Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,743,769 Views | 49415 Replies | Last: 1 day ago by fasthorse05
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Ellis Wyatt said:

GCP12 said:

Ellis Wyatt said:

drcrinum said:

Listening to Fox news. judge Napolitano said that if the FBI embedded Halper as a mole, it would have required a search warrant from a judge, meaning paperwork. Is that correct? Or could they have bypassed that with a NSL?
I think at this point it is fairly apparent that the requirements of the law were completely irrelevant to Obama's goon squad.
Exactly. Who cares what the law says? These people have proven over and over they don't care.

Police officer: Sir, you were speeding

Me: Oh no, officer. I could never do that. It's against the law.

Which is what makes mesocosm's claims about the spying beyond absurd to me. But he's just like every other lib out there.
Here's the Lying leader start at the 2:45 mark

Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Flying Crowbar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I couldn't listen to him for more than a minute before I had to shut it off.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
The point here is that the remnants of the IC cabal have vastly overplayed their hand. Intimidation tactics don't work with Trump. For every time they screamed, "YOU CAN"T DO THAT!!" Trump smiled and replied, "Watch me."

Rosenstein used to work under Mueller and still follows his directions. Which put Rosenstein on a collision course with the White House, Congress and the Senate. Rosenstein appears to have folded his hand. We'll see if he tries to stonewall again.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
McCarthy weighs in. LINK
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Bruce is in a lot of trouble.
Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OneNightW said:

Bruce is in a lot of trouble.
As is his wife.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Graybeard continues to please me very much
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Prosperdick
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I believe the appropriate ham radio distress call for Mrs. Ohr is MAYDAY MAYDAY MAYDAY!

How appropriate.
Red Fishing Ag93
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'll be pleased the day the FBI can subpoena my laptop and phone and I can just tell 'em to F off, you are dealing with Red Fishing Ag 93!
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Elections have consequences, Chuck
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This is always funny to me. Obama spied on journalists, foreign leaders and all other kinds of people. People that, in reality, did not have a real chance of stopping Obama. But, it's crazy to think he'd spy on the one guy who could completely destroy his legacy in under two years.
captkirk
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GCP12 said:

This is always funny to me. Obama spied on journalists, foreign leaders and all other kinds of people. People that, in reality, did not have a real chance of stopping Obama. But, it's crazy to think he'd spy on the one guy who could completely destroy his legacy in under two years.
I think the original plan was to destroy him after he lost, so he would never consider running again. The plan never contemplated him winning
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GCP12 said:

This is always funny to me. Obama spied on journalists, foreign leaders and all other kinds of people. People that, in reality, did not have a real chance of stopping Obama. But, it's crazy to think he'd spy on the one guy who could completely destroy his legacy in under two years.
Erick Erickson is one of the diehard to the end anti-Trumpers.

I'm sure he is secretly hoping Mueller is able to remove Trump from office.
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GCP12 said:

Elections have consequences, Chuck
Trump has two battling forces between Congress and his DOJ. He will bring them together to get them to work together. Management 101.
coyote68
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Trump is POTUS. The DOJ/FBI want you to believe they are not accountable. KGB?
DarrellS8
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RoscoePColtrane said:


Isn't this the idiot who was one of the Democrats to hire the Awan bros? The guys who hacked the Democratic Congressmen for Pakistan
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I think they would have destroyed trump and his family as putin agents and then used it as a way to go to war with Russia.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is fuuking priceless

They are in full panic mode, somebody is now trying to claim that Trump and Cohen kidnapped their son... jeez

Too many pages to post the whole thing




https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4478776/Endorsed-Letter.pdf
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
MelvinUdall
How long do you want to ignore this user?
RoscoePColtrane said:

This is fuuking priceless

They are in full panic mode, somebody is now trying to claim that Trump and Cohen kidnapped their son... jeez

Too many pages to post the whole thing




https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4478776/Endorsed-Letter.pdf


WTF did I just read?
Ag87H2O
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rapier108 said:

drcrinum said:

Listening to Fox news. judge Napolitano said that if the FBI embedded Halper as a mole, it would have required a search warrant from a judge, meaning paperwork. Is that correct? Or could they have bypassed that with a NSL?
At the rate this is going, would not be a surprise if they simply bypassed everything, legal requirements be damned.
Obama cared zero about the process or the law. He was running his own personal kingdom any way he liked and to heck with the law. He used the federal agencies and staff like his own personal servants, and enforced/ignored laws at his whim depending on whether or not they advanced his agenda. He knew the Republicans were neutered and afraid of him and were not about to challenge him on anything. And he knew the courts would either side with him, or he likely had dirty laundry on many of the judges so he could quietly force them to do his bidding. Amazing the control you can attain with the the power of the entire federal establishment at your fingertips.

Obama was as close to King George as we have seen since the founding of America. He had the table set perfectly for the tyranny of HRC and beyond. Trump really screwed up their plans.
valvemonkey91
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Who now thinks that Sharyl Attkisson wasn't spied on? This corruption goes to the heart of the Obama regime, the DNC, and Hillary and her den of thieves. If big names do not get serious jail time, our rule of law as well as our republic is lost. We are a banana republic if that happens.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
nhayden said:

RoscoePColtrane said:

This is fuuking priceless

They are in full panic mode, somebody is now trying to claim that Trump and Cohen kidnapped their son... jeez

Too many pages to post the whole thing




https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4478776/Endorsed-Letter.pdf


WTF did I just read?
read the entire document, this a satire 100% and it has Avenatti's fingerprints all over it.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
aggielostinETX
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GCP12 said:

This is always funny to me. Obama spied on journalists, foreign leaders and all other kinds of people. People that, in reality, did not have a real chance of stopping Obama. But, it's crazy to think he'd spy on the one guy who could completely destroy his legacy in under two years.
The Clinton campaign knew in late October they would lose NC.

They told high-level execs at large local banks as much so they could start the spin.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is a cold case that they've dug up and tried to tie it to Cohen and by Proxy Trump



Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Claverack
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Patrick Henry, arguing against the adoption of the Constitution, June 7, 1788:

http://www.let.rug.nl/usa/documents/1786-1800/the-anti-federalist-papers/speech-of-patrick-henry-(june-7-1788).php

Quote:

Shew me that age and country where the rights and liberties of the people were placed on the sole chance of their rulers being good men, without a consequent loss of liberty? I say that the loss of that dearest privilege has ever followed with absolute certainty, every such mad attempt. If your American chief, be a man of ambition, and abilities, how easy is it for him to render himself absolute: The army is in his hands, and, if he be a man of address, it will be attached to him; and it will be the subject of long meditation with him to seize the first auspicious moment to accomplish his design; and, Sir, will the American spirit solely relieve you when this happens?

Henry envisioned a Constitution enacted without protections granted to individuals by a Bill of Rights. But he could just have easily been arguing against a Constitution run by individuals who ignored a Bill of Rights. Without doubt we have been brought to the full realization of Henry's concerns by the Democratic Party, President Obama, his would-be successor, and a bureaucracy of statists more loyal to an establishment of rulers than the nation.

I'm hoping and praying those presently in power understand the long-lasting implication of failing to move against those wishing to install an Orwellian one-party system in the United States. Without real reform to return the EOP and the surveillance state to compliance with law and oversight, we are merely asking for a replay of the Obama years (and worse) when the next Democrat enters the White House.

Agnzona
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Prayer may be the only chance we have left.
Rapier108
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Quote:

Public records show Stefan Halper, the foreign policy expert "outed," as an FBI informant that spied on Donald Trump's presidential campaign, was paid a large sum in 2016 for work he did for the Obama administration.

The Department of Defense paid Halper $282,295 on September 27, 2016 just months before the 2016 presidential election for work titled, "INDIA AND CHINA ECON STUDY," says USASPENDING.gov, a website that tracks spending data for the U.S. government. This sum was one of two payments made to Halper for the job; the second, worth $129,280, was made on July 26, 2017. The record lists Halper's "Period of Performance" as September 26, 2016 to March 29, 2018.

USASPENDING.gov shows the Department of Defense paid Halper a total of $1,058,161 for work between 2012-2018. The work designated for "India-China" study comprised nearly 40 percent of that compensation.

The contents of the work listed above are presently unknown.
http://www.breitbart.com/big-government/2018/05/21/department-of-defense-paid-fbi-informant-stefan-halper-400k-in-2016/

https://www.usaspending.gov/#/award/23674475

Yes, I know it's Breitbart.
AgFan2015
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Quote:

Robert Mueller, the special counsel leading the Justice Department's Russia collusion investigation, removed an FBI agent from the case over possible anti-Trump text messages, Fox News confirmed Saturday.

The agent has been identified as Peter Strzok, one of the agency's most experienced and trusted counterintelligence investigators, said the New York Times, which first reported the dismissal.
The allegations came to light after the Justice Department's inspector general started examining Strzok's messages.

"Immediately upon learning of the allegations, the Special Counsel's Office removed Peter Strzok from the investigation," Peter Carr, a spokesman for Mueller, confirmed to Fox News.
Strzok also worked on the FBI investigation last year into whether then-Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton mishandled classified information through her use of private email servers while secretary of State.
During this investigation, Strzok was allegedly involved in an extra-marital affair with FBI lawyer Lisa Page, according to The Washington Post.
"Lisa Page completed her brief detail and had returned to the FBI weeks before our office was aware of the allegations," Carr also said in his statement, though it was not immediately clear to which allegations he was referring.



Strzok was reportedly reassigned this past summer from the Mueller investigation to the FBI's human resources department, according to The Times.
A lawyer for Storzok declined to comment.

OP,

We are almost 400 pages into this thread, did you ever think you'd cause a wave this big on TexAgs with a simple post????






Agnzona
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is the largest scandal in American history followed with the largest cover up in American history. It will certianly become the largest Texags thread ever and rightfully so.
FbgTxAg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Agnzona said:

This is the largest scandal in American history followed with the largest cover up in American history. It will certianly become the largest Texags thread ever and rightfully so.
The Beer Thread would like a word
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
First Page Last Page
Page 392 of 1412
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.