I think he's already indicted, possibly sealed, or they wouldn't have released the report yet.

I read all 74 points, but the use of an acronyms makes it hard to follow. What is the CF investigation?

Safe at Home said:

---

I read all 74 points, but the use of an acronyms makes it hard to follow. What is the CF investigation?

---

Clinton Foundation.

Or Cluster **** investigation...just as applicable.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

I think he's already indicted, possibly sealed, or they wouldn't have released the report yet.

---

Haven't checked the laws about gofundme but McCabe says he needs the money for a criminal defense. If he doesn't believe he's about to be or already is, indicted, is that fraud??

lol.

drcrinum said:

---

lol.

---

Lying *****. Just talked grandkids. Mmmmmm hmmmm.

Lock her up.

aggiehawg said:

---

Guess Ol' Loretty just saw an advance copy of Comey's interview.

He has at least two fronts to defend now. Lynch and McCabe.

Page, Strzok, Priestap have already cut their deals.

---

I think we should have them stand in a circle and give them all guns. Let them sort it out.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Guess Ol' Loretty just saw an advance copy of Comey's interview.

He has at least two fronts to defend now. Lynch and McCabe.

Page, Strzok, Priestap have already cut their deals.

---

I think we should have them stand in a circle and give them all guns. Let them sort it out.

---

Just so long as there are no ARs.

Does core principals of DOJ include pawning off decisions to the FBI?

Reminds me of the scene in Mississippi Burning where the FBI bugged the meeting that they called. Gene Hackman said something like the rattlesnakes are starting to commit suicide.

backintexas2013 said:

---

Does core principals of DOJ include pawning off decisions to the FBI?

---

Never.

aggiehawg said:

---

Guess Ol' Loretty just saw an advance copy of Comey's interview.

He has at least two fronts to defend now. Lynch and McCabe.

Page, Strzok, Priestap have already cut their deals.

---

I wonder if she got an advance copy of the book like all the anchors at MSNBC and CNN did, and none at fox did.

Cow Hop Ag said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

aggiehawg said:

---

Guess Ol' Loretty just saw an advance copy of Comey's interview.

He has at least two fronts to defend now. Lynch and McCabe.

Page, Strzok, Priestap have already cut their deals.

---

I think we should have them stand in a circle and give them all guns. Let them sort it out.

---

Just so long as there are no ARs.

---

Cap and ball.
I'd watch it even on the LHN.

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4438337-Cohen-v-USA-Trump-041518.html

Above is the response by Trump's attorneys to prevent the release of attorney-client records from the Cohen office/home seizures unless specifically reviewed and approved by the privileged holder, Donald Trump. Need Roscoe or somebody to post the response: 8 pages. Legal perspective opinion requested by our resident attorneys.

Well if Comey was in any way a witness for Mueller after tonight's interview he wouldn't stand up under any scrutiny under oath whatsoever by any decent defense lawyer. His impeachabilty is off the charts now.

Yeah, that was a disaster for Mueller. Comey contradicted his sworn testimony before the House and Senate on the Flynn matter.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

Well if Comey was in any way a witness for Mueller after tonight's interview he wouldn't stand up under any scrutiny under oath whatsoever by any decent defense lawyer. His impeachabilty is off the charts now.

---

So this is all his genius way of staying off the stand. Preempting Arkancide.

aggiehawg said:

---

Yeah, that was a disaster for Mueller. Comey contradicted his sworn testimony before the House and Senate on the Flynn matter.

---

But porn stars and NDA agreements!

aggiehawg said:

---

Yeah, that was a disaster for Mueller. Comey contradicted his sworn testimony before the House and Senate on the Flynn matter.

---

Curious if we hear anything from TAO, after that secion where he basically outlines Barry's complicity in all of this.

As much as Comey tried to manufacture an obstruction charge against Trump, he's likely going to face an obstruction charge of his own.

People look at this "reported" transcript of the interview and tell me if it even remotely resembles what was on TV tonight?

http://abcnews.go.com/Site/transcript-james-comeys-interview-abc-news-chief-anchor/story?id=54488723

This episode of The Next Revolution is well worth the watch a lot of discussion on the Comey situation

Brian Stelter is unbearable, trying to justify what Gagliano is taking issue with.

"Sometime people leak because of the need to cry out!" what a soy boy he is

Evidently Judge Kimba Wood of the SDNY is going to hear the argument on the seized items from Cohen's office. She was appointed by Reagan in 1987, and she will rule on what's privileged and what's not, or if even Cohen qualifies as a practicing attorney, 2PM eastern as I understand it.

drcrinum said:

---

https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/4438337-Cohen-v-USA-Trump-041518.html

Above is the response by Trump's attorneys to prevent the release of attorney-client records from the Cohen office/home seizures unless specifically reviewed and approved by the privileged holder, Donald Trump. Need Roscoe or somebody to post the response: 8 pages. Legal perspective opinion requested by our resident attorneys.

---

Actually, this is really reasonable. All it asks is to 1) let Cohen review copies of what was seized and forward copies of Trump related info to DJT's new lawyers, 2) let DJT assert privilege on those documents the new legal team concludes are privileged, 3) let the taint team decide whether to contest those assertions and 4) put any disagreements before the judge.

It's really just saying, "now that destruction of the evidence is impossible, we should follow normal practice to protect privileged communications." It also protects Trump from the "lying to the FBI gotcha" they seem to love so much b/c his lawyers will know exactly what the FBI has officially seen and what it hasn't.

Thank you!

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

Brian Stelter is unbearable, trying to justify what Gagliano is taking issue with.

"Sometime people leak because of the need to cry out!" what a soy boy he is

---

Quote:

---

Bill meeting on Tarmac to discuss HRC appointing Lynch to Supreme Court to replace Ginsberg after appointing Scalia's replacement.

---

From Q Anon thread, it would be fantastic if their conversation was actually recorded (some dispute over that) but if that audio is ever released it would be glorious.

It also makes sense that Bill wouldn't offer her the immediate SC nomination, it would look too political and optics has always been everything to them. Better to wait and let Ginsberg go on a retirement tour with a fawning media before Hillary appoints Lynch.

Thank GOD she didn't win.

RoscoePColtrane said:

---

Evidently Judge Kimba Wood of the SDNY is going to hear the argument on the seized items from Cohen's office. She was appointed by Reagan in 1987, and she will rule on what's privileged and what's not, or if even Cohen qualifies as a practicing attorney, 2PM eastern as I understand it.

---

http://dailycaller.com/2018/04/16/judge-napolitano-michael-cohen-attorney-client-privilege/

Less than a 2 minute video in this article (which I can't extract) with Judge Napolitano which is interesting. He says that Judge Wood is going to put Cohen on the witness stand today in court and then decide if he is a practicing attorney or not.