drcrinum said:

---

---

IF true, **** all these *******s.

Burn the damn government down

I want you to be right. I really do. I just don't think that's how Trump works. If he knows he has the goods, dragging it out only helps his cause.

Trump can find the political winds turning. He's going to use every media outlet he can as a positive feedback loop for the word "spy" as it relates to his campaign. He's sharp and will use theatrics and time to his advantage for as long as possible.

SpreadsheetAg said:

---

Perfect

---

Sure you didn't see any evidense, because they didn't produce the documents that were asked for.

SpreadsheetAg said:

---

Perfect

---

The country is tired of this semantics ***** His wires weren't tapped either, right?

Epstein got a 13 month deal in a private wing of the Palm Beach jail and was granted a 16-hour-per-day work release daily

You're little turd there looks like Harry Reid.

aggiehawg said:

---

drcrinum said:

---

---

Welp!

Really didn't think Wray and Rosenstein would be willing to give up their jobs over this but I guess they are. They were given a direct order. Instead of doing the honorable thing and resign, they weaseled.

Expected more from Wray.

---

.

I never checked with my attorney, but I would give someone working for me an order to do something and tell them their refusal was their voluntary resignation.

Basically, it was you have 2 choices. Carry out my order or resign.

Quote:

---

It's this reporters understanding that Pientka will account for what Flynn said in the interviews and will give context to the FBI's accusation that he lied during the interview. If asked, Pientka will also give his personal opinion as to whether or not that was actually the case. He will also discuss how forthcoming Flynn was about very specific sensitive information that Flynn could not have possibly known the investigators already knew, which may give additional insight into Flynn's veracity and willingness to tell the truth.

Pientka, however, will only testify about the circumstances regarding the Flynn interview and the issues that pertain to that interview, according to two sources with knowledge. There is no reason to believe that Pientka has any information on Comey's role in the Trump Russia investigations but wants the opportunity to "state the truth" what has been said about Flynn, said the source, with direct knowledge.

---

Sara Carter throwing cold water on that OAN report

Mueller apparently has a history of making deals with pedophiles and ephebephiles.

How it usually ends up being applied doesn't necessarily determine its sole meaning.

benchmark said:

---

Michael Barnhart said:

---

benchmark said:

---

H"By force" would be a tall hill for a US prosecutor ... he'd probably prefer to chase a lesser crime with higher odds.

Quote:

---

US Code, Title 18, Part I, Chapter 115, 2384 - Seditious conspiracy

If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.

---

---

Well, "overthrow" and "put down" don't appear to require "by force". I say this because of the inclusion of "to" before "destroy"...sentence construction using parallelism...and the use of "by force" in consecutive items of listed conduct.

So, can we shoehorn this conspiracy into conduct that constitutes overthrowing or putting down?

---

Pretty sure "seditious conspiracy" has to pass the "by force" litmus. Sedition usually applies to radical militias, terrorists, anarchists, etc. that conspire to overthrow the gov using violence.

---

You may be right, but the sentence structure of the cited statute does not require "by force" for each subversive activity. I don't have any real interest in digging up case law.

How soon they forget these types of emails.... tick tock Hillary




https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/20280

I am not seeing where Nader actually has been granted immunity. A little help? What am I missing?

Maybe it's a suggestion history is about to repeat itself?

MouthBQ98 said:

---

Maybe it's a suggestion history is about to repeat itself?

---

Oh. Okay. Thought I was losing my mind there for a moment. Didn't get the subtext that Mueller has been easy on pedos in the past.

But while we are discussing Mueller's potential witness list:

Flynn-accused liar
Gates-accused liar
Van der Zwaan-accused liar
Papadop-accused liar
Nader-convicted pedo
Comey-liar deluxe
Cohen?? He's still not indicted yet so we don't know what kind of chicanery he will be tagged with. Nor that he would cooperate.
Kushner? Just got his full security clearance. No sign he will be charged with anything.
Halper? MIA
Mifsud? MIA

That's a pretty sorry roster of witnesses.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

How soon they forget these types of emails.... tick tock Hillary




https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/20280

---

I'm sure they have a benign definition of "pay to play" to explain there's nothing to see here.

Can't wait to find out what hurt this poor things feelings

Quote:

---

I'm sure they have a benign definition of "pay to play" to explain there's nothing to see here.

---

Likely bundlers to get the in-home visit. My .02.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

Can't wait to find out what hurt this poor things feelings

---

The White House called the meeting. Their meeting, their call, Schiff, you dips***.

So the Dutch have definitive evidense that a specific Russian Anti-Aircraft brigade shot down the Airliner that three key members in the U-1 deal all happened to be on. Nothing to see here.

Schiff is throwing anything and everything against the wall. Their base is probably starting to figure out that the entire media narrative was fake.

Uhhmm? I was about to post a historical reference on the NoKo summit thread. What happened? Just briefly, no derail intended. I did notice many of Watson's posts had disappeared before the lock. Is he a Mod?

OneNightW said:

---

Schiff is throwing anything and everything against the wall. Their base is probably starting to figure out that the entire media narrative was fake.

---

That's because he know that the entire media, including Fox, will run his little speech over and over, and then repeat his lie about no spy in the campaign.

Heck, Fox News Radio at the top of the hour when discussing the meetings today made it all about Schiff.

aggiehawg said:

---

Uhhmm? I was about to post a historical reference on the NoKo summit thread. What happened? Just briefly, no derail intended. I did notice many of Watson's posts had disappeared before the lock. Is he a Mod?

---

He kind of became unhinged.

aggiehawg said:

---

Uhhmm? I was about to post a historical reference on the NoKo summit thread. What happened? Just briefly, no derail intended. I did notice many of Watson's posts had disappeared before the lock. Is he a Mod?

---

Not likely since he's been perma-banned once before.

Quote:

---

He kind of became unhinged.

---

I'll refrain from the obvious rejoinder but thanks. You too, Rapier.

OneNightW said:

---

Schiff is throwing anything and everything against the wall. Their base is probably starting to figure out that the entire media narrative was fake.

---

70% of Democrats still think he should be impeached. Plenty of them are still buying the BS of Schiff and Swallowswell.

Tailgate88 said:

---

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

So the Dutch have definitive evidense that a specific Russian Anti-Aircraft brigade shot down the Airliner that three key members in the U-1 deal all happened to be on. Nothing to see here.

---

WHAT?!

---

This. Please elaborate.