "due respect" rapes my ears, however.

---

and using ears for the written word rapes my eyes

BenFiasco14 said:

---

Squadron7 said:

---

BenFiasco14 said:

---

Enjoy your ban for saying the forbidden phrase.

---

I hope you are kidding.

---

Nope, staff specifically banned that term

---

What about hoo-hoo?

JAS61 said:

---

BenFiasco14 said:

---

Squadron7 said:

---

BenFiasco14 said:

---

Enjoy your ban for saying the forbidden phrase.

---

I hope you are kidding.

---

Nope, staff specifically banned that term

---

What about hoo-hoo?

---

I caught a ban for using another euphemism for the lady parts on the actual FH thread. Act accordingly.

biobioprof said:

---

Anyone got an answer for this?

---

Logic would lead you to believe Whelan received information from someone that Dr. Ford mentioned was at the party.

JAS61 said:

---

BenFiasco14 said:

---

Squadron7 said:

---

BenFiasco14 said:

---

Enjoy your ban for saying the forbidden phrase.

---

I hope you are kidding.

---

Nope, staff specifically banned that term

---

What about hoo-hoo?

---

I'm a big fan of coot, myself. Wife doesn't like it, so...

biobioprof said:

---

Anyone got an answer for this?

---

There supposedly had been rumors floating around DC since July about this. DiFi has shown the unredacted letter to staff and a few other Dem Senators and their staffs. He might have gotten the name from one of them.

My best guess.