Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,737,825 Views | 49411 Replies | Last: 9 hrs ago by nortex97
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That's my guess too. That's why she has been so quiet. She could be on CNN in an hour if she wanted. There is a reason she is laying low.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So is the rescheduled meeting with Horowitz and whatever Congressional committee still on for the 11th? Will we see the IG report drop this week? Pretty please/
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?



Lures = Spies, more then one. Certainly suspicious for entrapment, and it goes back to December 28, 2015. And that OCONUS is surely the UK...it ain't Russia. This is beginning to look like a much larger and even more complex operation than we have suspected.
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:




Lures = Spies, more then one. Certainly suspicious for entrapment, and it goes back to December 28, 2015. And that OCONUS is surely the UK...it ain't Russia. This is beginning to look like a much larger and even more complex operation than we have suspected.
MSM - They're not lures...they're fishing accoutrements.
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:


Whoops
VaultingChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SpreadsheetAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lures in December 2015? One for each Republican campaign?
FJB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wonder how far back this foes and if other campaigns races / enemies were targeted too.
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
That is before any of the primaries. Makes me wonder if they possibly started with the presumption that there was Republican-Russian corrupt dealings and they simply had to find them, and that they wouldn't have to look very hard.
FJB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Could get very interesting

akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98 said:

That is before any of the primaries. Makes me wonder if they possibly started with the presumption that there was Republican-Russian corrupt dealings and they simply had to find them, and that they wouldn't have to look very hard.
More likely that since D's were colluding with Russia, they just assumed the R's were as well.
akm91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So Trump's only reduced Federal workforce by 23,700.
HeardAboutPerio
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What XM radio News channel can one get a less biased account during the 2 P.M. hour on Fox while Shep is making me want to throw the entire radio out the window? He's unbearable. His admant stances on these issues that there is no debate sounds like CNN at any given hour.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
HeardAboutPerio said:

What XM radio News channel can one get a less biased account during the 2 P.M. hour on Fox while Shep is making me want to throw the entire radio out the window? He's unbearable. His admant stances on these issues that there is no debate sounds like CNN at any given hour.
I switch to Fox Business during that hour or listen to Merle Haggard on Willie's Roadhouse
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
ScottH_01
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
SpreadsheetAg said:

Lures in December 2015? One for each Republican campaign?
And any Democrat campaign not 100% playing ball I'd bet. Hillary wasn't going to let anything trip up her candidacy/coronation this time around. I'm not sure there were any Dems not playing ball though, no candidates felt like they were really that concerned with challenging her, and even Bernie was supposed to be so fringe as to not be a risk.
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So it's now Israel, Israel, Israel?
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
backintexas2013 said:

So it's now Israel, Israel, Israel?
I believe this was posted already, but Ross retweeted this over the weekend...
Secolobo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
HeardAboutPerio said:

What XM radio News channel can one get a less biased account during the 2 P.M. hour on Fox while Shep is making me want to throw the entire radio out the window? He's unbearable. His admant stances on these issues that there is no debate sounds like CNN at any given hour.
Shep/fox just caters to all the libs that don't work and are at home during the day. Get'em hooked during the day and make their heads explode at night...
Can I go to sleep Looch?
JTA1029
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
MouthBQ98 said:

That is before any of the primaries. Makes me wonder if they possibly started with the presumption that there was Republican-Russian corrupt dealings and they simply had to find them, and that they wouldn't have to look very hard.


I think you give them too much credit. They never actually suspected collusion with Russia. They just wanted to cause chaos for Trump.

Remember Strzok text on potentially joining Mueller team "I would if I thought there was any 'there' there."

He has known for a long time that there was no collusion, and he's been in the middle of this mess from the get go.
stetson
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
pedro_martinez said:

Wonder how far back this foes and if other campaigns races / enemies were targeted too.
I wondered this too and if Romney could have been under the same type of surveillance. Probably not as Romney is just another RINO and probably a part of Deep State. This goes back as far as at least 2015 and it's highly unlikely that any of the other candidates in the 2016 field were surveilled, which begs the question why not? I think the answer is that Trump was the only "outside" candidate that was identified as having a shot at winning.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
stetson said:

pedro_martinez said:

Wonder how far back this foes and if other campaigns races / enemies were targeted too.
I wondered this too and if Romney could have been under the same type of surveillance. Probably not as Romney is just another RINO and probably a part of Deep State. This goes back as far as at least 2015 and it's highly unlikely that any of the other candidates in the 2016 field were surveilled, which begs the question why not? I think the answer is that Trump was the only "outside" candidate that was identified as having a shot at winning.
Halper received a 285K payment in May of 2012 a few months before the elections
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Agnzona
How long do you want to ignore this user?
They were certianly investigations of Romney but he was pretty squeaky after all. Recall they came up with put his dog in a dog carrier on his roof.
Rudebaeger
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
stetson said:
Quote:

Quote:

pedro_martinez said:
Wonder how far back this foes and if other campaigns races / enemies were targeted too.
I wondered this too and if Romney could have been under the same type of surveillance. Probably not as Romney is just another RINO and probably a part of Deep State. This goes back as far as at least 2015 and it's highly unlikely that any of the other candidates in the 2016 field were surveilled, which begs the question why not? I think the answer is that Trump was the only "outside" candidate that was identified as having a shot at winning.


Makes you wonder if the FBI were spying on Bernie(and passing that info on to Hilldawg). We know that she cheated in the Dem. nomination. It seems that knowing Bernie's moves/conversations would have made that even easier.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Rudebaeger said:

stetson said:
Quote:

Quote:

pedro_martinez said:
Wonder how far back this foes and if other campaigns races / enemies were targeted too.
I wondered this too and if Romney could have been under the same type of surveillance. Probably not as Romney is just another RINO and probably a part of Deep State. This goes back as far as at least 2015 and it's highly unlikely that any of the other candidates in the 2016 field were surveilled, which begs the question why not? I think the answer is that Trump was the only "outside" candidate that was identified as having a shot at winning.


Makes you wonder if the FBI were spying on Bernie(and passing that info on to Hilldawg). We know that she cheated in the Dem. nomination. It seems that knowing Bernie's moves/conversations would have made that even easier.
They didn't waste resources on Bernie on an election/primary he could in no way possibly win. The super delegates were bought and paid for in advance. Bernie stayed in it to line his pockets, from the election coffers.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

They didn't waste resources on Bernie on an election/primary he could in no way possibly win. The super delegates were bought and paid for in advance. Bernie stayed in it to line his pockets, from the election coffers.
Agreed. Bernie has been a Socialist for nearly all of his life. Enough said, except even Dems Hillary so much, he started to get traction with voters. That development was quite unexpected to the Hillary campaign and the DNC. They knew the primaries were already rigged but then they had to become very concerned about the General Election if the Bernie Bros couldn't be swayed back to Hillary.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/06/04/spy-games-george-papadopoulos-via-sketchy-simona-mangiante-begins-media-tour/

Quote:

...From the motion to seal, we discover Robert Mueller leveraged the July 27th, 2017, charges against George Papadopoulos to make him a cooperating witness for the special counsel. The July 28th, 2017, motion to seal was transparently intended to disguise the arrest of Papapdopoulos and his subsequent role as a "proactive cooperator":

Quote:

What is a "Proactive Cooperator"? Let's turn to another legal case where the terminology is clearly defined:

Quote:

What this means is that after his arrest July 27th, 2017, and before the arrest was unsealed in October 2017, George Papadopoulos was working on behalf of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team to gain information against the targets of the DOJ investigation, Donald Trump officials.

For approximately two-plus months, August/September 2017, George Papadopoulos would have been targeting contact with former and current Trump campaign officials. The purpose of that targeting would have included an effort by the Mueller Special Counsel to build a "conspiracy" charge against anyone associated with President Trump. The agent running Papadopoulos appears to have been FBI Special Agent Jennifer Zelski Edward....

It does not look like Papadopoulos was able to generate any valuable information while he was working as an informant for the Special Counsel. Apparently there was no forward value on using Papadopoulos any longer, and on May 23rd, 2018, Robert Mueller informed the court he was done with Papadopoulos, prepare to sentence him according to the earlier plea-deal and guidelines of his cooperation....

So, another 'spy'. Mueller coerced Papadopoulos into becoming an 'informant', likely wearing a wire and intercepting all of his communications with the Trump Campaign, looking for info to charge people with conspiracy
And regarding the info today about a threat to charge Papadopoulos with being an Israeli agent, TCTH addresses that issue as well:
Quote:

...Remember the single-most-consistent professional trait about professional liars -- they lie; often, quite well....
fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Wait one minute!!

I won't stand for anyone saying that a socialist takes care of themselves before everyone else!! This is an astounding revelation, and clearly falls into the fake news category.

Honestly, I seriously doubt there's been a true socialist who DIDN'T take care of themselves, before the country they served.

Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


I heard this on Fox Business radio while driving home this evening. This hearing could result in major revelations.
Tailgate88
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Let's hope so.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
drcrinum said:



https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/06/04/spy-games-george-papadopoulos-via-sketchy-simona-mangiante-begins-media-tour/

Quote:

...From the motion to seal, we discover Robert Mueller leveraged the July 27th, 2017, charges against George Papadopoulos to make him a cooperating witness for the special counsel. The July 28th, 2017, motion to seal was transparently intended to disguise the arrest of Papapdopoulos and his subsequent role as a "proactive cooperator":

Quote:

What is a "Proactive Cooperator"? Let's turn to another legal case where the terminology is clearly defined:

Quote:

What this means is that after his arrest July 27th, 2017, and before the arrest was unsealed in October 2017, George Papadopoulos was working on behalf of Special Counsel Robert Mueller's team to gain information against the targets of the DOJ investigation, Donald Trump officials.

For approximately two-plus months, August/September 2017, George Papadopoulos would have been targeting contact with former and current Trump campaign officials. The purpose of that targeting would have included an effort by the Mueller Special Counsel to build a "conspiracy" charge against anyone associated with President Trump. The agent running Papadopoulos appears to have been FBI Special Agent Jennifer Zelski Edward....

It does not look like Papadopoulos was able to generate any valuable information while he was working as an informant for the Special Counsel. Apparently there was no forward value on using Papadopoulos any longer, and on May 23rd, 2018, Robert Mueller informed the court he was done with Papadopoulos, prepare to sentence him according to the earlier plea-deal and guidelines of his cooperation....

So, another 'spy'. Mueller coerced Papadopoulos into becoming an 'informant', likely wearing a wire and intercepting all of his communications with the Trump Campaign, looking for info to charge people with conspiracy
And regarding the info today about a threat to charge Papadopoulos with being an Israeli agent, TCTH addresses that issue as well:
Quote:

...Remember the single-most-consistent professional trait about professional liars -- they lie; often, quite well....

His charging document and plea was nothing but cover, that's why he's never been sentenced
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
July 27th? The date might be important. Mueller's world was rocked by Horowitz on that day.

Leading Rosenstein to issue the August 2, 2017 memo.
HelloUncleNateFitch
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Breaking: Mueller's trying to revoke manfort's house arrest and alleging witness tampering.
Mission Velveta
How long do you want to ignore this user?
UncleNateFitch said:

Breaking: Mueller's trying to revoke manfort's house arrest and alleging witness tampering.
LOL I rushed to this thread as soon as I saw the Reuters headline for this. I know somebody on here will dig up the court transcripts from today pronto.
First Page Last Page
Page 438 of 1412
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.