@LastRefuge2, who reported about Trump going to the Pentagon, has been posting about the Nunes report
Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts
7,495,497 Views |
49269 Replies |
Last: 11 days ago by aggiehawg
She usually had a translator with her. Akhmentshin was one. And he worked closely with Fusion on Prevezon/Browder/Magnitsky Act matter.Quote:
So Glenn Simpson was with Natalia Veselnitskaya at a hearing at the U.S. Court of Appeals in NYC on the morning of June 9th, before Trump Tower meeting, he then met with her & "some people from journalism" a day or two later at a dinner organized by a partner he works with.
Simpson is flat out dodging here. "Some people from journalism" is vague and non-responsive.
Yup. Don't worry leftcoast, it's all fake news. You don't need to worry about this thread anymore.
No problem, just wondering where your journalist standards begin and end.GCP12 said:
Yup. Don't worry leftcoast, it's all fake news. You don't need to worry about this thread anymore.
leftcoastaggie said:No problem, just wondering where your journalist standards begin and end.GCP12 said:
Yup. Don't worry leftcoast, it's all fake news. You don't need to worry about this thread anymore.
Lol...are you suggesting there isn't a House Intelligence Report? Or that what's in it is being misrepresented?
Well your source thinks the Russians wanted a free with subscription NRA pocket knife...leftcoastaggie said:No problem, just wondering where your journalist standards begin and end.GCP12 said:
Yup. Don't worry leftcoast, it's all fake news. You don't need to worry about this thread anymore.
Can I go to sleep Looch?
leftcoastaggie said:GCP12 said:
Let me get this straight, when there are unnamed sources that means it Fake News, right? At least that's what the board says when CNN or the failing NYT do it.Quote:
....said a senior government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the document.Quote:
...state several sources with knowledge of the report.Quote:
.....congressional source, which spoke on condition that they not be named.Quote:
But the government official, who viewed the document said.....Quote:
....stated a congressional member, who asked not to be named.
Are you just choosing to ignore the Congressmen who say the same thing - they are NOT unnamed.
Feel free to point out one article that Sara Carter has put out that turned out to be a blatant lie, fake news, or not even close to correct.leftcoastaggie said:No problem, just wondering where your journalist standards begin and end.GCP12 said:
Yup. Don't worry leftcoast, it's all fake news. You don't need to worry about this thread anymore.
My journalist standards are based on their history of reporting. CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WP, CBS, ABC all have repeated evidense that they will just plain lie their ****ing asses off.
HTH
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
The GOP congressmen who are reacting to a GOP report that the GOP released? Why do the refer to it as a memo prepared by the House Intelligence Committee when it was a partisan report? Maybe to cloud its origins?BernArnold said:leftcoastaggie said:GCP12 said:
Let me get this straight, when there are unnamed sources that means it Fake News, right? At least that's what the board says when CNN or the failing NYT do it.Quote:
....said a senior government official, who spoke on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the document.Quote:
...state several sources with knowledge of the report.Quote:
.....congressional source, which spoke on condition that they not be named.Quote:
But the government official, who viewed the document said.....Quote:
....stated a congressional member, who asked not to be named.
Are you just choosing to ignore the Congressmen who say the same thing - they are NOT unnamed.
Written by only the GOP members.....DeWrecking Crew said:leftcoastaggie said:No problem, just wondering where your journalist standards begin and end.GCP12 said:
Yup. Don't worry leftcoast, it's all fake news. You don't need to worry about this thread anymore.
Lol...are you suggesting there isn't a House Intelligence Report? Or that what's in it is being misrepresented?
Since you ignored my post on the other thread, I'll repeat it here:leftcoastaggie said:Written by only the GOP members.....DeWrecking Crew said:leftcoastaggie said:No problem, just wondering where your journalist standards begin and end.GCP12 said:
Yup. Don't worry leftcoast, it's all fake news. You don't need to worry about this thread anymore.
Lol...are you suggesting there isn't a House Intelligence Report? Or that what's in it is being misrepresented?
Schiff accused Nunes of mishandling classified information by leaking it to POTUS (LOL!). For 8 months, Democrats were in charge of the House Intel Committee while the chairman was sidelined. They could have gotten out in front of the issue and released a report to their liking. Instead, they opted to not touch this with a ten foot pole.
Your interpretation of this chain of events is partisan hackery by the Repubs? SERIOUSLY?
The guy who accuses his colleague for giving intel to POTUS isn't a hack, but the guy who briefs the rest of congress is a hack.
It's hilarious how desperate libs have become.
For over a year we've been asking repeatedly for evidence that Trump colluded with the Russians and not only has there not been any but when asked how exactly the Russians influenced the election all we get are crickets or some nonsense about a disinformation campaign.
On the other side we not only likely have proof of FISA abuse at the highest levels but we can plausibly explain WHY they were illegally surveilling Trump's campaign that would make Tricky Dick blush.
Do I have that right?
But it's just unnamed sources on both sides...RIIIIIIIGGGGHHHHTTTT.
On the other side we not only likely have proof of FISA abuse at the highest levels but we can plausibly explain WHY they were illegally surveilling Trump's campaign that would make Tricky Dick blush.
Do I have that right?
But it's just unnamed sources on both sides...RIIIIIIIGGGGHHHHTTTT.
leftcoastaggie said:Written by only the GOP members.....DeWrecking Crew said:leftcoastaggie said:No problem, just wondering where your journalist standards begin and end.GCP12 said:
Yup. Don't worry leftcoast, it's all fake news. You don't need to worry about this thread anymore.
Lol...are you suggesting there isn't a House Intelligence Report? Or that what's in it is being misrepresented?
Ok...but I'm not seeing where journalistic standards fit into this, why would an unnamed source affect this news?
Guess the local lefties have finally decided to try and disrupt/hijack this thread.
"If you will not fight for right when you can easily win without blood shed; if you will not fight when your victory is sure and not too costly; you may come to the moment when you will have to fight with all the odds against you and only a precarious chance of survival. There may even be a worse case. You may have to fight when there is no hope of victory, because it is better to perish than to live as slaves." - Sir Winston Churchill
Got their orders, I guess.Rapier108 said:
Guess the local lefties have finally decided to try and disrupt/hijack this thread.
Nothing says something is real like the lib bots being activated.
leftcoastaggie said:Because the Sara Carter article was full of unnamed sources, which according to most people on this board is considered Fake News. Well, unless those fake sources align with your political ideology, then no big deal.DeWrecking Crew said:leftcoastaggie said:Written by only the GOP members.....DeWrecking Crew said:leftcoastaggie said:No problem, just wondering where your journalist standards begin and end.GCP12 said:
Yup. Don't worry leftcoast, it's all fake news. You don't need to worry about this thread anymore.
Lol...are you suggesting there isn't a House Intelligence Report? Or that what's in it is being misrepresented?
Ok...but I'm not seeing where journalistic standards fit into this, why would an unnamed source affect this news?
Lmao...when the news is the release of an actual document it's hard for unnamed sources to just make up stuff
...whose FACTS are going to take the Democrats out back to the wood shed. Stay tuned Leftcoast, you and your boys' corrupt ways are headed for an old fashioned a$$ whipping.leftcoastaggie said:Written by only the GOP members.....DeWrecking Crew said:leftcoastaggie said:No problem, just wondering where your journalist standards begin and end.GCP12 said:
Yup. Don't worry leftcoast, it's all fake news. You don't need to worry about this thread anymore.
Lol...are you suggesting there isn't a House Intelligence Report? Or that what's in it is being misrepresented?
Alexander, Caesar, Charlemagne, and myself founded empires; but upon what foundation did we rest the creations of our genius? Upon force! But Jesus Christ founded His upon love; and at this hour millions of men would die for Him. - Napoleon Bonaparte
If there's no crime and nothing to cover up, why did Schiff sideline Nunes on bogus charges?leftcoastaggie said:I think you answered your own question. If there was some crime, cover-up, conspiracy, why DIDN'T the get out in front of the issue and release a report to their liking if they had eight months to do so? Maybe because there wasn't, so there was no need to.Bobcat06 said:Since you ignored my post on the other thread, I'll repeat it here:leftcoastaggie said:Written by only the GOP members.....DeWrecking Crew said:leftcoastaggie said:No problem, just wondering where your journalist standards begin and end.GCP12 said:
Yup. Don't worry leftcoast, it's all fake news. You don't need to worry about this thread anymore.
Lol...are you suggesting there isn't a House Intelligence Report? Or that what's in it is being misrepresented?
Schiff accused Nunes of mishandling classified information by leaking it to POTUS (LOL!). For 8 months, Democrats were in charge of the House Intel Committee while the chairman was sidelined. They could have gotten out in front of the issue and released a report to their liking. Instead, they opted to not touch this with a ten foot pole.
Your interpretation of this chain of events is partisan hackery by the Repubs? SERIOUSLY?
The guy who accuses his colleague for giving intel to POTUS isn't a hack, but the guy who briefs the rest of congress is a hack.
It's hilarious how desperate libs have become.
Swing and a miss leftyleftcoastaggie said:Did a quick google search for "Sara Carter and Uranium One". That was pretty easy.RoscoePColtrane said:Feel free to point out one article that Sara Carter has put out that turned out to be a blatant lie, fake news, or not even close to correct.leftcoastaggie said:No problem, just wondering where your journalist standards begin and end.GCP12 said:
Yup. Don't worry leftcoast, it's all fake news. You don't need to worry about this thread anymore.
My journalist standards are based on their history of reporting. CNN, MSNBC, NYT, WP, CBS, ABC all have repeated evidense that they will just plain lie their ****ing asses off.
HTH
Uranium one is real
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
I am in need of your services. I have recently received a large amount of money, $25,000,000, and am in need of a bank account into which I can deposit the funds temporarily. In return, I will give you 20% as a service fee. Please DM me with your bank information. Kind regards,
Featured Stories
See All
TexAgs Internship Program
by TexAgs
TexAgs' TXHSFB Recap: Reviewing our coverage from Week 7
by TexAgs Recruiting
61:36
3d ago
19k
4:48
1d ago
1.8k
2025 A&M pledge Landon Rink remains hungry from week to week
by Cade Draughon
44mAG
Kirby Smart catching a ton of heat online for shoving State's QB
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
143
Infection_Ag11
Kirby Smart catching a ton of heat online for shoving State's QB
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
124
Doctor Rosenrosen
Did Oregon coach Dan Lanning put 12 men on the field on purpose?
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
92