Prognightmare said:

---

Good Grief

ETA: someone in the back says, "Does anyone want vegan"?

---

Why are they all at least 60 lbs overweight?

Pinche Abogado said:

---

Unwanted touching...
https://instagr.am/p/Bn7SaEjhiyx

---

What a creep. Call the FBI!!!!!!

captkirk said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

That is a great letter

---

The Senatorial version of a dick slap.

---

Nice to see some GOP backbone for a change

---

Grassley has actually replaced Cruz as my favorite Senator. Maybe he has a great staff who write these things for him but irrespective that is one helluva of a beat down by Senate collegial standards.

Sometimes I wish we had the free flowing repartee of the British Parliament where one calls someone a "dick head" and a "liar."

aTm2004 said:

---

pagerman @ work said:

---

Prognightmare said:

---

Libs are BSC! They don't realize that **** like this energizes Republicans to turn out the vote.

---

This is also red meat for their base.

They already believe "war on women" and that republicans are misogynistic, sexist, "barefoot and pregnant in the kitchen making me a sandwich" scumbags, and this will be used to perpetuate that myth.

Don't think this hasn't been vetted.

---

Yes, their base. The moderates in the middle are the ones that are getting pushed out or are voting for the R. These loons are killing their own party because of this. It's glorious.

---

#WalkAway

I'd say "sweetie, be here Monday at 10am" and if she is there fine, if not move on. She is already a waste of time.

RAB91 said:

---

FriscoKid said:

---

Looks like she's thinking about testifying now. It's their only hope of delaying the vote. Grasley shot down their FBI plan earlier. Will be interesting to see ihey require in to be under oath.

---

But not on Monday....

Quote:

---

An email her lawyers sent to the Senate Judiciary Committee said Ford "would be prepared to testify next week" if the senators offer her "terms that are fair and which ensure her safety."

---

At this point, tell her to eff off (but politely).

---

I thought shutting down the government is bad.

Not denying that scenario, but this also seems insanely irresponsible to essentially say, "It wasn't Kavanaugh, and 'the dragging of the names of others in the public eye' is shameful, but you know what? It was probably this other guy, CHRIS GARRETT," thereby potentially getting Garret mixed up in this whole thing none of us really know anything about. Don't get me wrong, I think this entire ordeal has been handled horribly, but now pointing a finger at someone else only adds to that and seems incredibly reckless as well.

If Kavanaugh withdraws then Trump should just nominate this Ed Wheelan guy. He sounds brilliant.

low talker said:

---

---

If that Garret dude comes forward and says "Yeah, it was a party at my house and I grabbed her bewbs. It was me. She had blown me and the whole football team before, so I was just doing what I had done before. I'm sorry if it was misconstrued." - its over in my opinion

Especially if Judge (the witness she named) confirms

TCTTS said:

---

Not denying that scenario, but this also seems insanely irresponsible to essentially say, "It wasn't Kavanaugh, and 'the dragging of the names of others in the public eye' is shameful, but you know what? It was probably this other guy, CHRIS GARRETT," thereby potentially getting Garret mixed up in this whole thing none of us really know anything about. Don't get me wrong, I think this entire ordeal has been handled horribly, but now pointing a finger at someone else only adds to that and seems incredibly reckless as well.

---

Trust me. Garret admitted to doing it before this was rolled out. The GOP doesn't just make stuff up like the dems do

captkirk said:

---

TCTTS said:

---

Not denying that scenario, but this also seems insanely irresponsible to essentially say, "It wasn't Kavanaugh, and 'the dragging of the names of others in the public eye' is shameful, but you know what? It was probably this other guy, CHRIS GARRETT," thereby potentially getting Garret mixed up in this whole thing none of us really know anything about. Don't get me wrong, I think this entire ordeal has been handled horribly, but now pointing a finger at someone else only adds to that and seems incredibly reckless as well.

---

Trust me. Garret admitted to doing it before this was rolled out. The GOP doesn't just make stuff up like the dems do

---

Otherwise Garrett has a slander suit to file.

captkirk said:

---

Prognightmare said:

---

Good Grief

ETA: someone in the back says, "Does anyone want vegan"?

---

Why are they all at least 60 lbs overweight?

---

Because they're lib protestors

Quote:

---

low talker said:

---

---

---

Shocked I tellsya...

Her thought process was probably:
"I hate Brett Kavanaugh. You know I was once quasi-sexually indecent with a guy in HS who looked like him. I bet I could claim it was Kavanaugh and get away with it..."

Looks like the GOP is going to fold and let Ford decide when she wants to testify.

Rapier108 said:

---

Looks like the GOP is going to fold and let Ford decide when she wants to testify.

---

Oh... this is my shocked face. Useless urchins.

captkirk said:

---

TCTTS said:

---

Not denying that scenario, but this also seems insanely irresponsible to essentially say, "It wasn't Kavanaugh, and 'the dragging of the names of others in the public eye' is shameful, but you know what? It was probably this other guy, CHRIS GARRETT," thereby potentially getting Garret mixed up in this whole thing none of us really know anything about. Don't get me wrong, I think this entire ordeal has been handled horribly, but now pointing a finger at someone else only adds to that and seems incredibly reckless as well.

---

Trust me. Garret admitted to doing it before this was rolled out. The GOP doesn't just make stuff up like the dems do

---

I"ll believe that when I see it. Until then, this is literally the "evil twin" defense, and feels like grasping at straws.

Rapier108 said:

---

Looks like the GOP is going to fold and let Ford decide when she wants to testify.

---

Spineless POSs. Stop letting their little delay tectics dictate things. You're allowing it to continue.

Rapier108 said:

---

Looks like the GOP is going to fold and let Ford decide when she wants to testify.

---

Supposedly Thursday.

low talker said:

---

---

wow!

If correct, this would account for both of their stories. But an investigation can't turn anything up, right?

aginlakeway said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Looks like the GOP is going to fold and let Ford decide when she wants to testify.

---

Supposedly Thursday.

---

They're so terrified of a bunch of shrieking harpies (aka the metoo idiots) that they'll do anything to avoid being accused of supporting rape.

Now CNN is reporting that Ford wants no time limits on her opening statements.

RAB91 said:

---

Now CNN is reporting that Ford wants no time limits on her opening statements.

---

They'll give her anything and everything she demands.

bigcat22 said:

---

---

Zillow and Google Maps are more than the Dems have here.

The only difference is that Judge Kavanaugh isn't a private figure.

bigcat22 said:

---

---

This, of course, is true independent of whether ot not he actually figured out the truth.

bigcat22 said:

---

---

Does Shapiro think Whelen is speculating online? Good lord, what an idiot.

aginlakeway said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Looks like the GOP is going to fold and let Ford decide when she wants to testify.

---

Supposedly Thursday.

---

Can't be any sooner than Thursday. Grassley has to give a week's notice for any hearing.

That is if it gets delayed from Monday.

TCTTS said:

---

captkirk said:

---

TCTTS said:

---

Not denying that scenario, but this also seems insanely irresponsible to essentially say, "It wasn't Kavanaugh, and 'the dragging of the names of others in the public eye' is shameful, but you know what? It was probably this other guy, CHRIS GARRETT," thereby potentially getting Garret mixed up in this whole thing none of us really know anything about. Don't get me wrong, I think this entire ordeal has been handled horribly, but now pointing a finger at someone else only adds to that and seems incredibly reckless as well.

---

Trust me. Garret admitted to doing it before this was rolled out. The GOP doesn't just make stuff up like the dems do

---

I"ll believe that when I see it. Until then, this is literally the "evil twin" defense, and feels like grasping at straws.

---

So if there are corroborating witnesses, its just an evil twin defense? Guess you place no credibility on witness testimony unless it helps your side, then its sacrosanct.

Not based on her testimony alone, which was pathetic. This provides more details that could be wrapped up in a couple days. Then move forward with the vote

I don't have a "side" here. I literally just said this whole thing has been handled horribly. I'm simply saying, until Garret himself comes forward and says "It was me," it feels irresponsible to be naming him on Twitter.

FroWins said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Rapier108 said:

---

Looks like the GOP is going to fold and let Ford decide when she wants to testify.

---

Supposedly Thursday.

---

Can't be any sooner than Thursday. Grassley has to give a week's notice for any hearing.

---

She does it on Monday. No more delays.

bigcat22 said:

---

---

LOL. He has more than that, Ben. This is a respected legal dude, not a political provocateur