https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1043271391703781377.html

Kevin Malone said:

---

Rockdoc said:

---

If the NYT put it out. DO NOT BELIEVE IT!

---

But what happens when NYT puts out a story that others are also reporting? Do you believe the others but not NYT, disbelieve all information, or say they got it right this time?

Trying to understand the mind.

---

By all means, you may take them at their word. As for me, nope.

Quote:

---

But what happens when NYT puts out a story that others are also reporting? Do you believe the others but not NYT, disbelieve all information, or say they got it right this time?

Trying to understand the mind.

---

WOW! You are an avowed lefty. So you believe the NYT has revealed the existence of the Deep State that is hell bent on a coup?

aggiehawg said:

---

Quote:

---

But what happens when NYT puts out a story that others are also reporting? Do you believe the others but not NYT, disbelieve all information, or say they got it right this time?

Trying to understand the mind.

---

WOW! You are an avowed lefty. So you believe the NYT has revealed the existence of the Deep State that is hell bent on a coup?

---

There's a difference between truthful and factual. An article may be factual but lie about it's sourcing and/or it's purpose, and may or may not be biased.

If the NYT has facts:
Who did they get them from?
Why did this person give them to them?

Who is Scott Schools and why did he abruptly quit?

blindey said:

---

Who is Scott Schools and why did he abruptly quit?

---

https://www.cnn.com/2018/07/03/politics/scott-schools-leaving-justice-department/

Quote:

---

...As the highest-ranking career official, Schools has served as a key adviser on many sensitive matters within the department, including the firing of former FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and document production issues with Capitol Hill. Two sources confirmed to CNN that Schools was not forced out of the department, but rather received a unique opportunity....

---

Thanks. Your take?

Yeah, an opportunity to abandon ship.

blindey said:

---

Thanks. Your take?

---

Remember Rachel Bland, the previous #3 who left earlier this year? For a 'great opportunity'. Hah! Two #3s leaving in less than 6 months. Rats leaving a sinking ship IMO.
Who wants to be in line for Rosenstein's job if he is fired? Or who wants to be tainted by an investigation of the DOJ (hint: another Special Counsel)? Or both.
Or even worse: Who wants to be in a position where there is a lot of finger pointing over misdeeds by ranking DOJ officials?

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1043509787672170496.html

The above thread is a short synopsis of the exchange occurring from Ingraham's show below during the first 16 minute segment featuring Lee Smith:



That Lee Smith chap seems to be a smart cookie.

drcrinum said:

---

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1043509787672170496.html

The above thread is a short synopsis of the exchange occurring from Ingraham's show below during the first 16 minute segment featuring Lee Smith:



That Lee Smith chap seems to be a smart cookie.

---

I saw that segment last night. It was excellent. The deep state players are showing cracks and turning their knives on each other.

The fear of the unredacted documents has the rats eating each other, because they know what's behind them and it's not a national security threat, but is is incriminating to certain people and a couple of members of FVEY.

It's still uncertain how much they are going to release unredacted, but it's clear the possibility is causing mass panic. And as Trump told Hannity, "Eventually it's all going to come out." and the rats know that's true.

Those tweets echo what Hannity has been saying on his radio show for several months. His sources tell him that 30-50 agents want to testify to Congress about what was really going on but they want protection first. He also can't understand why Republicans haven't given them protection. He also says they are pissed and will blow the top off all of this deep state crap.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

---

I have a hard time believing they were spying because of his energy ties. It was all about getting Trump.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

---

I want to believe George P, but his ego is just too big. He isn't believeable

VegasAg86 said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

---

I have a hard time believing they were spying because of his energy ties. It was all about getting Trump.

---

Fairly certain that was his entire point

Bonfire1996 said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

---

I want to believe George P, but his ego is just too big. He isn't believeable

---

Have you watched his interviews? He's a beta, not sure he can spell ego. My guess is is wife is tweeting on his account

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

VegasAg86 said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

---

I have a hard time believing they were spying because of his energy ties. It was all about getting Trump.

---

Fairly certain that was his entire point

---

lol, oops, I didn't read it that way, but it does make much more sense.

Anyone catch Lanny Davis little smoke and mirrors screw up?


A few minutes after ABC News reported that Cohen had spent hours talking to Mueller's team about Trump's Russia ties, "He" (Cohen) tweets this in a third person type of thing.





This was clearly intended to be sent from another account was deleted in less than a minute. But soon, it showed up again, from the account of Cohen's "legal crisis manager" Lanny Davis? LOL

Then Lanny realizes that he's caught like a dumb ass and tries to clean it up

Lanny Davis having to say "I don't have access or control of Cohen's twitter" tells you he does have control of Cohen's twitter and is playing the same games he has always done with the Clinton's and his disinformation tactics. And it tells me he planter the ABC story and is pushing the narrative.

Papa better watch his back. Arkanacide is a b/tch.

tsuag10 said:

---

Papa better watch his back. Arkanacide is a b/tch.

---

I'm pretty sore Papa is being coached and has been told The Clinton's are on lock down.. I doubt he is doing this "out of the blue" on his own.. he's helping spread the word about what went down

The Daily Beast article attached to this is comical. "Brits Warn" more like the Brits Beg forgiveness. They have no leverage in this. They are caught with their pants down

Japanese warned Truman not to drop the bomb on Hiroshima

drcrinum said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

The Daily Beast article attached to this is comical. "Brits Warn" more like the Brits Beg forgiveness. They have no leverage in this. They are caught with their pants down

---

Nunes was on Fox this morning. He asked a question: How do the Brits & Aussies know what's in the redacted FISA on Carter Page when Congress and the American people don't know?

---

Hopefully it's declassified soon and then we'll all know! I just read the Threadreader at the top of this page which postulates that Trump's announcement that he would be declassifying this info caused the UK and Aussies to panic and call and beg him not to. The theory goes, he is going to let the IG release it concurrently with the next report concerning the FISA court, and that the timeline of same has been moved up.

Let's hope.

drcrinum said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

The Daily Beast article attached to this is comical. "Brits Warn" more like the Brits Beg forgiveness. They have no leverage in this. They are caught with their pants down

---

Nunes was on Fox this morning. He asked a question: How do the Brits & Aussies know what's in the redacted FISA on Carter Page when Congress and the American people don't know?

---

HRC bathroom server?

Oh we'll know all right. If Kav gets shot down, trump is going to burn Washington to the ground. Buckle up.

drcrinum said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

The Daily Beast article attached to this is comical. "Brits Warn" more like the Brits Beg forgiveness. They have no leverage in this. They are caught with their pants down

---

Nunes was on Fox this morning. He asked a question: How do the Brits & Aussies know what's in the redacted FISA on Carter Page when Congress and the American people don't know?

---

Good question