Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,770,240 Views | 49440 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by aggiehawg
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds a little like..."You can keep the damn cheese, just let me outta the trap...PLEASE"!
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Not that I would have known, but IF someone from OIG was indicted, (not even convicted), it would do a world of good for the OIG folks.

IMO, everyone on the hill needs to have their freedom threatened, not just the Jan 6th folks.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?


whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yeah...well I have no idea what any of that means, good, bad or indifferent???
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whatthehey78 said:

Yeah...well I have no idea what any of that means, good, bad or indifferent???
Don't let the confusion frustrate you, just stay focused, because that's what all the white noise is designed to do. In these huge conspiracies they deluge the zone with a plethora of things, to provide ground cover for the serious criminal activity. all the nonsensical dirty tricks and misdemeanors dilute the most serious of crimes and provides avenues of plausible deniability, buffers between the victims/targets and the top of the food chain, the real people behind it all.

The Mob did this dating back 100 year. Our government is the largest criminal enterprise in the world.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Would be pretty funny.


whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
All very interesting...but somebody PLEASE step on the gas, kick some butt! People don't live forever and the longer one has to destroy evidence...substantially less will be discovered. I'm old...GET ER DONE!!!
Shoefly!
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I hear you! I want to see some heads roll.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whatthehey78 said:

All very interesting...but somebody PLEASE step on the gas, kick some butt! People don't live forever and the longer one has to destroy evidence...substantially less will be discovered. I'm old...GET ER DONE!!!


Like with a cloth?
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
Lonestar_Ag09
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Go get 'em!
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Even got the filing in a business day early. Was due Monday.



will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Interesting......
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
A motion to expunge an pseudonymous reference that has to be an actual first in court. He's basically opened the door for Durham to just drop the pseudonymous reference and just drop his real name in place, since it was his own counsel that revealed the true identity of the pseudonymous reference. Not that the Twitter sleuths weren't outing him already, Joffe's own counsel that confirmed it.

These people best tread lightly with Durham because he has more than they know
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Margot Cleveland thread.

whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Reading MC's tweets, she seems convinced Sussman's Motion to Dismiss will be denied...and in some manner, makes note of the significance of the Inspector General's role/questionable actions in this.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
whatthehey78 said:

Reading MC's tweets, she seems convinced Sussman's Motion to Dismiss will be denied...and in some manner, makes note of the significance of the Inspector General's role/questionable actions in this.
I'll give Horowitz a little slack in that Weissmann and Team Mueller were basically Hoovering up all of the information claiming exclusive jurisdiction and restricting access at the time, or at least in the beginning of his investigation. And IG's don't have the subpoena power that Durham does. Makes a difference.

OTOH, this defense team for Sussman are pretty awful lawyers, just like many of the LawFare lawyers are. Barr ran circles around Team Mueller without breaking a sweat. And Durham is doing the same here.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

OTOH, this defense team for Sussman are pretty awful lawyers, just like many of the LawFare lawyers are.


But don't they have a lot of success doing whatever they do?

I would love a "lawfare for dummies" post if anyone wants to put it together.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

aggiehawg said:

OTOH, this defense team for Sussman are pretty awful lawyers, just like many of the LawFare lawyers are.


But don't they have a lot of success doing whatever they do?

I would love a "lawfare for dummies" post if anyone wants to put it together.
Marc Elias is probably the best of the lot of them but his specialty is election law, pretty narrow field.

Basically I was referring to when these LawFare clients get popped on a criminal charge and the firm brings in their criminal defense partners in the same firm. They are pretty bad from what I have seen, well other than filing useless and baseless motions to get their billable hours up, that is.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So is it a firm? Just a blog they all collaborate on?

Sorry for my ignorance.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

aggiehawg said:

OTOH, this defense team for Sussman are pretty awful lawyers, just like many of the LawFare lawyers are.


But don't they have a lot of success doing whatever they do?

I would love a "lawfare for dummies" post if anyone wants to put it together.
And here's the real kicker, the fearless leader of Lawfare, Benjamin Wittes, isn't even a lawyer, he's a self proclaimed "legal journalist" with a BA Liberal Arts degree from Oberlin Liberal Arts College.

The Lawfare "Blog" does have an attorney Robert Chesney and Jack Goldsmith whose a law professor, but Wittes is a politically connected propagandist. He's listed as a "Research Director and Co Director on Public Law at the Harvard/Brookings Project and Senior Fellow in Governance Studies at Brookings. If you know anything about Brookings, it's a deep swampy think tank steeped in corruption top to bottom. Brookings gets millions in tax money through various left wing departments in the system and it's corruption dates back to FDR.

I'd love to see all of them fry

People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some Junkie Cosmonaut said:

So is it a firm? Just a blog they all collaborate on?

Sorry for my ignorance.
It is a series of firms. Comey Bestie, Ben Wittes, runs the LawFare blog with a few others and guest posts.

Off the top of my head: Perkins, Coie; Wilmer, Hale; Lathan & Watkins; Covington & Burling: Baker, Hostetler; Boies, Schiller, Flexner.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:



Elias crowing about this, is whistling past the graveyard stuff.
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
If things progress with Durham the way I hope, it wouldn't surprise me if the Dems start to distance themselves from Elias.

Not that I think Elias will flip, but the water level around him keeps getting higher.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
See that the hopes are going up up up. Difference is that nobody has been posting with the word 'perp walk'

The sting of no perp walks will sting regardless.

Over and under for how long it will be until Scooby unmasks Durham revealing a swamp creature is 6.72 months.
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Scooby??
Unmasks Durham??
Can we not just use plain English??
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sicandtiredTXN said:

A motion to expunge an pseudonymous reference that has to be an actual first in court. He's basically opened the door for Durham to just drop the pseudonymous reference and just drop his real name in place, since it was his own counsel that revealed the true identity of the pseudonymous reference. Not that the Twitter sleuths weren't outing him already, Joffe's own counsel that confirmed it.

These people best tread lightly with Durham because he has more than they know
I would certainly hope Durham has much more than they know and can prove it beyond any doubt.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
TacosaurusRex
How long do you want to ignore this user?
dellgriffith
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Oh crap.

ETA: I'm f***ed.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Guess we will see Grift or gift.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
First Page Last Page
Page 1339 of 1413
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.