sicandtiredTXN said:

---

There's an April 2020 article in the Washington Examiner that's worth another read in light of recent filings by Durham regarding he direction his case against Sussmann is going. The article picks up testimony given in the UK by Christopher Steele about how he first learned of Alfa Bank -Trump Org connection. Hint: It didn't come from Danchenko or any of Steele's source network. Rather, Steele learned of it at the July 29, 2016, meeting at Perkins Coie, attended by Sussmann, Elias, Steele, Simpson, Fritsch (from Fusion GPS), and perhaps Joffe.

Steele testified that Sussmann was the source, and that after the meeting, Simpson tasked Steele with doing research on Alfa Bank's ties to Putin and to write up the Trump-Alfa story as part of the dossier. Which Steele did, although he testified that Sussmann carried the narrative to the press. Steele pitched it to Kavelac at the State Dept.

Here's the article

https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/christopher-steele-claims-clinton-lawyer-fed-him-debunked-claim-about-russian-collusion-in-2016

So how does this fit in with Durham? Well, Durham told us that Elias has been before the grand jury, and based on what happened and who was present at the July 29 meeting, Elias is central to tying the scheme and all its participants together. Elias was there at the origin. So he becomes perhaps the central witness in not only the false statement charge against Sussmann , but also in any subsequent conspiracy case.

Some people got some explaining to do! What will Elias say about that meeting? That's the million dollar question. Undoubtedly he will say they were planning opposition research, which is not illegal. But what about the part that a frame-up hoax would be presented to the FBI and Dept of State? That's a crime. And it's what happened- largely because a federal investigation into the made up oppo research added gravitas to the narrative. It's possible Elias will likely testify that he didn't know it was made up, and/or he didn't realize false evidence would be presented to the FBI. But his ability to put all the major players in the same room at the same time is critical for establishing a conspiracy. Curious as heck to know what other cards Durham is holding onto.

---

whatthehey78 said:

---

Anyone have an idea(s) what will take place next? Court filings/motions, more indictments, plea bargains???

ETA - confessions, suicides?

---

TRM said:

---

If Sussman is any indication, the remaining characters are going to put up a fight - except for probably the GT researchers.

Doesn't Durham still need to respond to the motion to dismiss and the judge needs to rule on the motion to strike and motion to dismiss?

---

Just reading through your foia @RyanM58699717 and LOL at Camp's distaste for Indiana. pic.twitter.com/lDnCctdyPV

— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) February 21, 2022

She. Her quotes in the Slate article Franklin Foer wrote Oct 31st 2016 make sense now. She saw spikes in DNS look ups during the conventions. She was blinded by politics in her Alfa bank analysis.

— Regina (@ReginaMourad) February 21, 2022

Durham Clinton findings, FBI corruption, time to rethink structure of FBI, “insulate from the political process” says Whitewater Independent Counsel Ray | Just the Newshttps://t.co/lWKsPsthcQ

— John Solomon (@jsolomonReports) February 21, 2022

An overlooked Durham filing proves what we suspected:

Trump Transition data from the Executive Office of the President was passed to the CIA.

ht @ProfMJCleveland https://t.co/1Aln0SbIvm

— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) February 21, 2022

fasthorse05 said:

---

Wonder how aware Cheney's husband is about all the nasty details?

I don't think he's a partner, but does a substantial business with Chinasupposedly.

---

RyanM58699717 said:

---

Scoop inbound for Wednesday or Thursday if you guys dont mind me teasing you.

Keep on eye on Margot's feed.

---

RyanM58699717 said:

---

Scoop inbound for Wednesday or Thursday if you guys dont mind me teasing you.

Keep on eye on Margot's feed.

---

Quote:

---

Would Latham Watkins actually do that to their own attorneys working for Sussman or were they in on it i.e. knowingly breached their responsibility to their client?

---

I don't think this necessarily changes anything, except that in the case of a motion to delay trial or a deadline, sussmann can no longer make demands upon his rights to a speedy trial. I don't see any new scheduling orders yet.

— Mccabe's Porsche on Blocks (@Larry_Beech) February 22, 2022

It matters because it's the first time we have overwhelming evidence that a sitting president intentionally interfered in the peaceful transition of power.

Not just "theories", actual verified evidence and documentation that have held up in multiple court cases to date.

— GalacticRedPill (@GalacticRedPill) February 22, 2022

akm91 said:

---

Open up the tween in incognito window and that'll help with the issue of getting blocked.

---

Sarge 91 said:

---

akm91 said:

---

Open up the tween in incognito window and that'll help with the issue of getting blocked.

---

"What the hell is an incognito window?"

Sincerely, olds like me and Hawg.

---

akm91 said:

---

Open up the tweet in incognito window and that'll help with the issue of getting blocked. Or you can delete all the twitter cookies for your browser and that'll resolve the issue for a while

---