Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts
7,482,658 Views |
49269 Replies |
Last: 23 hrs ago by aggiehawg
Note to self.
Research "Gates Procedure," pull up acronymfinder.com to understand all of these acronyms, read entirety of thread to understand context, post response that is intelligible..
FWIW, that's a dig on me and my ignorance on some of this stuff.
Research "Gates Procedure," pull up acronymfinder.com to understand all of these acronyms, read entirety of thread to understand context, post response that is intelligible..
FWIW, that's a dig on me and my ignorance on some of this stuff.
OGC is Office of General CounselQuote:
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence has released documents governing intelligence community dissemination of information regarding members of Congress and congressional staff, known as the "Gates Procedures" after former Director of Central Intelligence Robert Gates.
Interestingly, the above quote is from Lawfare Blog. You know, guys who are in on the deep state corruption.
Also interestingly, the Gates Procedures were written in 1992. They were not revised until 2013 and 2017...by the corrupt Obama Regime.
Between this and the 11th hour change to EO 12333 by Obama set up the nefarious actions of the Obama administration to carry on after he was gone. Clapper signed the rules on Dec. 15 and Loretta Lynch signed them on Jan. 3. The new rules allowing the NSA to disseminate "raw signals intelligence information."drcrinum said:
Look at the date...one day before the Inauguration!
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/3283349/Raw-12333-surveillance-sharing-guidelines.pdf
It's what Evelyn Farkas was talking about here
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
My bad.
Actually, I don't think Manafort has anything of value on Trump that Mueller wants or needs. Soo, put on a good show for Trump.
Don't even get me started on my wild theory of the kabuki going on surrounding this.aggiehawg said:
Actually, I don't think Manafort has anything of value on Trump that Mueller wants or needs. Soo, put on a good show for Trump.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Very true, if he does anything with Manafort.aggiehawg said:Agree. If he does anything, it will be commutation of his sentence(s).RoscoePColtrane said:Commutation more than likely.aggiehawg said:You mean "pardon"?drcrinum said:
Parole shopping?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Just a matter of time before Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Strozk, Lynch, Yates et al are going through what Manafort is having to endure. I hope each is held in solitary and given the maximum sentence for their crimes. What a bunch of trash.
Aw c'mon, let's hear it! You got nothing better to do.RoscoePColtrane said:Don't even get me started on my wild theory of the kabuki going on surrounding this.aggiehawg said:
Actually, I don't think Manafort has anything of value on Trump that Mueller wants or needs. Soo, put on a good show for Trump.
Kind of big news about Rosenstein and Manafort 8 years ago.
Q drop...
Q drop...
Quote:
Q!CbboFOtcZs 31 Jul 2018 - 1:28:47 PM
FINALLY.
Public DOMAIN.
[url=https://archive.today/newest/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zaknV3FMGow][/url]
[RR] exonerated Manafort FOR THE SAME CHARGES (8) years ago.
>
https://www.politico.com/story/2018/04/03/mueller-paul-manafort-probe-rosenstein-approves-497701[url=https://archive.today/newest/https://www.politico.com/story/2018/04/03/mueller-paul-manafort-probe-rosenstein-approves-497701][/url]
Can you locate the orig court docs?
[RR][RR][RR]
[RR][RR]
[RR]
Q
Appeals Court rejected Paul Manafort's request to be let out of jail until his trial
Judge Ellis asserted on the evidence Paul Manafort wants excluded about his work in Ukraine, the judge did not rule he said he agreed with the govt that it was relevant, but basically said they needed to think about prejudice and that he didn't want data dumps and judge repeated his joke from last time about how the jurors in Paul Manafort's case will get lunch, but that they shouldn't look for baked Alaska on the menu.
Judge Ellis asserted on the evidence Paul Manafort wants excluded about his work in Ukraine, the judge did not rule he said he agreed with the govt that it was relevant, but basically said they needed to think about prejudice and that he didn't want data dumps and judge repeated his joke from last time about how the jurors in Paul Manafort's case will get lunch, but that they shouldn't look for baked Alaska on the menu.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Rosenstein was USA in Maryland 8 years ago. Did Manafort live in Maryland back then?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
why the face?
that appeal had no chance.
that appeal had no chance.
No need to troll.coyote68 said:
Just a matter of time before Brennan, Clapper, Comey, Strozk, Lynch, Yates et al are going through what Manafort is having to endure. I hope each is held in solitary and given the maximum sentence for their crimes. What a bunch of trash.
That's my what else is new face, bored, no surprisedBMX Bandit said:
why the face?
that appeal had no chance.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
BMX Bandit said:
why the face?
that appeal had no chance.
It's Roscoe's go to face for most of his posts.
MelvinUdall said:BMX Bandit said:
why the face?
that appeal had no chance.
It's Roscoe's go to face for most of his posts.
This whole ordeal will wear on you and lull you to sleep at times.
Nothing exciting till the next Horowitz drop
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
This jury is not going to be sequestered, correct?
Nothing noted in the court record about it.aggiehawg said:
This jury is not going to be sequestered, correct?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Wow! A reporter from the WSJ texting Carter Page in July 2016 about info obtained from the dossier. Of course it's just a coincidence that Fusion GPS was founded by 3 former WSJ employees, Simpson, Frisch & Catan. This means Simpson was leaking to the press (his former buddies at the WSJ) 2 months prior to the big drops in September 2016.
Yet the WSJ never bit on the story, his former colleagues thought he was FOS.
Well we called this one:
Quote:
In making their opening remarks in the trial in Alexandria, Va., prosecutors spent more than twenty minutes outlining expensive purchases they said Manafort made with money he earned doing work for Ukranian oligarchs and the Ukrainian government, including since-deposed pro-Russian leader Viktor Yanukovych.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Uzo Asonye told the jury that Manafort considered himself above the law as he funneled tens of millions of dollars through offshore accounts to pay for personal expenses such as a $21,000 watch and a $15,000 jacket made of ostrich.
Quote:
Judge T.S. Ellis III interjected to remind jurors that wealth alone is not criminal, and he rebuked Asonye in front of the jury for saying that the "evidence will show" Manafort's guilt.
"It isn't a crime to have a lot of money and be profligate in your spending," Ellis said.
Quote:
Attorney Thomas Zehnle said in his opening statement that Manafort trusted others to keep track of the millions of dollars he was earning from his Ukrainian political work, and had misplaced his trust in Gates.
LINKQuote:
"Money's coming in fast. It's a lot, and Paul Manafort trusted that Rick Gates was keeping track of it," Zehnle said. "That's what Rick Gates was being paid to do."
He also claimed that Manafort's foreign business contacts insisted on paying him using the overseas accounts.
"This is the way that they required it to be done," Zehnle said. "Paul Manafort traveled in circles that most people will never know and he's gotten handsomely rewarded for it. We do not dispute that."
Manafort's team also denied he was trying to hide money, saying he simply did not understand all the complexities of the tax code, like many Americans -- and that his penalty should be an audit, not the possibility of hundreds of years in prison.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
Joined:
Oct 10, 2006
Posts:
49,044
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Wow....the judge interrupted an opening statement???
Yeppers. Getting off to good start, aren't they?blindey said:
Wow....the judge interrupted an opening statement???
Attacking wealth? Sounds like Democrats.
Point being, attorneys are given wide latitude in opening statements. Judges very seldom interrupt them and I mean very seldom.
FIFYtechno-ag said:
Attacking wealth? Sounds like Democrats.....while stockpiling wealth for themselves.
That's the authoritarian socialist way.Zombie Jon Snow said:FIFYtechno-ag said:
Attacking wealth? Sounds like Democrats.....while stockpiling wealth for themselves.
That is highly dependent on the judge so I would not necessarily agree with that as a blanket statement. I'm not familiar enough with Ellis to say if this is a big deal or not, especially since he interrupted both sides' opening statements. He may be one of the ones more prone to that, which is not all that unusualaggiehawg said:
Point being, attorneys are given wide latitude in opening statements. Judges very seldom interrupt them and I mean very seldom.
Featured Stories
See All
SEC Round-Up: No lie, Moss needs to keep balling as Ags face Tigers
by Olin Buchanan
Presenting Texas Aggies United’s Best Seats In The House Sweepstakes!
by Texas Aggies United
32:54
1h ago
409
Pick 'Em & Rip 'Em sponsored by PrizePicks: Week 6
by Matthew Dawson
12:10
2h ago
1.1k
Juicy
"Kyle Field homefield advantage is fairly significantly overrated"
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
269
Bag
"Kyle Field homefield advantage is fairly significantly overrated"
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
91
DTP02
"Kyle Field homefield advantage is fairly significantly overrated"
in Billy Liucci's TexAgs Premium
71