Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,602,299 Views | 49327 Replies | Last: 1 hr ago by nortex97
MiamiHopper
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Is this the same binder that Mark Meadows allegedly took home with him near the end of Trump's term?
lcraggie
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hope this comes out and there is no way to cover this corruption, but I am sure there will be people that say, "what difference does it make? That was already known."
Rangers Lead the Way, NSDQ


sam callahan
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

I hope this comes out and there is no way to cover this corruption

It's been obvious for a long time what happened and while I, too, hope for as much damning evidence as possible, I also understand it won't matter.

They have the power to destroy anyone they want. They are in no danger of being held accountable.
normalhorn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Two thoughts that lead me to believe that no Republican has said folder

1) IF trump has/had it, shouldn't he have had the foresight to copy it and spread it across the globe at different locations and use it as leverage (I.e. deadman switch) if any legal cases began to come together?

2) IF he did indeed have access to these binders and they include the dirt that some think they do, why wouldn't he have played his hand by now, instead of seeing his coffers be bled dry by legal fees?
...take it easy on me, I'm a normal horn
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Accurate.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No idea if Haspel is a commie plant or if they just blackmailed her. But it doesn't really matter because the folks that control the illegal spying can target absolutely anybody. I was rewatching Snowden last night and it reminded me this tech has been around for decades. Now that the globalists/leftists or whoever have gone to war, they are using everything in the arsenal.

Whoever puts up a fight, they're putting themselves, their families and all their network in the crosshairs. That's why it'll take real damn heroic courage for leaders to save us from this evil.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dreyOO said:

No idea if Haspel is a commie plant or if they just blackmailed her. But it doesn't really matter because the folks that control the illegal spying can target absolutely anybody. I was rewatching Snowden last night and it reminded me this tech has been around for decades. Now that the globalists/leftists or whoever have gone to war, they are using everything in the arsenal.

Whoever puts up a fight, they're putting themselves, their families and all their network in the crosshairs. That's why it'll take real damn heroic courage for leaders to save us from this evil.
Blackmailed her? Shoot she had the goods on everybody. Haspel is the straight up product of "the Farm" recruited as a young girl, married to the Company. Don't you let that school marm look fool you, she was a straight up killer. She wasn't just CIA for years she was NSC/DCS the real spooks. SHe was a John Brennan, Michael Hayden disciple. She would protect the shield at all costs and had insurance so she didn't just disappear off the census rolls. Haspel was the Dragon Lady, and she still exists because she made her bones years ago for the company and kept receipts. You don't spend your entire adult life in the top echelon of the darkest clandestine corridors we have and not develop superior survival skills and the ability to sidestep a few landmines pitiful politicians may through out in your path.
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I'm responding to his post, not positing on what drives her. My point, wholly aside from that motivation, is that it doesn't matter. Anyone that stands against the fascists (with the keys to our intelligence agency) is fooked.

That is unless some billionaire that loves America and doesn't give a damn about being cancelled or his family's collateral damage takes a stand. This is where my fantasy of Trump winning and burning it all down kicks in.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
“Never argue with stupid people, they will drag you down to their level and then beat you with experience" - Mark Twain
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Not surprised. And yes, Obama and his clowns should be prosecuted.
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG




Yes, Russiagate and Ukraine go together. Putin must be made the world villain again (now with AI!), and this also justifies the money laundering operation/bills for "Ukraine."

Meanwhile, propaganda from NBC News claims "Russia is targeting 2024 election" already in what is actually to be Russiagate 3.0, not 2.0:

Quote:

The report explained:
Quote:

The dissemination of attacks on Biden is part of a continuing effort by Moscow to undercut American military aid to Ukraine and U.S. support for and solidarity with NATO, experts said.
A similar effort is underway in Europe. France, Germany and Poland said this month that Russia has launched a barrage of propaganda to try to influence European parliamentary elections in June.
It goes on to explain that Russia will use the rise of deepfake and AI-driven technology to create false narratives or stage a cyber attack against an element of the Biden campaign:
Quote:

U.S. officials and experts are most concerned that Russia could try to interfere in the election through a "deepfake" audio or video using artificial intelligence tools or through a "hack and leak," such as the politically damaging theft of internal Democratic Party emails by Russian military intelligence operatives in 2016.

The type of pro-Russia online propaganda campaigns that thrived on Twitter and Facebook ahead of the 2016 U.S. presidential election is now routine on every major social media platform, though it's rare for individual accounts to go as viral now as they once did.

Sigh…
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Apologies for the triple post but wow;
Quote:

So the official MSM narrative is now that the CIA established bases in Ukraine, since 2014.

In addition to the bases, CIA proxy, USAID, funded and operated biolabs in Ukraine, as part of project PREDICT, a preemptive pandemic response program, looking for animal viruses in nature, so they could then enhance the functions, and make vaccines for viruses that don't exist yet, and might never exist.

In other words, the CIA were conducting gain of function/directed evolution research on bat coronaviruses in Ukraine, starting in 2014. Also known as, bioweapon development. Most notably from virologist Nathan Wolfe, CEO of the Biden-funded, Metabiota, operating in Ukraine.

Lo and behold, six years after the CIA started looking for bat coronaviruses in Ukraine, a bat coronavirus causes a pandemic, and all evidence suggests it was man-made.

AND US intelligence, health agencies, big tech, and lapdog media, went great lengths to cover the entire thing up.

You wanna know why the media freak out so much about the biolabs in Ukraine? Because they are protecting one of the Deep State's darkest secrets.




I don't know if Tucker had an assassination attempt on him (note reader note already on Gen Flynn tweet) but I wouldn't be surprised: Ukraine did put him on their enemies of the state list.

Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I don't know when this document was unsealed but I just ran across it.

https://media.licdn.com/dms/document/media/D561FAQEjGXGjz8yKCg/feedshare-document-pdf-analyzed/0/1709390884547?e=1710374400&v=beta&t=CUxZRP5BKuT3fbAhBoY7FdPN_YZJGyirmq4NAsgAxFk


The lab at GTRI run by Mano Antonakakis (a.k.a. the Manos Lab) that was contracted by DARPA's Enhanced Attribution Program to fabricate evidence of Russia collusion against Trump is the subject of a federal lawsuit for violating the False Claims Act for failing to adequately protect Controlled Unclassified Information (CUI) in accordance with the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) 252.204.7012.

The Manos Lab had unqualified people pencil whipping self assessments for compliance with the NIST 800-171. The complaint was based on the

Quote:

9. Relator Christopher Craig is employed by Defendant GIT and currently serves as the Associate Director of Cyber Security at Georgia Tech. In this role, he manages all cyber security personnel through his direct reports, the Principal Engineer, the Operations Manager, and the Policy and Compliance Manager. In this position, Relator Craig has direct and firsthand information about the allegations contained herein.

10. Relator Kyle Koza graduated from GIT with a Bachelors in 2009 and a Masters in 2015 in Information Security. Since 2010, he has been employed by GIT, beginning his tenure as an Information Security Engineer in 2013. Relator Koza served as Georgia Tech's Principal Information Security Engineer from 2017 to June 2022. From this position, Relator Koza has direct and firsthand information about the allegations contained herein

This is only interesting in a darkly ironic way because Manos Antonakakis was supposedly a consummate expert in cybersecurity that was picking up breadcrumbs to connect Trump to Russian influence. He could not even make his own lab network compliance with the basic security protections required to handle CUI. It appears that when the Associate Director of Cybersecurity at GIT and the Information Systems Security Engineer pointed out the violations of DFARS 252.204.7012 that GTRI protected Antonakakis and retaliated against Craig and Koza.

https://www.racket.news/p/forget-collusion-was-interference
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
And we're back!

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

And we're back!


Seriously doubt those will ever be produced.
policywonk98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

will25u said:

And we're back!


Seriously doubt those will ever be produced.



Agreed. But if the House functioned as intended by the Founders. They would simply say, turn it all over or we will hold off funding your agency until you allow us oversight of the activity we have requested.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I was thinking about a similar situation the other day.

Assuming trump were to win and he demanded those docs, amongst the thousands the agencies never delivered the first time, can't he basically say "you have so many days, with little to few redactions, or you're fired"?

I can't see any other way but the president HAS to be able to have access to anything he wants.
Jabin
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Agreed. But if the House functioned as intended by the Founders. They would simply say, turn it all over or we will hold off funding your agency until you allow us oversight of the activity we have requested.
Completely agree, and am baffled suspicious why the House hasn't done this when controlled by the Rs.

  • Why didn't they do that to the IRS during the entire Lois Lerner fiasco?
  • Why didn't they do that to the Justice Department, targeted specifically to Eric Holder's office, when he ignored their subpoenas regarding Fast and Furious?
  • Why don't they do it now with regard to Justice and/or the FBI?

The fact that the Senate is still controlled by the Ds is irrelevant (I think?). The Rs could put together a giant omnibus spending bill that simply cuts funding for only those targeted offices, leaving it up to the Ds in the Senate on whether they want to defund the entire government or not.

Congress otherwise does it all of the time. I worked in the Pentagon for a few years and the House micromanaged specific offices and departments via the funding process all of the time. So the Rs know it can be done but fail to use that incredibly powerful tool.

It makes me think that the Rs don't really want to do anything, but I'm not sure exactly why.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Until the House starts treating DoJ, FBI, NARA, and CIA as they did the IRS after Lerner/Koskinen, these requests will fail to yield results.

You want them to listen? Gut their funding and let them know it will stay that way as long as their unelected bureaucrats continue behaving as if they serve the Democrat Party rather than the nation.

Fail to hold them to account with the one power in the House's possession and you are guaranteeing more of the same for Trump and any future Republican following him to the White House.
Ulysses90
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Claverack said:

Until the House starts treating DoJ, FBI, NARA, and CIA as they did the IRS after Lerner/Koskinen, these requests will fail to yield results.

You want them to listen? Gut their funding and let them know it will stay that way as long as their unelected bureaucrats continue behaving as if they serve the Democrat Party rather than the nation.

Fail to hold them to account with the one power in the House's possession and you are guaranteeing more of the same for Trump and any future Republican following him to the White House.
The GOP in Congress is terrified of being tarred with the accusation that holding back the appropriations for DoJ, FBI, and CIA will allows the Democrats to accuse them of being pro-crime while it never occurred to those same GOP pansies that they should have been accusing the entire Democrat party of being pro-arson, pro-looting, pro-anarchy from the very first car that was torched and store window that was shattered in the name of St. George Floyd of Fentanyl.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Foreverconservative said:




In a host of disappointing moments, this one really cuts hard for me.

Really thought he would make a difference.

Instead, it was all for show In service to the Democrat Party.

If you ever hear people in DC tell you someone operates in an honest way, even if those people are Republican and people you normally hear out, then don't believe them.

That person they back is more likely than not a man running cover for corruption, protecting those in the Beltway who believe they are and should be above the laws applicable to the rest of us.

They are destroying our Republic to save the traitors, grifters and globalist authoritarians running roughshod over our Constitution and Bill of Rights protections.

Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They have to start jailing people who violate the law. You cannot violate the constitution and US law and expect to walk free.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
He's one of their 'top' fixers. He also was quite involved in whitewashing GCF about classified docs, and triggering/working behind the scenes and in media regarding the Mar A Lago ransacking and Jack Smith special counsel attempts to take down Trump this year.

You can follow him on twitter if you want to know some of what the Dems are plotting/pondering (he is still all in about the J6 fedsurrection and heroism of the cops who lied about it for Democrats). It's mildly amusing, though the snark about his role in the disgraceful treasonous crossfire hurricane coup attempt still pisses me off.







An absolutely contemptible traitor to the republic who hides behind a veil of patriotism, while backing the police state/NSD-DoJ and FBI at every possible corner in charging/prosecuting/arresting/harassing/censoring Republicans/conservatives.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trailer makes it seem like it will be decent. Plus gets to tell his side of the story, which not a lot of people know about.

https://www.flynnmovie.com/

fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Hawg, thought you'd find this amusing.

Finally, Raffensberger's time comes around and the Georgia politicians bail him out. I haven't even calculated who voted for whom, but I'm sure the Republicans covered their own ass, as always.

Raffensberger is a POS.

Quote:

https://thefederalist.com/2024/03/28/georgia-house-guts-bill-that-would-have-given-election-board-power-to-investigate-secretary-of-state/
Quote:

But the House Committee on Governmental Affairs ditched the Senate's bill in favor of a "substitute" bill that has nothing to do with the bill's original purpose. That substitute appears to focus on campaign finance laws but includes no language authorizing the SEB to investigate the secretary of state as initially proposed.
The initial legislation was proposed after Houston County resident, Joseph Rossi, filed a complaint alerting Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger's office to alleged discrepancies in Fulton County's 2020 election administration.
The SEB and the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections entered a consent agreement last June acknowledging the county "misidentified and duplicated" audit data when entering said data into the software used by the state. The investigators concluded the inconsistencies were the result of human error and the agreement stipulated the county would have to "adequately train all of its elections staff involved in conducting the risk-limiting audit on the policies and procedures in advance of each election."
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

The SEB and the Fulton County Board of Registration and Elections entered a consent agreement last June acknowledging the county "misidentified and duplicated" audit data when entering said data into the software used by the state. The investigators concluded the inconsistencies were the result of human error and the agreement stipulated the county would have to "adequately train all of its elections staff involved in conducting the risk-limiting audit on the policies and procedures in advance of each election."
And the creator of risk-limiting audits has stated repeatedly that Dominion's system is not amenable to his process. Which is why that "human error" happened in the first place, I'd suspect.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?


fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Just out of curiosity, which federal judge?

I always like to know which ones so I'll know if there's any possibility of a fair trial for the 50% of the country that has to appear before that court.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Those were not "mistakes" Andy. They were deliberate as there was no Woods file done before the application. That warrant application went through, or to be more precise "around" the usual procedures even bypassing certain people normally in that chain that were not within the cabal, to get the application completed and filed ASAP.

The only thing McCabe regrets is that they did not cover their tracks better and for longer.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"mistakes" LOLOLOLOL
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


Traitor.
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Haha.

Hey Jim Acosta.

Sarah Sanders has you balls.
First Page Last Page
Page 1405 of 1410
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.