Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,601,917 Views | 49326 Replies | Last: 2 hrs ago by MarkTwain
rab79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Has this been discussed this as a motive for dragging out the Flynn fiasco? And is it correct about the gag order? I honestly don't remember.

https://straightlinelogic.com/2020/05/25/the-unspooling-by-james-howard-kunstler/
Quote:

What "the Resistance" really fears more than anything is General Michael Flynn's mouth. He's been under a judicial gag order since his case went before Judge Emmet Sullivan's federal district court. Understandably, Gen. Flynn wasn't eager to complicate his unjust plight with a contempt citation. Judge Sullivan's recent shenanigans have one object: to keep that gag order in force as long as possible. The moment Judge Sullivan confirms the DOJ's move to dismiss the charges, as he is duty-bound to do, General Flynn will be free to offer his views to the public. That might be inconvenient in an election season.



NO AMNESTY!

in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
rab79 said:

Has this been discussed this as a motive for dragging out the Flynn fiasco? And is it correct about the gag order? I honestly don't remember.

https://straightlinelogic.com/2020/05/25/the-unspooling-by-james-howard-kunstler/
Quote:

What "the Resistance" really fears more than anything is General Michael Flynn's mouth. He's been under a judicial gag order since his case went before Judge Emmet Sullivan's federal district court. Understandably, Gen. Flynn wasn't eager to complicate his unjust plight with a contempt citation. Judge Sullivan's recent shenanigans have one object: to keep that gag order in force as long as possible. The moment Judge Sullivan confirms the DOJ's move to dismiss the charges, as he is duty-bound to do, General Flynn will be free to offer his views to the public. That might be inconvenient in an election season.






Don't think there is a gag order. If there was, Powell couldn't be out talking about the case.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rab79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BuddysBud said:

rab79 said:


cliff notes so the rest of us aren't subjected to any more of the hilldog skreetching? please


Just read the responses to the video. They sum it up quite well.
What I get from the comments is that we should hang hillary and nuke china, and that apparently she was airing her dirty laundry. Any synopsis of what she said would be appreciated, my BP won't take listening to her voice.
NO AMNESTY!

in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hillary is indirectly admitting that the DNC is in bed with China.
rab79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BuddysBud said:

Hillary is indirectly admitting that he DNC is in bed with China.
so nothing we didn't already know, just confirmation from the ass's mouth.
NO AMNESTY!

in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
rab79 said:

BuddysBud said:

Hillary is indirectly admitting that he DNC is in bed with China.
so nothing we didn't already know, just confirmation from the ass's mouth.
ecoag80
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Okay, I'll put on the tin foil hat and ask the question. How long before someone has a slip and fall in the shower and ends up like Seth Rich?
rab79
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ecoag80 said:

Okay, I'll put on the tin foil hat and ask the question. How long before someone has a slip and fall in the shower and ends up like Seth Rich?
how do you get bullet holes in the back of your head from falling in the shower?
NO AMNESTY!

in order for democrats, liberals, progressives et al to continue their illogical belief systems they have to pretend not to know a lot of things; by pretending "not to know" there is no guilt, no actual connection to conscience. Denial of truth allows easier trespass.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


Adam drastically underestimates how glad I am that John McCain is dead. He was one of the vilest people to hold elected office in the last century.
Rudebaeger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

John McCain is the poster child for the following saying:

People enter politics for all of the right reasons and stay in politics for all of the wrong reasons.
agdad4x
How long do you want to ignore this user?
not bullet holes - just a caved in skull ...like from a sledge hammer... two or three times ...
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rudebaeger said:


John McCain is the poster child for the following saying:

People enter politics for all of the right reasons and stay in politics for all of the wrong reasons.
He was actually a sleaze before he even entered politics. Look at his flight history (And service history), and how he got into naval aviation despite being last in his class at the naval academy (where he wouldn't have even gotten in but for his dad/grand-dad).
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:



Quote:

Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of today.



Quote:

No man who is corrupt, no man who condones corruption in others, can possibly do his duty by the community.



I'm well past the point of caring who this catches and where their political loyalties lie.

I'm not surprised a bottom-feeder like McCain was involved with this garbage. He wasn't the only one. It would not surprise me at all to see people like Burr, Corker, and Ryan somehow involved with this as well.

For Obama and his shadow state to get away with this, Republicans had to look the other way. Some of them, like McCain, did even more.


BuddysBud
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Stlkofta said:

will25u said:



Quote:

Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of today.



Quote:

No man who is corrupt, no man who condones corruption in others, can possibly do his duty by the community.



I'm well past the point of caring who this catches and where their political loyalties lie.

I'm not surprised a bottom-feeder like McCain was involved with this garbage. He wasn't the only one. It would not surprise me at all to see people like Burr, Corker, and Ryan somehow involved with this as well.

For Obama and his shadow state to get away with this, Republicans had to look the other way. Some of them, like McCain, did even more.





Agreed! Both parties are filled with swamp rats that need to be brought into the light. I would be disappointed if members of only one party ended up being exposed. Unfortunately, the swamp is so deep that I doubt if anything will happen to anyone of significance.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
BuddysBud said:

Stlkofta said:

will25u said:



Quote:

Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of today.



Quote:

No man who is corrupt, no man who condones corruption in others, can possibly do his duty by the community.



I'm well past the point of caring who this catches and where their political loyalties lie.

I'm not surprised a bottom-feeder like McCain was involved with this garbage. He wasn't the only one. It would not surprise me at all to see people like Burr, Corker, and Ryan somehow involved with this as well.

For Obama and his shadow state to get away with this, Republicans had to look the other way. Some of them, like McCain, did even more.





Agreed! Both parties are filled with swamp rats that need to be brought into the light. I would be disappointed if members of only one party ended up being exposed. Unfortunately, the swamp is so deep that I doubt if anything will happen to anyone of significance.
Actually bi-partisan indictments make it more likely the MSM covers it significantly and much more difficult for them to paint it as political revenge from Trump via Barr. Bottom line every bad actor on each side needs to pay.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Bottom line every bad actor on each side needs to pay.
I know what you mean but it really should just be every bad actor needs to pay, period. Justice should be blind to party affiliation.
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BuddysBud said:

Stlkofta said:

will25u said:



Quote:

Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned an invisible government owing no allegiance and acknowledging no responsibility to the people. To destroy this invisible government, to befoul the unholy alliance between corrupt business and corrupt politics is the first task of the statesmanship of today.



Quote:

No man who is corrupt, no man who condones corruption in others, can possibly do his duty by the community.



I'm well past the point of caring who this catches and where their political loyalties lie.

I'm not surprised a bottom-feeder like McCain was involved with this garbage. He wasn't the only one. It would not surprise me at all to see people like Burr, Corker, and Ryan somehow involved with this as well.

For Obama and his shadow state to get away with this, Republicans had to look the other way. Some of them, like McCain, did even more.





Agreed! Both parties are filled with swamp rats that need to be brought into the light. I would be disappointed if members of only one party ended up being exposed. Unfortunately, the swamp is so deep that I doubt if anything will happen to anyone of significance.
I think we've got the perfect storm to make this happen:

1. A President who knows people in his party were in on it and doesn't give a damn about protecting anyone involved.

2. An Attorney General who doesn't give a damn what a party thinks of him.

3. Prosecuting attorneys and investigators with a missionary zeal to find the facts and pursue justice.

This is like baseball. You don't have to hit them all to send the right message. You hit 300 and knock a few home runs in the deal and you will have everyone paying attention to the consequences of doing the dirty in the future.

will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Roger Stone Files Notice of Appeal After DC Courtroom Lynching

Quote:

Lawyers for Roger Stone filed a notice of appeal with the Washington DC Appeals Court on Sunday night.

While there is great public support for a pardon or a commutation for Roger Stone there is no guarantee this will take place.

Roger Stone has not been promised or assured of a presidential pardon.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


https://thefederalist.com/2020/05/26/its-not-the-trump-administration-politicizing-flynns-case-its-judge-sullivan/

Quote:

A Bunch of Hypocrites


SeMgCo87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
agdad4x said:

not bullet holes - just a caved in skull ...like from a sledge hammer... two or three times ...
You mean like "Self-Inflicted, Blunt Force Trauma on the Back of the Skull?"

Yeah, sounds okay...clear case of suicide, if you ask me...
VaultingChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Quote:

Investigators are trying to determine whether Obama asked for the Flynn intercept or it was offered to him and by whom. They also want to know how many times Comey and Obama talked about Flynn in December 2016 and January 2017.

"We need to determine what motivated the FBI on Jan. 4, 2017 to overrule its own agent who believed Flynn was innocent and the probe should be closed," one investigator said.
VaultingChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG


Anyone willing to fax Beth a copy of the Fokker case?
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think Techno meant May 31st.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
akm91 said:

I think Techno meant May 31st.
If the deep state had their way it would be Mar 31st, 2021 (or perhaps later).
ccatag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
There's a whole separate thread on Grennell's response to Warner. Damn, I hope he stays in gov't in some capacity! We need leaders like him.
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That last paragraph also. Sheesh. I bet Congress can't wait for that guy to leave.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Line Ate Member said:

That last paragraph also. Sheesh. I bet Congress can't wait for that guy to leave.
Ratcliffe gets sworn in today.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Line Ate Member said:

That last paragraph also. Sheesh. I bet Congress can't wait for that guy to leave.
Ratcliffe gets sworn in today.
I wonder if he has any final "FU's" on the way out the door. Although I'm sure Trump has another job lined up for him so I doubt he'll be out of the lime light for long.

Meanwhile...

brownbrick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
To address the earlier Hillary clip, I'll provide a summary:

"Well we know the russians were helping the republicans last time around, so what if this time around the democrats get the chinese involved. What if this time the democrat nominee goes onto a news show and wonders allowed, "boy wouldn't it be something if the chinese pulled Trumps tax records from the IRS, I bet the US media would handsomely reward any chinese official who gave them Trumps tax records...." She goes on to say that what they learned from the Mueller investigation is that something like that couldn't be a conspiracy because it is out in the open....

I think even Maddow was a little uncomfortable with the suggestion Clinton was making.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
3 Toed Pete said:

nortex97 said:

aggiehawg said:

Rockdoc said:

Tailgate88 said:

Fox News Alert: FBI Director Christopher Wray orders internal review of investigation into former National Security Adviser Michael Flynn.

No link yet just came to my phone.



I just saw that. Kinda worried that Wray may have a personal angle on this.
Who is still at the FBI besides Pientka? There's still people left at DOJ like Bruce Ohr and Van Grack the hack but I thought most everyone at the FBI was already gone?
It's a sham. It's a 'review procedures and current employees' investigation. In other words, "we will improve some processes and no one currently employed did anything wrong" BS pubic relations deal to counter anything Durham/Jensen come up with.
We saw exactly what wray is all about a couple of years ago with him trying to impede the release of the Nunes Memo. He has stayed in character ever since.
He blatantly lied about the accuracy of its content. He should be gone
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
brownbrick said:



I think even Maddow was a little uncomfortable with the suggestion Clinton was making.
Sounds like China collusion to me.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
brownbrick said:

To address the earlier Hillary clip, I'll provide a summary:

"Well we know the russians were helping the republicans last time around, so what if this time around the democrats get the chinese involved. What if this time the democrat nominee goes onto a news show and wonders allowed, "boy wouldn't it be something if the chinese pulled Trumps tax records from the IRS, I bet the US media would handsomely reward any chinese official who gave them Trumps tax records...." She goes on to say that what they learned from the Mueller investigation is that something like that couldn't be a conspiracy because it is out in the open....

I think even Maddow was a little uncomfortable with the suggestion Clinton was making.
I'm sure Madcow asked "well Mrs. Clinton, keeping top secret, classified material on your server in your bathroom and allowing it to traverse to Anthony Weiner's laptop is DEFINITELY against the law regardless of intent whereas not releasing your tax records isn't breaking any U.S. laws. You do see the difference, correct?
First Page Last Page
Page 1136 of 1410
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.