"what difference does it make?" surely the interview is being done without swearing in, with no transcript, and on the condition and prior understanding that it will not lead to prosecution, right? That's how its done isn't it?
Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts
7,556,694 Views |
49302 Replies |
Last: 4 days ago by policywonk98
GCP has floated a similar theory in this thread. I wish it were true, but I don't buy it. It's a witch hunt to bring down trump and overturn the will of the peoplechach said:
This is just my mind wandering... it is all what ifs and fact less speculation but its made my mind turn quite a bit. I have not compared this to any timelines to see if it holds water either. One or two of these what ifs may have been alluded to in a previous post in this another thread. I can't remember because they are starting to blur together. By all accounts I don't trust mueller at all... but here goes...
What if Mueller was presented with evidence of his own previous crimes by the Trump doj after he was named special council in this investigation? What if he was offered a deal in return for continuing the investigation under the guise of Trump's "Russia dealings" while actually investigating the FISA abuses, rogue agent plots, etc. what if he brought in all of the rogue actors to keep them close and to keep tabs on them? This could explain why they all still have jobs. This could also explain why his whole team consisted dem homers. Also who better to shed light on all the corruption after the whole investigation is over than the democrat appointed special council that all the libs have complete and total faith in. Trump doesn't seem to be worried about his interview with mueller...
Maybe this whole theory is illegal, I don't know. Just my mind wandering.
CNN is an enemy of the state and should be treated as such.
EKUAg said:
Things to remember if the are pushing for obstruction for firing Comey:
Rod Rosenstein memo making the recommendation.
Comey testifying he told Trump three times he was not under investigation.
Comey testifying that Trump told him to investigate to ensure no one on his staff was colluding with Russia. Thx Last Refuge aka Sundance).
Also, explain why Mueller spoke with Rogers.
I'm sure the plan was for RR to testify that he was pressured into writing the recommendation. Ergo, obstruction.
this was my thinking as well.BenFiasco14 said:GCP has floated a similar theory in this thread. I wish it were true, but I don't buy it. It's a witch hunt to bring down trump and overturn the will of the peoplechach said:
This is just my mind wandering... it is all what ifs and fact less speculation but its made my mind turn quite a bit. I have not compared this to any timelines to see if it holds water either. One or two of these what ifs may have been alluded to in a previous post in this another thread. I can't remember because they are starting to blur together. By all accounts I don't trust mueller at all... but here goes...
What if Mueller was presented with evidence of his own previous crimes by the Trump doj after he was named special council in this investigation? What if he was offered a deal in return for continuing the investigation under the guise of Trump's "Russia dealings" while actually investigating the FISA abuses, rogue agent plots, etc. what if he brought in all of the rogue actors to keep them close and to keep tabs on them? This could explain why they all still have jobs. This could also explain why his whole team consisted dem homers. Also who better to shed light on all the corruption after the whole investigation is over than the democrat appointed special council that all the libs have complete and total faith in. Trump doesn't seem to be worried about his interview with mueller...
Maybe this whole theory is illegal, I don't know. Just my mind wandering.
Easy to condense this down to more simplified answerEKUAg said:
Things to remember if the are pushing for obstruction for firing Comey:
Rod Rosenstein memo making the recommendation.
Comey testifying he told Trump three times he was not under investigation.
Comey testifying that Trump told him to investigate to ensure no one on his staff was colluding with Russia. Thx Last Refuge aka Sundance).
Also, explain why Mueller spoke with Rogers.
According to Article 2 of the US Constitution the POTUS had EVERY right to fire Comey for any reason, didn't need a recommendation from anyone. He can fire him because he doesn't like his ties, whatever. That's the way it is, and the looney left can jump up and down till their pink hats hit the floor. There is no obstruction for firing Comey or Henry Gibson or Rosenstein.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
I like the way you think
Too late RR said under oath he was in no way pressured alreadyboulderaggie said:EKUAg said:
Things to remember if the are pushing for obstruction for firing Comey:
Rod Rosenstein memo making the recommendation.
Comey testifying he told Trump three times he was not under investigation.
Comey testifying that Trump told him to investigate to ensure no one on his staff was colluding with Russia. Thx Last Refuge aka Sundance).
Also, explain why Mueller spoke with Rogers.
I'm sure the plan was for RR to testify that he was pressured into writing the recommendation. Ergo, obstruction.
Doesn't matter See Article 2 USC
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Yes, Sara Carter just said the missing 5 months of texts have been located by the DOJ and are being recovered.
That should be interesting. As dumb as they were you would think at some point they would realize the texts would come back to haunt them.
Summary: No crimes committed
Firing James Comey = not obstruction
Asking McCabe if he was a Hillary Shill = Not obstruction
Telling the MSM to their faces they are "fake news" and "the opposition party = not obstruction
Throwing Jim Acosta out of the room because he's a rude ***** and not following protocol = not obstruction
Hypotheticals:
Fire Henry Gibson = no obstruction
Fire Rod Rosenstein = no obstruction
Fire Bob Mueller = no obstruction
Collusion is not a crime or statute to support it. Hypothetically of they found some collusion there is nothing to charge. Bad press for the rest of his term(s) as POTUS, but given the current media environment, will likely happen anyway.
Dream on snowflakes unless the POTUS lies to the FBI he's going to be your nightmare for seven more years.
Firing James Comey = not obstruction
Asking McCabe if he was a Hillary Shill = Not obstruction
Telling the MSM to their faces they are "fake news" and "the opposition party = not obstruction
Throwing Jim Acosta out of the room because he's a rude ***** and not following protocol = not obstruction
Hypotheticals:
Fire Henry Gibson = no obstruction
Fire Rod Rosenstein = no obstruction
Fire Bob Mueller = no obstruction
Collusion is not a crime or statute to support it. Hypothetically of they found some collusion there is nothing to charge. Bad press for the rest of his term(s) as POTUS, but given the current media environment, will likely happen anyway.
Dream on snowflakes unless the POTUS lies to the FBI he's going to be your nightmare for seven more years.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
I would love for Trump to testify that he learned Comey had leaked his memos to his friend and decided to fire him for mishandling classified information
These recovered texts is a set up. Been cleaned up and their production will be splashed all across the msm will Be a big nothing burger.
You never address anything. You attack Gowdy and Nunes. Haven't said anything about how stupid Schiff is or even bothered to address things that have come out that should concern everyone.
So you've seen them?Proc92 said:
These recovered texts is a set up. Been cleaned up and their production will be splashed all across the msm will Be a big nothing burger.
Proc92 said:
These recovered texts is a set up. Been cleaned up and their production will be splashed all across the msm will Be a big nothing burger.
Don't think so. If they clean them up and the IG has all of them someone is completely ****ed.
Backups of the backups. "We know everything."
Also I don't think Page and Peter the Cheater were smart enough to stop what they were doing.
Maybe they are so happy that someone actually found them attractive they couldn't help themselves
Maybe they are so happy that someone actually found them attractive they couldn't help themselves
The ones they already have are pretty telling. Certainly not nothing burgers. Sorry.
Wouldn't this be considered blackmail?
Of course. And there will be and may have been an effort by crafty criminals to try to discredit the coming expose.Rockdoc said:
The ones they already have are pretty telling. Certainly not nothing burgers. Sorry.
Gowdy's Benghazi investigation revealed that Hillary had her own private server.leftcoastaggie said:If Gowdy wrote it, then the Deep State has nothing to worry about. His two-year Benghazi probe resulted in a $7 million bill and an 800 page report that:drcrinum said:Boyd is mistaken in that letter. The Memo is a summary document of the OIG Report, not classified documents sent by the FBI to the HPSCI, & we know that Gowdy wrote the Memo.GCP12 said:
I'll let those more knowledgeable on this stuff comment on what last refuge means here..Quote:
.......provided no new evidence of specific wrongdoing by then-Secretary of State Clinton. Its overall narrative does not differ substantially from other reports issued by Congress. It implicates intelligence and military leaders with failing to scramble an adequate response in the hours after the initial attack.
Not to mention a $150k settlement with TAX PAYER money to an aide that was unwilling to partake in Gowdy's partisan attack focused solely on Hillary during the investigation. Best part of the story was that aide who Gowdy paid off is a vet, a reservist, and a Former Student of Texas A&M University.
Would you say that's been relevant in the last three years?
LYING AGAINleftcoastaggie said:If Gowdy wrote it, then the Deep State has nothing to worry about. His two-year Benghazi probe resulted in a $7 million bill and an 800 page report that:drcrinum said:Boyd is mistaken in that letter. The Memo is a summary document of the OIG Report, not classified documents sent by the FBI to the HPSCI, & we know that Gowdy wrote the Memo.GCP12 said:
I'll let those more knowledgeable on this stuff comment on what last refuge means here..Quote:
.......provided no new evidence of specific wrongdoing by then-Secretary of State Clinton. Its overall narrative does not differ substantially from other reports issued by Congress. It implicates intelligence and military leaders with failing to scramble an adequate response in the hours after the initial attack.
Not to mention a $150k settlement with TAX PAYER money to an aide that was unwilling to partake in Gowdy's partisan attack focused solely on Hillary during the investigation. Best part of the story was that aide who Gowdy paid off is a vet, a reservist, and a Former Student of Texas A&M University.
He was fired because he took leave to fulfill his obligations as an Air Force reservist. Which is against the law. The settlement was for veterans status discrimination and retaliation.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/powerpost/gowdy-benghazi-panel-settled-wrongful-firing-suit-with-150000-in-public-funds/2017/12/01/d7c49dac-d6db-11e7-a986-d0a9770d9a3e_story.html?utm_term=.aa28d18a8727
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
If Mueller is a double-agent working with Trump, I'll eat my hat.chach said:
This is just my mind wandering... it is all what ifs and fact less speculation but its made my mind turn quite a bit. I have not compared this to any timelines to see if it holds water either. One or two of these what ifs may have been alluded to in a previous post in this another thread. I can't remember because they are starting to blur together. By all accounts I don't trust mueller at all... but here goes...
What if Mueller was presented with evidence of his own previous crimes by the Trump doj after he was named special council in this investigation? What if he was offered a deal in return for continuing the investigation under the guise of Trump's "Russia dealings" while actually investigating the FISA abuses, rogue agent plots, etc. what if he brought in all of the rogue actors to keep them close and to keep tabs on them? This could explain why they all still have jobs. This could also explain why his whole team consisted dem homers. Also who better to shed light on all the corruption after the whole investigation is over than the democrat appointed special council that all the libs have complete and total faith in. Trump doesn't seem to be worried about his interview with mueller...
Maybe this whole theory is illegal, I don't know. Just my mind wandering.
not sure I follow. sorryAdam Ag 98 said:
Wouldn't this be considered blackmail?
Trolls starve quickly when not fed.
Crinum, Roscoe---has anyone heard about the FBI agent embedded since '09, had/has cancer, had his "license to chat" by Lynch revoked by Sessions?
Everyone seems to have forgotten about him, including me. I'm sure he's still around, but it would be nice to know if he's still in the till to speak to the Legislature. Besides, even though it's likely the Pubs have the goods to proceed criminally, the PR battle is another story.
The DNC, pardon me, the press, will have to have Putin and Lenin both testify! Isn't Lenin still lined up in his plastic skin in Moscow? Let's drag his ass out.
Everyone seems to have forgotten about him, including me. I'm sure he's still around, but it would be nice to know if he's still in the till to speak to the Legislature. Besides, even though it's likely the Pubs have the goods to proceed criminally, the PR battle is another story.
The DNC, pardon me, the press, will have to have Putin and Lenin both testify! Isn't Lenin still lined up in his plastic skin in Moscow? Let's drag his ass out.
That a dossier that they knew was unproven oppositional research was used to help get a warrant to spy on a political enemy.
Hell even comment on what this thread was initially about. Your left wing mantra isn't exactly hitting out of the park.
It's ok to admit you are a partisan hack.
Schiff is even worse than the two you name. He got slapped around yesterday like a little *****.
Hell even comment on what this thread was initially about. Your left wing mantra isn't exactly hitting out of the park.
It's ok to admit you are a partisan hack.
Schiff is even worse than the two you name. He got slapped around yesterday like a little *****.
Poor leftcoast is gonna be crying in a few weeks.
My wife and i we're wondering about this person as well. I hope he's gotten his opportunity to speak his peace.fasthorses05 said:
Crinum, Roscoe---has anyone heard about the FBI agent embedded since '09, had/has cancer, had his "license to chat" by Lynch revoked by Sessions?
Everyone seems to have forgotten about him, including me. I'm sure he's still around, but it would be nice to know if he's still in the till to speak to the Legislature. Besides, even though it's likely the Pubs have the goods to proceed criminally, the PR battle is another story.
The DNC, pardon me, the press, will have to have Putin and Lenin both testify! Isn't Lenin still lined up in his plastic skin in Moscow? Let's drag his ass out.
Featured Stories
See All
26:41
3h ago
3.9k
Second CFP rankings of 2024 sees Texas A&M move down to No. 15
by Richard Zane
10:53
22h ago
2.8k