FriscoKid said:
Oh it's like Christmas up in here. Some bad stuff is about to come out.
Rosenstein better have his desk packed up because he's not going to survive this.
Why you say that?
FriscoKid said:
Oh it's like Christmas up in here. Some bad stuff is about to come out.
Rosenstein better have his desk packed up because he's not going to survive this.
How naive of you. Or forgetful. Mueller made a specific criminal referral to SDNY. You really think that was about taxi medallions? And why would Mueller be looking into state/city taxi medallions during a probe into conspiracy with a foreign government probe? Because the Rooskis had a plan to take over NYC's cab service? Or better yet, it was the Rooskis who started Uber and Lyfft?Quote:
I was not arguing in any way the efficacy of team Mueller. But since you wanted to bring that up, you need to acknowledge that your entire argument regarding the Cohen guilty plea was through the SDNY and not the SCO. And I fail to see how the point that it "didn't lay a glove a Trump . . . despite what the MSM press breathlessly reported" is any negative reflection on the SDNY (or SCO's for that matter).
Because he signed off on the last FISA application and it wasn't exactly truthful. He knew the FBI was withholding info from the judge. That's why people wanted this application declassified because it implicates him.BMX Bandit said:FriscoKid said:
Oh it's like Christmas up in here. Some bad stuff is about to come out.
Rosenstein better have his desk packed up because he's not going to survive this.
Why you say that?
Bonfire1996 said:
What do you wanna bet they don't do it?
RoscoePColtrane said:Bonfire1996 said:
What do you wanna bet they don't do it?
It wasn't a request it was an official Order from the POTUS. Doubt they balk
POTUS Testicle Transporter:aggie2812-2 said:
Oh he ordered more than just the FISA docs!! This is too funny, I don't think people thought he would really do it. I hope it really has some good stuff in it and shows us all how stupid this investigation really is.
Tailgate88 said:POTUS Testicle Transporter:aggie2812-2 said:
Oh he ordered more than just the FISA docs!! This is too funny, I don't think people thought he would really do it. I hope it really has some good stuff in it and shows us all how stupid this investigation really is.
I got $50 that says they do it.,.....just after the midterms.Bonfire1996 said:
What do you wanna bet they don't do it?
Baby steps, baby steps. Two weeks from an October surprise. As for Trump, he was resisting officially stepping in, wisely in my view, until the Kavanaugh crap hit.Rockdoc said:
I think we've all learned to not hold our breath. I'm certainly not.
There wasn't.Quote:
Honestly don't think there ever has been one
How does declassifying obstruct the case? Answer: It doesn't.drcrinum said:
Well, I think we better wait on celebrating. There is a big question now looming: Will Rosenstein & Wray permit the declassification and release of the documents ordered by Trump? Suppose they refuse to comply, claiming obstruction of ongoing investigations? Then what? Trump fires them! That may play right into their hands.
RoscoePColtrane said:
CNN is melting down currently. CNN spinning unredacted text messages as "threat" to national security. Have you ever seen reporters try so hard to not cover a story, and not want to see more documents?
It isn't obstruction. Wray has no call here. He doesn't make prosecution decisions.drcrinum said:
Well, I think we better wait on celebrating. There is a big question now looming: Will Rosenstein & Wray permit the declassification and release of the documents ordered by Trump? Suppose they refuse to comply, claiming obstruction of ongoing investigations? Then what? Trump fires them! That may play right into their hands.
I'm pretty sure a directive from the POTUS is not up for dispute. This is a purposeful move, it takes a tone of redactions out of the Horowitz FISA reports. akes is that much clearer and less dispute by affected parties trying to hide their dirty laundry.drcrinum said:
Well, I think we better wait on celebrating. There is a big question now looming: Will Rosenstein & Wray permit the declassification and release of the documents ordered by Trump? Suppose they refuse to comply, claiming obstruction of ongoing investigations? Then what? Trump fires them! That may play right into their hands.
RoscoePColtrane said:
CNN is melting down currently. CNN spinning unredacted text messages as "threat" to national security. Have you ever seen reporters try so hard to not cover a story, and not want to see more documents?
RoscoePColtrane said:
CNN is melting down currently. CNN spinning unredacted text messages as "threat" to national security. Have you ever seen reporters try so hard to not cover a story, and not want to see more documents?
Rhetorical question. Dems have not come close to possessing integrity, much less knowing the meaning of the word since FDR.Agnzona said:
Liberals, anyone want to try and claim CNN as any kind of legitimate news organization? They are actually arguing to keep information from the public?
Do any of you have even an ounce of integrity left and just want to admit that they work for the DNC?
Sigh. You really want to force me to say why? You are tedious, spinning and not worthy of much discussion on my part. You haven't followed the developments as they happened, haven't read the pleadings, have no clue to what you are referring.MASAXET said:aggiehawg said:How naive of you. Or forgetful. Mueller made a specific criminal referral to SDNY. You really think that was about taxi medallions? And why would Mueller be looking into state/city taxi medallions during a probe into conspiracy with a foreign government probe? Because the Rooskis had a plan to take over NYC's cab service? Or better yet, it was the Rooskis who started Uber and Lyfft?Quote:
I was not arguing in any way the efficacy of team Mueller. But since you wanted to bring that up, you need to acknowledge that your entire argument regarding the Cohen guilty plea was through the SDNY and not the SCO. And I fail to see how the point that it "didn't lay a glove a Trump . . . despite what the MSM press breathlessly reported" is any negative reflection on the SDNY (or SCO's for that matter).
LOL. You are entertaining, Max.
You're all over the place. First, the reason for the referral is immaterial to the main point: there was a referral. That would negate the idea that anything wrong with the plea would look negatively on Mueller since he didn't handle the plea. Second, taking everything you say at face value: doesn't that justify the referral in the first place? If Mueller's probe is about potential conspiracy with a foreign government and he came across something that had nothing to do with that (such as taxi cab medallions as you reference), then referring it to the SDNY was the correct call. You seem to be complaining about him taking the correct course of action. I agree with you making fun of any absurd argument about the Russians being involved in the taxi issues, and it's a good thing the SCO's office did not try to make such an absurd argument in order to handle the taxi issues (because it didn't have anything to do with the Russians).
But enough of the random rabbit trail: why did you ignore the rest of my post? You know, the part we were actually discussing before the strawman?