Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,607,615 Views | 49329 Replies | Last: 3 days ago by JFABNRGR
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/12/former-judge-general-flynn-not-aware-strzok-removed-bias-case-can-dismissed-due-giglio-violation/

Quote:

Former Judge: If General Flynn Was Not Aware Strzok Was Removed for Bias Case Can Be Dismissed Due to Giglio Violation

Glenn Reynolds is a law professor, author and USA Today columnist. Glenn runs the wildly popular Instapundit website at PJ Media and has an enormous following.

This afternoon Glenn Reynolds posted this comment from a former judge and reader on the General Michael Flynn arrest and plea deal.

Glenn believes this was a flawed investigation because General Michael Flynn was not notified that the main witness against him was removed from the investigation for bias. If General Flynn was not aware of this it is Giglio violation.

A READER WHO IS A FORMER PROSECUTOR AND JUDGE EMAILS:
Quote:

Did the prosecution tell Flynn's lawyer that their main witness against him was removed for bias? Since Strzok led the interview and his testimony would be needed to establish untruthfulness, he is a critical witness not just a prosecutor. If not disclosed, would this not be a Giglio violation? This is the kind of misconduct that can get a case dismissed and a lawyer disbarred. It is a Constitutional violation. This has bothered me since I heard about it.


Any lawyers care to offer an opinion on this? True, maybe, maybe not, false....
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


Dilley is co-host of Your Voice America; has >100,000 followers. I know nothing about him. Time will tell...
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?

GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Yup. We might get some quick confirmation on whether Brower really has sources.
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:



http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2017/12/former-judge-general-flynn-not-aware-strzok-removed-bias-case-can-dismissed-due-giglio-violation/

Quote:

Former Judge: If General Flynn Was Not Aware Strzok Was Removed for Bias Case Can Be Dismissed Due to Giglio Violation

Glenn Reynolds is a law professor, author and USA Today columnist. Glenn runs the wildly popular Instapundit website at PJ Media and has an enormous following.

This afternoon Glenn Reynolds posted this comment from a former judge and reader on the General Michael Flynn arrest and plea deal.

Glenn believes this was a flawed investigation because General Michael Flynn was not notified that the main witness against him was removed from the investigation for bias. If General Flynn was not aware of this it is Giglio violation.

A READER WHO IS A FORMER PROSECUTOR AND JUDGE EMAILS:
Quote:

Did the prosecution tell Flynn's lawyer that their main witness against him was removed for bias? Since Strzok led the interview and his testimony would be needed to establish untruthfulness, he is a critical witness not just a prosecutor. If not disclosed, would this not be a Giglio violation? This is the kind of misconduct that can get a case dismissed and a lawyer disbarred. It is a Constitutional violation. This has bothered me since I heard about it.


Any lawyers care to offer an opinion on this? True, maybe, maybe not, false....

If true, I'm going all in on believing the thread about Flynns appointments taking out leakers.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
GCP12 said:





He tweeted the above circa an hour after his initial 'Scoop' tweet, so maybe there are more than 4. Mueller may not have anyone credible left on his team.
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Even MORE political hacks in this witch hunt? Say it isn't so! Hopefully our resident libs will be along soon with an explanation...
Long Live Sully
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
This will be the mortician Mueller next week.


GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Thread:
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GCP12 said:


GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
It's a thread.
Zombie Jon Snow
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG

Still not really sure I follow...and not sure he isn't a loon anyway but here is the chain....


Quote:


(1) Aha! Now I know what this means.

(2) Why was "tapes" in quotations marks?

Because Trump was NOT referring to actual recordings of the conversations.

(3) It's clear to me now that Michael Flynn installed a team of DIA spooks and tech-savvy civilians who all got Top Secret / Sensitive Compartmented Information (TS/SCI) security clearances.

(4) You DON'T lose your security clearance when you're fired.

Flynn was fired, and then H. R. McMaster "fired" Flynn's staff.

They all retained their TS/SCI clearances.

(5) These clearances can be provided by the Department of Defense, the State Department, the Department of Energy, and the Department of Homeland Security.

(6) So the Intelligence community couldn't stop Flynn from assembling a team of Leak Killers.

Flynn knowingly did things that put him at risk of prison, but this served two purposes:

(7) One, it made FLYNN the story, and two, it TOTALLY distracted from the Leak Killers.

(8) Trump is doing amazing things in terms of geopolitics, but he hasn't had A SINGLE INTELLIGENCE LEAK.

(9) The only person allowed to supply others with raw signals intelligence--(SIGINT)--is NSA Director Admiral Mike Rogers.

SIGINT is phone calls, e-mails, and text messages.

(10) The Obama administration smeared Rogers by saying he ran to Trump tower to plead for his job.

Clapper and Ash Carter recommended that he be fired.

(11) There's ZERO chance that Rogers did that.

He's a pro.

But the smear made him angry.

(12) So Rogers is providing raw SIGINT to the Leak Killers.

They have EVERY REASON to get it.

Leaks of classified intelligence are ILLEGAL.

(13) Trump was talking about SIGINT being given to the Leak Killers.

That's why he said "tapes."

He meant communications between the leakers and the press.

(14) Everything is now falling into place.

So to speak.

(15) I won't speculate on ANYTHING or ANYBODY except for Flynn.

He DID recruit the Leak Killers and put them in place.

The total lack of intelligence leaks proves it.

(16) Everything else is based on "reports."

Remember: Mike Rogers creates barium meals by feeding leakers bogus reports.

The Leak Killers get the REAL story, directly from Rogers.

(17) The reason the Leak Killers are so effective is that they have raw SIGINT, there are only a handful of them, and they care only about the country.

(18) They're the new Untouchables.

(19) So THAT'S what Trump was talking about.

SIGINT in the hands of the Leak Killers...

drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/938209617573588993

Here is the threadreader on Wictor's tweet thread; it's much easier to read. Just click on it.
OldFashioned
How long do you want to ignore this user?
People here are way too quick to believe anonymous loons from the internet, twitter of all places.

MSM is fake news, but anonymous twitter user with painted image of George Washington = source gold.
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OldFashioned said:

People here are way too quick to believe anonymous loons from the internet, twitter of all places.

MSM is fake news, but anonymous twitter user with painted image of George Washington = source gold.
They're theories. We are well aware of what they are. You believe trump is going to be removed from office because of Russian collusion. Look in the mirror before you call us crazy
OldFashioned
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Oh, that's what I said? Nice fake news there. Never said Russian collusion is what's threatening him.

Who's defined as "us"?
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OldFashioned said:

Oh, that's what I said? Nice fake news there. Never said Russian collusion is what's threatening him.
Sorry. Should've just said removed from office period. My bad.
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OldFashioned said:

People here are way too quick to believe anonymous loons from the internet, twitter of all places.

MSM is fake news, but anonymous twitter user with painted image of George Washington = source gold.
Who said we believe them? We know what we're looking at. It's only people on your side that ingest Fake news hook line and sinker without any skepticism at all. Except you get fed it from places like the now disgraced ABC
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/12/05/ingraham-mueller-deputy-jeannie-rhee-was-obama-wh-represented-clinton-foundation

Quote:

Laura Ingraham reported that one of Robert Mueller's deputies in his special investigation into President Trump was the personal attorney of a top Obama official and also represented the Clinton Foundation.

In an Ingraham Angle exclusive, Ingraham said Jeannie Rhee was hired by Mueller this past summer to work on the probe.

She formerly worked in the Obama Justice Department as a deputy assistant attorney general in the office of legal counsel - offering advice to the administration.

Ingraham said Rhee was also the personal attorney for Ben Rhodes, the deputy national security adviser for President Barack Obama.

Rhee also represented the Clinton Foundation and donated $9,000 to Hillary and other Democrats, Ingraham said.
Brower either has sources or made a good guess...
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Watched the opening of Laura Ingraham show on Fox. She went after Jeannie Rhee, who joined Mueller's Team in June. Her history: Was an Assistant Deputy AG in the Obama Admin from 2009-2011, whereupon she joined a private law firm where Weissmann was a partner. Recently (this year) she was the personal attorney for Obama's National Security Advisor, Ben Rhodes, who is under investigation by Congress regarding the unmasking of names in SIGNIT intel reports, and she was his point of contact for his appearance before the House Intel Committee in July although she did not appear with him because she was then working with Mueller. Oh yes, she also represented the Clinton Foundation and was a HRC donor. No conflict of interest here. Move along.

Edit: you beat me to it.
scottimus
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
They had to be known as expendable.

2 ideas come to mind.

1 this is all true and Mueller has nothing.

2 they are expelling any plausible conflicts of interest before the juicy stuff hits.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?

Ellis Wyatt
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It's time to fire up the electric chair.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


McCabe has got to go for sure. Baker next. Perhaps some of Mueller's Staff are involved.
gig em 02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
scottimus said:

They had to be known as expendable.

2 ideas come to mind.

1 this is all true and Mueller has nothing.

2 they are expelling any plausible conflicts of interest before the juicy stuff hits.
They are going to have to find all brand new evidence to support any juicy stuff. Whatever evidence of any crime they may have obtained prior to expulsion is spoiled.
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Rex makes a good point. If Mueller is competent at all and wanted the investigation to be viewed as impartial, he made some ridiculous hires. A giant sting operation almost makes more sense
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Who's defined as "us"?


Quote:

People on here
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?

OldFashioned
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Fortunately Mueller is continuing the investigation without the approval of Texags posters.

bobbranco
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OldFashioned said:

Fortunately Mueller is continuing the investigation without the approval of Texags posters.




And you have the inside information.
Do tell.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


https://bluntforcetruth.com/obstruction-of-justice-was-coming-from-inside-the-fbi/

Quote:

Obstruction of Justice was Coming from Inside the FBI


Interesting read outlining the double standards employed by Comey/Strzok/FBI on the HRC investigation vs Mueller/Strzok on the Russian collusion investigation. I think we need a SC to investigate Comey/FBI/Mueller.


gig em 02
How long do you want to ignore this user?
OldFashioned said:

Fortunately Mueller is continuing the investigation without the approval of Texags posters.




Fortunately? How dense can a person be? Are you a foreign agent or a paid DNC poster? I can't imagine a real life American of any political persuasion would continue to support this sham "investigation". Any evidence they have collected is now compromised, what part of that does a normal person not understand?
BenFiasco14
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
gig em 02 said:

OldFashioned said:

Fortunately Mueller is continuing the investigation without the approval of Texags posters.




Fortunately? How dense can a person be? Are you a foreign agent or a paid DNC poster? I can't imagine a real life American of any political persuasion would continue to support this sham "investigation". Any evidence they have collected is now compromised, what part of that does a normal person not understand?


Libs have no sense of ethics or morality. They'd rather drag the country through this dog and pony show because GCF lost the election and their death march to libtopia was halted.
OldFashioned
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This has nothing to do with Trump's actions.
First Page Last Page
Page 6 of 1410
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.