Gonna be lots of outrage when the oig report whitewashes all this activity. Then what to do?
That would take some mental gymnastics that even Nadia Comaneci would have never attempted. Consider where the leak of the Strzok/Page text messages originated. Consider the sheer number of career DOJ/FBI upper echelon bureaucrats have been fired, demoted or fled altogether.Proc92 said:
Gonna be lots of outrage when the oig report whitewashes all this activity. Then what to do?
Quote:
...Consider what is being said by the Court. "Systems through which queries are conducted of upstream data that do not interface with NSA's audit system." Outside query systems. The NSA was unable to ascertain all the various avenues by which raw FISA data was accessed....
Private contractors, employed by the FBI, were given full access to raw FISA data. FISA data that, once in their possession, could not be traced....
The government was unable to determine how many times non-FBI personnel had full access to raw FISA data....
These contractors were "not directly supervised by or otherwise under the direction and control of" presumably anyone....
The FBI systematically enabled outside contractors to access raw FISA data - using the FBI's systems as access points - across multiple Agencies. The FBI intentionally hid the implementation of this practice - and the practice itself - from the FISA Court until it was discovered in March 2016....
The FBI was not only ignoring minimization procedures, they were ignoring the FISA Court....
ProbabilitiesProc92 said:
Gonna be lots of outrage when the oig report whitewashes all this activity. Then what to do?
Proc92 said:
Gonna be lots of outrage when the oig report whitewashes all this activity. Then what to do?
You might want to reconsider that. Read this.Proc92 said:
I just don't see anything earth shattering coming from some lone inspector that nobody really heard of two years ago. The people being talked about in these last few posts are deeply connected and protected by scores of deeply imbedded string pullers and deep staters going all the way to the Clintons. They have gotten this far for a reason and I think it is hopeful at best to think that it will all come crashing down. The media simply won't play along with any storyline that paints the Democrat party as inherently corrupt or that treason against president trump was perpetrated by a cabal in Washington. The only way that gets any traction is 24/7 news coverage, that simply won't happen.
Written by the Jeff Carlson chap again. Says he is a CFA = Chartered Financial Analyst.aggiehawg said:You might want to reconsider that. Read this.Proc92 said:
I just don't see anything earth shattering coming from some lone inspector that nobody really heard of two years ago. The people being talked about in these last few posts are deeply connected and protected by scores of deeply imbedded string pullers and deep staters going all the way to the Clintons. They have gotten this far for a reason and I think it is hopeful at best to think that it will all come crashing down. The media simply won't play along with any storyline that paints the Democrat party as inherently corrupt or that treason against president trump was perpetrated by a cabal in Washington. The only way that gets any traction is 24/7 news coverage, that simply won't happen.
Thanks. Good read. And also exactly who should replace Sessions, reassign Rosenstein, and then assume immediate SC oversight.aggiehawg said:
You might want to reconsider that. Read this.Quote:
Thus far, all I've discovered regarding IG Horowitz appears to indicate he's a man of integrity, possessed with a useful and persistent determination.
Exactly the type of person one would want for an investigation of this magnitude.
Horowitz.Proc92 said:
I read that. Not sure why you expect a different outcome in a Washington based investigation of their own than what has happened for the past 30 years.
Proc92 said:
Gonna be lots of outrage when the oig report whitewashes all this activity. Then what to do?
No, but I'll make a friendly $1,000 wager if someone will hold both bets in escrow. ;-)Proc92 said:
Let's hope so.
Would you bet the house on it?
No. But I would bet $20,000 on it.Proc92 said:
Let's hope so.
Would you bet the house on it?
You said he was a "lone inspector." That is incorrect. He has a massive staff and budget. He's currently the head of the Inspector Generals program for sharing info across their respective agencies. Inspector Generals normally stay in the own lanes restricting themselves to matters in their own agency. But there are procedures for cross platforming information. Horowitz is currently the head of that as well.Proc92 said:
I read that. Not sure why you expect a different outcome in a Washington based investigation of their own than what has happened for the past 30 years.
drcrinum said:
https://www.themarketswork.com/2018/04/05/the-uncovering-mike-rogers-investigation-section-702-fisa-abuse-the-fbi/Quote:
...Consider what is being said by the Court. "Systems through which queries are conducted of upstream data that do not interface with NSA's audit system." Outside query systems. The NSA was unable to ascertain all the various avenues by which raw FISA data was accessed....
Private contractors, employed by the FBI, were given full access to raw FISA data. FISA data that, once in their possession, could not be traced....
The government was unable to determine how many times non-FBI personnel had full access to raw FISA data....
These contractors were "not directly supervised by or otherwise under the direction and control of" presumably anyone....
The FBI systematically enabled outside contractors to access raw FISA data - using the FBI's systems as access points - across multiple Agencies. The FBI intentionally hid the implementation of this practice - and the practice itself - from the FISA Court until it was discovered in March 2016....
The FBI was not only ignoring minimization procedures, they were ignoring the FISA Court....
This is a very long read, maybe 30 minutes to comprehend it to some degree. It's a very detailed analysis of the 99 page report from the FISA Court in conjunction with other related activities. No question that the Obama admin was widely spying on Americans for a long time through the FBI (main culprit) and to some extent the CIA. They were performing unfettered upstream queries via contractors with no supervision and no control over the materials extracted, and most importantly, there were avenues to conduct these queries that fell outside the realm of NSA oversight/control/access. It's mind boggling...and it's only scratching the surface I fear.
This Jeff Carlson is a hell of an investigative reporter.
Quote:
What bugs me about this agent being Stefan Halper is that (a) he's 73 and thus no longer a field agent;(b) his identity and past are widely known and public knowledge; (c) meaning if he was in any real danger, pull him in from the cold; and finally (d) if the Russians wanted him dead he'd be six feet under already.
In context I'm pretty sure Hawg was referring to the DOJ's claim that the necessity of the redaction was loss of life, and endanger international relationships. Halper being the informant against Russia implies Russian might kill him if they knew his identity. However Halper isn't some clandestine deep cover guy, he's very public and if Russia wanted him dead he'd be six feet under already.OPAG said:Quote:
What bugs me about this agent being Stefan Halper is that (a) he's 73 and thus no longer a field agent;(b) his identity and past are widely known and public knowledge; (c) meaning if he was in any real danger, pull him in from the cold; and finally (d) if the Russians wanted him dead he'd be six feet under already.
Why would the Russians want him dead? I think the Russians would want him alive if he is the original source of this Russian collusion plot. Trace it back to him and the Russians are off the hook.
I have thought on this, Halper is a Bush guy, The Bushes hate Trump, he totally trashed Jeb. Also the Bushes got very cozy with the Clintons. This would be a pure 'bi partisan swamp attack against Trump.
Maybe. The one reason I'm skeptical is because of the McCain angle. There is no love lost between the Bushes and McCain.Quote:
I have thought on this, Halper is a Bush guy, The Bushes hate Trump, he totally trashed Jeb. Also the Bushes got very cozy with the Clintons. This would be a pure 'bi partisan swamp attack against Trump.
The other side of this is, who else for whatever reason might the former administration have used this tactic of surveillance? Perhaps prior to 2016?CrazyDayDuck said:drcrinum said:
https://www.themarketswork.com/2018/04/05/the-uncovering-mike-rogers-investigation-section-702-fisa-abuse-the-fbi/Quote:
...Consider what is being said by the Court. "Systems through which queries are conducted of upstream data that do not interface with NSA's audit system." Outside query systems. The NSA was unable to ascertain all the various avenues by which raw FISA data was accessed....
Private contractors, employed by the FBI, were given full access to raw FISA data. FISA data that, once in their possession, could not be traced....
The government was unable to determine how many times non-FBI personnel had full access to raw FISA data....
These contractors were "not directly supervised by or otherwise under the direction and control of" presumably anyone....
The FBI systematically enabled outside contractors to access raw FISA data - using the FBI's systems as access points - across multiple Agencies. The FBI intentionally hid the implementation of this practice - and the practice itself - from the FISA Court until it was discovered in March 2016....
The FBI was not only ignoring minimization procedures, they were ignoring the FISA Court....
This is a very long read, maybe 30 minutes to comprehend it to some degree. It's a very detailed analysis of the 99 page report from the FISA Court in conjunction with other related activities. No question that the Obama admin was widely spying on Americans for a long time through the FBI (main culprit) and to some extent the CIA. They were performing unfettered upstream queries via contractors with no supervision and no control over the materials extracted, and most importantly, there were avenues to conduct these queries that fell outside the realm of NSA oversight/control/access. It's mind boggling...and it's only scratching the surface I fear.
This Jeff Carlson is a hell of an investigative reporter.
I swear, Obama did his very best to turn America into a third world banana republic.
And most of his voters STILL believe he was not just a good President but a great one.
Exactly my point. Thanks for the assist.Quote:
In context I'm pretty sure Hawg was referring to the DOJ's claim that the necessity of the redaction was loss of life, and endanger international relationships. Halper being the informant against Russia implies Russian might kill him if they knew his identity. However Halper isn't some clandestine deep cover guy, he's very public and if Russia wanted him dead he'd be six feet under already.
Just my take on it
Ridiculous question. He's not a prosecutor. He can't force Holder and Lynch to do their jobs. They are the ones who obstructed justice on Fast and Furious and Benghazi.Proc92 said:
What convictions resulted from his investigation into holder and fast and furious?
pacecar02 said:The other side of this is, who else for whatever reason might the former administration have used this tactic of surveillance? Perhaps prior to 2016?CrazyDayDuck said:drcrinum said:
https://www.themarketswork.com/2018/04/05/the-uncovering-mike-rogers-investigation-section-702-fisa-abuse-the-fbi/Quote:
...Consider what is being said by the Court. "Systems through which queries are conducted of upstream data that do not interface with NSA's audit system." Outside query systems. The NSA was unable to ascertain all the various avenues by which raw FISA data was accessed....
Private contractors, employed by the FBI, were given full access to raw FISA data. FISA data that, once in their possession, could not be traced....
The government was unable to determine how many times non-FBI personnel had full access to raw FISA data....
These contractors were "not directly supervised by or otherwise under the direction and control of" presumably anyone....
The FBI systematically enabled outside contractors to access raw FISA data - using the FBI's systems as access points - across multiple Agencies. The FBI intentionally hid the implementation of this practice - and the practice itself - from the FISA Court until it was discovered in March 2016....
The FBI was not only ignoring minimization procedures, they were ignoring the FISA Court....
This is a very long read, maybe 30 minutes to comprehend it to some degree. It's a very detailed analysis of the 99 page report from the FISA Court in conjunction with other related activities. No question that the Obama admin was widely spying on Americans for a long time through the FBI (main culprit) and to some extent the CIA. They were performing unfettered upstream queries via contractors with no supervision and no control over the materials extracted, and most importantly, there were avenues to conduct these queries that fell outside the realm of NSA oversight/control/access. It's mind boggling...and it's only scratching the surface I fear.
This Jeff Carlson is a hell of an investigative reporter.
I swear, Obama did his very best to turn America into a third world banana republic.
And most of his voters STILL believe he was not just a good President but a great one.
They know when they got found out but how long had they really been doing it and against whom?
Given the level of involvement between contractors and different departments and government officials in the current case, it would seem that this practice appeared somewhat common place business as usual(as necessary).