Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,603,434 Views | 49329 Replies | Last: 13 hrs ago by JFABNRGR
titan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
7:54p, 11/12/18
S
aggiehawg,

What is this about? This is getting absurd. Until the Trump admin realizes they must ignore Democrat faux claims of ethics or any other reason of complaint, and see it as the pre-judged "sting" that all this is, things will get nowhere.

This is why, though I know it irks, believe there will be no perp walks or any consequences at all -- to Democrats that ruined the institutions under Obama and continue to.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/us-acting-ag-will-consult-with-ethics-officials-on-possible-recusals/ar-BBPDy51?li=BBnb7Kz

Sessions should never have recused -- no Democrat would have. But even if you grant that, Whitaker needs to refuse. He needs to play by the 2.0 rules that does not back down ---not those of the age of Boehner and Bush.

Reply Quote
9
RoscoePColtrane
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to titan • 8:52p, 11/12/18
titan said:
aggiehawg,

What is this about? This is getting absurd. Until the Trump admin realizes they must ignore Democrat faux claims of ethics or any other reason of complaint, and see it as the pre-judged "sting" that all this is, things will get nowhere.

This is why, though I know it irks, believe there will be no perp walks or any consequences at all -- to Democrats that ruined the institutions under Obama and continue to.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/us-acting-ag-will-consult-with-ethics-officials-on-possible-recusals/ar-BBPDy51?li=BBnb7Kz

Sessions should never have recused -- no Democrat would have. But even if you grant that, Whitaker needs to refuse. He needs to play by the 2.0 rules that does not back down ---not those of the age of Boehner and Bush.

It's actually comical.

Nadler is crying and Schumer is crying because whitaker as a private citizen appeared on CNN, which he was invited to appear, and he gave his opinion on the Mueller investigation. Then he wrote an Opinion Piece about the Mueller investigation, and they are claiming he shows a bias toward Mueller.

Now here's the punchline..... Nadler along with every democrat that has ever appeared on TV since 2016 has made Bias derogatory statements and claims against Trump and many have written Opinion Pieces in the NYT or WaPo doing the same thing, all 100% anti Trump

So are any of the Democrats that are on any of these committees much less the committee chairs, are they going to recuse themselves from any investigation into Trump? Heck no they aren't and won't even consider it. So they can go sit down and STFU because they have no authority and no grounds.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Reply Quote
17
3 edits
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:12a, 11/13/18


https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2018/11/13/donald-trump-matthew-whitaker-no-need-recuse-russia-investigation-column/1968664002/

Quote:
.....Yet Trump's opponents seek to crucify Whitaker for refusing to step aside, speculating that as acting attorney general he will improperly interfere with the Mueller investigation. While this charge is both unsupported and unjust, it provides a political win-win for the president's detractors. If the narrative builds and prompts Whitaker to recuse, Rosenstein remains in the oversight role. But the more likely scenario sees Whitaker as Mueller's superior, in which case the victory comes when nothing comes of the Russia investigation.

If the special counsel concludes that the Trump campaign did not collude with Russia to interfere with the 2016 election -- as appears likely given the absence of any substantive charges of collusion in the last two years -- Trump's exoneration will be proof to his detractors that Whitaker interfered in the investigation. The relentless attacks on Whitaker today are merely laying the groundwork for that eventuality. And if Whitaker's reputation must take a hit in the process, that's just how Washington operates......

A 'win-win' for the Dems....no question about it, but releasing an unredacted FISA + Ohr's 302s easily would wipe out that advantage.
Reply Quote
6
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to titan • 8:21a, 11/13/18
AG
titan said:
aggiehawg,

What is this about? This is getting absurd. Until the Trump admin realizes they must ignore Democrat faux claims of ethics or any other reason of complaint, and see it as the pre-judged "sting" that all this is, things will get nowhere.

This is why, though I know it irks, believe there will be no perp walks or any consequences at all -- to Democrats that ruined the institutions under Obama and continue to.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/us-acting-ag-will-consult-with-ethics-officials-on-possible-recusals/ar-BBPDy51?li=BBnb7Kz

Sessions should never have recused -- no Democrat would have. But even if you grant that, Whitaker needs to refuse. He needs to play by the 2.0 rules that does not back down ---not those of the age of Boehner and Bush.
There is an ethics office in the DOJ that can be asked to review recusal questions. Same office with which Sessions consulted before his recusal. (Sessions' recusal was simply too broad at the time and he never really tightened that up.)

Not unusual but noteworthy that Rosenstein has never been cleared of his recusal issues over the Mueller investigation. (At least not that I am aware of.)

ETA: As to the propriety of appointing Whitaker, Here is Andy McCarthy's assessment.
Reply Quote
2
1 edit
SpreadsheetAg
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 9:56a, 11/13/18
AG
Quote:
ETA: As to the propriety of appointing Whitaker, Here is Andy McCarthy's assessment.
Good article on Whitaker
Reply Quote
2
RoscoePColtrane
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:35a, 11/13/18
Maryland AG is seeking an injunction relief to block Whitaker's appointment.

The Left is off their rockers....
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Reply Quote
4
End Of Message
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to RoscoePColtrane • 10:39a, 11/13/18
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:
Maryland AG is seeking an injunction relief to block Whitaker's appointment.

The Left is off their rockers....
A State AG has standing to challenge? Uh, no.
Reply Quote
8
Cepe
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:43a, 11/13/18
AG
Trump should just do what he has to because he's going to get hammered no matter what.
Reply Quote
14
valvemonkey91
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:48a, 11/13/18
AG
Can the US marshal be sent into the DOJ to collect all documents that have been asked for? What the hell is taking so long? I have lost all faith in our legal system. Nothing is going to happen to the criminals that are too politicallly connected. It's the beginning of the end of the republic.
Reply Quote
2
titan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to valvemonkey91 • 10:51a, 11/13/18
S
valvemonkey91 said:
Can the US marshal be sent into the DOJ to collect all documents that have been asked for? What the hell is taking so long? I have lost all faith in our legal system. Nothing is going to happen to the criminals that are too politicallly connected. It's the beginning of the end of the republic.
Agree fully. Or have the NSA literally hack it. Or if that creates a problem, ask the 4chan types. Something.

There should be a million conservative march on DC saying "we will not accept the findings of the Mueller-Rosenstein farce if it doesn't include going after Democrats so give it up"
Reply Quote
1
backintexas2013
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to RoscoePColtrane • 10:52a, 11/13/18
AG
Any clue what the initial Obamacare lawsuit was about
Reply Quote
RoscoePColtrane
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to valvemonkey91 • 11:02a, 11/13/18
valvemonkey91 said:
Can the US marshal be sent into the DOJ to collect all documents that have been asked for? What the hell is taking so long? I have lost all faith in our legal system. Nothing is going to happen to the criminals that are too politicallly connected. It's the beginning of the end of the republic.
In a Short answer, Not likely

USMS work for and are a part of the DOJ. Now if the AG were to order the to got to a certain Department, for instance the FBI, they could.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Reply Quote
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:09p, 11/13/18


https://www.buzzfeednews.com/amphtml/albertonardelli/joseph-mifsud-senate-trump-russia
Reply Quote
1
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:41p, 11/13/18


https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1062393726738227200.html

Read the above thread, and then please tell me what the hell is Mueller investigating and why is it such a secret?
Reply Quote
4
RoscoePColtrane
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:35p, 11/13/18




Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Reply Quote
3
Zombie Jon Snow
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:47p, 11/13/18
AG
Holy crap... I've been reading that name as Perkins Cole since the first time I saw it - maybe 18 months ago?

just noticed it is Perkins Coie

<mind blown>

I believe I've had discussions in person a few times and said Perkins Cole....lol.
Reply Quote
1
1 edit
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
6:48p, 11/13/18

Reply Quote
5
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
8:35a, 11/14/18


https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1062683423628845056.html

Never Trumpers are beginning to crawl out from under their rocks now that the Midterms are over. They must be afraid of something.
Reply Quote
6
Bonfire1996
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:18a, 11/14/18
AG
Federalist Society begins an attorney group called checks and balances....during trump and not Obama. Jeez.
Reply Quote
22
GCP12
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Bonfire1996 • 9:21a, 11/14/18
AG
Bonfire1996 said:
Federalist Society begins an attorney group called checks and balances....during trump and not Obama. Jeez.
The absurdity of the last 3.5 years is something to behold
Reply Quote
7
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to drcrinum • 9:24a, 11/14/18
AG
George Conway is Kelly Anne's husband.
Reply Quote
8
ThunderCougarFalconBird
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Bonfire1996 • 9:35a, 11/14/18
AG
Bonfire1996 said:
Federalist Society begins an attorney group called checks and balances....during trump and not Obama. Jeez.
You know what's interesting? So many people seemed perfectly happy to have a quasi-unitary federal sovereign with a strong form leader until someone without a (D) after his name showed up to do the job. And then they freaked out and started scrambling for any means possible to dial back the authority that the strong form leader possessed.
Reply Quote
7
titan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to drcrinum • 9:36a, 11/14/18
S
drcrinum said:


https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1062683423628845056.html

Never Trumpers are beginning to crawl out from under their rocks now that the Midterms are over. They must be afraid of something.
They need to go back under them. They still owe for derailing the real chance to get rid of Obamacare.
Reply Quote
5
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:42a, 11/14/18

Reply Quote
9
drcrinum
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
9:47a, 11/14/18


Interesting point. Hopefully Mifsud will surface for a Senate Intel Committee hearing.
Reply Quote
8
Bird Poo
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 9:59a, 11/14/18
AG
aggiehawg said:
George Conway is Kelly Anne's husband.
Yeah that is all kinds of effed up.

She's having a hard time keeping his ass on a leash.
Reply Quote
4
aggiehawg
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Bird Poo • 10:02a, 11/14/18
AG
OneNightW said:
aggiehawg said:
George Conway is Kelly Anne's husband.
Yeah that is all kinds of effed up.

She's having a hard time keeping his ass on a leash.
Well if Mary Matalin can stand being married to Carville, guess Kelly Anne can do it. They just never talk about politics, I suppose.
Reply Quote
6
RoscoePColtrane
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
10:28a, 11/14/18
Pretty amazing how the Federalist Society can put out an approved list of perspective SCOTUS nominees for Trump to pick from, and the Democrats scream bloody murder calling the Federalist Society a far right radical group, and charge them with hyper conservative views because they advocate for "originalism" and "textualism" in the legal system, and opposing judicial activism and the expansion of the "administrative state."

Fast forward now to Wittes praising the Federalist Society and flaunting this list like they are the gold standard now. It's no wonder the left claim to be native americans, they can shapeshift with the best medicine men on the planet. The GOP needs to pin these idiots down and quit allowing them to change with the wind direction, when it favors their cause.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Reply Quote
5
valvemonkey91
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Bird Poo • 10:32a, 11/14/18
AG
OneNightW said:
aggiehawg said:
George Conway is Kelly Anne's husband.
Yeah that is all kinds of effed up.

She's having a hard time keeping his ass on a leash.


Is she part of the problem? Holy crap what a nest of rats!
Reply Quote
1
VegasAg86
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to drcrinum • 11:36a, 11/14/18
AG
drcrinum said:


Interesting point. Hopefully Mifsud will surface for a Senate Intel Committee hearing.
This charge is one that really ticks me off. The guy joined the Trump team around March 14th, was announced the 21st and met with Mifsud the 24th (don't hold me to those dates, they could be off a couple of days, but the general time frame is reasonably accurate). Ten or eleven months later he didn't have perfect recall of exactly when those things happened, and he gets charged with perjury for it?
🤡 🤡 🤡
Reply Quote
5
Patentmike
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
12:05p, 11/14/18
AG
If the FBI ever questions me, I'm taking the fifth on every single question. The way they are pursuing process crimes, it's reasonable to assert that the answer to ANY question might have a tendency to incriminate the answerer.
PatentMike, J.D.
BS Biochem
MS Molecular Virology


Reply Quote
10
TJJackson
User Profile Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to Patentmike • 12:08p, 11/14/18
Michael Barnhart said:
If the FBI ever questions me, I'm taking the fifth on every single question. The way they are pursuing process crimes, it's reasonable to assert that the answer to ANY question might have a tendency to incriminate the answerer.


That would be my advice for any law enforcement agency.
Reply Quote
5
titan
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to TJJackson • 12:14p, 11/14/18
S
leakypipes said:
Michael Barnhart said:
If the FBI ever questions me, I'm taking the fifth on every single question. The way they are pursuing process crimes, it's reasonable to assert that the answer to ANY question might have a tendency to incriminate the answerer.


That would be my advice for any law enforcement agency.
That is why the 5th basically exists.

Part of this is due to the absurd erosion of some of the Presidential protections from just sundry lawsuits that started (with Nixon? Maybe Aggiehawg can clarify) It definitely really began under Clinton. And I didn't really like it.
Reply Quote
MouthBQ98
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to VegasAg86 • 12:15p, 11/14/18
AG
That's how unscrupulous prosecutors bully people into compliance, or attempt to, if they think they might get something. The result is that people learn to be vague and not recall anything with specificity.
Reply Quote
2
bobbranco
User Profile
Private Message
Ignore User Stop Ignoring
How long do you want to ignore this user?
24 hours One week Permanently Cancel
In reply to aggiehawg • 12:36p, 11/14/18
AG
aggiehawg said:
George Conway is Kelly Anne's husband.


And Trump likes to call him Mr. Kelly Anne Conway.
Reply Quote
4
First Page Last Page
Page 659 of 1410 ▼
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.