usmcbrooks said:
Brock Landers said:
usmcbrooks said:
ABATTBQ11 said:
After some of the updates on this thread, I feel like it should be pointed out that this guy was a fairly experienced shooter. Those saying an experienced shooter would have made this worse and that bumpstocks played no part may want to revisit those comments...
If this had of been me, it would have been much worse. I would have booby trapped whatever I could have to delay the entry team. If I had that stockpile of weapons and ammo, I'm taking out everybody I can while saving the last bullet for myself.
Edit: This is to clean, doesn't make any sense.
What does this part mean?
It's just to clean. Thousands of rounds and multiple weapons, and he offs himself at the first sign of armed confrontation? Check that a security guard. I stand by my comment from way back in this thread that I heard 7. 62.
I'm not sure what doesn't make sense about that given the facts we know for certain:
1) Stephen Paddock was dead on the floor
2) He was in the suite alone (unless you believe the officers who made entry are lying)
3) the police say they have no credible evidence of a second shooter. If there were one, you have to believe they wouldn't cover that up because of the obvious public safety concern
What's the alternative theory here?