https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1250583371538927617.html

The Crossfire Hurricane Team knew that Steele was the source for the September 2016 Isikoff article mentioned in Page's FISA, but they hid that from the FISA Court.

Does it seem like there is a lot of news coming out this week? Or that the pace is quickening? Maybe Grennell was put there to speed things along?

EKUAg said:

---

Susan Rice squeezing about Grennell being in the job and calling him a political hack (always accuse others of what you are) tells me the administration is over the target.

---

Exactly. Which seems so antithetical to me. If I have something to hide, I'm not going to poke my head up, opting instead to lay low, as low as I could get.

aggiehawg said:

---

EKUAg said:

---

Susan Rice squeezing about Grennell being in the job and calling him a political hack (always accuse others of what you are) tells me the administration is over the target.

---

Exactly. Which seems so antithetical to me. If I have something to hide, I'm not going to poke my head up, opting instead to lay low, as low as I could get.

---

to be fair, i have a feeling you do a better job of keeping your ego in check than these career politicians and bureaucrats do. they can't believe someone dare challenge them or go against them.

aggiehawg said:

---

EKUAg said:

---

Susan Rice squeezing about Grennell being in the job and calling him a political hack (always accuse others of what you are) tells me the administration is over the target.

---

Exactly. Which seems so antithetical to me. If I have something to hide, I'm not going to poke my head up, opting instead to lay low, as low as I could get.

---

It's so effective though. Not too long ago, I was one of the people who barely paid attention to the news and dismissed most of it as political pandering. Information overload is a real thing!

So is this prof that Hilary colluded with Russia? As well as the FBI?

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/report-footnotes-show-fbi-knew-russians-had-early-knowledge-of-steele-material/#

nortex97 said:

---

She just won't remember anything. She's pretty good at that.

---

So, are you telling us that her "not remembering" vs. Joe's "not remembering" is a race down to Alheimer's / Dementia?

Do either one of them qualify to be President or Vice President? Too bad the 25th Amendment only applies to one-Term Presidents...

Ah, that's right, the Dem version of the 25th Amendment is their Convention, plus the huge number of "Super-Delegates" who will draft Cuomo, even as he screams, "No, No, NO, N-O-O-O-O-O-O-O!!" as they drag him to the alter of Kali...

aggiehawg said:

---

EKUAg said:

---

Susan Rice squeezing about Grennell being in the job and calling him a political hack (always accuse others of what you are) tells me the administration is over the target.

---

Exactly. Which seems so antithetical to me. If I have something to hide, I'm not going to poke my head up, opting instead to lay low, as low as I could get.

---

With a compliant media, these Dem hacks have successfully leveraged these tactics to skirt any repercussions from their malfeasance. It's looking like it may no longer work with Trump in charge.

In response to the dr's tweet.

OBAMA IS A TREASONOUS CONSPIRATOR He knew everything just a start with misprision of felony, Pushing the spying to the point of orchestration with initial coup planned implementation by 1/20/2017

President Trump has been 1 step ahead since the 2016 campaign. We are at~4 years, cause it takes ~4 years to walk through an unbelievable minefield. lol those who think President Trump is dumb. MAGA

December 19, 2016
NPR's Exit Interview With President Obama | Morning Edition | NPR
@58.35 Obama returns to interview room to clarify about the CIA

Reporter: You had something you wanted to add...

Obama: When we were discussing the issue of the Russian hack ...when it comes to the motivations of the Russians that there is still a whole range of assessments taking place among the agencies...When I receive a final report... give us..best guess as to those motivations BUT that does not in any way detract from...perceived accurately ...Russian hack had done...create more problems for Clinton..
(range being Crossfire Hurricane, FISA, Russia Investigation)

Reporter: Think your stopping short endorsing the CIA conclusion ...hack designed to help Donald Trump
(NOPE cause Obama knows all the agencies investigations were WAY beyond just a hack. On 12/19/16 Obama has grand expectations to nullify election)

Obama: ...right now what you have now is CIA leaks, not an official document...important for the process of the process of various agencies comparing notes...assessments made on wide range of evidence...different agencies still looking at all that stuff...putting in a single package...why I asked for that report before the 20th...so that...aspects...classified can be presented as we have consistently done on a bipartisan basis to members of Congress....
(There it is! Obama in the thick of spying on Presidential Elect Donald Trump expecting the perceived hack problem for Clinton will be confirmed for the public BEFORE 1/20/17 PLUS those expected 'aspects' CLASSIFIED going to Congress to lay the hammer down to nullify election. JUST ANOTHER OBAMA FAIL)


New York Times3/1/17
Summary of White House scramble to gather the pieces of a ****ed up coup and cobble together a new frankenstein'd game plan for us to watch bleed out over the next 3 years. Courtesy of: Anonymous sources of the Obama White house and spy ring vomiting disinformation.

https://www.nytimes.com/2017/03/01/us/politics/obama-trump-russia-election-hacking.html
Mr. Trump has denied that his campaign had any contact with Russian officials, and at one point he openly suggested that American spy agencies had cooked up intelligence suggesting that the Russian government had tried to meddle in the presidential election. Mr. Trump has accused the Obama administration of hyping the Russia story line as a way to discredit his new administration.

Former senior Obama administration officials said that none of the efforts were directed by Mr. Obama.

The F.B.I. is conducting a wide-ranging counterintelligence investigation into Russia's meddling in the election, and is examining alleged links between Mr. Trump's associates and the Russian government.

Some Obama White House officials had little faith that a Trump administration would make good on such pledges, and the efforts to preserve the intelligence continued until the administration's final hours. This was partly because intelligence was still being collected and analyzed, but it also reflected the sentiment among many administration officials that they had not recognized the scale of the Russian campaign until it was too late.

I feel like this came from the Q thread.

And I'll highlight what Q said at least, and then leave Q out of it.

Quote:

---

You talked about this with the comedian Trevor Noah the other day. And you said a number of things in a row. You observed that there had been contacts between members of Mr. Trump's staff and Russian officials. You noted that Trump benefited from the hacks. Your spokesman, Josh Earnest, has gone on to say this week that it's obvious that Trump knew what was going on. To what extent are you suggesting some kind of cooperation between the president-elect and Russian officials here?


Well, I'm, I'm not suggesting cooperation at all. Keep in mind that those statements were in the context of everyone now acting surprised by the CIA assessment that this was done purposely to improve Trump's chances. And my only point was that shouldn't be treated as a blockbuster because that was the worst kept secret in this town.
Everybody understood that. It was reported on. Steve, if you go back and look at your stories, if you read any mainstream publication, you would see that if you have a hack of the DNC and a hack of Hillary Clinton's most senior advisers' e-mails, and those things are then released in drip-drip-drip fashion over the course of months, and that seem to generate consistently negative coverage despite the fact that there's nothing in there that's particularly controversial, that it's mostly just, as I said, political gossip or routine emails between folks who are working in a campaign environment, then it's a pretty clear inference that people would draw, and did draw, that this was helping the Trump campaign and it was hurting the Hillary campaign.
That doesn't mean that the Trump campaign was coordinating. It just means that they understood what everybody else understood, which was that this was not good for Hillary Clinton's campaign. And when you combine that with the fact that the president-elect has been very honest about his admiration for Putin and that he hopes to forge a more cooperative relationship with him and focus on the threat of Islamic terrorism, then my only point was we shouldn't now suddenly act as if this is a huge revelation.
In October, we said, after being very careful about it because we had no interest in appearing as if we were putting our thumbs on the scales, we did what was almost unprecedented which was, every intelligence agency in the federal government arrived at a consensus, that the Russians had hacked the DNC. And the information that was now being released was as a consequence of a decision by Russian intelligence and Russian officials at the highest levels.
So what the CIA is now assessing, which was it was done purposefully to tilt the election in the direction of a particular candidate, shouldn't be a surprise to anybody. And in fact isn't a surprise to anybody.
And as I said before, the issue now is not relitigating the election. The issue now is for us to learn lessons so that we don't have an ongoing situation in every election cycle where you have substantial foreign influence in our campaigns.

---

Short article. Whole article is below.

https://pjmedia.com/trending/judicial-watch-subpoenas-google-for-deleted-hillary-clinton-emails/

Judicial Watch Subpoenas Google for Deleted Hillary Clinton Emails

Quote:

---

On Wednesday, Judicial Watch issued a subpoena to Google, demanding emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton that were supposedly sent to a Gmail account before being deleted. The subpoena is part of a long-term Judicial Watch Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit seeking "talking points or updates on the Benghazi attack" which also involves a court-ordered deposition of Clinton herself. This FOIA request uncovered Clinton's insecure private home-brew server in 2015.

"A federal court, tired of the State and Justice Departments' gamesmanship, authorized Judicial Watch's subpoena to Google to follow a lead on the Clinton emails," Tom Fitton, president of Judicial Watch, said in a statement. "DOJ and State are AWOL and covering up for Hillary Clinton, so it is again up to Judicial Watch to do the basic investigative heavy lifting to get at the truth."

The Google subpoena, announced Wednesday, demands the Big Tech company produce all Clinton emails from a Google account believed to contain Clinton's emails. Platte River Networks' IT specialist Paul Combetta reportedly used a Google account to transfer Clinton's emails from a laptop to a Platte River server, then used BleachBit to remove any traces of the emails from the laptop. The subpoena seeks all Clinton emails from her time at State, between January 21, 2009 and February 1, 2013. Google must turn over the emails by May 13.

---

https://pjmedia.com/trending/bombshell-russian-intelligence-knew-steele-was-investigating-trump-in-2016-campaign

Quote:

---

.....Where speculation about this has been rampant, this is the first evidence -- from the FBI itself -- that the Steele dossier was a classic Russian disinformation campaign.....


Either the FBI knowingly accepted Steele as an important source despite his association with Russian oligarchs and their connections to Russian intelligence, or they're amazingly stupid and dense. Either way, the FBI doesn't come off looking so good....

---

Good read.

will25u said:

---

---

is it 2018 all over again?

<insert smiley face> YUP!

https://saraacarter.com/grassley-and-johnson-request-fbi-director-wray-turn-over-all-fbi-records-on-crossfire-hurricane/

Grassley/Johnson letter to Wray:

https://www.hsgac.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2020-04-16%20RHJ-CEG%20to%20FBI%20(Crossfire%20Hurricane%20Intel%20Memos).pdf

Methinks Grassley & Johnson are a little bit pissed.

Quote:

---

Methinks Grassley & Johnson are a little bit pissed.

---

Who would have thunk that a virus from China would have allowed the exposure of a Russian disinformation campaign and the Dem hoax as the House is in complete disarray and giving the entire floor to Trump in the media?

While Nancy has flown her New York based grand kids in so they can wake up before 5:00 in the morning to do their online work for their schools in NY (bad grandma) but then brags about the amount of chocolate and very expensive ice cream she has and is eating every night from her twin large Sub-Zeroes, which one is coming off as more concerned for the American public?

why would they ask for evidence while durham's investigation is still ongoing? how would that affect prosecutions? sorry if that's a stupid question.

I guess when it rains, it pours...

I don't recall seeing that letter Techno_Fog references from Demers (DOJ) to Judge Collyer (FISC) in July 2018. It's worth a read in detail now that we can compare it to Horowitz's Report. Lies, lies & more damn lies!

https://www.scribd.com/document/456781456/2018-DOJ-Letter-to-FISC

Threadreader:

https://threader.app/thread/1250953418975449088

ruddyduck said:

---

why would they ask for evidence while durham's investigation is still ongoing? how would that affect prosecutions? sorry if that's a stupid question.

---

Not a stupid question. The Senate has a separate function in oversight. But DOJ can only hold them off by claiming information is material to an ongoing investigation when no indictments result. DOJ has been stonewalling for a long time, first with the Mueller investigation dragging on for such a long time and now with the IGs and Durham.

They are running out of patience and frankly I think Grassley has given up expecting any indictments and just wants the truth to come out.

My .02.

https://threader.app/thread/1251122879179173890

Another great thread from Undercover Huber. Schiff lied/mislead in his infamous memo. Plus there was cut & paste from the Steele Dossier into Carter Page's FISA application.

thanks, hawg.

Quote:

---

They are running out of patience and frankly I think Grassley has given up expecting any indictments and just wants the truth to come out.

---

that is discouraging.

ruddyduck said:

---

thanks, hawg.

Quote:

---

They are running out of patience and frankly I think Grassley has given up expecting any indictments and just wants the truth to come out.

---

that is discouraging.

---

That might have been too strong. More like Grassley doesn't GAF if his investigation and reporting of facts potentially messes up some hypothetical future indictment and criminal trial.

Any better?

It's increasingly obvious that my suspicions and the suspicions of many others were correct: the Mueller investigation was a coverup attempt primarily, and secondarily a Hail Mary attempt to regain political power by the establishment powers in Washington, and a lot of insiders were aware or also suspected this and had to decide which side to take and when while this was all going on, not knowing then what the outcome would be.