Joe Biden or Hunter Biden?

Given Trump is not yet running against any Democrat, what would it matter?

Secolobo said:

---

---

Unfortunately, that is incorrect. Sullivan is tough and sometimes harsh but he won't put the people who deserve to have their ticket ripped and time in prison face justice.

He let the Ted Stephens murderers off the hook.

Interesting narrative.

Secolobo said:

---

Interesting narrative.

---

Here's the threadreader that includes all of the author's linked tweets.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1188934169436577794.html

Agree this is interesting stuff. Puts things in better perspective. If Halper was being paid via a non-compete DOD contract, then he had to have a 'handler' in the Pentagon. So this becomes more complicated. I wonder what the arrangement was between the FBI/CIA/DOD. Also, I infer in the background that Mattis & McMaster were not aligned with Flynn's views on the Middle East.

On my, the new whistleblower Vindman is a Ukrainian by birth.
Hmmm....double agent?

Quote:

---

If Halper was being paid via a non-compete DOD contract, then he had to have a 'handler' in the Pentagon.

---

Sole sourced contracts, such contracts for for high-rate (>$75/hr) SMEs, are required by the FAR and DFAR to have the contracting officer draft a J&A (Justification and Authorization) that must be approved by the HCA (Head of Contracting Authority). I don't know specifically which HCA would have approved the J&A for a sole-source contract to Halper or the company through which Halper was hired but that's a place to start asking questions. The HCA at the top of the heap from 2012-2018 was Shay Assad.

Treated different than this "whistleblower"...

Whistleblower Exposes Key Player in FBI Russia Probe: "It was all a Set-up"

I have been following the whole charade since really before this thread started. There are reasons why I have a better handle of what is happening under the rind than most but I will not get into that here.

I will say my family has an 'interesting history' led by my grandfather being the personal executive assistant and executive trustee for one of the most powerful men and CEO's in the United States from 1919 to 1948! I was raised in the 'swamp' and therefore have some first hand idea of how nasty it could be.

Having said that I am aghast at the height, depth and breadth of the corruption and wickedness that had crept in and was seeking to make a strangle hold on our nation and strangle it is exactly what would of happened had Hillary won.

It's like the Gordian knot. You can't untangle it, no way! It just needs to be sliced and diced as Alexander the Great did. However, you can't just go slice and dice the swamp today. It has to be done slowly, methodically, with stealth and cleverness. Step by step with wisdom, actually divine wisdom is needed. There are just so many layers and tentacles and they are all tied together like that big Gordian knot.

I have been truly amazed at the strategies created and implemented to deal with this most wicked and vile, evil monstrosity that would do anything to keep from being exposed and ripped apart. That would literally eat you alive without a second of remorse. This is not an R and D issue, it is so much deeper than that.

My prayer is that we can get through it without the swamp initiating WWIII or a civil war. They are a desperate animal now and they still have teeth. If there was every time to pray for our nation, if you fear God, now is the time, for sure.

https://saraacarter.com/alexander-vindman-was-not-proper-to-demand-that-a-foreign-government-investigate-a-u-s-citizen-full-statement/


Full statement of the new whistleblower above. Claims he does not know Schiff's original whistleblower.
He felt that investigating the Bidens & Burisma would destroy the bipartisan backing that Ukraine was enjoying since the election of its new President. He also threw Sondland under the bus.

They've been in the queue a while...

So misguided. An example needs to be made of the lot.

You can tell by her twitter comments and retweets that she is grasping. It's almost like she "found" these two brothers.
In reference to the transcript, between her statements and schiff's, their minions don't care and probably have never seen it judging from the news sources they (are told to) follow or, are exposed to.

Rapier108 said:

---

Just another deep state hack who is nothing but opinions, feelz, and concerns.

---

I'm sure the Ukrainians are not asking his help for free. Probably just want to keep his gravy train rolling.

WTH is being alleged here?

drcrinum said:

---

Alexandra Chalupa should be worried. She's near the apex of Ukrainian efforts to interfere in the 2016 Election.

---

I can only assume that she knows these guys, the Vindman brothers. A connection between her Vindman should raise some eyebrows.

People pass over the reports that Ukrainian officials were concerned about being drawn into the US political process with respect to Trump and don't ask the question why? Because they were blackmailed by Biden, harassed by Chalupa and others to interfere in the 2016 election on Hillary's behalf.

Wow. Sounds like the thread between american progressive movement and its Ukrainian counterpart is quite deep and strong.

I will hand it to John Brennan. He's very good as this regime change and political disruption work he's been trained to do and trained others to do.

I suppose Obama, Clinton, and Dem-Socialists(aka Commies) should be very thankful that Brennan chose their side.

interesting they trotted out this "WB#3" while we still don't know the identity of "WB#1".

I got in trouble for posting something from somewhere, an I can't remember where. So if it is TGP, sorry. But this reads like a well researched article about Comey possibly doctoring his memos.

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2019/10/breaking-exclusive-fired-fbi-director-comey-likely-doctored-his-memos-in-effort-to-take-down-president-trump-and-the-us-senate-may-have-the-evidence/

Quote:

---

The Gateway Pundit reported on May 25th that the infamous Trump Tower meeting in early January 2017 may have initiated the Trump obstruction investigation.

Then we reported on August 3rd that text messages from Peter Strzok to Lisa Page showed that the Mueller Special Counsel in its first month was already working on an obstruction trap for President Trump to step in.

Then we reported the following day on August 4th that a further analysis indicated that the entire obstruction 'trap' started with Comey's notes that were likely doctored by Comey for use by the Mueller gang!

Today we can report that the US Senate may have Comey's original memos used by the FBI to open the FBI's Trump obstruction case which likely differ from the final memos Comey provided a few weeks later to Mueller's Special Counsel gang.

---

Wasn't Chalupa the hired DNC operative deeply involved in setting up some of this mess before the 2016 election?

Who are these brothers trying to help? The President and the USA state department, or elements in Ukraine? Are they presuming to determine how foreign policy should be carried out and under what terms?

MouthBQ98 said:

---

Wasn't Chalupa the hired DNC operative deeply involved in setting up some of this mess before the 2016 election?

---

Yes. She was the one heavily pressuring the Ukrainians for the so-called "black ledger" on Manafort, which is likely forged. Team Mueller didn't even use it at Manafort's trial for tax evasion.

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

I'm not sure that I agree, but who knows. If there is a show cause motion included, I think it's very unlikely that the judge would find the prosecution in contempt without having a hearing and allowing them to explain. In fact, it might be reversible error.

But what do I know?

---

Sorry, I was unclear. As to the show cause motion, he can simply say, "Denied" and that's it. Not that he would hold them in contempt without a hearing.

As to the motion to dismiss and/or compel production, he can just rule without a hearing, in either direction as those are more questions of law and not fact.

I was involved on a case that was going to mediation and on the eve of mediation, the judge fired off a sua sponte order that basically told the defendants to settle the matter in mediation or he was going to give the Plaintiffs everything they wanted. It was settled the next day.

But here's the uncertainty with Judge Sullivan: there have been so many sealed filings and ex parte proceedings in this case, that we don't know what Sullivan has and hasn't seen. But he can make rulings on the basis of that evidence that is not in the public record. Even to the point where he potentially could have evidence to support holding the prosecution in criminal contempt. We just don't know what Sullivan has seen.

---

From our good friend Roscoe B. Davis...I thought I had read this somewhere before, so I started looking. And lo and behold our dear friend Roscoe had lifted it from this thread from Mrs. Hawg.

And since it has pertinent new info, I'll just quote his tweets again... Governments filing about the 160 pages Powell submitted.

ETA: And here is someone that says they have appeared before Sullivan before.

will25u said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

I'm not sure that I agree, but who knows. If there is a show cause motion included, I think it's very unlikely that the judge would find the prosecution in contempt without having a hearing and allowing them to explain. In fact, it might be reversible error.

But what do I know?

---

Sorry, I was unclear. As to the show cause motion, he can simply say, "Denied" and that's it. Not that he would hold them in contempt without a hearing.

As to the motion to dismiss and/or compel production, he can just rule without a hearing, in either direction as those are more questions of law and not fact.

I was involved on a case that was going to mediation and on the eve of mediation, the judge fired off a sua sponte order that basically told the defendants to settle the matter in mediation or he was going to give the Plaintiffs everything they wanted. It was settled the next day.

But here's the uncertainty with Judge Sullivan: there have been so many sealed filings and ex parte proceedings in this case, that we don't know what Sullivan has and hasn't seen. But he can make rulings on the basis of that evidence that is not in the public record. Even to the point where he potentially could have evidence to support holding the prosecution in criminal contempt. We just don't know what Sullivan has seen.

---

From our good friend Roscoe B. Davis...I thought I had read this somewhere before, so I started looking. And lo and behold our dear friend Roscoe had lifted it from this thread from Mrs. Hawg.

---

I guess we know Roscoe is still following this thread. Even with his history on TexAgs, I felt he was a valuable contributor to this thread.

Roscoe, you should have attributed those things to your friend Dixie.