Doesn't really matter as he's on record now. Well, it technically matters to Steele I guess but for the purposes of the United States, Steele is a small fish, who was a useful idiot for others.drcrinum said:
Remember a while back when Steele said that he would be willing to meet with Horowitz's people but not Durham's? But Horowitz's office doesn't have subpoena authority, so it had to be a voluntary meeting for it to have occurred. And Horowitz's office wouldn't have any authority to grant immunity or to grant privilege to any info that Steele might convey, right? Meaning Horowitz could share everything with Durham, right?
So I'm thinking that it just wasn't attorneys from Horowitz's office that met with Steele...I suspect that it was a joint attorney venture from both Horowitz's & Durham's offices that met with Steele.
They did tell you a year ago.lead said:can someone demonstrate how any of that nonsense links together? It all seems like silly games to me. Why doesn't nostradamus just tell us what's going on without using arcane riddles?AgShaun00 said:
Crazy stuff on Q thread. All linking together. Question is how crazy does it really get?
Did you use the new magic word? I can't remember what the new word is, but "unroll" doesn't work anymore.drcrinum said:
This is an important revelation from the Concord Management case. I put in a threadreader request on this about 20 minutes ago, but it still hasn't come up. I think threadreader app is being shadow banned -- I can't believe that I am because I am a nobody in the Twitter world.
will25u said:Did you use the new magic word? I can't remember what the new word is, but "unroll" doesn't work anymore.drcrinum said:
This is an important revelation from the Concord Management case. I put in a threadreader request on this about 20 minutes ago, but it still hasn't come up. I think threadreader app is being shadow banned -- I can't believe that I am because I am a nobody in the Twitter world.
Quote:
Hillary Clinton likely attempted to alter her emails in an effort to cover up illegal activities rather than just deleting emails as was previously reported. Judicial Watch's efforts to obtain her attorney's interview with the FBI show this and other criminal actions!
....
To put it plainly Hillary attempted to doctor (i.e. change) her emails for some reason and in so doing she inadvertently changed her email address.
Clearly if Hillary was caught editing her emails by the FBI, then former FBI Director James Comey knew very well that Hillary intended to break the law! Three years ago Jim Comey lied to America!
Quote:
The defense team for former National Security Advisor Michael T. Flynn has submitted a filing to the Eastern District of Virginia fighting the government's most recent proposal to ask the Court to deem Flynn a "co-conspirator" in the case against his former partner. The designation is solely for the purpose of obtaining the admission of one document the government itself claims is already admissible under a different rule, according to a brief filed by Flynn's defense team.
The substantial briefing was filed in just the last few days in the case the government filed against Bijan Rafiekian, Flynn's former consulting firm partner. It was only unsealed Tuesday. Flynn's own filing is the most recentafter just receiving the government's filing at 9 pm last night.
The evidence collected by Flynn's current defense Attorney Sidney Powell, who recently replaced Flynn's former defense attorney Robert Kelner, sheds new light on the extraordinary tactics used to target and retaliate against Flynn, according to the filing.
Further, Powell's submission to the court also reveals that Flynn and his attorneys were under extreme pressure to file a Foreign Agents Registration Act in February, 2017 by David Laufman, the former head of the National Security Division.
SeMgCo87 said:cbr has written some well reasoned and articulate posts, in this and other threads.lead said:
I'm cool with your credentials - I'll take them at face value. Part of me wants the swamp to be as thick and deep as described. But, for the love of God, please demonstrate how all of this lines up with the predictions of "q".
But, at the risk of speaking for him, I think it needs to be strongly emphasized that Q did not, does not, will not "predict" anything.
From the beginning in October, 2017, Q drops have focused attention on topics or events with indirect references; things that could be verified if you researched them, but indirect enough to maintain "plausible deniability" for whomever was crafting the message.
So, don't hold up what Q states as a prediction, or you will always be disappointed and frustrated. Think of it as a fingerprint that leads you to something.
Bruce Lee, in his movie "Enter the Dragon", was teaching a young disciple and used an analogy, ""It is like a finger pointing at the moon...", to which the young student responded by staring intently at Lee's index finger.
And Lee instantly slapped him, saying, "Stop looking at my finger, or you will miss all that heavenly glory".
Q drops are the finger...look where it points. Everything cbr wrote is the moon.
My $0.02 anyway...after working overnight shifts for two weeks that's all the energy I have.
Have a pleasant morning
Isn't it a closed session and no transcripts will be available? Would be pretty easy for the Dems to spin whatever story they want with the help of their enablers in MSM.TurkeyBaconLeg said:
From the day that the Mueller testimony to Congress was announced for July 17th, I have always felt like this session would be cancelled or postponed. It just makes no sense for the Dems to bring Mueller in to testify. They have so much of the narrative that can be lost when the GOP questions Mueller.
That is over my head. But let me try to break it down and you tell me if I am right?drcrinum said:
So perhaps Flynn will no longer be permitted to be a witness....and lacking Flynn, perhaps the government will just close up shop and drop the indictment. Wouldn't that be something?will25u said:
This explains it in detail...
https://dailycaller.com/2019/07/09/michael-flynn-conspirator-turkish-lobbying/
Quote:
.....However, prosecutors told a federal judge and Rafiekian's lawyers last week that they don't plan to call Flynn any longer.
Flynn's attorneys say the decision followed "trial prep" sessions where prosecutors were dissatisfied by answers to questions critical to the case against Rafiekian, better known as Kian.
Flynn's new lead attorney, Sidney Powell, suggested in court filings that prosecutors were insisting that the former Defense Intelligence Agency chief give inaccurate testimony about a belated filing Flynn's firm made under the Foreign Agents Registration Act.
"The prosecutors have been adamant Mr. Flynn testify that he authorized filing the FARA form knowing and intending that it contain false statements," Powell wrote. "Mr. Flynn cannot give that testimony because it is not true.".....
I'm guessing the answer is "no"MouthBQ98 said:
Are prosecutors supposed to attempt to suborn perjury to attempt to win in court?
