Frog_ said:

---

That thundering noise you hear is the ground shaking from republicans stampeding to the polls.

---

tsuag10 said:

---

Prognightmare said:

---

This is Burt?

---

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/supreme-court/accuser-s-schoolmate-says-she-recalls-hearing-alleged-kavanaugh-incident-n911111

Quote:

---

WASHINGTON A former schoolmate of Brett Kavanaugh's accuserwrote a Facebook post saying she recalls hearing about the alleged assault involving Kavanaugh, though she says she has no first-hand information to corroborate the accuser's claims.

"Christine Blasey Ford was a year or so behind me," wrote the woman, Cristina Miranda King, who now works as a performing arts curator in Mexico City. "I did not know her personally but I remember her. This incident did happen."


She added, "Many of us heard a buzz about it indirectly with few specific details. However Christine's vivid recollection should be more than enough for us to truly, deeply know that the accusation is true."

---

---

Trillary Clinton said:

---

I'm really disappointed in Kav. Disgusting he would do this.

---

aggiehawg said:

---

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Trillary Clinton said:

---

I'm really disappointed in Kav. Disgusting he would do this.

---

Lol. What did he do?

---

mugwurt said:

---

aginlakeway said:

---

Trillary Clinton said:

---

I'm really disappointed in Kav. Disgusting he would do this.

---

Lol. What did he do?

---

Just flag for trolling

---

Quote:

---

It is fashionable throat-clearing at this point to offer some vertiginous, ostentatiously sympathetic twaddle about how Professor Ford is credible in the sense that she truly believes what she has claimed, yet mistaken about . . . well . . . everything that matters. Sorry, I'm a simple man. What's happening here is pure BS.

---

Prognightmare said:

---

---

Maroon Dawn said:

---

Perfect summation of the liberals

But for the FULL "holy hell they PERFECTLY predicted the liberal response!" Here it is:

---

JAS61 said:

---

Prognightmare said:

---

---

When confronted with the fact that Christine Balsey Ford told no one of the attack until 2012, Cristina Miranda retracted her statement, and shut down her twitter page:

https://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/09/19/nolte-kavanaugh-accusers-classmate-deletes-claim-everyone-knew-alleged-misconduct/

Note that her comment that the deleted tweet with the false claim had "served its purpose."

The end always justifies the means to these people, doesn't it? Time to start suing them into the poorhouse for libel and/or slander.

---

Prognightmare said:

---

This it Burt?

---

Urban Ag said:

---

this has literally devolved in to 35+ years ago high school recollection of a girl this woman didn't know, who admits she heard "buzz" about an incident, with few specific details, and yet it's enough for us to truly, deeply, know the accusation is true.

Astonishing.

---

AlaskanAg99 said:

---

I'm not about to read 28 pages so I don't know if this has been discussed. Maryland doesn't have a statute of limitations on this. So why hasn't Dr Ford pressed charges in Maryland and had a police investigation started?

Or why hasn't a prosecutor approached her to say they need more information to open a case?

I wonder....

---

AlaskanAg99 said:

---

I'm not about to read 28 pages so I don't know if this has been discussed. Maryland doesn't have a statute of limitations on this. So why hasn't Dr Ford pressed charges in Maryland and had a police investigation started?

Or why hasn't a prosecutor approached her to say they need more information to open a case?

I wonder....

---

aginlakeway said:

---

---

aggiehawg said:

---

AlaskanAg99 said:

---

I'm not about to read 28 pages so I don't know if this has been discussed. Maryland doesn't have a statute of limitations on this. So why hasn't Dr Ford pressed charges in Maryland and had a police investigation started?

Or why hasn't a prosecutor approached her to say they need more information to open a case?

I wonder....

---

Why doesn't Maryland have a Statute of Limitations on a misdemeanor? Have a link to prove what you claim?

---

Quote:

---

MD Code, Criminal Law, 3-307
Formerly cited as MD CODE Art. 27, 464B
3-307. Sexual offense in the third degree

Prohibited
(a) A person may not:
(1)(i) engage in sexual contact with another without the consent of the other; and
(ii) 1. employ or display a dangerous weapon, or a physical object that the victim reasonably believes is a dangerous weapon;
2. suffocate, strangle, disfigure, or inflict serious physical injury on the victim or another in the course of committing the crime;
3. threaten, or place the victim in fear, that the victim, or an individual known to the victim, imminently will be subject to death, suffocation, strangulation, disfigurement, serious physical injury, or kidnapping; or
4. commit the crime while aided and abetted by another;
(2) engage in sexual contact with another if the victim is a substantially cognitively impaired individual, a mentally incapacitated individual, or a physically helpless individual, and the person performing the act knows or reasonably should know the victim is a substantially cognitively impaired individual, a mentally incapacitated individual, or a physically helpless individual;
(3) engage in sexual contact with another if the victim is under the age of 14 years, and the person performing the sexual contact is at least 4 years older than the victim;
(4) engage in a sexual act with another if the victim is 14 or 15 years old, and the person performing the sexual act is at least 21 years old; or
(5) engage in vaginal intercourse with another if the victim is 14 or 15 years old, and the person performing the act is at least 21 years old.
Penalty
(b) A person who violates this section is guilty of the felony of sexual offense in the third degree and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 10 years


OR


MD Code, Criminal Law, 3-308
Formerly cited as MD CODE Art. 27, 464C
3-308. Sexual offense in the fourth degree

"Person in a position of authority" defined
(a) In this section, "person in a position of authority":
(1) means a person who:
(i) is at least 21 years old;
(ii) is employed by or under contract with a public or private preschool, elementary school, or secondary school; and
(iii) because of the person's position or occupation, exercises supervision over a minor who attends the school; and
(2) includes a principal, vice principal, teacher, coach, or school counselor at a public or private preschool, elementary school, or secondary school.
Prohibited--In general
(b) A person may not engage in:
(1) sexual contact with another without the consent of the other;
(2) except as provided in 3-307(a)(4) of this subtitle, a sexual act with another if the victim is 14 or 15 years old, and the person performing the sexual act is at least 4 years older than the victim; or
(3) except as provided in 3-307(a)(5) of this subtitle, vaginal intercourse with another if the victim is 14 or 15 years old, and the person performing the act is at least 4 years older than the victim.
Prohibited--Persons in a position of authority
(c)(1) Except as provided in 3-307(a)(4) of this subtitle or subsection (b)(2) of this section, a person in a position of authority may not engage in a sexual act or sexual contact with a minor who, at the time of the sexual act or sexual contact, is a student enrolled at a school where the person in a position of authority is employed.
(2) Except as provided in 3-307(a)(5) of this subtitle or subsection (b)(3) of this section, a person in a position of authority may not engage in vaginal intercourse with a minor who, at the time of the vaginal intercourse, is a student enrolled at a school where the person in a position of authority is employed.
Penalty
(d)(1) Except as provided in paragraph (2) of this subsection, a person who violates this section is guilty of the misdemeanor of sexual offense in the fourth degree and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 1 year or a fine not exceeding $1,000 or both.
(2)(i) On conviction of a violation of this section, a person who has been convicted on a prior occasion not arising from the same incident of a violation of 3-303 through 3-310 of this subtitle, 3-311 or 3-312 of this subtitle as the sections existed before October 1, 2017, 3-315 of this subtitle, or 3-602 of this title is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 3 years or a fine not exceeding $1,000 or both.
(ii) If the State intends to proceed against a person under subparagraph (i) of this paragraph, it shall comply with the procedures set forth in the Maryland Rules for the indictment and trial of a subsequent offender.

---

Quote:

---

2. suffocate, strangle, disfigure, or inflict serious physical injury on the victim or another in the course of committing the crime;
3. threaten, or place the victim in fear, that the victim, or an individual known to the victim, imminently will be subject to death, suffocation, strangulation, disfigurement, serious physical injury, or kidnapping; or
4. commit the crime while aided and abetted by another;
(2) engage in sexual contact with another if the victim is a substantially cognitively impaired individual, a mentally incapacitated individual, or a physically helpless individual, and the person performing the act knows or reasonably should know the victim is a substantially cognitively impaired individual, a mentally incapacitated individual, or a physically helpless individual;

---

• Hand over mouth
• Other guy in the room with them
• Drunk

tsuag10 said:

---

The parts of her story that might give them a case for the felony charge might be:

Quote:

---

2. suffocate, strangle, disfigure, or inflict serious physical injury on the victim or another in the course of committing the crime;
3. threaten, or place the victim in fear, that the victim, or an individual known to the victim, imminently will be subject to death, suffocation, strangulation, disfigurement, serious physical injury, or kidnapping; or
4. commit the crime while aided and abetted by another;
(2) engage in sexual contact with another if the victim is a substantially cognitively impaired individual, a mentally incapacitated individual, or a physically helpless individual, and the person performing the act knows or reasonably should know the victim is a substantially cognitively impaired individual, a mentally incapacitated individual, or a physically helpless individual;

---

Hand over mouth
Other guy in the room with them
Drunk

---