Give him a nudge.

More crazy eyed liberals posting here can be entertaining.

BenFiasco14 said:

---

GCP12 said:

---

BenFiasco14 said:

---

Rockdoc said:

---

Yep Thomas Ford is gonna personally perp walk him to prison. It will be his shining moment. He waiting in the bushes right now.

---

Where has he run off to?

---

I saw him post on the football board. I decided not to call him out

---

Oh really? I wouldn't have been able to resist. Recently?

---

It was a post about his dad being at the Jimbo welcoming

Is this guy the only one working at the fbi? Good lord he was busy

Watch the end of this short clip. Sara Carter says part of the OIG report will come out later this month, and the remainder after the first of the year.

Boom

GCP12 said:

---

drcrinum said:

---

---

---

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/937741488645070849

Click on the threadreader. Some interesting revelations about Flynn's spook friends, timelines, and a speculation on how, when & why Strzok was outed. Interesting read with obvious overtones of 'intellience services'.

I would like confirmation that Strzok exists. I'm starting to wonder if he isn't just some fictional character that the FBI is going to use as a scapegoat for everything, at this point.

GCP12 said:

---

I would like confirmation that Strzok exists. I'm starting to wonder if he isn't just some fictional character that the FBI is going to use as a scapegoat for everything, at this point.

---

Hardly any photos of him exist. He doesn't even have an official FBI photo in his file.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/04/anti-trump-text-messages-show-pattern-of-bias-on-muellers-team/

Quote:

---

It's still unclear what exactly was discussed, but the messages are not the only evidence of Strzok's link to politically-charged rhetoric. The demoted agent's wife also appears to have deep pro-Clinton sentiments.

A Facebook account that appears to be operated by Melissa Hodgman, a top lawyer at the Securities and Exchange Commission who married Strzok in 1994, shows membership in several pro-Clinton and pro-Obama Facebook groups.

"Democrats for a Blue America" and "Thank You Obama" are two of the groups Hodgman supports. She is also a follower of a page called "We Voted for Hillary."

Hodgman did not respond to emails from The Daily Caller seeking comment about her involvement with the groups.

---

drcrinum said:

---

---

Curious how Strzok's text messages get released?

Possibly in the forthcoming OIG report

Have they been released?

I thought I heard that the tweets will be released maybe in a month or so?

GCP12 said:

---

I would like confirmation that Strzok exists. I'm starting to wonder if he isn't just some fictional character that the FBI is going to use as a scapegoat for everything, at this point.

---

Just released.

The bigger story is that guy -apparently- has a girlfriend...

akm91 said:

---

drcrinum said:

---

Curious how Strzok's text messages get released?

---

---

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/937842655106686978

Quote:

---

15. Over the weekend reports of agent Strzok being removed from the Mueller Team after the OIG Inspector General discovered anti-Trump/pro-Clinton content within his internal communication. That DOJ-OIG investigation has been going on all year.

---

The actual text messages have not been released/leaked. Why they would be so damning is curious -- anti-Trump rhetoric -- when many on Mueller's team were donors and supporters of HRC. Has to be more than that. Probably references to schemes to take Trump down.

How the messages were discovered by the OIG is another issue. Note: The disclosure of this discovery comes following the indictment of Flynn. Remember, Flynn has spook friends in high places, not to mention Admiral Rogers. I suspect someone from this network tipped off the OIG. (See the earlier thread I posted from GalacticRedPill)

Also, it's important to note that OIG reports are usually only reported/released when completed. The OIG thought this info on Strzok was important enough to report it separately. Also there is supposedly another interim OIG report coming out this week (per Sara Carter) -- so there must be another important finding/discovery.

That's apparently also the guy that edited Comeys statement on Clinton to remove the gross negligence finding because that would be a declaration of her guilt.

Anyone that believes the Mueller investigation is legitimate is a completely partisan hack.

Thanks. Makes sense that someone in IC highlighted Strzok's duplicity/bias.

Quote:

---

That's apparently also the guy that edited Comeys statement on Clinton to remove the gross negligence finding because that would be a declaration of her guilt.

---

This will be interesting line of questioning when Comey testifies under oath on Capitol Hill later on.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/12/04/clinton-aides-went-unpunished-after-making-false-statements-to-anti-trump-fbi-supervisor/

Quote:

---

Top Clinton Aides Face No Charges After Making False Statements To FBI

The FBI agent who was fired from Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation team for sending anti-Donald Trump text messages conducted the interviews with two Hillary Clinton aides accused of giving false statements about what they knew of the former secretary of state's private email server.

Neither of the Clinton associates, Cheryl Mills and Huma Abedin, faced legal consequences for their misleading statements, which they made in interviews last year with former FBI section chief Peter Strzok.

The starkly different outcomes from Strzok's interviews a felony charge against Flynn and a free pass to Mills and Abedin are sure to raise questions from Republicans about double-standards in the FBI's two most prominent political investigations. FBI Director Christopher Wray will likely be pressed on the Strzok scandal on Thursday when he attends an oversight hearing before the House Judiciary Committee.

A review of those documents conducted by The Daily Caller shows that Mills and Abedin told Strzok and Laufman that they were not aware of Clinton's server until after she left the State Department.

"Mills did not learn Clinton was using a private server until after Clinton's [Department of State] tenure," reads notes from Mills' April 9, 2016 interview. "Mills stated she was not even sure she knew what a server was at the time."


Abedin also denied knowing about Clinton's server until leaving the State Department in 2013. "Abedin did not know that Clinton had a private server until about a year and a half ago when it became public knowledge," the summary of Strzok's interview with Abedin states.


But undercutting those denials are email exchanges in which both Mills and Abedin either directly discussed or were involved in discussing Clinton's server.



Former FBI Director James Comey defended the Clinton aides' inconsistent statements in a House Judiciary Committee hearing held on Sept. 28, 2016.

---

Nothing to see here regarding Strzok. Just issuing 'Get Out Of Jail Free' cards to Clinton cronies, but Flynn...!
(Please click on the small images and they enlarge...don't know why this happened.)

Didn't Mills and Abedin get immunity which would protect them from prosecution of lying to FBI?

akm91 said:

---

Didn't Mills and Abedin get immunity which would protect them from prosecution of lying to FBI?

---

I don't believe immunity would protect you from prosecution for lying.. In fact, lying would probably nullify your immunity agreement.

Ag with kids said:

---

akm91 said:

---

Didn't Mills and Abedin get immunity which would protect them from prosecution of lying to FBI?

---

I don't believe immunity would protect you from prosecution for lying.. In fact, lying would probably nullify your immunity agreement.

---

One can only hope. Those two need to be thrown in jail along post haste.

https://truepundit.com/mueller-fired-fbis-strzok-for-leaking-classified-trump-intel-to-washington-post-mueller-knew-agent-was-anti-trump-when-hired/

Quote:

---

Mueller Fired FBI's Strzok for Leaking Classified Trump Intel to Washington Post; Mueller Knew Agent Was Anti-Trump When Hired

Some truths here: Mueller already knew the FBI's Peter Strzok didn't like President Donald Trump yet still hired him, according to FBI and DOJ sources.

But that has little to do with why Strzok was expelled from the Special Counsel's team...

Yet that, again, has little to do with the real reasons Mueller sacked FBI's Strzok, a high ranking section chief, sources in the FBI and DOJ said.

Mueller suspected Strzok of leaking classified details about his team's FBI raid on Paul Manafort's house, a story the Washington Post first printed in August, several FBI and DOJ sources confirm.

The Manafort search warrant is a sealed document and not a public record. The Post's story offered a detailed glimpse of the pre-dawn raid of Manfort's Virginia home, which rousted Manafort and his wife out of bed.

Within days of the story Mueller concluded the Post offered details only a member of the Special Counsel's inner circle could have known...

Federal sources said Mueller fired Strzok one week after the story appeared in the Washington Post and after conducting an internal probe to isolate the leak.

Mueller may have examined telecommunications of team members, sources said, which would reveal such things as anti-Trump texts and communications with members of the media, including the Washington Post.

Sources confirm Strzok's removal from the team had very little to do with his anti-Trump texts or his sexual romp with FBI lawyer Lisa Page, who works for FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe.

---

Well, it's the True Pundit and anonymous sources, but this makes more sense than firing someone for anti-Trump tweets.
(I don't know if this story relates to the 'Dead Man's Switch' or if he has more info to relate.)

Strzok's tweets just reflect the general atmosphere on Mueller's Team...I mean he just fitted in with the other regulars.

Yea, I'm going to start a new thread on Weissman.

And just how long are they going to let this witch hunt continue?

Rockdoc said:

---

And just how long are they going to let this witch hunt continue?

---

Yup. Plug needs to be pulled. There's nothing but corruption up there. The voters have spoken. If the Dems want to get rid of Trump they should work on the 2020 election instead of pinning their hopes on the Special Counsel.

Deats said:

---

gazelle01 said:

---

BenFiasco14 said:

---

But the libs told us this was a completely clean and non partisan "investigation"?

---

Yes, he was REMOVED from the investigation last summer, after it barely had even begun, yet this somehow proves the investigation was partisan?!

Great analysis, OP.

---

Ethical person excuses themselves if they have known bias unless they are out for a personal mission

---

Non-ethical people (the people the laws target) do not voluntarily remove themselves. Funny how that works.

Quote:

---

Well, it's the True Pundit and anonymous sources, but this makes more sense than firing someone for anti-Trump tweets.(I don't know if this story relates to the 'Dead Man's Switch' or if he has more info to relate.)

---

Whoa. I missed this before. I usually dont follow him. Do you know if he is usually overly dramatic?

Quote:

---

Federal sources said Mueller fired Strzok one week after the story appeared in the Washington Post and after conducting an internal probe to isolate the leak.

---

Could line up with the theory that Flynn's appointments with TS/SCI clearances are helping out behind the scenes...

An unsettling thought...but I don't think there would be a new investigation into Russian collusion regarding the 2016 election. There wasn't any. Some shady/criminal activities for certain during the election, but not primarily related to Russia.

CTH sees it differently...

https://theconservativetreehouse.com/2017/12/05/black-hat-hunting/#more-143006