Mueller dismisses top FBI agent in Russia probe for anti-Trump texts

7,763,893 Views | 49423 Replies | Last: 4 days ago by will25u
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
So we're at "it wasn't a big deal" today, eh?
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I feel like Norm MacDonald is playing the part of reality and Clapper and the main stream media are playing the part of David Koechner trying to hide the dead hookers at this point.

aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
GCP12 said:


Bulls***! Clapper was DNI. He was over both the FBI and the CIA. He wasn't forbidden from knowing the FBI was spying on USPers as opposed to the CIA being prohibited from doing that.

Look, Clapper, if Brennan and Comey kept you out of the loop just man up and say that. You've embarrassed yourself enough already, what's one more?
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Clapper's pants are pulled down and everyone is getting a good look at his chubby pasty ass. Dude is scum and will pull the senile grandpa card soon.
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
blindey said:

So we're at "it wasn't a big deal" today, eh?
Pretty sure the final narrative is as follows...

There was not a spy into the campaign. There was an informant

Placing an informant(not a spy) into a presidential campaign is common and no big deal.

Also, WE ARE NOT CALLING IT SPYGATE!!! I DON'T CARE WHAT TRUMP SAYS!!!
Flying Crowbar
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Anyone interested in going to this next week? Could be fun...

https://www.brazosbookstore.com/event/james-r-clapper-facts-and-fears

SIAP

ETA - I'm not paying $35 to see him.
GCP12
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Q&A session?
coyote68
How long do you want to ignore this user?
I have suspected that this is much bigger than what we are seeing, just the tip of the iceberg. I suspect that Obama had a team in place to spy and collect information on every person who might be an issue in the future. That would include politicians of both parties, Judges, business people show business people, everyone who would need to be controlled or eliminated at some point. Call me a conspiracy theory person or whatever, but there is something very big and secret these folks are fighting to coverup.
ThunderCougarFalconBird
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Sounds like the Q thread.
Agnzona
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Lot Y Tailgate said:

Wendy 1990 said:

I think the real end game is Obama's spied on A LOT of people. John Roberts comes readily to mind.


It would make way more sense to release whatever blackmail information he had on Roberts and get him to resign than try and manipulate his votes...


Absolutely not. How many just appointed youngish SCOTUS steps down? That risks being exposed. Not to mention influencing decesions is way more valuable.
richardag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
FriscoKid said:

It really does feel like the figurative "flood gates" are open at this point.
You could say the pace has become "Fast & Furious".
Among the latter, under pretence of governing they have divided their nations into two classes, wolves and sheep.”
Thomas Jefferson, Letter to Edward Carrington, January 16, 1787
FJB
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
OneNightW said:

Clapper's pants are pulled down and everyone is getting a good look at his chubby pasty ass. Dude is scum and will pull the senile grandpa card soon.
Clapper wil definitely pull the senile card...

RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Kushner getting he security clearance today is actually more significant that they are talking about. If he had any serious issues still involving Mueller's CI investigation they'd never clear him fully.

Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?




Status report, followed by status report, followed by another status report. What does this mean? Delaying tactic? If so, for what purpose?
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
He's way low on this number

Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
This is just something to get another narrative going other than the SpyGate narrative, of which Mueller's been a part of, when it comes out he granted independent FISA power to Mueller.
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

Secret surveillance was conducted on no fewer than seven Trump associates: chief strategist Stephen Bannon; lawyer Michael Cohen; national security adviser Lt. Gen. Michael Flynn; adviser and son-in-law Jared Kushner; campaign chairman Paul Manafort; and campaign foreign policy advisers Carter Page and George Papadopoulos.

The FBI reportedly applied for a secret warrant in June 2016 to monitor Manafort, Page, Papadopoulos and Flynn. If true, it means the FBI targeted Flynn six months before his much-debated conversation with Russia's ambassador, Sergey Kislyak.

The FBI applied four times to wiretap Page after he became a Trump campaign adviser starting in July 2016. Page's office is connected to Trump Tower and he reports having spent "many hours in Trump Tower."

CNN reported that Manafort was wiretapped before and after the election "including during a period when Manafort was known to talk to President Trump." Manafort reportedly has a residence in Trump Tower.
Cohen was never on the Trump Campaign. Only reason he was targeted was because of the Steele dossier.

Which poses an evidentiary problem. Fruits of a counter-intelligence probe are usually inadmissible unless the charges are terrorism or espionage.

This stinks to high heaven.
benchmark
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
aggiehawg said:

McCarthy's latest.
Quote:

The two investigations must not be compartmentalized. Manifestly, the FBI saw them as inseparably linked: Trump's victory in the primaries, the opening of his path to the Oval Office, meant first and foremost that the Hillary investigation had to be brought to a close.
READ THE REST
THIS
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:

He's way low on this number




All that surveillance and still no collusion. Schiff has said all of the evidence is in the public domain. Swallowswell called Trump's joke about emails evidence. Combine this with Kushner getting his clearance and "we don't know what Mueller has uncovered" holds no water. They have nothing and will never get anything.
🤡 🤡 🤡
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Quote:

All that surveillance and still no collusion. Schiff has said all of the evidence is in the public domain. Swallowswell called Trump's joke about emails evidence. Combine this with Kusher getting his clearance and "we don't know what Mueller has uncovered" holds no water. They have nothing and will never get anything.
At this point, Team Mueller should consider themselves lucky if they are allowed to slink away with most of their law licenses intact.

What a clusterf*** of an investigation and courtroom antics.
drcrinum
How long do you want to ignore this user?


fasthorse05
How long do you want to ignore this user?
It may take me the rest of the night to get that out of my head!

Thanx alot.
Hate is how progressives sustain themselves. Without hate, introspection begins to slip into the progressive's consciousness, threatening the progressive with the truth: that their ideas and opinions are illogical, hypocritical, dangerous, and asinine.
This is backed by data.
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
Bird Poo
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:






Fancy way of saying "the FBI planted evidence".
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:




I don't care if they were sure Hillary would win, that is just idiotic. With the full force of the American and British ICs arraigned against Trump they couldn't pull off a simple frame job? With a target rich environment of Trump's life for the last 40 years they had to resort to pee-pee showers?

THAT is the real reason why the American public has lost faith in our premier law enforcement and intelligence communities. They went full

VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:


Exactly!!!

Watching his speech the night he won, he struck me as completely humbled at being elected. Obviously happy, but he seemed very honored and humbled. Meanwhile Obama's speech was as fine a display of narcissism as you will see.
🤡 🤡 🤡
RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
Clapper is going to plead insanity, it's the only answer to this logic.

From his new book, "Facts and Fears: Hard Truths from a Life in Intelligence,"
Quote:

"Of course the Russian effort affected the outcome. Surprising even themselves, they swung the election to a Trump win. To conclude otherwise stretches logic, common sense, and credulity to the breaking point,"

Quote:

"Less than 80,000 votes in three key states swung the election, I have no doubt that more votes than that were influenced by this massive effort by the Russians."
And here in 2017 he says this



Then this performance yesterday



Then he wants to explain off this lie as he was confused and thinking of a different program, and the question was ANY DATA, ?



Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
I'm thinking Clapper's book tour will be brief. Hope the publisher of that crap didn't do a large first printing.
Garrelli 5000
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Is Schiff actually this stupid, actually involved in some way, or simply willing to be the far left's Baghdad Bob without caring what an idiot he looks to be?

Clapper - I get it - if 1/2 of what is said on this thread is true, Clapper is at best the most under qualified person every for any job, at worst will be in prison. Same for Brennan and Comey.

Unless I'm missing something, Schiff seems to be the "just weird enough looking to distract" patsy they've sent out to deny the US has already taken control of the city.
Staff - take out the trash.
ccatag
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
drcrinum said:




Need to work the MSM, (like Isikoff , WaPo, NYT, etc) into this schematic and circular confirmation echo chamber
It's deja vu' all over again....

RoscoePColtrane
How long do you want to ignore this user?
The left is in full court press







Never take a hostage you aren't willing to shoot,
Remember, America doesn’t negotiate with terrorists.
Code 7 10-42
VegasAg86
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
RoscoePColtrane said:

Clapper is going to plead insanity, it's the only answer to this logic.

From his new book, "Facts and Fears: Hard Truths from a Life in Intelligence,"
Quote:

"Of course the Russian effort affected the outcome. Surprising even themselves, they swung the election to a Trump win. To conclude otherwise stretches logic, common sense, and credulity to the breaking point,"

They definitely surprised themselves. The Democrat meltdown and pursuit of Trump is more than they could have hoped for in their wildest dreams. As far as actually affecting the election, not so much.
Quote:

"Less than 80,000 votes in three key states swung the election, I have no doubt that more votes than that were influenced by this massive effort by the Russians."
Influencing 80,000 votes with $1,000 or so on Facebook ads with much of it spent after the election is impressive, indeed. Need to try to copy their techniques, we'd never lose. /sarcasm


Quote:

And here in 2017 he says this





He was merely mistaken. He thought Chuckie was asking about a different campaign.


🤡 🤡 🤡
tsuag10
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
What's the saying:

"If you repeat a lie enough, even YOU begin to believe it's true."
aggiehawg
How long do you want to ignore this user?
AG
Oh Good Lord! Why didn't Behar ask how many spies were placed in the Hillary camapign to protect her campaign from the same infiltration?

Seems to me if the Russians really wanted to crater Hillary, that would be the easier way to do it. Spy on her and let fly some of her drunken tirades caught on cell-phone by an operative.
First Page Last Page
Page 407 of 1413
 
×
subscribe Verify your student status
See Subscription Benefits
Trial only available to users who have never subscribed or participated in a previous trial.