Quote:
My point is simply addressing your assertion that there must be some sort of religious framework for a society to function well.
You are right that it is fuzzy.
There are other ways to have high social trust and good political institutions. You could be a much smaller political unit (Singapore, NZ, Norway, etc) or you could have an ethnic monoculture or have a shared ethnic history.
We don't have these options in the U.S. but we did have an extremely strong 'civic religion' which went hand in hand with a generic public Christian morality.
IMO the biggest challenge for a country of hundreds of millions of people is just continuing to exist and not exiting from world history. How do you avoid just collapsing into chaos due to social entropy like most large empires through time?
If you look at China and India you see very aggressive unifying ideology in the form of the CCP or Hindu Nationalism. Both approaches are very totalitarian, but that's one way to maintain a massive country.
If you want to argue against the ten commandments or generic Christianity in the public sphere then fine, but what is the positive vision for citizens that replaces it? Currently our public morality rests on legalism and proceduralism and that doesn't make for a strong civic society; a large multicultural society based on that is bound to fail.