Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,730,324 Views | 49406 Replies | Last: 22 hrs ago by Garrelli 5000
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


lol, quick, someone tell McCabe the FBI was closing the file on Flynn on January 4th because no derogatory information could be found.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blindey said:

I would be keeping my mouth shut if I were McCabe. It sounds like his political cover in DC is running thin.
Have you read the motion yet? I was surprised that Yates came out so well. Both Comey and McCabe were very dismissive of her and did what they wanted, over her misgivings and directives in contravention of their chosen course.

They had the transcript. They could give a briefing to Pence or Trump as to what was said. Yates wanted such briefings to occur but Comey refused did an end round run on her, cutting her out of the loop and infuriating her.

And technically, she was one of their bosses.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

blindey said:

I would be keeping my mouth shut if I were McCabe. It sounds like his political cover in DC is running thin.
Have you read the motion yet? I was surprised that Yates came out so well. Both Comey and McCabe were very dismissive of her and did what they wanted, over her misgivings and directives in contravention of their chosen course.

They had the transcript. They could give a briefing to Pence or Trump as to what was said. Yates wanted such briefings to occur but Comey refused did an end round run on her, cutting her out of the loop and infuriating her.

And technically, she was one of their bosses.
Where can I get the motion?

edit, nvm, found it
MooreTrucker
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So a quick one minute refresher, please. Flynn plead guilty because the threatened his family, correct? With what?
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
actually had a work appointment today and saw this thread had 100+ new replies when i got back in to my car. definitely not disappointed.



Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
MooreTrucker said:

So a quick one minute refresher, please. Flynn plead guilty because the threatened his family, correct? With what?
They threatened going after his son. And in violation of the law, made that agreement without the knowledge of the court, then lied to the court in swearing that there were no other negotiations or agreements other than what the court was aware of.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MooreTrucker said:

So a quick one minute refresher, please. Flynn plead guilty because the threatened his family, correct? With what?
They threatened to prosecute his son for FARA or something like it.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MooreTrucker said:

So a quick one minute refresher, please. Flynn plead guilty because the threatened his family, correct? With what?
Trumped up FARA charges as his son worked at Flynn Intelligence Group. That would have been the Inovo deal wherein there was contact with Turkish government officials.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

blindey said:

I would be keeping my mouth shut if I were McCabe. It sounds like his political cover in DC is running thin.
Have you read the motion yet? I was surprised that Yates came out so well. Both Comey and McCabe were very dismissive of her and did what they wanted, over her misgivings and directives in contravention of their chosen course.

They had the transcript. They could give a briefing to Pence or Trump as to what was said. Yates wanted such briefings to occur but Comey refused did an end round run on her, cutting her out of the loop and infuriating her.

And technically, she was one of their bosses.
lol, one thing's for certain. McCabe hasn't read the motion.
andrago94
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think it would have been better for the Trump side if they had let this drag out in the courts longer. Now I guess Flynn's old law firm is off the hook for producing more documents along with the government. The other side can claim this was all political machinations by Trump DOJ. Having the judge grant the dismissal request would have been better...
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

will25u said:




Ohhhhh so the FBI was trying to do Trump a solid and go after anyone who lies to his administration? Riiiiiight
No, I don't care what CNN or MSNBC said this time
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
andrago94 said:

I think it would have been better for the Trump side if they had let this drag out in the courts longer. Now I guess Flynn's old law firm is off the hook for producing more documents along with the government. The other side can claim this was all political machinations by Trump DOJ. Having the judge grant the dismissal request would have been better...
Well, the documents don't lie.
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

This I am sure has been discussed here before, but maybe not with proof. Do we now have proof? Obama knew...


Obama is gonna be pissed when he sees this on the news!
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Oh look, they got their little mouthpiece Natasha to get something out to the twitter brigade in no time flat.

FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
andrago94 said:

I think it would have been better for the Trump side if they had let this drag out in the courts longer. Now I guess Flynn's old law firm is off the hook for producing more documents along with the government. The other side can claim this was all political machinations by Trump DOJ. Having the judge grant the dismissal request would have been better...
Na, Flynn can still go after them for malpractice and get these all through discovery.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:


Wait... Nadler is accusing someone of politicizing? NADLER???!!!!

No, I don't care what CNN or MSNBC said this time
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Transcripts are going to be released tomorrow!!! Per hanity and Jarret.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
will25u said:

Transcripts are going to be released tomorrow!!! Per hanity and Jarret.
Ooohh! Goody, goody! More fun to look forward to tomorrow.
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tailgate88 said:

AG 2000' said:


Dude has to be a narcissist psychopath to post that.
Oh, so you know him then
No, I don't care what CNN or MSNBC said this time
tremble
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
andrago94 said:

I think it would have been better for the Trump side if they had let this drag out in the courts longer. Now I guess Flynn's old law firm is off the hook for producing more documents along with the government. The other side can claim this was all political machinations by Trump DOJ. Having the judge grant the dismissal request would have been better...


This is my concern as well. Unless Flynn files a civil suit against these crooks a lot of this will get swept under the rug.
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
tremble said:

andrago94 said:

I think it would have been better for the Trump side if they had let this drag out in the courts longer. Now I guess Flynn's old law firm is off the hook for producing more documents along with the government. The other side can claim this was all political machinations by Trump DOJ. Having the judge grant the dismissal request would have been better...


This is my concern as well. Unless Flynn files a civil suit against these crooks a lot of this will get swept under the rug.
You don't think that he isn't going to go after his previous law firm and the US government (can he do this) for the actions against him? Dude is going to get paid, and it still won't be enough for what these people did to him.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff is planning to selectively release information from some of the 53 declassified transcripts of witnesses that testified before Congress regarding the FBI's Russia probe into the Trump campaign. This move, comes after a long battle against Republican colleagues, who are fighting to make all the transcripts available to the American public, said a U.S. official, with knowledge of Schiff's plans.

Schiff has been fighting the release of the transcripts.
Quote:

The decision for Schiff to publish a selective portion of the 6,000 pages of transcripts comes after a recent public showdown with Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell, who is also fighting to make all the transcripts public. In fact, Grenell reiterated in a letter Wednesday that if Schiff doesn't make the transcripts public then he will release them himself.

Interestingly, the committee voted unanimously in the fall of 2018, to make all the transcripts public after declassification, which has already been done.

"Schiff's planning to selectively leak to the liberal media what he wants, while keeping the truth from the American people," said one source, familiar with Schiff's plans.
LINK

Cherry-picking, out of context, no doubt. Hope Grennel beats him to the punch.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

will25u said:

Transcripts are going to be released tomorrow!!! Per hanity and Jarret.
Ooohh! Goody, goody! More fun to look forward to tomorrow.
Not sure there is going to be enough popcorn for this.
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

House Intelligence Committee Chairman Rep. Adam Schiff is planning to selectively release information from some of the 53 declassified transcripts of witnesses that testified before Congress regarding the FBI's Russia probe into the Trump campaign. This move, comes after a long battle against Republican colleagues, who are fighting to make all the transcripts available to the American public, said a U.S. official, with knowledge of Schiff's plans.

Schiff has been fighting the release of the transcripts.
Quote:

The decision for Schiff to publish a selective portion of the 6,000 pages of transcripts comes after a recent public showdown with Director of National Intelligence Richard Grenell, who is also fighting to make all the transcripts public. In fact, Grenell reiterated in a letter Wednesday that if Schiff doesn't make the transcripts public then he will release them himself.

Interestingly, the committee voted unanimously in the fall of 2018, to make all the transcripts public after declassification, which has already been done.

"Schiff's planning to selectively leak to the liberal media what he wants, while keeping the truth from the American people," said one source, familiar with Schiff's plans.
LINK

Cherry-picking, out of context, no doubt. Hope Grennel beats him to the punch.
I have to assume Grenell will release them. *****-for-brains will be very upset someone leaked his plans. Couldn't happen to a bigger, lying, leaking PoS.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

I have to assume Grenell will release them. *****-for-brains will be very upset someone leaked his plans. Couldn't happen to a bigger, lying, leaking PoS.
To Sara Carter, no less.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
3 Toed Pete
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It seems to me the selective release of the transcripts gives Grenell even more justification for releasing ALL of the transcripts
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prognightmare said:


Can Trump sue him if his lies go too far?

I hate this guy's face.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
3 Toed Pete said:

It seems to me the selective release of the transcripts gives Grenell even more justification for releasing ALL of the transcripts
If Schiff didn't release everything, I'm certain Grenell will.
ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Schiff head only selected certain transcripts to release. His ass is puckering.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


First transcript released by Schiff: Michael Sussmann:

https://intelligence.house.gov/uploadedfiles/ms53.pdf
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prognightmare said:

Schiff head only selected certain transcripts to release. His ass is puckering.
That's been the dem's SOP for years and most likely coordinated with MSM to blast out the propaganda.
"And liberals, being liberals, will double down on failure." - dedgod
valvemonkey91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VegasAg86 said:

3 Toed Pete said:

It seems to me the selective release of the transcripts gives Grenell even more justification for releasing ALL of the transcripts
If Schiff didn't release everything, I'm certain Grenell will.



We have been hearing that crap for 3 years. I'll believe it when I see it. I still stand by my prediction that nothing is going to happen to anyone politically connected.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Prognightmare said:


LOL at Schiff's bullet points:

1 - Trump Tower meeting was attempted collusion
2 - Trump's "Russia, if you can find her emails" shows collusion
3 - Stone and Cohen tried to lie to hide collusion
4 - Paul Prince apparently misled the committee.
5 - Flynn's call
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
valvemonkey91 said:

VegasAg86 said:

3 Toed Pete said:

It seems to me the selective release of the transcripts gives Grenell even more justification for releasing ALL of the transcripts
If Schiff didn't release everything, I'm certain Grenell will.



We have been hearing that crap for 3 years.
Not exactly. Grenell has been putting the pressure on hard.
First Page Last Page
Page 1081 of 1412
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.