sicandtiredTXN said:

---

When was this article published? Today? Looks like it.

There are things in this article that are basically lifted out of this very thread that were posted days ago.


https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/2912732/replies/61526032


Hmmm who is this Charlie Martin. Hmmm Charlie Martin writes on science, health, culture, and technology for PJ Media.

---

I think that's fine. The truth needs to be spread far and wide. Everyone needs to know what the criminals were doing within our government. Attribution is nice, but it is the least of our worries.

sicandtiredTXN said:

---

SO the focus must be on Conspiracy, because the first and foremost the statute of limitations has run out on just these small individual crimes, but the conspiracy clock doesn't even start until the last act is done. It's always the cover up that really makes everything worse. And the cover up is a continuation of the conspiracy. Durham has to be mounting a stack of proof to connect it all or this just turns into a long report of wrongdoing with no accountability.

---

The untypical 27 page Sussmann perjury indictment gives me hope of a pending Durham MOAB. My money is on conspiracy to defraud the gov ... has been for over 3 yrs. Regardless, there's still the likely congressional report on the wrongful FBI investigation/surveillance and predicates - specifically Crossfire Hurricane. Investigating the origins of the Russia hoax was a big part of Barr's SC charter 15 mo's ago.

sicandtiredTXN said:

---

https://f5s-img.s3.amazonaws.com/000/4a/1d/4a1d1f15d6704bef5c0612aca0e01563a9f21a4b_392389_u266800.jpg

My guess is Durham has flipped either Joffe or his Team leader at GA Tech David Dagon.

Lots of moving pieces in this game of chess. But with all the detail Durham laid out in that 27 page indictment he has flipped someone.

---

As far as the names given to the FBI, thats Matt Blaze, Steven Bellovin, and Susan Landau.
Joffe isn't someone likely to flip imo.

RyanM58699717 said:

---

sicandtiredTXN said:

---

My guess is Durham has flipped either Joffe or his Team leader at GA Tech David Dagon.

Lots of moving pieces in this game of chess. But with all the detail Durham laid out in that 27 page indictment he has flipped someone.

---

As far as the names given to the FBI, thats Matt Blaze, Steven Bellovin, and Susan Landau.
Joffe isn't someone likely to flip imo.

---

Joffe has a lot of legal exposure aside from this, he has tax issues hanging over his head for one. And the fact that Joffe was pseudonymously referenced as "Tech Executive-1" in the Sussman indictment is generally done to protect the identity of persons that have given Grand Jury testimony, not always but generally. Joffe has exposure as well because he attempted to use the "Guccifer" hack as cover for his EOP access, of which it's pretty well established that Guccifer is a hoax. It was established long ago that Guccifer's drops and metadata was bogus and 'massaged' if not damn well fabricated from whole cloth by Bill Binney over four years ago. Bill broke it all down to the raw binary coding proving it was garbage. So Joffe has more than a few issues and him popping up in the Sussmann case wasn't by accident.

As far as those think tank names you've dropped I'd love to see some citation if it's available. If it's some anonymous sourcing forgive me if I remain sceptical, have been fed a load of crap in this thing for years from all over. Not saying you're propagandizing or anything I just like to see more substance.

Joffe isn't going to flip.


As for the names - here you go.

Notes included as exhibit D. Couple points. Indictment referenced that 3 names were given to Baker as credible researchers who supported the conclusions. Two names are notable as being cited in the Slate/New Yorker articles. Will need to research the 3rd a bit. pic.twitter.com/TXrbYyT91z

— Ryan M (@RyanM58699717) December 7, 2021

aggiehawg said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

sicandtiredTXN said:

---

When was this article published? Today? Looks like it.

There are things in this article that are basically lifted out of this very thread that were posted days ago.


https://texags.com/forums/16/topics/2912732/replies/61526032


Hmmm who is this Charlie Martin. Hmmm Charlie Martin writes on science, health, culture, and technology for PJ Media.

---

I think that's fine. The truth needs to be spread far and wide. Everyone needs to know what the criminals were doing within our government. Attribution is nice, but it is the least of our worries.

---

I never want attribution outside of this forum. Was glad when the MF Barnes sock assumed a different name on twitter and lifted my posts here word for word without attribution because then I would be attached to him.

There are still posters here who think I might be MF Barnes despite Brandon confirming there is no possible way that I could be. Part of the reason they think I could be was his use of my posts in another outlet.

I don't do, have never done FaceBook, twitter, instagram, nor any other message board, nor social media besides TexAgs. If you see something I said on another site, it is because they took it from here. Not that I posted it elsewhere.

---

I get it. Mark Levin talks about the "backbenchers" who do no independent research and just take his content and broadcast it as if it were their own. He says they listen to his show as "show prep." It clearly irritates him, but then he comes back around to it being better that people know the truth, regardless of who gets the credit.

I appreciate all the reading and analysis you and others provide here. I have spent hours reading this thread after works sometimes, and I could not possibly have kept informed otherwise.

Margot scoop Wed. or Thur.?? I know Thur's not over...but you'd think 'scoops' would hit the news/social media early, not at the end of the day.

Yeah, I'm disappointed. Had understood Durham's investigation was "speeding up". Can't see it from my vantage point.

whatthehey78 said:

---

Margot scoop Wed. or Thur.?? I know Thur's not over...but you'd think 'scoops' would hit the news/social media early, not at the end of the day.

Yeah, I'm disappointed. Had understood Durham's investigation was "speeding up". Can't see it from my vantage point.

---

Maybe didn't want it to get washed up in the war coverage....who knows.

whatthehey78 said:

---

Margot scoop Wed. or Thur.?? I know Thur's not over...but you'd think 'scoops' would hit the news/social media early, not at the end of the day.

Yeah, I'm disappointed. Had understood Durham's investigation was "speeding up". Can't see it from my vantage point.

---

Came out yesterday morning and its huge. https://thefederalist.com/2022/02/23/lets-hope-the-special-counsel-and-others-are-investigating-the-people-who-watch-you-online/

Ok well... the story is definitely interesting but whoever chose the picture to represent the computers involved in the surveillance has never been inside a real data center.

RyanM58699717 said:

---

whatthehey78 said:

---

Margot scoop Wed. or Thur.?? I know Thur's not over...but you'd think 'scoops' would hit the news/social media early, not at the end of the day.

Yeah, I'm disappointed. Had understood Durham's investigation was "speeding up". Can't see it from my vantage point.

---

Came out yesterday morning and its huge. https://thefederalist.com/2022/02/23/lets-hope-the-special-counsel-and-others-are-investigating-the-people-who-watch-you-online/

---

Not arguing...but not sure "hoping the SC/others are investigating..." is a scoop or just wishful thinking??? I was expecting a new revelation of facts from the existing investigation/indictment.

Keep the faith, 78.

The only thing that can stop Durham is Garland/Biden. Biden because he's a sunk political cost, he just doesn't know it. And I now believe Garland is so corrupt, he may be involved on the periphery.

Last but not least, one of the Dems dark web buddies. I bet Durham won't indict anyone else until May, maybe July. I suspect it will be recognizable names.

fasthorse05 said:

---

Keep the faith, 78.

The only thing that can stop Durham is Garland/Biden. Biden because he's a sunk political cost, he just doesn't know it. And I now believe Garland is so corrupt, he may be involved on the periphery.

Last but not least, one of the Dems dark web buddies. I bet Durham won't indict anyone else until May, maybe July. I suspect it will be recognizable names.

---

The bullet we dodged by him not ending up on the Supreme Court.....him AND Roberts would have been a nightmare.

This is hysterical pic.twitter.com/sZciEqWDEJ

— Six Ways To Sunday (@wakeywakey16) February 25, 2022

In what case was the deposition taken?

Interesting appearances in the Sussmann case. @McAdooGordon can you explain when non-party attorney would generally file an appearance in a criminal case? Subpoena? pic.twitter.com/hfBnZCGut5

— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) February 25, 2022

Usually to assert rights that the witness has or claims, which the govt or defense can’t or won’t respect the way the witness wants. So they go to the judge. /2

— Leslie McAdoo Gordon (@McAdooGordon) February 25, 2022

Not sure. I'll keep an eye out.

Y'all might have to explain this one to me.

It sounds like someone else is speaking on behalf of Joffe.

Yeah, I don't understand the addition of the new lawyers.

Maybe notifying the judge that Joffe will appear, but certain questions are off limits (5th Amendment) like in his deposition.

People thinking Joffe lied in his depot.

On August 31, 2016 marks the date that the FBI participated in ODNI briefings to both Trump and Clinton campaigns.

Source-pg 340 of IG report on Crossfire Hurricane/FISA

— Pamela Browne (@browne_pamela) February 25, 2022

VegasAg86 said:

---

In what case was the deposition taken?

---

Looks like the Alpha Bank case.

@GlennKesslerWP, here's something for you to "fact check" (note that the lawyer is reading from Fritsch's emails and Fritsch is pleading the Fifth):

h/t @codyave @KingMakerFT pic.twitter.com/WZwoQpXzzR

— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) February 26, 2022

The defendant in the case is "John doe".

Is it because when the case was filed, they didn't know who the defendant was?

BTW, I wonder if Schiff is busy looking for naked Russian pics on the internet?

Thread...

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1497576590833688578.html

2/ They report on emails from GA Tech Right to Know (which I believe I was first reporter to obtain), but miss some of details elaborated on here in piece w/ assist by @Techno_Fog https://t.co/VAGn2APmXg

— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) February 26, 2022

Tailgate88 said:

---

Ok well... the story is definitely interesting but whoever chose the picture to represent the computers involved in the surveillance has never been inside a real data center.

---

Dude, that's GCF bathroom.

will25u said:

---

VegasAg86 said:

---

In what case was the deposition taken?

---

Looks like the Alpha Bank case.

@GlennKesslerWP, here's something for you to "fact check" (note that the lawyer is reading from Fritsch's emails and Fritsch is pleading the Fifth):

h/t @codyave @KingMakerFT pic.twitter.com/WZwoQpXzzR

— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) February 26, 2022

---

Knowing what we know now, is any of this a surprise to anyone that is not CM?

Going back to the point made many times on this thread or in this forum, this is worse than watergate by a factor of ten.

Peter Fritsch's counsel admits that Fusion GPS is cooperating with Durham and that Fritsch is a subject of the investigation. pic.twitter.com/Rlz41MAzdg

— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) February 25, 2022

"...investigation wrapping up in a couple of the coming weeks."

Don't know if that is a 'good thing' or not???? I was hoping for more indictments, lots more. Your thoughts...

ETA - correction in terminology.

I'm also going on the record stating that Margaret Krawiec did an amazing job with these depos. Even though they invoked the 5th and answers were not forthcoming, it was clear she & her team have the goods. Imagine what Durham has...

— Matt Beebe (@TheMattBeebe) February 26, 2022

Holy Crap! That Alpha deposition questioning Fritsch:

Quote:

---

Q: What did you mean when you said it had been planted on someone's server?

---

Fritsch better hope he can get a plea deal.

sicandtiredTXN said:

---

whatthehey78 said:

---

"...investigation wrapping up in a couple of the coming weeks."

Don't know if that is a 'good thing' or not???? I was hoping for more indictments, lots more. Your thoughts...

ETA - correction in terminology.

---

Sounds more like wishful thinking to me, because given as tight a ship as Durham has been running there's no way Joffe's attorney has a clue when DUrham is going to be wrapping up. He may be wrapping up Joffe's part involving his immunity deal in exchange for his GJ testimony but I'm not buying Durham is done over all.

---

Thanks...I'm going with your assessment and may Durham's will be done!

will25u said:

---

---

Ted's idiocy knows no bounds. OR Russia is hiding something..what a joke....makes me wonder what the DC dummies drink.

I know it's a long shot but Durham has to bag some big trophies, this is too big in scope to not bag some 5 pound bass.