RoscoePColtrane said:

---

redline248 said:

---

I will try later, but a simple yes or no to my question is helpful in the meantime.

---

They try to relate Comey's stand in Ashcroft's hospital room 15 years ago to him not being swamp and some kind of white hat, however that James Comey that is not who he turned out to be when he was given the keys to the FBI. His own actions alone in clearing Hillary alone and his purposely ignoring white hot evidence right in front of his face, from the hard coloring outside the policy lines of Bureau Policy and basic investigation common sense.

Not buying anyone's theory that Comey is any kind of good guy at the present. Comey flat out broke the law and is going to be indicted.

---

You truly believe Comey is going to be indicted? Im too skeptical, and think he is one of the untouchables.

Disclosure : I don't follow this thread in detail.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/spygate-the-true-story-of-collusion_2684629.html

Excellent read. Very long. Detailed account of essentially all we know about Spygate to this juncture.

garc said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

redline248 said:

---

I will try later, but a simple yes or no to my question is helpful in the meantime.

---

They try to relate Comey's stand in Ashcroft's hospital room 15 years ago to him not being swamp and some kind of white hat, however that James Comey that is not who he turned out to be when he was given the keys to the FBI. His own actions alone in clearing Hillary alone and his purposely ignoring white hot evidence right in front of his face, from the hard coloring outside the policy lines of Bureau Policy and basic investigation common sense.

Not buying anyone's theory that Comey is any kind of good guy at the present. Comey flat out broke the law and is going to be indicted.

---

You truly believe Comey is going to be indicted? Im too skeptical, and think he is one of the untouchables.

Disclosure : I don't follow this thread in detail.

---

I think he's been indicted for two months if you want to know the truth. I think there are five high ranking sealed indictments already in place.

I think Samantha Power has been singing like a bird. Pretty certain Bill Priestap has tied a lot of people in it.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

I think he's been indicted for two months if you want to know the truth. I think there are five high ranking sealed indictments already in place.

I think Samantha Power has been singing like a bird. Pretty certain Bill Priestap has tied a lot of people in it.

---

I hope you're right.

Do you think anything will be revealed before the elections? The way they're working behind the scenes, the timing of the election might not fit revealing what they have so far.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

I think he's been indicted for two months if you want to know the truth. I think there are five high ranking sealed indictments already in place.

I think Samantha Power has been singing like a bird. Pretty certain Bill Priestap has tied a lot of people in it.

---

Curious. Why do you think Samantha Powers is singing.

benchmark said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

I think he's been indicted for two months if you want to know the truth. I think there are five high ranking sealed indictments already in place.

I think Samantha Power has been singing like a bird. Pretty certain Bill Priestap has tied a lot of people in it.

---

Curious. Why do you think Samantha Powers is singing.

---

Back when she gave her sworn testimony and she was confronted about her 428 unmaskings in a 1 year period, and she told Trey Gowdy that those weren't done with her knowledge but logged in with her name and credentials, she all of a sudden went off the radar. She was interviewed by Huber three times after that. Several of the courthouse VBloggers have reported she'd been seen in DC in and out of the RFK building multiple times. Most find it odd since she doesn't live in DC and isn't holding any position in DC.

VegasAg86 said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

I think he's been indicted for two months if you want to know the truth. I think there are five high ranking sealed indictments already in place.

I think Samantha Power has been singing like a bird. Pretty certain Bill Priestap has tied a lot of people in it.

---

I hope you're right.

Do you think anything will be revealed before the elections? The way they're working behind the scenes, the timing of the election might not fit revealing what they have so far.

---

The democrats are setting their own party on fire, not sure you could do more harm than they are doing to themselves right now. Documents are being held up for the sake of the big picture not the midterms. Might need some extra leverage after the midterms so you don't go all in yet.

This is worth the read. Ben Rhodes may have spoken out of turn.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1050154038497562629.html

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

benchmark said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

I think he's been indicted for two months if you want to know the truth. I think there are five high ranking sealed indictments already in place.

I think Samantha Power has been singing like a bird. Pretty certain Bill Priestap has tied a lot of people in it.

---

Curious. Why do you think Samantha Powers is singing.

---

Back when she gave her sworn testimony and she was confronted about her 428 unmaskings in a 1 year period, and she told Trey Gowdy that those weren't done with her knowledge but logged in with her name and credentials, she all of a sudden went off the radar. She was interviewed by Huber three times after that. Several of the courthouse VBloggers have reported she'd been seen in DC in and out of the RFK building multiple times. Most find it odd since she doesn't live in DC and isn't holding any position in DC.

---

She did pipe up on twitter in march noting that Brennan was not one to cross.

Gowdy from long ago commenting on Powers' testimony on unmasking.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

Back when she gave her sworn testimony and she was confronted about her 428 unmaskings in a 1 year period, and she told Trey Gowdy that those weren't done with her knowledge but logged in with her name and credentials, she all of a sudden went off the radar. She was interviewed by Huber three times after that. Several of the courthouse VBloggers have reported she'd been seen in DC in and out of the RFK building multiple times. Most find it odd since she doesn't live in DC and isn't holding any position in DC.

---

My read on Power is that she would gladly fall on her sword to protect the cause. She's a "means justifies the end" card-carrying leftist of the worst kind IMHO.

benchmark said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

Back when she gave her sworn testimony and she was confronted about her 428 unmaskings in a 1 year period, and she told Trey Gowdy that those weren't done with her knowledge but logged in with her name and credentials, she all of a sudden went off the radar. She was interviewed by Huber three times after that. Several of the courthouse VBloggers have reported she'd been seen in DC in and out of the RFK building multiple times. Most find it odd since she doesn't live in DC and isn't holding any position in DC.

---

My read on Power is that she would gladly fall on her sword to protect the cause. She's a "means justifies the end" card-carrying leftist of the worst kind IMHO.

---

She has two young girls at home (9 and 6). I seriously doubt it.

Excellent article on "Clinton's Researchers"

Quote:

---

Essentially what this tells us is that Secretary Hillary Clinton used her authority to waive the 'need to know' limit on the people she listed. In essence, she gave unlimited access to her "researchers" for an unspecified reason.

When I see the wording, immediately I think of two distinct reasons for Clinton to grant her researchers with top-level security access to classified information: (1) to participate in searches of FISA databases (ie. 'queries'); and (2) to make unmasking requests for any results within those search query results.

---

Exactly what we all have thought for some time, now.

Quote:

---

When I see the wording, immediately I think of two distinct reasons for Clinton to grant her researchers with top-level security access to classified information: (1) to participate in searches of FISA databases (ie. 'queries'); and (2) to make unmasking requests for any results within those search query results.

---

Don't forget the most important third reason.....

3) to find and delete and incriminating evidence.

Quote:

---

n 2003, Bill Clinton's former national security adviser was caught removing five classified documents from a secure reading room at the National Archives, as he prepared to testify before the 9/11 commission.

A Justice Department investigation ensued and in 2005 Berger reached a plea agreement in which he was allowed to plead guilty to a misdemeanor charge of unauthorized removal and retention of classified material instead of a felony. He was sentenced to two years of probation and 100 hours of community service and was stripped of his security clearance for three year

---

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/hillary-clintons-sandy-berger-problem/2015/08/03/b08466f0-39d5-11e5-9c2d-ed991d848c48_story.html?utm_term=.b3ba14e2edda

The Clintons are world class criminals. They didn't get here by being stupid......

Now that makes my blood boil.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

benchmark said:

---

My read on Power is that she would gladly fall on her sword to protect the cause. She's a "means justifies the end" card-carrying leftist of the worst kind IMHO.

---

She has two young girls at home (9 and 6). I seriously doubt it.

---

Ordinarily I'd agree ... most reasonable people in legal jeopardy would be forthright. But we're talking about someone in Obama's inner circle that's a Jim Jones People's Temple kool-aide junkie.

The Left, these days, is very much a Jim Jones type, and that's an excellent analogy. Therefore, given the exact same circumstances, the Left will always "take one for the team", except for the Clinton types. The Clinton's are smart enough to know what they've got. So, she either doesn't believe she can, or will be caught. or, like so many Lefties, the "cause is too great to give to the Feds, and tell the truth"!

Since so much of their belief is based on emotion and feelings, that makes sense.

Besides, most of the good Clinton stuff went out the State Department door the last day of Clinton's employement by State. Then, anything incriminating was burned in the fire at their home.

Prognightmare said:

---

---

There is a sixth not mentioned: Steele to David Corn to James Baker (+ likely Corn to Strzok/Page).

https://thehill.com/opinion/white-house/411209-move-over-grassy-knoll-the-trump-russia-bank-tale-joins-unproven

Good read.
You can 'bet the bank' that the Trump-Alfa Bank connection is in the Page FISA documents (perhaps even spelled Alpha Bank which would be hilarious).

drcrinum said:

---

You can 'bet the bank' that the Trump-Alfa Bank connection is in the Page FISA documents (perhaps even spelled Alpha Bank which would be hilarious).

---

I just really curious the necessity to redact these names. It's not a national security issue. Likely an embarrassment they were ever granted a security clearance in the first place. This redaction happy environment needs to be brought to an end. There are specific guidelines regarding redactions and it's like they just make up their own rules as they go

https://dailycaller.com/2018/10/14/fbi-evidence-refutes-papadopoulos/

Quote:

---

...Ratcliffe noted that the FBI opened its investigation on July 31, 2016, after receiving information from the Australian government about a conversation that Papadopoulos had on May 10, 2016, with Alexander Downer, the top Australian diplomat to the U.K.

Downer claimed that Papadopoulos told him that Russians had derogatory information on Hillary Clinton. But Ratcliffe, a top member of the House Judiciary Committee, suggested on Sunday that the FBI and Justice Department had information that contradicted its intelligence on Papadopoulos.

"Hypothetically, if the Department of Justice and the FBI have another piece of evidence that directly refutes that, that directly contradicts that, what you would expect is for the Department of Justice to present both sides of the coin to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to evaluate the weight and sufficiency of that evidence," Ratcliffe said.

"Instead, what happened here was Department of Justice and FBI officials in the Obama administration in October of 2016 only presented to the court the evidence that made the government's case to get a warrant to spy on a Trump campaign associate," he added....

---

Hadn't heard about contradictory evidence regarding Papadopoulos-Downer before.

.Leslie Stahl is such a partisan hack. She was never this combative with Barry, we still have the tapes. Her interviews with Barry was more like a teen idol interview for Hit Parade magazine.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

.Leslie Stahl is such a partisan hack. She was never this combative with Barry, we still have the tapes. Her interviews with Barry was more like a teen idol interview for Hit Parade magazine.

---

The President handled himself very well, though. Might actually increase his favorables.

Something is not right. No leaking charge...when he sent photos of the unredacted FISA document?

drcrinum said:

---

Something is not right. No leaking charge...when he sent photos of the unredacted FISA document?

---

You are correct it smells

Possibly he rolled over on Warner, because it would have to be someone of that stature to justify him not being charged with the leak. I just can't see him getting a pass just trying to avoid involving that document in any type of discover whatsoever.

Quote:

---

Wolfe pleaded guilty to lying to the FBI about his interactions only with Reporter #3.

On Oct. 17, Reporter #3 asked Wolfe, using the encrypted messaging app Signal, to provide a contact information for the person subpoenaed, and Wolfe obliged, according to the indictment. Later that day, that reporter published a story disclosing the subpoena to testify before the committee. After the story published, Wolfe congratulated the reporter, using Signal, stating "Good job!" and "I'm glad you got the scoop," the indictment said.

---

Here's something else. This sentence and plea is not concerning the document exchange by text, this is another reporter and conversation. The indictment alleges that on March 17, 2017, U.S. intelligence agencies provided a classified document to the Senate Intelligence Committee. As director of security, Wolfe received the document. On that day, the indictment states, Wolfe exchanged 82 text messages with Watkins and that evening had a 28-minute phone call with Reporter #2. Ali Watkins Reporter #2.

This sentence is for Reporter #3 a separate leak about a subpoena on a witness.

Remember that there were 3 counts in this indictment and the 4 players are:

Reporter #1 Manu Raju at CNN
Reporter #2 Ali Watkins at NYT/Buzzfeed
Reporter #3 Marianna Sotomayor NBC
Reporter #4 Brian Ross ABC

Brian Ross was just the Barium leak that outed Wolfe

drcrinum said:

---

I heard this on the news but this is the first tweet I've seen.

---

They will run from this like the plague. The last thing they want is to get drug into a discovery inquiry.

The video from Lou Dobbs is funny as well

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

drcrinum said:

---

I heard this on the news but this is the first tweet I've seen.

---

They will run from this like the plague. The last thing they want is to get drug into a discovery inquiry.

The video from Lou Dobbs is funny as well

---

"The Dems always travel in packs and that means they leave a lot of footprints everywhere."