Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,484,695 Views | 49269 Replies | Last: 2 days ago by aggiehawg
bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
.
.
.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Dabney L. Friedrich: Telephone Conference as to CONCORD MANAGEMENT AND CONSULTING LLC held on 8/6/2018. Request to appoint firewall counsel as referenced in docket 42 (page 4) GRANTED by the Court. Bond Status of Defendant: N/A; Defense Attorney: Katherine Seikaly; US Attorneys: Jonathan Kravis and Lawrence Atkinson. (jl) (Entered: 08/06/2018)

https://www.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.dcd.193580/gov.uscourts.dcd.193580.42.0.pdf

Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
cbr
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:




what in the holy living **** is going on? they were or must have been on notice to do this for years now.

MelvinUdall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
BMX Bandit said:

Hardest working man in oil isn't a title earned from sleeping


Well played...
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm coming back to this thread. Too much misinformation and idiotic posting on the Manafort thread.

Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Haha it appears his lackey has followed you over here.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Interesting Chalupa seems to have become a bit of a psychic

Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
MASAXET
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rockdoc said:

Haha it appears his lackey has followed you over here.
Certainly no "lackey" as I disagree with BMX regularly. He just happens to be more reasonable and level-headed in his positions than most. Posters like him and sassapis are much less biased in their respective analysis, will actually engage in discussion, and can generally support their opinion/analysis. Hawg used to similarly engage with differing opinions but now appears to only enjoy playing the role of providing info to those she agrees with
Rockdoc
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It is the politics board after all. You engage how you want to engage and if it displeases someone, just ignore or check out. Hawg's reputation speaks for itself.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:

Interesting Chalupa seems to have become a bit of a psychic


WTF? Where did that come from?
BMX Bandit
How long do you want to ignore this user?
No kidding!

What the background on Chalupa ?
MASAXET
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

MASAXET said:

Simple disagreement from posters like BMX is now misinformation and idiotic posting? That sure is a low threshold
Go back to your thread. I'm out of that one.

I was open to the adversarial system going toe to toe, but neither you nor etcetera were intellectually honest enough to simply disagree. Only one of you (allegedly) even have a law degree nor even the remotest understanding of statutory construction.

Quit cyber stalking me. Go have your circular jerk off, bash me and have a great time. You are beneath my GAS level anymore because I have zero respect for anything that you post.

Now, have a pleasant evening and a better tomorrow. 'kay?

We're done.
I'm genuinely curious what I have posted that was intellectually dishonest. If you could point me to something I posted I'd be happy to apologize for anything dishonest - I'm certainly not above being wrong and can recognize when it happens.

Was it highlighting the issue of the change in FISA language to "substantial purpose"? I'm not sure what was dishonest about that and I would've expected that to be an issue you'd like to discuss given your engagement in FISA discussions in the past.

ProgN
How long do you want to ignore this user?
aggiehawg said:

I'm coming back to this thread. Too much misinformation and idiotic posting on the Manafort thread.


aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RoscoePColtrane said:


The more we see, the more the actual conspiracy emerges.

There is a reason the Democrats haven't been beating the drum to release transcripts, or anything else, related to this since Lisa Page testified last month.

GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blindey said:

RoscoePColtrane said:

Interesting Chalupa seems to have become a bit of a psychic


WTF? Where did that come from?
George Webb's crazy self started ringing the alarm on the Chalupa's over a year ago, and no one was listening. Him and this other guy that goes by George Nasif.

Chalupa has deep ties to Fusion GPS, the DNC, FVEY and GCHQ. Now this is trying to follow Webb's thinking, drinking from a fire hose.


Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1026696993094225920.html

Interesting thread, including subthreads, on who was paying Steele and who was directing his activities.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chalupa was considered a DNC contractor. But she was doing opposition research which she continually denied. But that one email alone shows she was plugged in pretty deep. I don't think that was just a random guess, but could be wrong.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/07/14/politics/dnc-contractor-ukraine-alexandra-chalupa-trump/index.html
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chuck Ross was talking about Chalupa and how she tried to buy dirt on Trump from a terrorist and no one was listening to him.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/03/21/former-dnc-official-partnered-with-convicted-bomb-maker-to-investigate-trump/
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Chalupa met with Valeriy Chaly, Ukraine's ambassador to the US in March of 2016. She was targeting Manafort a few days before Trump even announced publicly he brought on Manafort.

There are three Chalupa sisters, Andrea, Alexandria, and Ali (ChalupaA@dnc.org)


https://www.politico.com/story/2017/01/ukraine-sabotage-trump-backfire-233446



And jeff Carlson talked about her a few months ago


https://themarketswork.com/2018/03/09/victoria-nuland-alexandra-chalupa-ukrainian-ties-the-steele-dossier/




Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Todays transcript




https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1027009612002852869.html
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RoscoePColtrane said:

Todays transcript




https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1027009612002852869.html

Lies, damned lies and I don't recall.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drcrinum said:

RoscoePColtrane said:

Todays transcript




https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1027009612002852869.html

Lies, damned lies and I don't recall.
It's bad when the judge calls you out in court, of your inconsistent testimony and how your 20 hrs of prep work isn't holding out under cross.

He remembers every little detail when the prosecution is questioning him and has memory loss under cross. But there is enough physical stand alone evidence to prove the taxes owed, they will convict him of that fairly easily, but the conspiracy and Bank Fraud will be tougher. The 290 years they are seeking has likely zero chance of success, but stranger things have happened. I'm thinking less than 10 years, a big fine and back taxes.

The DC court trial will likely go away and they won't pursue the FARA because of the collateral damage to those still kicking back to the swamp. Only way I see them going after the FARA is out of desperation because Manafort was acquitted in the EDVA, but there's no way that happens now.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:

Chalupa was considered a DNC contractor. But she was doing opposition research which she continually denied. But that one email alone shows she was plugged in pretty deep. I don't think that was just a random guess, but could be wrong.

https://www.cnn.com/2017/07/14/politics/dnc-contractor-ukraine-alexandra-chalupa-trump/index.html



There are 3 sisters and 2 of them worked for / in Ukraine?

Quote:

In another crazy twist, we have uncovered the Ukrainian Chalupa sisters, Alexandra and Andrea, and their dirty little secret. The biggest story of the 2016 campaign is about election interference, but it's not by the Russians but by the Ukrainians, with Soros and McCain backing the activities of the Chalupa sisters. Alexandra Chalupa is a Democratic National Committee (DNC) operative, and she admits to having meetings with Ukrainian officials in the Ukrainian Embassy for the purposes of gaining dirt on Donald Trump or anyone close to his campaign.

While the embassy declined that request, officials there became "helpful" in Chalupa's efforts, she said, explaining that she traded information and leads with them. "If I asked a question, they would provide guidance, or if there was someone I needed to follow up with." But she stressed, "There were no documents given, nothing like that." Chalupa said the embassy also worked directly with reporters researching Trump, Manafort and Russia to point them in the right directions. [Source: Politico]

Clearly, there is hardcore"collusion" going on here between a foreign government and the DNC. Chalupa's younger sister Andrea performed the role of frequenting Washington, D.C. parties and pumping the fake Trump-Russia collusion story everywhere to everyone, especially on social media.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
All three are Ukrainian and heavy activists but it's ho they are funded by and their circles that are very shady.


Andrea Chalupa



DNC operative oppo-research specialist
Has a extreme left propaganda podcast "Gaslit Nation"
(15 minutes is the limit before IQ numbers falling are permanent)
Worked with Michael Isikoff & tied to over 60 Ukrainian journalists via oligarch Victor Pinchuk.


Alexandra "Ali" Chalupa



DNC operative, oppo-research specialist.
Alexandra was communicating w/ Obama DOJ officials spring 2016 when dossier was being drafted.
Twelve Oval visits via WH visitor logs July/Aug '16
Wikileaks DNC emails have a lot of her activity as well.
Deep ties to Victoria Nuland and the Obama State Dept.

https://themarketswork.com/2018/03/09/victoria-nuland-alexandra-chalupa-ukrainian-ties-the-steele-dossier/



Irena Chalupa



Propagandist posing as a Internet Journalist
Work for 100% Soros funded StopFake in Ukraine
International Renaissance Foundation funds StopFake, owned by Soros
But also is a Fellow at Atlantic Council with guess who?
Evelyn Farkas & Dmitri Alperovitch (Crowdstrike)
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Sasappis said:

RoscoePColtrane said:




He remembers every little detail when the prosecution is questioning him and has memory loss under cross. But there is enough physical stand alone evidence to prove the taxes owed, they will convict him of that fairly easily, but the conspiracy and Bank Fraud will be tougher. The 290 years they are seeking has likely zero chance of success, but stranger things have happened. I'm thinking less than 10 years, a big fine and back taxes.

The DC court trial will likely go away and they won't pursue the FARA because of the collateral damage to those still kicking back to the swamp. Only way I see them going after the FARA is out of desperation because Manafort was acquitted in the EDVA, but there's no way that happens now.
That is not really the way the federal system works, especially when there has been a trial.

Manafort is facing 19 counts so that is going to really screw him on the sentencing guidelines. Granted that has changed in the recent past, but for example he is facing 5 counts of failing to report foreign accounts. Those are 5 years a piece. The sentencing report will probably not be in his favor so he may get the max for each. If he gets 25 years for those 5 counts and does 80%, that is 20 years. He is 69 today. That 20 year sentence is a life sentence on something that I think he is almost certainly convicted of.

You are right he may get out of the conspiracy charge, but that by no means is a victory.

Depending on whether they sentence them concurrently or consecutively but I understand and acknowledge he will be convicted. He will likely ask for the Judge to sentence him. Then if he is excessively sentence will immediately appeal it.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Zero chance of this happening, but interesting:



RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Yeah that's a stretch.

And as you said interesting.

Imagine if Trump guaranteed him safe passage in and out under some blanket immunity deal, they would STP. (Caca in de pantaloons) I'm guessing that hearing would never happen, and they'd duck for cover.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
HTownAg98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's a little primer on Federal sentencing, and how it works. Something to keep in mind is that the number of years that Manafort is looking at that has been reported by the media is wildly wrong.
https://www.popehat.com/2013/02/05/crime-whale-sushi-sentence-eleventy-million-years/
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:

All three are Ukrainian and heavy activists but it's ho they are funded by and their circles that are very shady.


Andrea Chalupa



DNC operative oppo-research specialist
Has a extreme left propaganda podcast "Gaslit Nation"
(15 minutes is the limit before IQ numbers falling are permanent)
Worked with Michael Isikoff & tied to over 60 Ukrainian journalists via oligarch Victor Pinchuk.


Alexandra "Ali" Chalupa



DNC operative, oppo-research specialist.
Alexandra was communicating w/ Obama DOJ officials spring 2016 when dossier was being drafted.
Twelve Oval visits via WH visitor logs July/Aug '16
Wikileaks DNC emails have a lot of her activity as well.
Deep ties to Victoria Nuland and the Obama State Dept.

https://themarketswork.com/2018/03/09/victoria-nuland-alexandra-chalupa-ukrainian-ties-the-steele-dossier/



Irena Chalupa



Propagandist posing as a Internet Journalist
Work for 100% Soros funded StopFake in Ukraine
International Renaissance Foundation funds StopFake, owned by Soros
But also is a Fellow at Atlantic Council with guess who?
Evelyn Farkas & Dmitri Alperovitch (Crowdstrike)
They all look just like I thought they would
First Page Last Page
Page 570 of 1408
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.