Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,770,058 Views | 49440 Replies | Last: 22 hrs ago by aggiehawg
Gator92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Disagree.

Current CPI, PPI inflation is a supply problem. Fed monetary policy drives asset(equity, real estate).

Supply shortage, namely labor shortage is driving CPI, PPI. Hurricane, China ammonium nitrate export ban along w/ hedge fund oil/gas ESG is causing food inflation. Environmental regs also. Dollar is higher despite QE. Commodities higher despite higher dollar.

Demand still lower than pre-ccp virus.

We have a supply problem...
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What are you talking about?
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wrong thread?
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
akm91 said:

Wrong thread?
But why addressed to me?
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
"It has long been a crime to make a false statement to the government. But the law criminalizes only false statements that are materialfalse statements that matter because they can actually affect a specific decision of the government," the lawyers wrote, adding that, by contrast, false statements "about ancillary matters" are "immaterial and cannot give rise to criminal liability."

This. Pisses. Me. Off.

What the hell spawned from that faulty information that was peddled to the FBI? Only an impeachment sham that essentially gridlocked the government for 2+ years. That is some really fancy lawyer speakage there.

If there was a shed those idiots would meet behind, I would love to join them.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

fullback44 said:

Anyone else get a feeling that all of the political theater going on with Obama, Trump, Mueller, Hillary, Durham, Ukraine, Covid, Russia, BLM, etc etc etc was to get all sides of the isle focusing on things not related to the real issue of passing on massive world wide inflation? None of the other political stuff effects the world on an everyday basis as much as inflation does, not even raising or lowering taxes a few points in either direction.. anyway just throwing this out there …. I feel that If a lot of this political theater goes to the wayside in a year of two then maybe that's what this was all about ?

If Durham does nothing or very very little it sure seems these were or are all diversions away from the real issues that are happening ?
We cannot have much of an effect on inflation because we have no control over monetary policy of the Fed. They pump up or they they pump down. Went after G.W. Bush with causing a short recession in 1992,for instance. Greenspan used his job for political purposes.
Hawg this is what he was responding to

Hawg I think he's trying to turn your legal discussion into an economic lesson that has no real relevance to the subject of the thread.
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sicandtiredTXN said:

aggiehawg said:

fullback44 said:

Anyone else get a feeling that all of the political theater going on with Obama, Trump, Mueller, Hillary, Durham, Ukraine, Covid, Russia, BLM, etc etc etc was to get all sides of the isle focusing on things not related to the real issue of passing on massive world wide inflation? None of the other political stuff effects the world on an everyday basis as much as inflation does, not even raising or lowering taxes a few points in either direction.. anyway just throwing this out there …. I feel that If a lot of this political theater goes to the wayside in a year of two then maybe that's what this was all about ?

If Durham does nothing or very very little it sure seems these were or are all diversions away from the real issues that are happening ?
We cannot have much of an effect on inflation because we have no control over monetary policy of the Fed. They pump up or they they pump down. Went after G.W. Bush with causing a short recession in 1992,for instance. Greenspan used his job for political purposes.
Hawg this is what he was responding to

Hawg I think he's trying to turn your legal discussion into an economic lesson that has no real relevance to the subject of the thread.
Would be nice if he had quoted that post in his response so I would know which one it was. It's not like I don't thousands and thousands of posts on this thread.
Gator92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

What are you talking about?
Quote:

We cannot have much of an effect on inflation because we have no control over monetary policy of the Fed. They pump up or they they pump down. Went after G.W. Bush with causing a short recession in 1992,for instance. Greenspan used his job for political purposes.
Current inflation in CPI, PPI is not a result of monetary policy.

Government regulation, media covid hysteria, child care tax credit, direct stimulus, unemployment benefits are causing current inflation.

All the above are actions of current and past executive, not the Fed.

Probably wrong thread, but I was responding to your above comment on this thread.


will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

3. In light of the above, there is no basis to strike any portion of the Government's Motion. Indeed, the Government intends to file motions in limine in which it will further discuss these and other pertinent facts to explain why they constitute relevant and admissible evidence at trial. Pursuant to caselaw and common practice in this and other districts, the filing of documents containing reference to such evidence on the public docket is appropriate and proper, even in highprofile cases where the potential exists that such facts could garner media attention. See, e.g., United States v. Stone, 19 Cr. 18 (D.D.C. October 21, 2019) (ABJ), Minute Order (addressing the Government's publicly-filed motion in limine seeking to admit video clip from the movie "Godfather II" that defendant sent to an associate and permitting admission of a transcript of the video); United States v. Craig, 19 Cr. 125 (D.D.C. July 10, 2019) (ABJ), Minute Order (addressing Government's publicly-filed Rule 404(b) motion to offer evidence of defendant's efforts to assist Paul Manafort's relative in obtaining employment);
Ooops! Sounds like Sussman's trial is full steam ahead. File motions in limine to determine the admissibility of some particular items of evidence they intend to introduce at trial.
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

3. In light of the above, there is no basis to strike any portion of the Government's Motion. Indeed, the Government intends to file motions in limine in which it will further discuss these and other pertinent facts to explain why they constitute relevant and admissible evidence at trial. Pursuant to caselaw and common practice in this and other districts, the filing of documents containing reference to such evidence on the public docket is appropriate and proper, even in highprofile cases where the potential exists that such facts could garner media attention. See, e.g., United States v. Stone, 19 Cr. 18 (D.D.C. October 21, 2019) (ABJ), Minute Order (addressing the Government's publicly-filed motion in limine seeking to admit video clip from the movie "Godfather II" that defendant sent to an associate and permitting admission of a transcript of the video); United States v. Craig, 19 Cr. 125 (D.D.C. July 10, 2019) (ABJ), Minute Order (addressing Government's publicly-filed Rule 404(b) motion to offer evidence of defendant's efforts to assist Paul Manafort's relative in obtaining employment);
Ooops! Sounds like Sussman's trial is full steam ahead. File motions in limine to determine the admissibility of some particular items of evidence they intend to introduce at trial.
I admit, I'm stoopid...but does your comment above imply Sussman's attempt to get his case dismissed today was futile and likely ignored?? Sorry for asking!
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Durham hasn't filed anything yet on the motion to dismiss. That is incoming.

This was to strike stuff from the previous Durham motion or whatever.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Remember when Barr did this?



That was Durham doing a written equivalent type of FO.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
whatthehey78 said:

aggiehawg said:

Quote:

3. In light of the above, there is no basis to strike any portion of the Government's Motion. Indeed, the Government intends to file motions in limine in which it will further discuss these and other pertinent facts to explain why they constitute relevant and admissible evidence at trial. Pursuant to caselaw and common practice in this and other districts, the filing of documents containing reference to such evidence on the public docket is appropriate and proper, even in highprofile cases where the potential exists that such facts could garner media attention. See, e.g., United States v. Stone, 19 Cr. 18 (D.D.C. October 21, 2019) (ABJ), Minute Order (addressing the Government's publicly-filed motion in limine seeking to admit video clip from the movie "Godfather II" that defendant sent to an associate and permitting admission of a transcript of the video); United States v. Craig, 19 Cr. 125 (D.D.C. July 10, 2019) (ABJ), Minute Order (addressing Government's publicly-filed Rule 404(b) motion to offer evidence of defendant's efforts to assist Paul Manafort's relative in obtaining employment);
Ooops! Sounds like Sussman's trial is full steam ahead. File motions in limine to determine the admissibility of some particular items of evidence they intend to introduce at trial.
I admit, I'm stoopid...but does your comment above imply Sussman's attempt to get his case dismissed today was futile and likely ignored?? Sorry for asking!


This is Durham letting Sussmann know to "buckle up buttercup because…"

People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Well played.

Also:

fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
sicandtiredTXN said:

aggiehawg said:

fullback44 said:

Anyone else get a feeling that all of the political theater going on with Obama, Trump, Mueller, Hillary, Durham, Ukraine, Covid, Russia, BLM, etc etc etc was to get all sides of the isle focusing on things not related to the real issue of passing on massive world wide inflation? None of the other political stuff effects the world on an everyday basis as much as inflation does, not even raising or lowering taxes a few points in either direction.. anyway just throwing this out there …. I feel that If a lot of this political theater goes to the wayside in a year of two then maybe that's what this was all about ?

If Durham does nothing or very very little it sure seems these were or are all diversions away from the real issues that are happening ?
We cannot have much of an effect on inflation because we have no control over monetary policy of the Fed. They pump up or they they pump down. Went after G.W. Bush with causing a short recession in 1992,for instance. Greenspan used his job for political purposes.
Hawg this is what he was responding to

Hawg I think he's trying to turn your legal discussion into an economic lesson that has no real relevance to the subject of the thread.


Not sure what yall are thinking .. I'm just saying are they using all these political events to keep our eyes off something else …. Like Inflation

I love the Mueller thread, not trying to derail, just wondering if anything will ever happen of substance or is this all smoke and mirrors .. I don't know, I have hope Durham cleans shop but other times I wonder if this is just the same Ole same ole .. Mueller knew Trump did nothing but drug it out as long as possible. Will they cut Durham off if things heat up even more?

That's it ..
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
fullback44 said:

sicandtiredTXN said:

aggiehawg said:

fullback44 said:

Anyone else get a feeling that all of the political theater going on with Obama, Trump, Mueller, Hillary, Durham, Ukraine, Covid, Russia, BLM, etc etc etc was to get all sides of the isle focusing on things not related to the real issue of passing on massive world wide inflation? None of the other political stuff effects the world on an everyday basis as much as inflation does, not even raising or lowering taxes a few points in either direction.. anyway just throwing this out there …. I feel that If a lot of this political theater goes to the wayside in a year of two then maybe that's what this was all about ?

If Durham does nothing or very very little it sure seems these were or are all diversions away from the real issues that are happening ?
We cannot have much of an effect on inflation because we have no control over monetary policy of the Fed. They pump up or they they pump down. Went after G.W. Bush with causing a short recession in 1992,for instance. Greenspan used his job for political purposes.
Hawg this is what he was responding to

Hawg I think he's trying to turn your legal discussion into an economic lesson that has no real relevance to the subject of the thread.


Not sure what yall are thinking .. I'm just saying are they using all these political events to keep our eyes off something else …. Like Inflation

I love the Mueller thread, not trying to derail, just wondering if anything will ever happen of substance or is this all smoke and mirrors .. I don't know, I have hope Durham cleans shop but other times I wonder if this is just the same Ole same ole .. Mueller knew Trump did nothing but drug it out as long as possible. Will they cut Durham off if things heat up even more?

That's it ..


You're fine fullback it was the Gator that was derailing the thread with his economy lesson
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
VaultingChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Worse Than Watergate

Quote:

A majority of voters think special counsel John Durham's accusations against Hillary Clinton's 2016 presidential campaign are very important, and agree with former President Donald Trump that it's a scandal worse than Watergate.

In response to the Durham filing, Trump issued a statement saying it was "a scandal far greater in scope and magnitude than Watergate and those who were involved in and knew about this spying operation should be subject to criminal prosecution." Sixty-five percent (65%) of voters agree with the quote from Trump, including 48% who Strongly Agree. Twenty-eight percent (28%) disagree with the Trump statement, including 21% who Strongly Disagree.
There is no doubt why so many Dem politicians are not running for re-election.

They see the impending implosion of the Russia collusion hoax with the unprecedented spying on a sitting U.S. president.

As if those results were not alarming enough for Democrats, there is one final poll result…..

Quote:

Most voters think President Biden is one of the worst ever to hold the office, and rank him below his two immediate predecessors in the White House.
Holy s..t!
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:




Interesting move by Sussmann to maybe send up a smoke signal to Strzok and Wittes that he's in deep shiit and needed to phone a friend, or is it a warning that more's coming
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
Gator92
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
just sick and tired of muh Fed money printing...

Quote:

You're fine fullback it was the Gator that was derailing the thread with his economy lesson

carry on
whatthehey78
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Gator92 said:

just sick and tired of muh Fed money printing...

Quote:

You're fine fullback it was the Gator that was derailing the thread with his economy lesson

carry on
Derail much!
VaultingChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FJB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is this an Xbox chat by chance or what medium / platform is this from?
VaultingChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
FJB said:

Is this an Xbox chat by chance or what medium / platform is this from?
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
VaultingChemist said:

FJB said:

Is this an Xbox chat by chance or what medium / platform is this from?

Oh goody and now you have all the groundwork for a nice conspiracy charge case, with multiple conspirants involving ongoing criminal activity by knowingly committing federal felonies, these are the exact communications I said Durham likely has and these communications allow the government to prove two or more individuals conspired to defraud the government and it shows the willingness the conspirators violated all the secure protocols for communications, by bypassing the secure comms in the commission of multiple felonies. And actually there could be two separate types of conspiracies going on here which makes it even better. You have an agreement to commit an offense against the United States, namely the unauthorized data-mining itself and an agreement to defraud the United States. by willingly trying to avoid scrutiny by using this Xbox platform to circumvent the very government they were contracted to work for that in itself establishes a conspiracy, Problem is this is where DARPA (military) caught them.

This is the very stuff Kash Patel was warning about, and it so happen Kash's connection to DARPA and the MIA run deep. I'm guessing Durham has every bit of this in the bundle gathered by Kash Patel while he was the number two for John Ratcliffe and Ratcliffe has told Maria Bartiromo multiple times that he turned over tens of thousands of communications supporting his case and that many indictment are coming.



Oh look, this sounds like seeding the clouds to cause friction to a sitting POTUS. Obviously RR is Rod Rosenstien

Remember this very scenario in the news

https://www.foxnews.com/us/erdogans-bodyguards-accused-of-attacking-protesters-outside-turkish-embassy-in-dc

While Fox just reported the incident as it actually happened, the dirtbags carries headline like this:

"Presidential Silence After an Attack on American Soil"

"When protesters were assaulted by Turkish agents on American soil, Trump stayed out of it."

https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/01/trump-stands-by-while-erdogan-orders-attack-protesters/580093/

All part of the dirty tactics being played out by the Deep State to muddy up Trump's presidency'!

Now notice where the topic of conversation turns to an individual referred to as "MF" and whether or not these users should work to "put him back in the news." That's easy to figure out who MF is if you look at the timeline of the news cycle literally the next days of these chat timestamps.



They eventually agree that an individual known as "S" will work to draft a "memo" somehow connecting "MF" to Turkey and the user known as "Huck" will use a secured connection with their "friends in New York."

Then the NY Times broke a story that that former Trump National Security Adviser Michael Flynn had accepted money from the Turkish government and then intervened on their behalf in U.S. military operations.

The chat goes on to cover several other topics: including a "project" involving an individual who this groups refers to as "Limey," Now first off I'm thinking Christopher Steel, however the timeline doesn't match up and he was all in from the beginning.

But guess who's timeline does line up? That bit** former British Member of Parliament named Louise Mensch, who I talk about repeatedly in this thread, and her NYC Blog/website Beat Street was flooding the Internet in the timeframe with reports and leaks that are dubiously-sourced. But Mensch's reporting suggestions that the FBI and "deep state" are close to indicting and arresting Flynn and several other Trump associates for espionage, and six months later Flynn is indicted by information, aka no grand jury, and eventually later once Mueller was dug in he got Manafort and Stone, and Papadopoulos.

Now as I've mentioned before Mensch has contacts/sources and she was the first person to break the lie about the Alfa Bank server nonsense. So Mensch's "sources" likely are members of the intelligence community, and in the case of Alfa Bank she could have very well been fed false information like Alfa Bank to support their own leaking and disinformation operations, knowing she was a rabid Trump Hating bit** and would run with it, or she was in on it. Either way it fits the ongoing Psyop assault on Trump.



So you have these users known as "Severus," "Roger," "Huck," "Juules," and "Dooku" all conspiring to push this Psyop on Trump. And the conversation ends when the individual known as "Juules" comments that the media will have their hands full because "RM is happening tonight," directly referring to the soon to be announcement of the appointment of Robert Mueller "RM" literally just hours after this specific chat was closed.

https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/appointment-special-counsel

If S is Sussmann and GT is Georgia Tech, and they know about RR, the implications are that this is a larger conspiracy than even most of this thread have ever speculated. Involving both Hillary folks and IC/DOJ folks. Which also mean Obama et al. Document's provenance? This could be as I mentioned to Hawg two days ago about Obama breaking protocol with the POTUS records archive and shipped all his stuff to a private storage two days before Trump was sworn in, instead of the National Archives as protocol states.

Now this AEWP is interesting. this isn't any Government acronym I know of, but in context it sound like a person.

"Roger: It really has. Didn't AEWP mention it when we gave him the tape?"

Okay 'him' is a male pronoun. Who was it that was breaking almost every thing on the MF phone call?



Adam Entous Washington Post = AEWP

Look at this Mollie Hemingway Federalist article it holds a LOT of this very content in this chat timeline and look who is referenced in bold. (I'm currently reading her book) and notice all the names mention in this article that are mention right here in these 1300 plus pages many many times, often by Will and Hawg and several others.

https://thefederalist.com/2020/05/08/obama-biden-oval-office-meeting-on-january-5-was-key-to-entire-anti-trump-operation/
Quote:

February 9: The strategy to get Flynn fired didn't immediately work so another leak was deployed to Greg Miller, Adam Entous and Ellen Nakashima of the Washington Post. That article, headline "National security adviser Flynn discussed sanctions with Russian ambassador,

They gave AEWP a tape? Tape of what? MF phone call? Sounds damn likely. All this BS about they were just data-mining is just the tip of the iceberg. If they are passing tapes of MF phone calls between Flynn and Sergey Kislyak, that's seriously ugly.

Conspiracy charges looking better and better the deeper you dig.

Is Jules actually Joffe? TBD I guess. all these pseudonyms have to be hashed out. Durham may have already done it, it would take just one of these 20 in this chat group to flip and the pseudonym legend can be filled in to ID all of them.






Now all this was flying all over the dark web sites and all the 8chan type of forums, and were immediately blown off as "conspiracy theory BS" which was easy to do because there is a lot of it on those formats. But even crazy ole Alex Jones was talking about this stuff, I'm sure his little team of muckrakers were living on 8chan looking for stuff to exploit and boost their monetization revenues.

My guess is Durham has spent the last couple of years trying to unwind all this mess which is mind blowing and he's had to apply constant pressure to crack the shells on these nuts.


As I posted before Durham has likely sent the message that "I'm just getting warmed up"

Let's hope so



People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
So... Not to bring Q over here, but did we know about these chat logs before '20?

Q posted these chat logs years ago. Like 2018 years ago....

fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Do you realize that these very same "gaming communications" plus more than this were released by Q (who ever that was) around 2017 or 2018 going forward… who ever was gathering this information released this same information via there Q release program. The gaming coms were released by Q ( who ever that is) once the people using Xbox or other gaming platforms were outed, this is not new information. I would "suspect" the MI was releasing info to let them know they were outed, but not sure why they would release that kind of information back then in 17 or 18 ? What's new is that the people who were doing the coms are now being released to the public.. via Durham investigation. So the puzzle as to who these coms people were in the releases is now coming together. There were other Q released coms.. however that's way too much information to try and remember .. supposedly this stuff is all being discussed again on the Chan's again.. 8 and 4 I believe..

Anyway.. some of this past information is converging, not trying to derail to Q stuff, just putting this out there that some of these coms are known (plus more coms were released, Q talked gaming coms more than once)
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

So... Not to bring Q over here, but did we know about these chat logs before '20?

Q posted these chat logs years ago. Like 2018 years ago....


Yeah and these chat grabs were posted on the dark web within 24 hrs of them happening live in 2017 because there was an insider going by "FreshCamel" that was capturing this stuff live supposedly.

I don't know crap about Q other than he was a guy named Ron Watkins supposedly outed as a fraud and his father started 4chan before selling it to someone else. I'm not going to deliberate this Q stuff one way or another, I'm simply trying to connect the dots.

If you think Ive got it all wrong fine, ignore it, I'm going to keep digging because Durham's reveals are starting to merge with things documented 2 and 4 years ago in this 1300 plus pade spy novel y'all have written here that is turning out to be a non-fiction book and I find it fascinating
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
fullback44
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
You are correct sir… some of this info is converging now (and it has in the past also) what's exciting is that if more of this info converges then there is a lot of stuff that will be coming down the pipe soon, this thread will be on fire with Durham Info! Let's hope Durham does not get shut down

Another "conspiracy" coming true.. how about that !
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
sicandtiredTXN said:

will25u said:

So... Not to bring Q over here, but did we know about these chat logs before '20?

Q posted these chat logs years ago. Like 2018 years ago....


Yeah and these chat grabs were posted on the dark web within 24 hrs of them happening live in 2017 because there was an insider going by "FreshCamel" that was capturing this stuff live supposedly.

I don't know crap about Q other than he was a guy named Ron Watkins supposedly outed as a fraud and his father started 4chan before selling it to someone else. I'm not going to deliberate this Q stuff one way or another, I'm simply trying to connect the dots.

If you think Ive got it all wrong fine, ignore it, I'm going to keep digging because Durham's reveals are starting to merge with things documented 2 and 4 years ago in this 1300 plus pade spy novel y'all have written here that is turning out to be a non-fiction book and I find it fascinating


We aren't disparaging you. Thank you for the digging that you were doing. I appreciate it.

We are just saying that there's some correlation to what you're saying now with what Q had posted before.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Fantastic post. Thank you.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:

sicandtiredTXN said:

will25u said:

So... Not to bring Q over here, but did we know about these chat logs before '20?

Q posted these chat logs years ago. Like 2018 years ago....


Yeah and these chat grabs were posted on the dark web within 24 hrs of them happening live in 2017 because there was an insider going by "FreshCamel" that was capturing this stuff live supposedly.

I don't know crap about Q other than he was a guy named Ron Watkins supposedly outed as a fraud and his father started 4chan before selling it to someone else. I'm not going to deliberate this Q stuff one way or another, I'm simply trying to connect the dots.

If you think Ive got it all wrong fine, ignore it, I'm going to keep digging because Durham's reveals are starting to merge with things documented 2 and 4 years ago in this 1300 plus pade spy novel y'all have written here that is turning out to be a non-fiction book and I find it fascinating


We aren't disparaging you. Thank you for the digging that you were doing. I appreciate it.

We are just saying that there's some correlation to what you're saying now with what you had posted before.


I don't feel like anyone is disparaging me, I'm not real sensitive about it anyway I just am not going down the Q rabbit hole

No problem at all
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
MarkTwain
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Jules asks Roger "any update on camp Eagle."

Be funny if camp eagle was camp Clinton. Eagle was Bill's secret service name.


Bill Clinton, codename "Eagle";
Chelsea, codename "Energy";
Hillary Clinton, codename "Evergreen";
Al Gore, codename "Sundance".
People sleep peaceably in their beds at night only because hard men stand ready to do violence on their behalf.
First Page Last Page
Page 1331 of 1413
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.