The host obviously didn't know the new narrative, he was operating under the "it is shocking that Trump would allege this" narrative. Clapper quickly set him straight that it is a good thing. Interesting that Clapper is implying that it was a random person that came forward when he saw questionable things.backintexas2013 said:GCP12 said:
MUST... CONTINUE... NARRATIVE.
We discussed this two days ago. The old narrative is it didn't happen. New narrative it was for the good of the country.
I hope someone retweets the October 2016 tweet with the NPR link and replacing Trump with Ana Navarro in the current tweet.RoscoePColtrane said:
Isn't this the ***** that is on CNN screaming about the POTUS calling gang members 'animals"?
She's scrubbing tweets real time right now,VegasAg86 said:I hope someone retweets the October 2016 tweet with the NPR link and replacing Trump with Ana Navarro in the current tweet.RoscoePColtrane said:
Isn't this the ***** that is on CNN screaming about the POTUS calling gang members 'animals"?
Which ones? She can't possibly deny that she called Trump an animal.RoscoePColtrane said:She's scrubbing tweets real time right now,VegasAg86 said:I hope someone retweets the October 2016 tweet with the NPR link and replacing Trump with Ana Navarro in the current tweet.RoscoePColtrane said:
Isn't this the ***** that is on CNN screaming about the POTUS calling gang members 'animals"?
These aren't twitter links, they're images. She can't scrub people's screenshots. Just tweet the screenshots at her.RoscoePColtrane said:She's scrubbing tweets real time right now,VegasAg86 said:I hope someone retweets the October 2016 tweet with the NPR link and replacing Trump with Ana Navarro in the current tweet.RoscoePColtrane said:
Isn't this the ***** that is on CNN screaming about the POTUS calling gang members 'animals"?
Just noticed 2 years later? Don't think that's going to fly.agdad4x said:
It's really fairly easy for her:
"My account was hacked"
and she is off the hook
Sorry if this is late, I'm just catching up with the thread...MouthBQ98 said:
They know good and damn well it was in jest, but it isn't politically useful to admit it was jest. They pretend en-masse to take it literally because this gives them additional pretext to delude themselves with all the salacious Russian collusion allegations. They are choosing to live a lie, to indulge a farce because it satisfies their emotional need for their dogma to prevail over their political opponents, whom they must demonize to justify their "righteous" spite.
Remember you are dealing with people who build their self image around being morally superior and correct, and this is heavily associated with the adoption of progressive dogma which they believe inherently imparts moral superiority and wisdom. They have to rationalize their sociopathic and spiteful political actions that their dogma calls for somehow, as those actions are logically inconsistent with the moral superiority they assure themselves they have, snd the easist way to accomplish this is to turn your political opponent into a vile caricature of detestable stereotypes in your own mind, and always presume the worst of them, and worst interpretations of their actions and words. Within a likeminded group, this can become a hysterical maelstrom as they feed off of eachother and feed eachother spin and misinformation.
oysterbayAG said:
Does anyone know what has happened to Tony Podesta ?
Pretty sure that was John...but Tony was probably just as careless.BQ78 said:
Don't know, check his G-mail account password is Pa$$word.
Quote:
A panicked Anthony Weiner gave all his electronic devices to private investigators two days after he was exposed for engaging in lewd, online exchanges with a 15-year-old girl, court records revealed Thursday.
A newly unsealed, search-and-seizure warrant obtained by the feds shows that the disgraced ex-pol handed over an iPhone, iPad and laptop computer to Granite Intelligence on Sept. 23, 2016.
Probably not at this point. He told the government to give him an unredacted copy of the August Rosenstein memo by today or file motions to get CIPA protections in place. They gave him the memo yesterday.whatthehey78 said:
Yes...I rely way tooooo much on the informative posters that post herein, but I have to ask...has Judge Ellis officially ruled, or otherwise commented on the purported unredacted doc(s) provided by Muller's team? As I recall, they were supposed to clarify Mueller's full/expanded authorization extended by RR.
Hoping they are found to be "lacking" in the judge's opinion and Muller's case significantly limited thereby. One eye closed, holding my breath and fingers crossed. Please...say it's so!
Thanks, kindly!blindey said:Probably not at this point. He told the government to give him an unredacted copy of the August Rosenstein memo by today or file motions to get CIPA protections in place. They gave him the memo yesterday.whatthehey78 said:
Yes...I rely way tooooo much on the informative posters that post herein, but I have to ask...has Judge Ellis officially ruled, or otherwise commented on the purported unredacted doc(s) provided by Muller's team? As I recall, they were supposed to clarify Mueller's full/expanded authorization extended by RR.
Hoping they are found to be "lacking" in the judge's opinion and Muller's case significantly limited thereby. One eye closed, holding my breath and fingers crossed. Please...say it's so!
He's got Manafort's motion (and team Mueller's opposition) "under advisement." That means he's going to think about it and make a decision sooner or later. There's no official deadline to get this done, but in criminal cases, defendants have a right to a speedy trial and the judge won't want this to linger. I can't imagine it will sit for more than a month in any circumstances. My guess is we will get something from the judge the week after Memorial Day.
So, she called Trump an animal, but how dare he call rapists and terrorists animals. Good grief, the Democrat's hypocrisy knows no bounds. First Nancy Pelosi, now her.aginlakeway said:Which ones? She can't possibly deny that she called Trump an animal.RoscoePColtrane said:She's scrubbing tweets real time right now,VegasAg86 said:I hope someone retweets the October 2016 tweet with the NPR link and replacing Trump with Ana Navarro in the current tweet.RoscoePColtrane said:
Isn't this the ***** that is on CNN screaming about the POTUS calling gang members 'animals"?
JTA1029 said:
On hannity Greg Jarret just said the "papadopoulos got drunk and told the Australian guy about emails" thing was completely made up to cover for the spying.
My theory - the DNC leadership freaked after they killed Seth Rich, and it was convenient to them to tie the Wikileaks email release to Russia to avoid scrutiny with that and the bonus is that they could cover for the already going on illegal spying of the trump campaign. 2 birds one stone.
I don't think there was actually an operation with that name. I think it's a lie concocted after the fact.Senor Cardgage said:
Speaking of Crossfire Hurricane, I wonder if they thought they were being clever with their naming the op using a Rolling Stones lyric, since Trump played "You Can't Always Get What You Want" at the Republican Convention?
