So I haven't seen the one that was on hanity anywhere. It was a huge one. I expected some more to come up today. They didn't.

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2018/01/26/congressman-matt-gaetz-discusses-a-criminal-conspiracy/#more-145084

Quote:

---

Well, well, well. that's a shift in language. Congressional Rep Matt Gaetz: "I believe there's been a criminal conspiracy". This specific language elevates the current political dynamic toward an exponential level of risk for those within the "conspiracy".

18 U.S. Code 241 Conspiracy against rights: If two or more persons conspire to injure, oppress, threaten, or intimidate any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District in the free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege secured to him by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or because of his having so exercised the same; or

If two or more persons go in disguise on the highway, or on the premises of another, with intent to prevent or hinder his free exercise or enjoyment of any right or privilege so secured They shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both. (link)

---

Gaetz at it again. Start at the 1:40 mark.

Going to be a long week waiting and the fallout is going to be spectacular. One side is going to take it on the chin politically. Rs for attacking without cause or Ds for not wanting this to come out to protect their own.

Finn said:

---

Going to be a long week waiting and the fallout is going to be spectacular. One side is going to take it on the chin politically. Rs for attacking without cause or Ds for not wanting this to come out to protect their own.

---

Finn, if the Dems showed up in Houston the day after all of the Harvey rain, with Pelosi, Schumer, and the "talking points" saying "there's no way a hurricane could do this", then nearly ALL of the news stations would run with it, and nearly all of the Dems would believe it wasn't a hurricane!

What I'm trying to say is that until the Right lays out the proof, the Nunes/Gowdy memo will be cast aside as trash, unverifiable, baseless, etc.. Pretty much what's been said for the last week by the left, and therefore, the media.

Grassley letter to DNC, copy to Perkins Coie:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20DNC%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Grassley letter to Hillary for America, copy to Perkins Coie:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20Hillary%20for%20America%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Grassley letter to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20DWS%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Grassley letter to Donna Brazile:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20Brazile%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Grassley letter to John Podesta, copy to Perkins Coie:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20Podesta%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Grassley letter to Joel Benenson:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20Benenson%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf


Grassley (& Graham) doing serious work. These letters of inquiry relate to Christopher Steele. Similar to questions asked at a formal deposition. Unless you are a zealot, I suggest you read either the DNC or the HFA letters to grasp the intent behind these inquiries and to see the parties involved in the background.

Edit: Looks like CrowdStrike will be called back to duty again.

chach said:

---

They won't believe it when there is proof either.

---

That's why the backup docs will have to be released also.

I wonder if Stonetear is in these memo documents.

This is getting the kind of freaky weird I like.

Watch at 5:40 mark. Memo is expected to be released next week after the State of the Union Speech, sometime mid week. We'll see....

fasthorses05 said:

---

Finn said:

---

Going to be a long week waiting and the fallout is going to be spectacular. One side is going to take it on the chin politically. Rs for attacking without cause or Ds for not wanting this to come out to protect their own.

---

Finn, if the Dems showed up in Houston the day after all of the Harvey rain, with Pelosi, Schumer, and the "talking points" saying "there's no way a hurricane could do this", then nearly ALL of the news stations would run with it, and nearly all of the Dems would believe it wasn't a hurricane!

What I'm trying to say is that until the Right lays out the proof, the Nunes/Gowdy memo will be cast aside as trash, unverifiable, baseless, etc.. Pretty much what's been said for the last week by the left, and therefore, the media.

---

Things will start getting real once there are charges and a arrest, IMO. Until then the dems and the MSM will trash anything the R's do.

Don't need you trolling on here. Nothing to add? Stay off.

etcetera said:

---

I agree with Aggiehawg. These things are fun to watch.

Another GOP Congressional fishing expedition?

Good luck.

---

The whole "Russian collusion" has been a Dem fishing expedition.

hth

Those questions are referencing a lot of names and activities. It will be interesting if they comply and if they all get their stories lined up without tripping up.

This thread is just rolling out

etcetera said:

---

Quote:

---

What I'm trying to say is that until the Right lays out the proof, the Nunes/Gowdy memo will be cast aside as trash, unverifiable, baseless, etc.. Pretty much what's been said for the last week by the left, and therefore, the media.

---

No offense intended to you, but I hope most Americans have enough sense to not blindly believe any allegation from any Congresscritter, regardless of their party affiliation, unless it is accompanied by solid proof.

---

Beat it.

I fully expect there to be suicides over all of this. Grassley's letters may just be the catalyst.

drcrinum said:

---

Grassley letter to DNC, copy to Perkins Coie:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20DNC%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Grassley letter to Hillary for America, copy to Perkins Coie:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20Hillary%20for%20America%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Grassley letter to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20DWS%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Grassley letter to Donna Brazile:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20Brazile%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Grassley letter to John Podesta, copy to Perkins Coie:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20Podesta%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Grassley letter to Joel Benenson:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20Benenson%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf


Grassley (& Graham) doing serious work. These letters of inquiry relate to Christopher Steele. Similar to questions asked at a formal deposition. Unless you are a zealot, I suggest you read either the DNC or the HFA letters to grasp the intent behind these inquiries and to see the parties involved in the background.

Edit: Looks like CrowdStrike will be called back to duty again.

---

So I read the DNC letter and can't help but wonder what kind of response does he expect. "Don't recall or don't know" may be the recurring theme on The Who knew questions. However, the correspondence records regarding an impressive list of people is where it gets really interesting. Is this truly a fishing expedition? I suspect they already have evidence of this and want to get them denying it on record.

Here's the list of persons in the communications request:

Fusion GPS; Bean LLC; Glenn Simpson; Mary Jacoby; Peter Fritsch; Tom Catan; Jason Felch; Neil King; David Michaels; Taylor Sears; Patrick Corcoran; Laura Sego; Jay Bagwell; Erica Castro; Nellie Ohr; Rinat Akhmetshin; Ed Lieberman; Edward Baumgartner; Orbis Business Intelligence Limited; Orbis Business International Limited.; Walsingham Training Limited; Walsingham Partners Limited; Christopher Steele; Christopher Burrows; Sir Andrew Wood, Paul Hauser;4 Oleg Deripaska; Cody Shearer; Sidney Blumenthal; Jon Winer;5 Kathleen Kavalec; Victoria Nuland; Daniel Jones;6 Bruce Ohr; Peter Strzok; Andrew McCabe; James Baker;7 Sally Yates; Loretta Lynch; John Brennan.

Sundance just retweeted this thread from December.

I suppose we are to be on the lookout for the names Brandon L Van Grack's name popping up.

Also, he retweeted this bit of research someone did regarding a name in the texts.

and Michael Steinbach.

Not sure what responses they expect, but I can't help but think they already know answers to some of the questions and they're going to see who lies in their answers.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Not sure what responses they expect, but I can't help but think they already know answers to some of the questions and they're going to see who lies in their answers.

---

That's the exact thought I had when I was reading those letters.

HeardAboutPerio said:

---

drcrinum said:

---

Grassley letter to DNC, copy to Perkins Coie:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20DNC%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Grassley letter to Hillary for America, copy to Perkins Coie:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20Hillary%20for%20America%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Grassley letter to Debbie Wasserman-Schultz:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20DWS%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Grassley letter to Donna Brazile:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20Brazile%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Grassley letter to John Podesta, copy to Perkins Coie:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20Podesta%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf

Grassley letter to Joel Benenson:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2018-01-25%20CEG%20LG%20to%20Benenson%20(Steele%20Dossier).pdf


Grassley (& Graham) doing serious work. These letters of inquiry relate to Christopher Steele. Similar to questions asked at a formal deposition. Unless you are a zealot, I suggest you read either the DNC or the HFA letters to grasp the intent behind these inquiries and to see the parties involved in the background.

Edit: Looks like CrowdStrike will be called back to duty again.

---

So I read the DNC letter and can't help but wonder what kind of response does he expect. "Don't recall or don't know" may be the recurring theme on The Who knew questions. However, the correspondence records regarding an impressive list of people is where it gets really interesting. Is this truly a fishing expedition? I suspect they already have evidence of this and want to get them denying it on record.

Here's the list of persons in the communications request:

Fusion GPS; Bean LLC; Glenn Simpson; Mary Jacoby; Peter Fritsch; Tom Catan; Jason Felch; Neil King; David Michaels; Taylor Sears; Patrick Corcoran; Laura Sego; Jay Bagwell; Erica Castro; Nellie Ohr; Rinat Akhmetshin; Ed Lieberman; Edward Baumgartner; Orbis Business Intelligence Limited; Orbis Business International Limited.; Walsingham Training Limited; Walsingham Partners Limited; Christopher Steele; Christopher Burrows; Sir Andrew Wood, Paul Hauser;4 Oleg Deripaska; Cody Shearer; Sidney Blumenthal; Jon Winer;5 Kathleen Kavalec; Victoria Nuland; Daniel Jones;6 Bruce Ohr; Peter Strzok; Andrew McCabe; James Baker;7 Sally Yates; Loretta Lynch; John Brennan.

---

Just standard operating procedure, crossing t's and dotting i's. Need to get their statement/responses now so later on they can be held accountable to them, catch them in any lies.

That's exactly what I think it's about too

Javelina said:

---

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Not sure what responses they expect, but I can't help but think they already know answers to some of the questions and they're going to see who lies in their answers.

---

That's the exact thought I had when I was reading those letters.

---

get out of my head

Last night on one of the twitter pages, I was reminded that organizing for America (obamas campaign) paid Perkins Cole $972,000 during the Fusion GPS 2016 timeframe. We all know he's in the middle of this, but we shouldn't forget that possible direct financial tie.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Not sure what responses they expect, but I can't help but think they already know answers to some of the questions and they're going to see who lies in their answers.

---

Or who responds. Lot of lawyers busy this weekend. I agree the committee already knows the answers. One way or another, they are going to get these people on record.

Ellis Wyatt said:

---

Last night on one of the twitter pages, I was reminded that organizing for America (obamas campaign) paid Perkins Cole $972,000 during the Fusion GPS 2016 timeframe. We all know he's in the middle of this, but we shouldn't forget that possible direct financial tie.

---

voila!

Hannity's account hacked/taken down last night.

Rats chewing wires.

Based on their history I wouldn't be surprised at all if Twitter facilitates the "hacks" of Hannity, Sara Carter, etc. They're trying to see if there's any DM dirt that can be leaked.

All this may have been posted already so I apologize if it has, but I do believe it's an interesting link of information regarding Strzok and his family's connections along with his solely interviewing hillary clinton, viewing the emails, etc. Again, sorry if this has already been mentioned. Housatonic also details links and continues down this rabbit hole as well...supposedly there have only been 100 people with last name of Strzok. It seems to be implied (remotely) that Strzok is not his real name.

Would they need to go through that trouble to see the DMs?

I would think they could just log in & see it, (really am guessing as I don't know their capabilities)