MouthBQ98 said:

---

The close incestuous relationship between these legions of progressive bureaucrats and the press that is ostensibly claims to be holding government accountable is stunning. It seems like every significant bureaucrat has friends and confidants amongst the press, though I am sure many of them are relationships of convenience or common ideological purpose. It's just odd how integrated the press is as an unofficial messaging arm for the leadership of federal bureaucracies.

---

Operation Mockingbird in action!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-8189913/Ex-MI6-spy-dirty-dossier-Donald-Trump-sued-three-Russian-oligarchs.html

Nothing has happened yet as the judge hasn't ruled, but soon I gather.

Wow... All the way down to the 5th page?

TTT... I was cracking up so hard with this video. Chad Prather laughing in the background didn't help either... Bill Barr trying sooooo hard to stifle the laugh could see it all over his face....

will25u said:

---

Wow... All the way down to the 5th page?

TTT... I was cracking up so hard with this video. Chad Prather laughing in the background didn't help either... Bill Barr trying sooooo hard to stifle the laugh could see it all over his face....

---

That is awesome!!

drcrinum said:

---

Quote:

---

Congress has not been briefed on U.S. Attorney John Durham's review of the Russia investigation, according to a leading GOP investigator.

Rep. Jim Jordan, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said "no" when asked during a Just the News podcast on Thursday whether Durham or Attorney General William Barr have provided lawmakers an update on the inquiry.

"Remember: The attorney general said that he expects the investigation and then some kind of presentation or report, I assume -- but he said he expects the investigation to end sometime this summer," the Ohio congressman said.

The interview indicated that lawmakers, including Jordan, had little official information to go on as they talked about Durham's work over the past year. For instance, Rep. Doug Collins, a member of the House Judiciary Committee, told Fox News in late February that there will not be a report from Durham and rather that the public would hear about the progress the prosecutor has made if and when there is an indictment......

---

No leaks! This is such a contrast to the Mueller Investigation where leaks were commonplace. Either Durham is running a very tight ship or there is bad news in the offing for the plotters.

---

drcrinum said:

---

Quote:

---

Congress has not been briefed on U.S. Attorney John Durham's review of the Russia investigation, according to a leading GOP investigator.

Rep. Jim Jordan, the top Republican on the House Judiciary Committee, said "no" when asked during a Just the News podcast on Thursday whether Durham or Attorney General William Barr have provided lawmakers an update on the inquiry.

"Remember: The attorney general said that he expects the investigation and then some kind of presentation or report, I assume -- but he said he expects the investigation to end sometime this summer," the Ohio congressman said.

The interview indicated that lawmakers, including Jordan, had little official information to go on as they talked about Durham's work over the past year. For instance, Rep. Doug Collins, a member of the House Judiciary Committee, told Fox News in late February that there will not be a report from Durham and rather that the public would hear about the progress the prosecutor has made if and when there is an indictment......

---

No leaks! This is such a contrast to the Mueller Investigation where leaks were commonplace. Either Durham is running a very tight ship or there is bad news in the offing for the plotters.

---

The Bad News is for Brennan, since the Dems have leaked that his e-mails have been requested, to be polite about it. That's the least of it.

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/george-papadopoulos-former-trump-campaign-adviser-denied-campaign-was-involved-in-dnc-hack-in-recorded-call/

Interesting read. Papadopoulos denies any involvement in the DNC hack by the Trump Campaign & doubts the Russians had anything to do with the hacking. Articles gives verbatim account from the transcript. I wonder who leaked it.

drcrinum said:

---

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/george-papadopoulos-former-trump-campaign-adviser-denied-campaign-was-involved-in-dnc-hack-in-recorded-call/

Interesting read. Papadopoulos denies any involvement in the DNC hack by the Trump Campaign & doubts the Russians had anything to do with the hacking. Articles gives verbatim account from the transcript. I wonder who leaked it.

---

Here's the actual portion of the Papadopoulos transcript (Crossfire Typhoon) that CBS obtained (4 full pages):

https://www.scribd.com/document/455641630/Transcript

drcrinum said:

---

Interesting read. Papadopoulos denies any involvement in the DNC hack by the Trump Campaign & doubts the Russians had anything to do with the hacking. Articles gives verbatim account from the transcript. I wonder who leaked it.

---

Transcript may be new news to Papa. Interesting to see if Papa discloses CHS name.

https://justthenews.com/accountability/russia-and-ukraine-scandals/russia-case-footnotes-be-declassified-exposing-fbi

Declassifed footnotes from Horowitz's report about to be released. Will answer a number of questions. Good read.

drcrinum said:

---

Very short video.

---

I definitely liked what he said in that interview last night. Now we have to hope something comes of it.

Piling on

Covington, Burling has really screwed the pooch in the Flynn case. And they just keep getting worse.

I honestly don't know why Judge Sullivan hasn't hammered the hell out of them by now.

Can you explain in layman's terms what this means? Is it that they gave up documents before, but just now found some more?

aggiehawg said:

---

Covington, Burling has really screwed the pooch in the Flynn case. And they just keep getting worse.

I honestly don't know why Judge Sullivan hasn't hammered the hell out of them by now.

---

Sullivan has been a disappointment

will25u said:

---

Can you explain in layman's terms what this means? Is it that they gave up documents before, but just now found some more?

---

Law firms use document retention and location software. When new counsel takes over, the entire file should be all together or easily located if parts are in different attorney's offices. They started transporting the files to Sydney last July.

Now in April, nearly 9 months later they suddenly "found" additional documents? Only two ways to explain that. Documents were intentionally withheld from the production or were never entered into the software. Either one is no bueno.

captkirk said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Covington, Burling has really screwed the pooch in the Flynn case. And they just keep getting worse.

I honestly don't know why Judge Sullivan hasn't hammered the hell out of them by now.

---

Sullivan has been a disappointment

---

Yes, along with the FISA Court judges and John Roberts. They have all been weak.

I will go out on a limb and guess the emails and notes would have been helpful to Flynn.

aggiehawg said:

---

Covington, Burling has really screwed the pooch in the Flynn case. And they just keep getting worse.

I honestly don't know why Judge Sullivan hasn't hammered the hell out of them by now.

---

One of the partners is one:

Eric Holder

EKUAg said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Covington, Burling has really screwed the pooch in the Flynn case. And they just keep getting worse.

I honestly don't know why Judge Sullivan hasn't hammered the hell out of them by now.

---

One of the partners is one:

Eric Holder

---

If Holder came within a mile of this case, he should be called to the court and explain himself. Won't happen, though. If he is cc'd on one email (which might explain why certain emails were withheld) he should be called to appear before the court. He wasn't AG when the Flynn case originated, Lynch was but his contacts are still in DOJ.

Again, won't happen.

EKUAg said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Covington, Burling has really screwed the pooch in the Flynn case. And they just keep getting worse.

I honestly don't know why Judge Sullivan hasn't hammered the hell out of them by now.

---

One of the partners is one:

Eric Holder

---

OUCH!!!

Well there's another high-level Obama Admin official that took off their lift shoes, and are sneaking around in a crouch now...

Sullivan has a Political Correctness issue to deal with... trying to figure out how to pick up this legal turd by the clean end...first he has to find it.

Another familiar name at Covington:

Michael Chertoff
Secretary of Homeland Security under W.

Poor old Flynn's attorneys fees should be well north of $1 million by now. I've not seen a public fund raising campaign, but maybe there is one. I'm hoping he's been getting some help in lieu of the huge lawsuit Powell is going to recommend Flynn file.

There has been.

Covington should give him back every dollar he spent there. He will get it with his malpractice case against them after this is all over hopefully.

fasthorse05 said:

---

Poor old Flynn's attorneys fees should be well north of $1 million by now. I've not seen a public fund raising campaign, but maybe there is one. I'm hoping he's been getting some help in lieu of the huge lawsuit Powell is going to recommend Flynn file.

---

I've donated to it, not that I am big daddy dollars. I saw an article last summer that said he had >$4.5 million in unpaid legal bills.

https://mikeflynndefensefund.org/

Not the greatest audio reproduction, but...

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2020/04/09/exculpatory-papadopoulos-transcript-fbi-surveillance-wire-declassified-and-released/

Sundance playing detective again, putting together parts of the puzzle. If you remember, Confidential Human Source #3 (CHS-3) was not identified in Horowitz's Report. Turns out this person is a friend of Papadopoulos, Jeffery Wiseman, which is detailed in the above article.

Also, there is a bit of additional circumstantial evidence per the threadreader below:

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1248482689704841221.html

That clip should be sent (as well as a memo from Barr) to Pierre Delecto and the senators demanding more info as to why he was fired immediately.