You get to a point where you realize that a handful of Americans prevented the successful conclusion of a coup attempt facilitated by the Democrat Party and led by elements of the Federal Bureaucracy aligned with it.will25u said:
And decentralized again. After 9/11, the field offices were required to run everything through the DC HQ. Before then, DOJ oversaw the field offices through the US Attorney's offices who reported to Main Justice.Mtn_Guide said:
That's why the FBI needs to be completely dismantled and burned to the ground.
I'll say it again. Perkins, Coie is a real life Bendini, Lambert and Locke. Completely crooked law firm.Quote:
As for senior Justice Department official Bruce Ohr's account of one of their meetings, Steele added: "I think Bruce Ohr has misreported it ... or misremembered it."
He also revealed that one piece of anti-Trump information he obtained in 2016 a since-debunked claim that Trump secretly may have communicated with Russia through a computer server at the Alfa Bank didn't come from a Russian intelligence source but rather from one of the lawyers at Perkins Coie.
And Steele divulged he paid some of his sources of information as much as $3,000 to $5,000 a month, prompting the lawyers for the plaintiffs to ask whether that might have compromised some of the information he got.
"So they had a financial incentive to feed you stuff that was interesting, right?" a lawyer asked.
"Yes, that is true," Steele answered. "But they were paid also to do other project work." Steele added he didn't think his sources would mislead him because they could be terminated if they did so.
I seem to recall that one of the conclusions reached after 9/11 was these alphabet agencies not communicating, and that the Department of Homeland Security was created to assure that communication links across agencies would occur. Thought was, I guess, that CIA operatives knew about some of the 19, but couldn't get the concerted attention of the FBI to pursue some of the leads.aggiehawg said:And decentralized again. After 9/11, the field offices were required to run everything through the DC HQ. Before then, DOJ oversaw the field offices through the US Attorney's offices who reported to Main Justice.Mtn_Guide said:
That's why the FBI needs to be completely dismantled and burned to the ground.
In 2016, the only reason the FBI agents in the SDNY were not allowed to have their legal counteparts to apply for search warrants for Anthony Weiner's laptop that contained Huma and Hillary's emails was because Comey, Baker, et al wouldn't allow them to. And Preet Bahara didn't have the guts to stand up to Lynch and apply for them anyway. Not after the Tango on the Tarmac.
aggiehawg said:
Consent motion? Sounds like Barr has ordered DC US Attorney (Acting) Shea to play ball with Sydney.
Same players, all part of the same conspiracy. Revelations from the Flynn case will cause other dominoes to fall, is my prediction.Quote:
Interesting timing considering the new documents about to be exposed in the Flynn Case. Methinks Barr has coordinated this move, perhaps to use the Flynn revelations as a prelude to Durham.
webgem08 said:
Huh, he doesn't mention that on his website. I wonder why?
Na, they have no intention of a fair investigation with this.Rockdoc said:
They're not gonna be pleased with what they find out (if that even matters to them).
Was he a partner? Which office?Tibbers said:webgem08 said:
Huh, he doesn't mention that on his website. I wonder why?
I called his office and asked that very question. Their office worker Katie said, "we didn't think it was pertinent to share that information with constituents." I told her that wasn't a wise position to take and explained how it really doesn't look good that that one piece of information was left out but the rest of his bio is complete. She then said, "well I don't speak for him." I said, "well unless he clears it up and has a proper explanation, that's going to be the story we (constituents) run with."
They really aren't getting the best and brightest in these offices now are they?
I left a call back number and expect to hear from Mr. Allred.
aggiehawg said:Same players, all part of the same conspiracy. Revelations from the Flynn case will cause other dominoes to fall, is my prediction.Quote:
Interesting timing considering the new documents about to be exposed in the Flynn Case. Methinks Barr has coordinated this move, perhaps to use the Flynn revelations as a prelude to Durham.
Very true, but he's usually the one at least making a constant effort to expose this stuff.nortex97 said:
Hannity is so insufferable it was easily missed.
aggiehawg said:Was he a partner? Which office?Tibbers said:webgem08 said:
Huh, he doesn't mention that on his website. I wonder why?
I called his office and asked that very question. Their office worker Katie said, "we didn't think it was pertinent to share that information with constituents." I told her that wasn't a wise position to take and explained how it really doesn't look good that that one piece of information was left out but the rest of his bio is complete. She then said, "well I don't speak for him." I said, "well unless he clears it up and has a proper explanation, that's going to be the story we (constituents) run with."
They really aren't getting the best and brightest in these offices now are they?
I left a call back number and expect to hear from Mr. Allred.
So one year? He should be asked about it, of course but being an associate for one year is not all that damning in my view. It's a huge firm and he was a lowly associate. Having said that, if his supervising attorney was Marc Elias, or Michael Sussmann that would be concerning.Quote:
Associate, Perkins Coie, Limited Liability Partnership, 2015-2016
Tibbers said:aggiehawg said:Was he a partner? Which office?Tibbers said:webgem08 said:
Huh, he doesn't mention that on his website. I wonder why?
I called his office and asked that very question. Their office worker Katie said, "we didn't think it was pertinent to share that information with constituents." I told her that wasn't a wise position to take and explained how it really doesn't look good that that one piece of information was left out but the rest of his bio is complete. She then said, "well I don't speak for him." I said, "well unless he clears it up and has a proper explanation, that's going to be the story we (constituents) run with."
They really aren't getting the best and brightest in these offices now are they?
I left a call back number and expect to hear from Mr. Allred.
"While at Perkins and Coie, Colin was a voting rights litigator and counsel to a range of clients including national and state political candidates and advocacy organizations."
Associate, Perkins Coie, Limited Liability Partnership, 2015-2016
Check his bio now. It lists perkins and Coie affiliation.
https://www.colinallred.com/about
While I am not opposed to this idea, Grenell doesn't have a legal nor law enforcement background, FWIW.Quote:
Next step: fire Wray, appoint Grenell.