His lawyer is also ghost-writing his tweets, so nothing there either. Whoever doesn't support Trump is an idiot!

OldFashioned said:

---

This has nothing to do with Trump's actions.

---

Do tell.

OldFashioned said:

---

This has nothing to do with Trump's actions.

---

You realize the "investigation" can no longer result in a criminal conviction, right?

OldFashioned said:

---

This has nothing to do with Trump's actions.

---

Oh, we know. You just don't like him

gig em 02 said:

---

OldFashioned said:

---

This has nothing to do with Trump's actions.

---

You realize the "investigation" can no longer result in a criminal conviction, right?

---

Lol, you grabbed the jug of koolaid today

OldFashioned said:

---

gig em 02 said:

---

OldFashioned said:

---

This has nothing to do with Trump's actions.

---

You realize the "investigation" can no longer result in a criminal conviction, right?

---

Lol, you grabbed the jug of koolaid today

---

No facts. No links. All conjecture.

Is that all you have?

Pretty annoying when I think new info is posted but it's just arguing.

OldFashioned said:

---

gig em 02 said:

---

OldFashioned said:

---

This has nothing to do with Trump's actions.

---

You realize the "investigation" can no longer result in a criminal conviction, right?

---

Lol, you grabbed the jug of koolaid today

---

I drink the Constitution, due process and liberty kool aid every day. What year did you fail out of A&M and transfer to a third tier school?

Just an Ag said:

---

I'm not sure where to put this. Here seems fine. The FBI needs to be cleaned out and replaced with professionals with allegiance to the law, not political parties.

---

Don't worry, nothing to see here. They're completely impartial and just want to nail trumpcuz he's bad /libs

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/937324573070102529

Click on the thread reader -- lots of interesting history regarding the Clinton e-mail server as well as other investigations into the DNC hack, etc. My point in posting this is the following tidbit:



Strzok was in charge of the FBI investigation into the Weiner -- Huma -- Hillary Clinton laptop/classified e-mails. He interviewed Clinton, not under oath and not recorded...and gave her a pass (no intent), interviewed Huma and it was recorded...and gave her a pass (no intent), but did you know that Weiner was never questioned about Hillary's e-mails on the laptop? Why? Comey admitted/testified that Weiner wasn't questioned about this matter.

I'm suspicious that Strzok did interview Weiner and it wasn't recorded...and was buried...perhaps with Comey's knowledge. Comey lies sometimes...

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2017-12-06/chuck-grassley-demands-all-strzok-text-messages-part-fbi-trump-anti-bias-probe

Quote:

---

Chuck Grassley Demands FBI Produce All Strzok Text Messages As Part Of Trump Anti-Bias Probe

Following this weekend's shocking disclosure that Peter Strzok was removed from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's investigation of Russia-Trump election (having previously handled the Clinton email server probe and interviewing Michael Flynn) after allegedly having exchanged anti-Trump and pro-Hillary Clinton text messages with his mistress (who was an FBI lawyer working for Deputy FBI Director Andrew McCabe), an angry Senator Senator Grassley - who was previously stonewalled by the FBI and DOJ from getting requested information about Strzok's unexpected removal - has issued a letter demanding FBI documents in advance of an upcoming Senatorial interview with the anti-Trump FBI agent.

In his letter to FBI director Christopher Wray, Grassley writes:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2017-12-05%20CEG%20to%20FBI%20(Strzok%20Communications).pdf

Quote:

---

The Committee has previously written to Mr. Strzok requesting an interview to discuss his knowledge of improper political influence or bias in Justice Department or FBI activities during either the previous or current administration, the removal of James Comey from his position as Director of the FBI, the DOJ's and FBI's activities related to Hillary Clinton, the DOJ's and FBI's activities related to Donald J. Trump and his associates, and the DOJ's and FBI's activities related to Russian interference in the 2016 election. To date, the Committee has received no letter in reply to that request.

In advance of Mr. Strzok's interview, please provide the following communications, in the form of text messages or otherwise, to the Committee no later than December 11, 2017:
[ol]

All communications sent to, received by, or copying Mr. Strzok related to then Director Comey's draft or final statement closing the Clinton investigation, including all records related to the change in the portion of the draft language describing Secretary Clinton's and her associates' conduct regarding classified information from "grossly negligent" to "extremely careless";

All communications sent to, received by, or copying Mr. Strzok regarding the decision to close the Clinton investigation without recommending any charges;

All communications sent to, received by, or copying Mr. Strzok related to opening the investigation into potential collusion by the Trump campaign with the Russian government, including any FBI electronic communication (EC) authored or authorized by Mr. Strzok and all records forming the basis for that EC;

All communications sent to, received by, or copying Mr. Strzok related to the FBI's interactions with Christopher Steele relating to the investigation into potential collusion by the Trump campaign with the Russian government, including any communications regarding potential or realized financial arrangements with Mr. Steele;

All communications sent to, received by, or copying Mr. Strzok related to any instance of the FBI relying on, or referring to, information in Mr. Steele's memoranda in the course of seeking any FISA warrants, other search warrants, or any other judicial process;

All FD-302s of FBI interviews of Lt. Gen. Flynn at which Mr. Strzok was present, as well as all related 1A documents (including any contemporaneous handwritten notes); and

All communications sent to, received by, or copying Mr. Strzok containing unfavorable statements about Donald J. Trump or favorable statements about Hillary Clinton.

[/ol]

---

---

Here is the full letter from Grassley:
https://www.judiciary.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/2017-12-05%20CEG%20to%20FBI%20(Strzok%20Communications).pdf


This is gonna get interesting.

when has a senate interview or request for info from another agency ever resulted in actual criminal consequence or true justice for federal wrongdoers?

Proc92 said:

---

when has a senate interview or request for info from another agency ever resulted in actual criminal consequence or true justice for federal wrongdoers?

---

That's what I was going to ask.

Since the FBI is giving the legislature the metaphorical finger (and apparently has been for a while), why don't all of the agencies do the same? There certainly doesn't seem to be consequences.

Are we sure that Sessions isn't a clone, or alien, being used by Rosenstein and McCabe?

Every time I see Sessions I think of a little old man in pajamas sitting at a table with a glass of warm milk and a plate of cookies. That's about how useful he is.

Just imagine, JUST IMAGINE, what the press would be doing if all the Democrats in this mess were Republicans and vica versa. They would be SCREAMING for all of these guys to be perp walked straight to the electric chair.

DRAIN. THE. SWAMP!

Rockdoc said:

---

Every time I see Sessions I think of a little old man in pajamas sitting at a table with a glass of warm milk and a plate of cookies. That's about how useful he is.

---

Now you did it!





I am headed to HEB for some cookies.

Hey, here in B/CS it's a milk and cookie kind of day.

Rockdoc said:

---

Hey, here in B/CS it's a milk and cookie kind of day.

---

We have 33 degrees and pissin' rain.

So I decided on beans and cornbread and then cookies.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/938381814267334656

Thread on Strzok. Theory includes Comey being part of the scheme to trap Strzok.

GCP12 said:

---

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/938381814267334656

Thread on Strzok. Theory includes Comey being part of the scheme to trap Strzok.

---

That's tin foil level conspiracy theory right there...

Why would Strzok need to be trapped when Comey knew he changed the wording, interviewed Clinton, Mills, Abedin and Flynn?

akm91 said:

---

GCP12 said:

---

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/938381814267334656

Thread on Strzok. Theory includes Comey being part of the scheme to trap Strzok.

---

That's tin foil level conspiracy theory right there...

Why would Strzok need to be trapped when Comey knew he changed the wording, interviewed Clinton, Mills, Abedin and Flynn?

---

I cannot get on board with Comey being a part of the scheme. But, I believe the overall theory is a Sun Tzu strategy:

Quote:

---

All warfare is based on deception.

---

Trump/Sessions/Flynn want the Dems/Media to believe that Trump is out of control and never wanted the SC. When in reality, he always wanted the SC so, Mueller would have unlimited scope into all the swamp dealings.

These conspiracy theories within conspiracy theories are sounding a lot like wishful thinking. I had hoped the SC was going to be fair and maybe even get to the bottom of the Hillary crimes, but I no longer think that is the case. Laws do not apply to some people, and it's a damn shame.

I think that Mueller had no choice but to fire these hacks after the texts were made public. I think there is no 4D chess going on. Mueller is a political animal and it's evident with all the partisans he hired.

I suspect this will go on for another couple of weeks while the investigators are exposed, and Trump will determine it's politically expedient to have the SC turn over all findings and shut it down.

Quite a few from congress (R's of course) are banding together and demanding this thing be brought to a halt because of the obvious corruption and bias with Mueller and company.

Quote:

---

I think that Mueller had no choice but to fire these hacks after the texts were made public. I think there is no 4D chess going on. Mueller is a political animal and it's evident with all the partisans he hired.

---

This guy was removed a long time ago. Not when the texts were made public.

They hid it as long as they could. Once it was obvious what was going on, dominoes started falling.

Over 10,000 texts! Hmmmm....think there was any sexting too?

Don't understand the major purge comment. Purging the texts? What is he referring to?

akm91 said:

---

Don't understand the major purge comment. Purging the texts? What is he referring to?

---

The IG report

Gotcha. Either that or the 27 leak investigations that's going on right now.

Here is an interesting tidbit.

akm91 said:

---

Gotcha. Either that or the 27 leak investigations that's going on right now.

---

Think that's the same thing if I understand correctly

And a little more on the FBI/DOJ bias...

http://thehill.com/homenews/administration/363666-gop-lawmakers-cite-new-allegations-of-political-bias-in-fbi?amp&__twitter_impression=true

FBI is full of lawyers guys...