I'm shocked and pleasantly surprised that CBS is letting her run with all these scoops! She is one of the best.akm91 said:
God bless Catherine Herridge for the outstanding job she's doing as a journalist!
I'm shocked and pleasantly surprised that CBS is letting her run with all these scoops! She is one of the best.akm91 said:
God bless Catherine Herridge for the outstanding job she's doing as a journalist!
Just wanted to star this response and usher an end to the ******* that's ruining F16.WatchOle said:
Yes - I will look into this
Tailgate88 said:I'm shocked and pleasantly surprised that CBS is letting her run with all these scoops! She is one of the best.akm91 said:
God bless Catherine Herridge for the outstanding job she's doing as a journalist!
will25u said:So this is the charging document for Flynn?aggiehawg said:
From Herridge.
So Mueller is saying that Flynn DID lie to Strozk and Pientka?
Brandon Van Grack, for starters.akm91 said:
So which of the SC "Dream Team" lawyers gets disbarred for this?
Hope is all of them!
Christmas in May?Prosperdick said:
The libs love rattling the moderator sabres for their own ends now they can rattle it for us!!! Sorry my son and I just watched Die Hard for the 50th time last night.
Prognightmare said:Just wanted to star this response and usher an end to the ******* that's ruining F16.WatchOle said:
Yes - I will look into this
Love it that he was appointed. There's fixin to be all kinds of light shown on this mugger.akm91 said:Ratcliffe picking up where Grenell left off.Quote:
Ratcliffe, in his first major move as DNI, sent the declassified transcripts of phone conversations between Flynn and Kislyak to Sens. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, and Ron Johnson, R-Wis., on Friday. The Flynn-Kislyak phone calls took place in 2016 on Dec. 22 and Dec. 29.
Ratcliffe continuing Grenell's work
The FBI is a disgrace and must be done away with entirely.Quote:
He was for a decade following 9/11 the federal government's police chief as FBI director. Thanks to fawning by the Washington press, Bob Mueller retired with a sterling reputation despite blowing the anthrax case.
In 2017, he came out of retirement and tried to frame President Donald John Trump. John Dowd, Trump's lawyer, provided the details to Gregg Jarrett of Fox.
Dowd told Jarrett, "Mueller's scheme was the same one captured in the (newly released) FBI set-up notes pertaining to Flynn. They knew they had nothing, but using their official power they created and perpetuated the facade of an investigation."
Dowd said Mueller admitted he had nothing to the president's lawyers on March 5, 2018.
But the investigation dragged on for another year.
Dowd said, "As I look back, we had the most perfect trusting relationship with Mueller based on his word and handshake, which held throughout. No paper. Word was solid. They received everything they asked for without a hitch or page missing, including the most intimate notes of conversations with and by POTUS. Every witness they requested testified truthfully. No lying. No grand jury testimony. Mueller affirmed all of this in our March 5 meeting. How could there be a whisper of obstruction under these circumstances?"
Obviously, entrapment -- framing a fellow -- was standard operating procedure for Mueller, a longtime FBI man.
Jarrett wrote, "Despite no evidence of an underlying crime, Mueller insisted that the president be interviewed by the special counsel. Dowd knew it was a trap. Mueller had done it to Flynn and others. He was clearly angling for obstruction of justice and hoping to ensnare the president in the equivalent of a perjury trap if he consented to be interviewed."
Politics aside, this is unacceptable.
The left used to complain about J. Edgar Hoover spying on Americans, and rightly so. Hoover kept files on everyone in Washington in an abuse of power worthy of the Kremlin.
50 years later, the FBI is still at it.
Under Obama, the FBI lied to federal judges 17 times to get permission to spy on Donald Trump.
Instead of going after those real crimes, Mueller tried to frame President Trump.
Rockdoc said:
I agree, but what jury in DC would actually convict him?
Ixnay on the military tribunals. Change of venue? Available, but unlikely.valvemonkey91 said:Rockdoc said:
I agree, but what jury in DC would actually convict him?
If he is even indicted and IF it goes to trial, is it possible to try these type cases in federal courts in the Midwest? As far away from DC as possible? Can these be military trials?
aggiehawg said:Ixnay on the military tribunals. Change of venue? Available, but unlikely.valvemonkey91 said:Rockdoc said:
I agree, but what jury in DC would actually convict him?
If he is even indicted and IF it goes to trial, is it possible to try these type cases in federal courts in the Midwest? As far away from DC as possible? Can these be military trials?
I think the main reason people bring it up is because of treason and the coup attempt. Typically you think of a coup attempt or treasonous activity being handled by the military.EKUAg said:aggiehawg said:Ixnay on the military tribunals. Change of venue? Available, but unlikely.valvemonkey91 said:Rockdoc said:
I agree, but what jury in DC would actually convict him?
If he is even indicted and IF it goes to trial, is it possible to try these type cases in federal courts in the Midwest? As far away from DC as possible? Can these be military trials?
Why do people keep going to military tribunals for civilian crimes? Those were set up to try the terrorists picked up on the battlefield, not potential crimes within the US not related to the GWOT.
December 31, 2016...Page 13.drcrinum said:
Here's the link to read the Flynn-Kislyak transcripts:
https://www.grassley.senate.gov/sites/default/files/2020-05-29%20ODNI%20to%20CEG%20RHJ%20%28Flynn%20Transcripts%29.pdf
Flynn successfully nullifies one of Soetoro's attempts to undermine the incoming President.Quote:
FLYNN: Good
KISLYAK: Your proposal that we need to act with cold heads~ uh, is exactly what is uh, invested in the decision.
FLYNN: Good
KISLYAK: And I just wanted to telI you that we found that these actions have targeted not only against Russia, but also against the president elect.
FLYNN: yeah, yeah
KISLYAK: and and with all our rights to responds we have decided not to act now because, its because people are dissatisfied with the lost of elections and, and its very deplorable. So, so I just wanted to let you know that our conversation was taken with weight. And also ...
FLYNN: Good. Good.
KISLYAK: We are hoping within two weeks we will be able to start working in more constructive way.
Sadly, people grasp for straws when public trust is destroyed. If you can't trust civilian law enforcement and the courts - the military is the last straw. Exactly why so many corrupted countries devolve into juntas and coup d'tats.EKUAg said:
Why do people keep going to military tribunals for civilian crimes? Those were set up to try the terrorists picked up on the battlefield, not potential crimes within the US not related to the GWOT.