Indeed.

will25u said:

---

Something to keep an eye on.

---

Did they find Hilary's emails?

all yoga and recipes. nothing to see here

will25u said:

---

Something to keep an eye on.

---

So this means Trump was working with ISIS to get Hillary's emails prior to the 2016 election?

That *******!

Impeach now!

Why is a member of the NSC meeting with a lobbyist for Ukrainian and Libyan interests?

Quote:

---

Alexander Vindman (National Security Council) Email December 7, 2018 Topic: U.S.-Ukraine Energy Issues

---

Quote:

---

1. (a) Name ofRegistrant
(b) Registration No. Yorktown Solutions, LLC 6491

(c) Business Address(es) ofRegistrant 601 13th Street, NW, Suite 900S Washington, D.C. 20005

---

Quote:

---

Public Joint-Stock Company National Joint-Stock Company Naftogaz January 1,2019

of Ukraine State Foreign Trade Enterprise SpetsTechnoExport January 1,2019

Ukrinmash January 1,2019

Global Axis Partners May 16, 2019

---

Quote:

---

Kyiv City Organization of Employers of the Oil and Gas Industry

Libyan United Democratic Party

---

Yorktown Solutions FARA filing

Daniel Vajdich is listed as the registered agent for the lobbying firm Yorktown Solutions. He's also in the Atlantic Council.

Interesting, no?

ETA: original FARA filing for Yorktown Solutions

In Flynn case, government can file the surreply and defense can respond with "sur surreply"

Nunes interview. At the end, he said there is a larger story than the seeding of the Steele dossier concerning exculpatory evidence that they are hoping will be declassified.

Rapier108 said:

---

Secolobo said:

---

I think when Nunes found this out and headed straight to tell trump (and dems went nuts), trump already knew. He told Nunes to keep it to himself and let it all play out. Two years, had to be...

---

Even before Trump took office, Admiral Mike Rodgers (head of the NSA at the time) warned Trump that his communications were being monitored.

---

On this very board, we pointed out how irregular it was that Trump's phone calls were being leaked. We had no idea at the time that our intelligence agencies were the ones spying and leaking. It all makes better sense now.

Not completely surprised. Sulllivan is wary of reversible error. So let Van Grack have his dog and pony show.

aggiehawg said:

---

Why is a member of the NSC meeting with a lobbyist for Ukrainian and Libyan interests?

Quote:

---

Alexander Vindman (National Security Council) Email December 7, 2018 Topic: U.S.-Ukraine Energy Issues

---

Quote:

---

1. (a) Name ofRegistrant
(b) Registration No. Yorktown Solutions, LLC 6491

(c) Business Address(es) ofRegistrant 601 13th Street, NW, Suite 900S Washington, D.C. 20005

---

Quote:

---

Public Joint-Stock Company National Joint-Stock Company Naftogaz January 1,2019

of Ukraine State Foreign Trade Enterprise SpetsTechnoExport January 1,2019

Ukrinmash January 1,2019

Global Axis Partners May 16, 2019

---

Quote:

---

Kyiv City Organization of Employers of the Oil and Gas Industry

Libyan United Democratic Party

---

Yorktown Solutions FARA filing

Daniel Vajdich is listed as the registered agent for the lobbying firm Yorktown Solutions. He's also in the Atlantic Council.

Interesting, no?

ETA: original FARA filing for Yorktown Solutions

---

I went through that filing earlier this afternoon. Vindman had 1 meeting & 7 emails during the 6 month reporting period with that lobbying outfit that were related to Ukrainian energy. Of course that period ended May 31, 2019 & doesn't cover the period of interest. However, Yorktown Solutions represents Kyiv City Organization of Employers Oil & Gas = NAFTOGAZ KYIV. Naftogaz is state owned & historically has been a major source of Ukrainian corruption, but it's not Burisma, the latter being a private entity. Naftogaz has been in the news regarding Rick Perry; he has been trying to coerce Naftogaz to change the composition of its board of directors. Perry wants to bring in American energy companies.

Quote:

---

I went through that filing earlier this afternoon. Vindman had 1 meeting & 7 emails during the 6 month reporting period with that lobbying outfit that were related to Ukrainian energy.

---

Why is NSC meeting with him?

We'll see what the next filing says in December.

will25u said:

---

---

Surreply granted & a directed sur-surreply.

Two short videos. Smells like Schiff collusion with the new whistleblower.

Delusions of grandeur?

I posted the above + multiple other related tweets on the "Something very big just happened" thread, but it has significant implications for our thread if this is true. If true, all the rumors about Hillary, the State Department, Benghazi, supplying ISIS in Syria & related classified materials on her server/Weiner laptop would end up being revealed/exposed by necessity.

Speculation is not helpful

Citations and facts, with a twist of conjecture

Dam.. you guys are stealing our Q thread info... lol...I think alot of this is fixing converge real soon if all things in the know (corruption) are true...

Q thread outlined what would / could happen ( many pieces have fallen in place.. and continue to prove out)

Mueller thread is the reality of what is happening .. best thread in the political forum BTW, you guys do an amazing job

I think the two threads converge soon and then the "unknown events" could happen... pray things don't get out of hand or too crazy once **** goes down

JJMt said:

---

Aggiehawg or any other lawyer: have you ever seen an attorney in a white-collar criminal case use the media andTwitter to publicize a case as much as Sydney has her case with Flynn? I can't quite figure out why she's doing it. She's way too smart to be doing it unless she thinks it will help Flynn. I can't believe that she would think that the media attention would impact Judge Sullivan. Is she trying to set Flynn up for a pardon, or trying to somehow influence the appellate court? I am completely at a loss.

---

Secolobo said:

---

and raise money for his defense.

---

This

Quote:

---

Go back to accounting, letters are too hard for your brain.

---

Flagged for ad hominem attack, as he said, go troll another thread.

https://thefederalist.com/2019/10/30/judge-tells-government-to-respond-to-allegations-it-hid-evidence-from-michael-flynns-legal-team/

Quote:

---

.....While Powell appeared undaunted by Judge Sullivan's order canceling the November 5, 2019, hearing, the government's immediate filing of a document cast as a "Notice of Claims Raised and Relief Sought for the First Time In A Reply Brief" suggests federal prosecutors feared Sullivan had made up his mind -- and not in their favor.
.....


Late yesterday, Judge Sullivan entered an order directing the government to file a surreply brief by November 1, 2019, but in doing so instructed prosecutors to address not just the Brady issues, but any "new relief, claims, arguments, and information raised in Defendant's Reply Brief." The order also gave Flynn a chance to respond to the government's arguments by November 4, 2019. But that's it: Judge Sullivan made clear that no new arguments should be made in Powell's sur-surreply and no further pleadings concerning Flynn's motion to compel would be accepted.

Whether Judge Sullivan will schedule oral argument after receiving these latest filings is yet to be seen. And how he will rule is anyone's guess. But that Judge Sullivan did not limit the additional briefing to specific Brady issues, but instead directed the government to respond broadly to any "new relief, claims, arguments, and information," suggests the long-time federal judge's concern has been piqued by what he's read so far.

---

I suspect lots of midnight oil will be burned over the next few days.

Quote:

---

The government then highlighted several of the arguments Powell made in her reply brief, such as that "the government suppressed text messages that 'would have made a material difference' to the defendant"; "that the defendant's false statements were not material; that the defendant's attorneys were acting under an 'intractable conflict of interest,' which the government exploited to extract a guilty plea; and that the 'FBI had no factual or legal basis for a criminal investigation.'"

---

That "intractable conflict of interest" on the part of Burling, Covington was well known by Van Grack and Team Mueller. So, they offered a get-out-of-jail-free card to the lawyers by dropping the FARA claim in the guilty plea.

drcrinum said:

---

---

This isn't about tapes.

This is about the latest Democrat strategy to claim the transcript was altered or is inaccurate so much so that it is useless. Instead we have to believe this Lt. Col. who thinks he runs US foreign policy.

We're already seeing the drones posting that talking point today.

I was wondering about that...how long is the timeline until some O-5 is looking down the business end of a court martial?

blindey said:

---

I was wondering about that...how long is the timeline until some O-5 is looking down the business end of a court martial?

---

I was confused about that too. He is still active duty, I believe.

blindey said:

---

I was wondering about that...how long is the timeline until some O-5 is looking down the business end of a court martial?

---

Not arguing/just curious...but why exactly, would he be facing a court martial as a result of his testimony?