VaultingChemist said:
Anyone know if drcrinum is still around? He was very active on this thread, but hasn't posted anything in over a year.
MF Barns sock, but Hawg will correct me...
VaultingChemist said:
Anyone know if drcrinum is still around? He was very active on this thread, but hasn't posted anything in over a year.
Subpoena Issued in case as to Igor Y. Danchenko. (dvanm) Modified to correct type of service on 2/9/2022 (dvanm). (Entered: 02/08/2022) https://t.co/5UNuCYlnv7 pic.twitter.com/oz1ZfimbiI
— FOOL NELSON (@FOOL_NELSON) February 9, 2022
When Strzok went on his first book tour in 2020, he falsely "remembered" a critical detail. I called him out on it at the time. He then claimed "So, I got that wrong". He never gave Flynn that benefit.
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) February 10, 2022
Btw, @CBSDavidMartin never corrected the falsehood.https://t.co/vmvDZTRG15
When it comes to books by Democrats or anti-Trump hacks, it is almost always Simon & Schuster.akm91 said:
Wonder who's the publisher for his book and what are the ties to the DNC/Clintonistas?
So Mueller's team had evidence to establish computer crimes against Donald Trump Jr., but chose to not charge him.
— DawsonSField (@DawsonSField) February 11, 2022
What a weak Witchhunt! Letting a Trump get away & then redacting it for 2 years so no one would know Mueller let DJT Jr. get away! https://t.co/wYKmwq8keU
BUZZFEED the original publishers of the Steele Dossier, oh yes what a source.will25u said:
Thread.
Yes, it is Dawson, but he is just going over what is in the article. Nothing outlandish.So Mueller's team had evidence to establish computer crimes against Donald Trump Jr., but chose to not charge him.
— DawsonSField (@DawsonSField) February 11, 2022
What a weak Witchhunt! Letting a Trump get away & then redacting it for 2 years so no one would know Mueller let DJT Jr. get away! https://t.co/wYKmwq8keU
This wasn't limited to the Office of the President of the U.S.
— Techno Fog (@Techno_Fog) February 12, 2022
They also exploited data from Trump Tower, another Trump building, and a "healthcare provider."
More on the conflict of interest re: Joffe lawyers and Sussmann lawyers. ht @HansMahncke pic.twitter.com/n9SGbrC4J9
Quote:
Joffe and his associates manipulated this information to further a conspiracy theory that Trump and those in Trump's orbit were continuing their secret backchannels with the Russians. This was repackaged with the Alfa Bank hoax and given to Sussmann, who then laundered it to the CIA on February 9, 2017. Sussmann alleged to the CIA that the data showed "that Trump and/or his associates were using supposedly rare, Russian-made wireless phones in the vicinity of the White House and other locations." Durham "identified no support for these allegations."
One can't help ask why Joffe (via Sussmann) risked legal exposure to continue to push false Trump-Russia allegations before and after the 2016 election. First to the FBI in 2016 then to the CIA in 2017. It seems that Joffe was desperate, and his desperation only increased after Trump's election.
The source of Joffe's desperation? It's speculation at this point, but perhaps it goes to the origins of the purported Russia/DNC hack. To revise a previous question we have asked:We don't have an answer to that question - yet. Maybe we never will. But if anything, it seems likely that we will see an indictment of Rodney Joffe.Quote:
What if Crowdstrike was a patsy, there to unknowingly reach false conclusions of a "Russian hack" based on fraudulent information provided to them by Rodney Joffe and Perkins Coie and the DNC/Hillary Campaign?
benchmark said:
So, a Clinton/DNC paid subcontractor was mining internet traffic from POTUS' home, private office, executive office, and his personal Doctor for the purpose of obtaining derogatory information? Sounds like sort of a big deal.
benchmark said:
So, a Clinton/DNC paid subcontractor was mining internet traffic from POTUS' home, private office, executive office, and his personal Doctor for the purpose of obtaining derogatory information? Sounds like sort of a big deal.
On a general note, the bold is completely invalid in the 21st C. It was a slogan and meme from a different era of communication potentialities.We fixed the keg said:This would be one of the biggest "conspiracy theories" to be true (if true). At the time, I thought this was a dubious claim that was a 'bridge to far' because of how broad the conspiracy would have had to reach.Quote:
I'd never lost faith in Sidney, but had a lot of questions. I wonder who she'd talked to and what she knows. DARPA and the AF OSI? Don't know if they're really involved, but if so, *****
Who in the hell is really calling the shots, and who frickin' came up with the plan? I suspect it metasticized, but there seems to be endless tentacles!
Interesting bit of information for sure.
Intriguing point, Titan.titan said:On a general note, the bold is completely invalid in the 21st C. It was a slogan and meme from a different era of communication potentialities.We fixed the keg said:This would be one of the biggest "conspiracy theories" to be true (if true). At the time, I thought this was a dubious claim that was a 'bridge to far' because of how broad the conspiracy would have had to reach.Quote:
I'd never lost faith in Sidney, but had a lot of questions. I wonder who she'd talked to and what she knows. DARPA and the AF OSI? Don't know if they're really involved, but if so, *****
Who in the hell is really calling the shots, and who frickin' came up with the plan? I suspect it metasticized, but there seems to be endless tentacles!
Interesting bit of information for sure.
Now, nothing is EASIER than coordinating a large conspiracy largely unseen if you want to. Think of the Sunrise movement organizing the Floyd protests and the media not covering this. Think of zoom sessions or even just chat correspondence. None of that is that hard to do right now, provided you have ideologues conducting them. As always true about a conspiracy, you need to not have a mole that gives it away, but that is all. That is easier to accomplish in rabidly ideological groups and secret services. Especially in the present polarized and even blind obedience and mass group-think being common climate. (cancel culture)
Remark: This is not commenting on the whole Sidney thing evidence or not. Merely that the "conspiracy would be too larger" is no longer even remotely an argument against it or any other proposition.
Remember -- Hillary was supposed to win and no one was supposed to ever find out about the pre-election stuff.
— Dr. Shipwreckedcrew.substack.com (@shipwreckedcrew) February 12, 2022
When Trump won, a massive and desperate clean-up operation was needed....
Or Trump needed to be driven from office ASAP.
That is all.
🚨 HUGE NEWS 🚨
— Center for Renewing America (@amrenewctr) February 12, 2022
New statement from our Senior Fellow #KashPatel on the latest Durham filing. pic.twitter.com/9eLRzUKtQP
This Danchenko f-stick helped cause a lot of people their jobs, reputation and money.will25u said:I think Dr Ship may have solved the riddle of the sealed summons. If you read Danchenko's cryptic messages last week through the prism of a guilty plea, they start making sense. https://t.co/C6IPFg306u pic.twitter.com/684gB47dal
— Hans Mahncke (@HansMahncke) February 9, 2022
To prevent Garland and Monaco from shutting him down prematurely.
— The Durham Report (@TheDurhamReport) February 13, 2022
Obama knew. Clinton knew. Biden knew. Comey knew. Brennan knew. McCabe knew. Strzok knew.Clapper knew.Schiff knew.FBI knew.DOJ knew. CIA knew.State knew. They all knew Trump was innocent but they smeared and spied on him. Worst scandal in nation's history. Trump is a crime victim https://t.co/X2vCGLVAeH
— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) February 12, 2022
will25u said:Obama knew. Clinton knew. Biden knew. Comey knew. Brennan knew. McCabe knew. Strzok knew.Clapper knew.Schiff knew.FBI knew.DOJ knew. CIA knew.State knew. They all knew Trump was innocent but they smeared and spied on him. Worst scandal in nation's history. Trump is a crime victim https://t.co/X2vCGLVAeH
— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) February 12, 2022
Burr knew, Rubio knew, Grassley knew, Graham knew, Thune knew, Barrasso knew, Blunt knew, Portman knew, Murkowski knew, Collins knew,... THEY all knew.
— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) February 13, 2022
No one in DC did not know. That's the point. https://t.co/PAuguAnYad
CyclingAg82 said:
This Danchenko f-stick helped cause a lot of people their jobs, reputation and money.
I hope this mfer goes to jail for a long time, i hope he is the first of many. You all know the names, but Strzok, McCabe and Weissman head my list. Evil f's - all of them.
Igor, if you are still alive at 69, you will have to tell your fraud against innocent people frankly. You will have minimum 25 years in jail to tell your full story to all of US.
— M I L L I A N (@SergeiMillian) February 9, 2022
Yes. The tenure of the anti-Trump off-stage four year coup plot of 2017-2020 marked when D.C. became the most malignant major government on earth after Beijing.GCP12 said:will25u said:Obama knew. Clinton knew. Biden knew. Comey knew. Brennan knew. McCabe knew. Strzok knew.Clapper knew.Schiff knew.FBI knew.DOJ knew. CIA knew.State knew. They all knew Trump was innocent but they smeared and spied on him. Worst scandal in nation's history. Trump is a crime victim https://t.co/X2vCGLVAeH
— Tom Fitton (@TomFitton) February 12, 2022Burr knew, Rubio knew, Grassley knew, Graham knew, Thune knew, Barrasso knew, Blunt knew, Portman knew, Murkowski knew, Collins knew,... THEY all knew.
— TheLastRefuge (@TheLastRefuge2) February 13, 2022
No one in DC did not know. That's the point. https://t.co/PAuguAnYad
100% of NYT published leaks/stories on Russia collusion hoax are attempts to get ahead of how bad it will seem when the truth comes out. We should have known this was them confessing to the surveillance of POTUS in office.
— Mollie (@MZHemingway) February 13, 2022
FIFY.sicandtiredTXN said:
All we heard from the left and theLame StreamState Media, every day was everything Trump was bigger than Watergate, everything he did was held up as the biggest scandal in American History.
It is bigger than any war in our history. Losing the revolution? America remains better off than where we are headed now. Losing 1812, same. Losing the civil war? Same, slavery was dying anyway. Losing ww1? We'd actually have been better off. Losing ww2? Well, we gave our country to our own nazis. No difference, except that we allowed it to happen without firing a shot.Maroon Elephant said:
It goes without saying that if any sliver of this is true (and it appears most of it is) that makes this the biggest non-war, non-assassination story in the history of our nation. I wish we had competent and free thinking mainstream media that would cover it all.
The Ukraine crisis is the real deal IMO. However, the fact that we even ask ourselves this question speaks to the elephant in the room - we can't trust our government.sicandtiredTXN said:
This Russia fake crisis is a smokescreen to cover all the scandals coming to light.
Sullivan was briefed by Marc Elias about the Trump server allegations in Sept 2016 and hyped the claim in a statement before the election. Question is what did Sullivan authorize?
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) February 13, 2022
^100% concur! There had better be some REAL consequences (serious fines/loss of licenses/financial ruin, etc.) come from this...and not just public condemnation and short term, embarrassment.VaultingChemist said:Sullivan was briefed by Marc Elias about the Trump server allegations in Sept 2016 and hyped the claim in a statement before the election. Question is what did Sullivan authorize?
— Chuck Ross (@ChuckRossDC) February 13, 2022
I am sure Durham released this bombshell to prevent Garland from shutting down the investigation.
Hillary spied on Trump with assist of Obama's team (including Biden). After Hillary lost, the coverup began, and continues to this day. I am almost certain that the election fraud occurred as part of this coverup, and the Jan. 6 "insurrection" was used to stifle the investigation into election fraud. Unbelievable.
Edit for Hillary quote: "If that f__king ******* (Donald Trump) wins, we all hang from nooses."
Yes, Hillary, we now understand why you said that.
Regulars know DH is apolitical but conservative at heart.
— Margot Cleveland (@ProfMJCleveland) February 13, 2022
Me: "So, Friday Durham, who's Special Counsel you probably never heard of filed motion that broke loose story. MSM won't be able to ignore anymore."
DH: "Durrum. Never heard of him."
Proof 64,384 legacy media has died.
sicandtiredTXN said:
All we heard from the left and the Lame Stream Media, every day was everything Trump was bigger than Watergate, everything he did was held up as the biggest scandal in American History.
Well it's now verified that they were all projecting what they were doing and it is bigger than Watergate. This wasn't four burglars ruffling through filing cabinets at the DNC office at the Watergate Hotel in Foggy Bottom DC, or Dick Nixon erasing 12 minutes of tape, this was full blown cyber attacks on the Trump Servers during the campaign, tapping all the phone lines in Trump tower, NSA monitoring all telephonic and electronic traffic on the Republican Candidate for POTUS, the POTUS elect, and even electronically spied on the sitting POTUS, his Executive Office, The Eisenhower Executive Building, and even his private residences in Bedminster and Mar a Lago while he was the sitting POTUS.
All this nonsense about the Clinton Campaign paying for the Steele Dossier, is nothing but a distraction to all they were really doing. Oppo Research is done in every election, the fact that they used foreign actors crossed some lines, but is nothing compared to what Durham is bringing to light.
Hillary was supposed to win and none of this would have ever seen the light of day.
Where are the calls to Georgia Tech and all they were involved in.????
Now you have leakers all over the White House claiming Russia is going to invade Ukraine any minute, and I will bet a grand against a wooden nickel it's nothing but a wag the dog moment to distract from all this currently rolling out of the Durham investigation. I would not be surprised to know Biden's handlers are calling in the marker for lifting the Trump sanctions against Russia, and Putin is returning the favor by causing all these distractions. Every time Trump talked to Putin the MSM was screaming for a transcript. And Trump released his Phone Call transcripts. Biden's calls have all been secretive no transcripts are being demanded and they damn sure aren't volunteering any.
This Russia fake crisis is a smokescreen to cover all the scandals coming to light.
2) was called in by the dnc in late April of 2016, contracted crowdstrike, and played middleman between CS, DNC, and FBI, including editing crowdstrike reports.
— Mccabe's Porsche on Blocks (@Larry_Beech) February 13, 2022