Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,759,443 Views | 49423 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by will25u
trharding
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I thought allegations has to be proved, not disproved in this country...
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
trharding said:

I thought allegations has to be proved, not disproved in this country...
Innocent till proven guilty went out the window a long time ago, especially when the accused is a conservative, Republican, or Christian.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
trharding said:

I thought allegations has to be proved, not disproved in this country...
innocent until proven guilty (except if your name is followed by (R)).
dreyOO
How long do you want to ignore this user?
blindey said:

So you're not another iteration of MF Barnes.

If he's capable of morphing from the hardest working man in the oil patch to legal beagle Roscoe P Coltraine, I may have an assignment worthy of his tradecraft. It has something to do with infiltrating a little known media outlet based out of Atlanta
hbtheduce
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Nothing disproven other than they got the wrong Cohen in Prague.

I expect Trumps Russia hooker pee-pee tape to be made public by the IG soon.
FTAG 2000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:

Lock step with the talking points




It was okay for Cheryl Mills and Hillary, what's the big deal?
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
LBJ might have used the CIA to spy on the Goldwater campaign featuring the ubiquitous E. Howard Hunt.

LINK

Quote:

Whether the impetus came from the White House or Langley, it is clear that Hunt arranged the infiltration of the Goldwater campaign headquarters. "My subordinates volunteered inside, collected advance copies of position papers and other material, and handed them over to CIA personnel," Hunt wrote. Hunt's assets included a secretary on Goldwater's campaign staff who provided advance copies of speeches and press releases. A female CIA employee who worked from the Continental Press offices would pick up the material and deliver it to Cooper.

LBJ wasn't squeamish about using the inside information, and he did so in a blunt fashion that must have made CIA officers cringe. Goldwater campaign staff noticed that the Johnson campaign had the unnerving habit of responding to points in their candidate's speeches before he had delivered them.

Johnson didn't seem to care that his actions made clear to Goldwater that he was being spied on.

One of the most glaring incidents took place on September 9, 1964, after Hunt's operation delivered to Cooper an advance copy of a speech Goldwater was slated to deliver that evening in Seattle. The Republican planned to announce formation of a Task Force on Peace and Freedom headed by former Vice President Richard Nixon that would advise Goldwater on foreign affairs. The idea was to calm fears that Goldwater had insufficient foreign-policy experience and that he would pursue a radical international agenda.
LOL. Had to laugh at that. Nixon?

Quote:

Johnson swung into action and called a "flash" press conference. While Goldwater was on an airplane and unable to respond, LBJ announced the formation of a task force of his own: a "panel of distinguished citizens who will consult with the president in the coming months on major international problems facing the United States." Johnson's ploy worked perfectly: news of his advisory panel was widely reported, including on the front page of the New York Times, while Goldwater's announcement received little attention.
Everything Old is New Again.



HeardAboutPerio
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
whatthehey78 said:

Your thoughts...:

A. Schiff and C. Schumer seem pretty confident there was nothing "new" in the way of earth shattering revelations from today's meeting, while D. Nunes and K. Gowdy have seemingly been AWOL/totally mum.

What do ya think?


This happens everytime there is some joint meeting: memo release both gop and dem versions, this meeting today and on and on: Schiff immediately runs to the cameras and declares superiority of knowledge and emphatically refutes any GOP stances.

On the GOP side, nothing is said but a few days later the truth is known. I particularly liked the majority memo release and Schiff running to the mic to say it's all lies while a few days later the meeting minutes are released and you see how Schiff deflects and distracts from the topics all throughout the debate. In addition, you get to see the utter disdain they have for him.

TLDR: schiff always runs to be first at the mic, the truth comes out later. The GOP representation delay is annoying but the media isn't going to give them any serious attention anyway.
Line Ate Member
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
AG 2000' said:

RoscoePColtrane said:

Lock step with the talking points




It was okay for Cheryl Mills and Hillary, what's the big deal?
Wait. So a dispute between Congress and the DOJ caused a meeting to be set up in the White House. The President's CoS set up the meeting and didn't expect him to have nothin to do with it?

He came in, made sure they were taken care of, and interjected (most likely) that Trump wanted this to be resolved before Trump had to really get involved. He did what any assistant would do if he/she set up a meeting for a group of people.

If our government hadn't gotten so swampy and indifferent towards the Constitution, none of this crap would be needed.

This might be one of the dumbest things to get upset about in recent weeks and that is saying something. I guess when someone broke every egg in your Russia basket, you have to then put all of your broken shells into the "Let's see if this sticks" basket.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Mark Warner has literally colluded with Russians. Nothing he has to say should be of any interest.
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:

Lock step with the talking points


Was Mueller there? I thought this meeting was about the spy they used to try to protect Trump from the Russians? Didn't they both leave before the actual discussions started?
🤡 🤡 🤡
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:

Two idiots unaware where the burden of proof lies


The dossier was in the hands of the press starting in August of 2016. It got into the public domain in January of 2017. If there was any evidence to prove any of it, it would have been found.
🤡 🤡 🤡
txwxman
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Full of Schiff really botched the Svetlana Ogorodnikov investigation, so not surprising to see him revert to his usual behavior here.
texsn95
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Lot Y Tailgate said:

aggiehawg said:

Uhhmm? I was about to post a historical reference on the NoKo summit thread. What happened? Just briefly, no derail intended. I did notice many of Watson's posts had disappeared before the lock. Is he a Mod?


He was repeatedly attacked by other posters.
Nope...he's a worse troll than you are, and that's saying alot.
marble rye
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
And yet, staff let's them keep posting.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
txwxman said:

Full of Schiff really botched the Svetlana Ogorodnikov investigation, so not surprising to see him revert to his usual behavior here.
Beat it.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
marble rye said:

And yet, staff let's them keep posting.
And idiots keep responding to them and enabling the derail of threads
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Premium
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:




Point being?
Finn
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Entrapment?
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Here's an eye opener, too many gray areas open for subjective interpretation. And there may be a paper trail to Barry's oval office that they are desperately trying to keep buried.



Quote:

50 U.S. Code 1802 - Electronic surveillance authorization without court order; certification by Attorney General; reports to Congressional committees; transmittal under seal;...of communication common carrier; applications; jurisdiction of court US Code

(a)
(1) Notwithstanding any other law, the President, through the Attorney General, may authorize electronic surveillance without a court order under this subchapter to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year if the Attorney General certifies in writing under oath that
(A) the electronic surveillance is solely directed at
(i) the acquisition of the contents of communications transmitted by means of communications used exclusively between or among foreign powers, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title; or
(ii) the acquisition of technical intelligence, other than the spoken communications of individuals, from property or premises under the open and exclusive control of a foreign power, as defined in section 1801(a)(1), (2), or (3) of this title;
(B) there is no substantial likelihood that the surveillance will acquire the contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party; and
(C) the proposed minimization procedures with respect to such surveillance meet the definition of minimization procedures under section 1801(h) of this title; and
if the Attorney General reports such minimization procedures and any changes thereto to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence at least thirty days prior to their effective date, unless the Attorney General determines immediate action is required and notifies the committees immediately of such minimization procedures and the reason for their becoming effective immediately.
(2) An electronic surveillance authorized by this subsection may be conducted only in accordance with the Attorney General's certification and the minimization procedures adopted by him. The Attorney General shall assess compliance with such procedures and shall report such assessments to the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence under the provisions of section 1808(a) of this title.
(3) The Attorney General shall immediately transmit under seal to the court established under section 1803(a) of this title a copy of his certification. Such certification shall be maintained under security measures established by the Chief Justice with the concurrence of the Attorney General, in consultation with the Director of National Intelligence, and shall remain sealed unless
(A) an application for a court order with respect to the surveillance is made under sections 1801(h)(4) and 1804 of this title; or
(B) the certification is necessary to determine the legality of the surveillance under section 1806(f) of this title.
(4) With respect to electronic surveillance authorized by this subsection, the Attorney General may direct a specified communication common carrier to
(A) furnish all information, facilities, or technical assistance necessary to accomplish the electronic surveillance in such a manner as will protect its secrecy and produce a minimum of interference with the services that such carrier is providing its customers; and
(B) maintain under security procedures approved by the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence any records concerning the surveillance or the aid furnished which such carrier wishes to retain.
The Government shall compensate, at the prevailing rate, such carrier for furnishing such aid.
(b) Applications for a court order under this subchapter are authorized if the President has, by written authorization, empowered the Attorney General to approve applications to the court having jurisdiction under section 1803 of this title, and a judge to whom an application is made may, notwithstanding any other law, grant an order, in conformity with section 1805 of this title, approving electronic surveillance of a foreign power or an agent of a foreign power for the purpose of obtaining foreign intelligence information, except that the court shall not have jurisdiction to grant any order approving electronic surveillance directed solely as described in paragraph (1)(A) of subsection (a) unless such surveillance may involve the acquisition of communications of any United States person.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1802
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Under normal application of the law, one would think that couldn't have possibly been used to spy on Trump or his team. Knowing how the Obama goons operated, it seems that anything that was remotely close to following some statute was "good enough for government work."

It is infuriating, and I hope all the ugly truth comes out and the guilty are punished.
TRADUCTOR
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Thanks Rosco, the Session's EDVA appointment post gives a semblance of Trump's endgame and the 50,1802 post putting a bow on Barry for delivery to EDVA.. good to fall asleep in the happy direction...again

Trump goes to Washington and becomes the first franchise Player BABY!

HeardAboutPerio
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
txwxman said:

Full of Schiff really botched the Svetlana Ogorodnikov investigation, so not surprising to see him revert to his usual behavior here.


Right, kind of like the genesis of McCarthyism... good intentions gone bad. But seriously, Schiff did some good 30 years ago in that investigation. However, he long ago used up the goodwill associated with his time as a US attorney and now uses his skills obtained from that career to lead politically charged investigations. Unlike another individual with a similar background, Gowdy, he chooses to immerse himself in obsfucatiin by falsely championing a cause that is purely for political gain or even retaliation as opposed to seeking the truth.
coyote68
How long do you want to ignore this user?
God Bless America!

Gigem!
VaultingChemist
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thread on Obama using 50 1802 with UK intelligence, but Lynch was covering for him:



2. The surveillance may have been conducted by UK intelligence - and then fed back to Obama's IC thugs, for unmasking in the US.
Let me explain.

3. Here's the thing.
An American POTUS can LEGALLY authorize electronic surveillance 'without a court order...to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year'.
Yes, it's true. Obama had legal authorization to by-pass the normal court vetting process.

4. Such power lies in 50 U.S. Code 1802 -
Electronic surveillance authorization without court order;
(link: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1802)
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50
Please read it.

5. 'Foreign intelligence information' in relation to a 'US person' (eg Team Trump) is information that's necessary for the US to protect against attack, hostile acts, sabotage, terrorism, as well as 'clandestine intel activities' /...

6. /...by a foreign power, or agent of a foreign power (Russia), OR
information relevant to the national defense/ security of the US, or the conduct of the foreign affairs of the US.

7. Now, this authorization by POTUS (eg Obama) requires certification by the AG (eg Lynch - DOJ) that MUST be lodged with 'the court' (eg FISC):

'The (AG)+ shall immediately transmit under seal to the court ...(FISC).. a copy of his certification.'

8. So if my analysis is correct, a copy of that certification is currently under seal AT LEAST with the FISC & DOJ.

THAT'S what they're trying to desperately hide.

9. But that's just the start.

The Act says that the AG has to
keep the Select Committee on Intelligence AND the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence informed of these authorizations AND unmaskings under them.

see 1802 (a) (1) (C), above.

10. If this is what's happened, my bet is that Lynch didn't bother reporting, or selectively reported to the Committees in a way that excluded non-friendlies.

NOW can you see why Schiff, Feinstein, Warner & Co are frightened?

11. Connect dots :

#1 - Obama authorized electronic surveillance on Team Trump, by-passing normal judicial oversight.

12. #2- to create 'foreign intelligence', Brennan and others organized for UK intelligence, to conduct surveillance on Team Trump (either from UK, or from a UK govt asset within the US).

Thats why the Brits were brought in.

13. #3 - Obama's authorization was certified by AG Lynch and is now held under seal by the DOJ (and FISC).

The DOJ are terrified of making this known.

14. #4 - From Obama's authorization, ALL the unmasking followed, as well as the FBI fraudulent counter-intel investigation AND perhaps the FISA warrant, too.

That reels in all the Obama THUGS.

#Obamagate

15. Now, why is this a CRIME?

Obama's authorization was based on MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE (the Fusion GPS Dossier, secretly funded by the Clinton, DNC & Obama).

16. You can be certain - Obama KNEW it was FAKE, when he made the authorization. As did Lynch, when she certified it.

Obama's entire 'inner circle', the 'Secret Society', ALL KNEW.

That's what will come out.

17. They were trying to frame an innocent citizen and destroy a political rival using 'trumped up' evidence (lol).

These were genuine police state tactics. This is the sort of thing that happens in Putin's Russia. Or Mugabe's Zimbabwe.l

18. If true, it takes the US into totally uncharted territory.
It also has grave ramifications for any UK politician or official, who was involved in any way.

19. A POTUS himself, hatching a plan to destroy an American using fake evidence?

I really hope it ISN'T true.

But I suspect it may well be.

And that what's coming is far, FAR worse than any of us may have thought.

RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
How this song bird's tone changes now that his nuts are in a vice.

This is May 5th 2017 at Harvard




This is an interesting exchange

Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is who I wish Trump would have made the FBI Chief, instead of Wray, I don't get a fuzzy feeling from Wray, Mike Rogers interviewed for the position but Wray got the Job, I think that was a mistake.

Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/999971153811857408.html

This is an excellent piece of detective work by Undercover Huber @JohnWHuber & friends. From the Clinton-email-investigation released emails and the S&P text messages, he (they) have uncovered conclusive evidence that Priestap was in London in mid-May 2016, approximating the time frame when Papadopoulos had his drunken encounter with Downer at the wine room. This has never been disclosed at any Congressional committee meeting or by other news source. What was Priestap doing in London at this time? Was he meeting with GCHQ/Hannigan or Halper or Hakluyt? Something to be explored during his testimony the first week in June.


MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:

Lock step with the talking points




They damn well should be there if they have clearance and the president wants them there. It's his bureaucracies to run, and they are part of the operation.

Dems must be delusional or supremely narccisistic if they are serious about this. Makes me think it is purely political bull *****
MouthBQ98
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:

Two idiots unaware where the burden of proof lies




You could say the same thing about Bigfoot, Atlantis, and Little green men...
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
VaultingChemist said:

Thread on Obama using 50 1802 with UK intelligence, but Lynch was covering for him:



2. The surveillance may have been conducted by UK intelligence - and then fed back to Obama's IC thugs, for unmasking in the US.
Let me explain.

3. Here's the thing.
An American POTUS can LEGALLY authorize electronic surveillance 'without a court order...to acquire foreign intelligence information for periods of up to one year'.
Yes, it's true. Obama had legal authorization to by-pass the normal court vetting process.

4. Such power lies in 50 U.S. Code 1802 -
Electronic surveillance authorization without court order;
(link: https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/1802)
law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50
Please read it.

5. 'Foreign intelligence information' in relation to a 'US person' (eg Team Trump) is information that's necessary for the US to protect against attack, hostile acts, sabotage, terrorism, as well as 'clandestine intel activities' /...

6. /...by a foreign power, or agent of a foreign power (Russia), OR
information relevant to the national defense/ security of the US, or the conduct of the foreign affairs of the US.

7. Now, this authorization by POTUS (eg Obama) requires certification by the AG (eg Lynch - DOJ) that MUST be lodged with 'the court' (eg FISC):

'The (AG)+ shall immediately transmit under seal to the court ...(FISC).. a copy of his certification.'

8. So if my analysis is correct, a copy of that certification is currently under seal AT LEAST with the FISC & DOJ.

THAT'S what they're trying to desperately hide.

9. But that's just the start.

The Act says that the AG has to
keep the Select Committee on Intelligence AND the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence informed of these authorizations AND unmaskings under them.

see 1802 (a) (1) (C), above.

10. If this is what's happened, my bet is that Lynch didn't bother reporting, or selectively reported to the Committees in a way that excluded non-friendlies.

NOW can you see why Schiff, Feinstein, Warner & Co are frightened?

11. Connect dots :

#1 - Obama authorized electronic surveillance on Team Trump, by-passing normal judicial oversight.

12. #2- to create 'foreign intelligence', Brennan and others organized for UK intelligence, to conduct surveillance on Team Trump (either from UK, or from a UK govt asset within the US).

Thats why the Brits were brought in.

13. #3 - Obama's authorization was certified by AG Lynch and is now held under seal by the DOJ (and FISC).

The DOJ are terrified of making this known.

14. #4 - From Obama's authorization, ALL the unmasking followed, as well as the FBI fraudulent counter-intel investigation AND perhaps the FISA warrant, too.

That reels in all the Obama THUGS.

#Obamagate

15. Now, why is this a CRIME?

Obama's authorization was based on MANUFACTURED EVIDENCE (the Fusion GPS Dossier, secretly funded by the Clinton, DNC & Obama).

16. You can be certain - Obama KNEW it was FAKE, when he made the authorization. As did Lynch, when she certified it.

Obama's entire 'inner circle', the 'Secret Society', ALL KNEW.

That's what will come out.

17. They were trying to frame an innocent citizen and destroy a political rival using 'trumped up' evidence (lol).

These were genuine police state tactics. This is the sort of thing that happens in Putin's Russia. Or Mugabe's Zimbabwe.l

18. If true, it takes the US into totally uncharted territory.
It also has grave ramifications for any UK politician or official, who was involved in any way.

19. A POTUS himself, hatching a plan to destroy an American using fake evidence?

I really hope it ISN'T true.

But I suspect it may well be.

And that what's coming is far, FAR worse than any of us may have thought.




Very interesting. Can't believe Roscoe didn't break this
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
When he was sapper he justified the rolling stone fake rape article. He deserves all the abuse he gets.
backintexas2013
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The only thing cnn cares about are the attorneys attending the start of the meeting.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
That's a great piece of putting the timeline together. So if Priestap was there to monitor that interaction or be the handler for the op, he must have been dispatched there, presumedly by Comey. We may never find out but it has to be asked, Why did Brennan go to Moscow in March 2016 solo, with no staff or extra security? That's a bit odd, and I think is relevant. We also know Strzok, Page, McCabe & SA Michael Gaeta, of the FBI office in Rome, all traveled to London not long after in August 2016.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
First Page Last Page
Page 415 of 1413
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.