Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,731,143 Views | 49406 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by Garrelli 5000
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Sidney Powell: "They altered the 302 until McCabe approved it."
nortex97
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Hannity is so insufferable it was easily missed.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:


You get to a point where you realize that a handful of Americans prevented the successful conclusion of a coup attempt facilitated by the Democrat Party and led by elements of the Federal Bureaucracy aligned with it.

Cries out for reform. Perhaps a term limit to SES service in the Washington DC area of operations would limit this kind of dangerous activity from taking place.

Other than that, the only thing that will actually help in the long run is to make the folks involved pay a heavy price for their activities.

Hopefully the guys taking a look at this will have the guts to make the fruits of Durham's investigation pay off.

FrontPorchAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's why the FBI needs to be completely dismantled and burned to the ground.
All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Mtn_Guide said:

That's why the FBI needs to be completely dismantled and burned to the ground.
And decentralized again. After 9/11, the field offices were required to run everything through the DC HQ. Before then, DOJ oversaw the field offices through the US Attorney's offices who reported to Main Justice.

In 2016, the only reason the FBI agents in the SDNY were not allowed to have their legal counteparts to apply for search warrants for Anthony Weiner's laptop that contained Huma and Hillary's emails was because Comey, Baker, et al wouldn't allow them to. And Preet Bahara didn't have the guts to stand up to Lynch and apply for them anyway. Not after the Tango on the Tarmac.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I feel like just a new aggregator lately, but news is coming quickly. But a lot of times I am out of my depth, so I try to bring over interesting news that could be of interest here.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

As for senior Justice Department official Bruce Ohr's account of one of their meetings, Steele added: "I think Bruce Ohr has misreported it ... or misremembered it."

He also revealed that one piece of anti-Trump information he obtained in 2016 a since-debunked claim that Trump secretly may have communicated with Russia through a computer server at the Alfa Bank didn't come from a Russian intelligence source but rather from one of the lawyers at Perkins Coie.

And Steele divulged he paid some of his sources of information as much as $3,000 to $5,000 a month, prompting the lawyers for the plaintiffs to ask whether that might have compromised some of the information he got.

"So they had a financial incentive to feed you stuff that was interesting, right?" a lawyer asked.
"Yes, that is true," Steele answered. "But they were paid also to do other project work." Steele added he didn't think his sources would mislead him because they could be terminated if they did so.
I'll say it again. Perkins, Coie is a real life Bendini, Lambert and Locke. Completely crooked law firm.
policywonk98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And not to derail here. But for those of you living in TX-32 or if you know anyone in TX-32. You need to let them know that their Freshman Congressman is a Perkins Coi Alum.
SeMgCo87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Mtn_Guide said:

That's why the FBI needs to be completely dismantled and burned to the ground.
And decentralized again. After 9/11, the field offices were required to run everything through the DC HQ. Before then, DOJ oversaw the field offices through the US Attorney's offices who reported to Main Justice.

In 2016, the only reason the FBI agents in the SDNY were not allowed to have their legal counteparts to apply for search warrants for Anthony Weiner's laptop that contained Huma and Hillary's emails was because Comey, Baker, et al wouldn't allow them to. And Preet Bahara didn't have the guts to stand up to Lynch and apply for them anyway. Not after the Tango on the Tarmac.
I seem to recall that one of the conclusions reached after 9/11 was these alphabet agencies not communicating, and that the Department of Homeland Security was created to assure that communication links across agencies would occur. Thought was, I guess, that CIA operatives knew about some of the 19, but couldn't get the concerted attention of the FBI to pursue some of the leads.

And, one of the alphabets created an online app called "T-Rex", which was designed to chew through messages, e-mails, texts, etc., to look for "suspicious messaging".

My remembrance, anyway.
webgem08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Huh, he doesn't mention that on his website. I wonder why?
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Consent motion? Sounds like Barr has ordered DC US Attorney (Acting) Shea to play ball with Sydney.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Consent motion? Sounds like Barr has ordered DC US Attorney (Acting) Shea to play ball with Sydney.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
will25u said:




Interesting timing considering the new documents about to be exposed in the Flynn Case. Methinks Barr has coordinated this move, perhaps to use the Flynn revelations as a prelude to Durham.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Interesting timing considering the new documents about to be exposed in the Flynn Case. Methinks Barr has coordinated this move, perhaps to use the Flynn revelations as a prelude to Durham.
Same players, all part of the same conspiracy. Revelations from the Flynn case will cause other dominoes to fall, is my prediction.
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They're not gonna be pleased with what they find out (if that even matters to them).
Tibbers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
webgem08 said:

Huh, he doesn't mention that on his website. I wonder why?



I called his office and asked that very question. Their office worker Katie said, "we didn't think it was pertinent to share that information with constituents." I told her that wasn't a wise position to take and explained how it really doesn't look good that that one piece of information was left out but the rest of his bio is complete. She then said, "well I don't speak for him." I said, "well unless he clears it up and has a proper explanation, that's going to be the story we (constituents) run with."

They really aren't getting the best and brightest in these offices now are they?

I left a call back number and expect to hear from Mr. Allred.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ruddyduck said:


So he's back to being a tyrannical dictator and abusing his power now? Jeebus! These people are dumb. And how are they going to hold hearings if none of them are in DC? Which reminds me. Here's a good question.



Who indeed? Lobbyists?
webgem08
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow, let us know if you hear anything. Going through his bio, nothing but red flags. It's frustrating that he's a Texas rep.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

They're not gonna be pleased with what they find out (if that even matters to them).
Na, they have no intention of a fair investigation with this.

This is just another phase of of the schiff show being in the headlines with OMB.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tibbers said:

webgem08 said:

Huh, he doesn't mention that on his website. I wonder why?



I called his office and asked that very question. Their office worker Katie said, "we didn't think it was pertinent to share that information with constituents." I told her that wasn't a wise position to take and explained how it really doesn't look good that that one piece of information was left out but the rest of his bio is complete. She then said, "well I don't speak for him." I said, "well unless he clears it up and has a proper explanation, that's going to be the story we (constituents) run with."

They really aren't getting the best and brightest in these offices now are they?

I left a call back number and expect to hear from Mr. Allred.
Was he a partner? Which office?
SeMgCo87
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

Quote:

Interesting timing considering the new documents about to be exposed in the Flynn Case. Methinks Barr has coordinated this move, perhaps to use the Flynn revelations as a prelude to Durham.
Same players, all part of the same conspiracy. Revelations from the Flynn case will cause other dominoes to fall, is my prediction.
Some Junkie Cosmonaut
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
TexAgs91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
nortex97 said:

Hannity is so insufferable it was easily missed.
Very true, but he's usually the one at least making a constant effort to expose this stuff.
No, I don't care what CNN or MSNBC said this time
Tibbers
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

Tibbers said:

webgem08 said:

Huh, he doesn't mention that on his website. I wonder why?



I called his office and asked that very question. Their office worker Katie said, "we didn't think it was pertinent to share that information with constituents." I told her that wasn't a wise position to take and explained how it really doesn't look good that that one piece of information was left out but the rest of his bio is complete. She then said, "well I don't speak for him." I said, "well unless he clears it up and has a proper explanation, that's going to be the story we (constituents) run with."

They really aren't getting the best and brightest in these offices now are they?

I left a call back number and expect to hear from Mr. Allred.
Was he a partner? Which office?


"While at Perkins and Coie, Colin was a voting rights litigator and counsel to a range of clients including national and state political candidates and advocacy organizations."

Associate, Perkins Coie, Limited Liability Partnership, 2015-2016

Check his bio now. It lists perkins and Coie affiliation.

https://www.colinallred.com/about
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Associate, Perkins Coie, Limited Liability Partnership, 2015-2016
So one year? He should be asked about it, of course but being an associate for one year is not all that damning in my view. It's a huge firm and he was a lowly associate. Having said that, if his supervising attorney was Marc Elias, or Michael Sussmann that would be concerning.

ETA: Thanks for the info.
aggielostinETX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Tibbers said:

aggiehawg said:

Tibbers said:

webgem08 said:

Huh, he doesn't mention that on his website. I wonder why?



I called his office and asked that very question. Their office worker Katie said, "we didn't think it was pertinent to share that information with constituents." I told her that wasn't a wise position to take and explained how it really doesn't look good that that one piece of information was left out but the rest of his bio is complete. She then said, "well I don't speak for him." I said, "well unless he clears it up and has a proper explanation, that's going to be the story we (constituents) run with."

They really aren't getting the best and brightest in these offices now are they?

I left a call back number and expect to hear from Mr. Allred.
Was he a partner? Which office?


"While at Perkins and Coie, Colin was a voting rights litigator and counsel to a range of clients including national and state political candidates and advocacy organizations."

Associate, Perkins Coie, Limited Liability Partnership, 2015-2016

Check his bio now. It lists perkins and Coie affiliation.

https://www.colinallred.com/about


I already knew he was a piece of *****
“A republic, if you can keep it”

AggieKatie2 said:
ETX is honestly starting to scare me a bit as someone who may be trigger happy.
will25u
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
ruddyduck said:


I hope Grenell stays a while longer. If they hate him, that's a good sign.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Ellis Wyatt said:

ruddyduck said:


I hope Grenell stays a while longer. If they hate him, that's a good sign.
Next step: fire Wray, appoint Grenell.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Next step: fire Wray, appoint Grenell.
While I am not opposed to this idea, Grenell doesn't have a legal nor law enforcement background, FWIW.
First Page Last Page
Page 1059 of 1412
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.